{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:26484254", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 7, "content_hash": "sha256:7bef9f1407f5ed5f6ee8adfd1313f93a87b465e47275d305a59e6e1c3605aaa3", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:13Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:58:43Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Gene expression profiling can predict the fate of HeLa cells exposed to X-ray irradiation with or without protoporphyrin accumulation.", "doi": "10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.044", "pmid": "26484254", "authors": ["Junko Takahashi", "Masaki Misawa", "Hitoshi Iwahashi"], "journal": "Genomics data", "year": 2015, "abstract": "Protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) enhances the generation of reactive oxygen species in cells following physicochemical interactions with X-rays. To evaluate the use of porphyrins as radio-sensitizers in radiotherapy, the transcriptomic effects of PpIX and/or X-ray irradiation were investigated in HeLa cells. Microarray experiments were performed using Agilent-014,850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4x44K G4112F (GEO#: GSE61805). We selected the condition corresponding to 1 μg/mL PpIX exposure prior to 3 Gy-irradiation of cells, and collected cells 24 h post irradiation. X-ray exposure at a dose of 3 Gy did not affect cell survival 24 h post irradiation, regardless of the concentration of PpIX. Approximately 50% cells exposed to X-ray irradiation alone (XT) and 70% cells exposed to PpIX treatment for 6 h before X-ray irradiation (PpIX-XT) lost clonogenic ability. Based on p-values (p < 0.01), we selected genes for functional analysis. The majority of the regulated genes in the XT and PpIX-XT groups were related to cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis of the cells collected 24 h post irradiation revealed the fate of the cells that lost clonogenic ability due to cell cycle arrest.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The Student's t-test was used to assess the significance of each gene in the microarray.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:26484254", "locator": "sections[11] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The Student's t-test was used to assess the significance of each gene in the microarray."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:26484254", "locator": "sections[2] \"Direct link to deposited data\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:26484254"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE61805"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:student_t", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE61805"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:student_t"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:26484254", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.044", "sha256": "sha256:0442ff10953a6e21810470e84c26aa65e5089c98dc974d9ab1ab91a6ad04407c", "bytes": 8472, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.044", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC4583665", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE61805", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE61805", "version": null, "note": "Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1514358", "GSM1514359", "GSM1514360", "GSM1514361", "GSM1514362", "GSM1514363", "GSM1514364", "GSM1514365", "GSM1514366", "GSM1514367", "GSM1514368", "GSM1514369"], "sample_count": 12, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "4133", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Characterization of protoporphytin IX effects on X-ray irradiation in Hela cells in vitro", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:26484254:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:b7c1bb8be7da934e5f938bb13479cc5e608ee1a912639ab34427fc9a3b99e316", "bytes": 1050, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015", "version": null, "note": null, "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC4583665", "section_index": 1, "section_title": "p", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": null, "caption": null, "rows": [["Specifications"], ["Organism/cell line/tissue", "Human/HeLa cell line"], ["Sex", "Female"], ["Sequence or array type", "Agilent-014,850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4x44K G4112F (Feature Number version)"], ["Data format", "Raw data: TAR, Normalized data: TXT"], ["Experimental factors", "Gene expression profiling in HeLa cells with protoporphyrin IX treatment prior to X-ray irradiation (PpIX-XT), X-ray irradiation alone (XT), PpIX treatment alone (PpIXT), and non-treatment (NT)."], ["Experimental features", "The gene expression patterns of cells treated with 1 μg/mL and/or 3 Gy-irradiation collected 24 h after irradiation were analyzed. These specific conditions were chosen because X-ray exposure at a dose of 3 Gy did not affect cell survival 24 h post irradiation, but affected clonogenic survival regardless of the concentration of PpIX treatment."], ["Consent", "n/a"], ["Sample source location", "n/a"]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 2, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE61805 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE61805 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "student_t_test", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["student_t"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The Student's t-test was used to assess the significance of each gene in the microarray."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.student_t"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["student_t"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: student_t_test."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE61805"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE61805"], "statements": ["Deposited data can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE61805."], "basis": "The paper names GSE61805 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:26484254", "data:geo:GSE61805", "asset:table:pmid:26484254:1"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "student_t", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE61805"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:06:35Z", "independence": "same_provider"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 7926, "completion_tokens": 1097, "cached_tokens": 768}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:26484254", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:26484254"}, {"id": "source:pmid:26484254", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 26484254 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE61805", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE61805"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:26484254", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:26484254"}, {"id": "source:pmid:26484254", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 26484254 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE61805", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE61805"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-26484254", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:26484254"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE61805", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE61805"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:26484254", "parent_hash": "sha256:cdaade9532dd852176dca83e72a7b519ee911fd77d4bec60c9fe66e54b86ba9e", "fork_of": null, "generation": 6}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE61805 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE61805 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.student_t", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:student_t"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["expression profiling can predict the fate of HeLa cells exposed to X-ray irradiation with or w", "nd/or X-ray irradiation were investigated in HeLa cells. Microarray experiments were performed", "n Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan). The cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum in a", "nd/or X-ray irradiation were investigated in HeLa cells. The present study employed microarray"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:5", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["irradiation were investigated in HeLa cells. Microarray experiments were performed using Agilent-014", "med using Agilent-014,850 Whole Human Genome Microarray 4x44K G4112F (GEO#: GSE61805). We selected t", "ed in HeLa cells. The present study employed microarray analysis to quantify genes that were upregul", "0 μg/mL streptomycin. Sample preparation and microarray analyses RNA was extracted from cells using"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:392", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The Student's t-test was used to assess the significance of each gene in the microarray."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T03:13:11+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}