{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:27330992", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:442dce42539e9d890a9d40239b76be55cad88ff01538f4bb3063228fb08c1703", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:18Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:42:42Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Unraveling the rat blood genome-wide transcriptome after oral administration of lavender oil by a two-color dye-swap DNA microarray approach.", "doi": "10.1016/j.gdata.2016.05.005", "pmid": "27330992", "authors": ["Motohide Hori", "Hiroko Kubo", "Junko Shibato", "Tomomi Saito", "Tetsuo Ogawa", "Minoru Wakamori", "Yoshinori Masuo", "Seiji Shioda", "Randeep Rakwal"], "journal": "Genomics data", "year": 2016, "abstract": "Lavender oil (LO) is a commonly used essential oil in aromatherapy as non-traditional medicine. With an aim to demonstrate LO effects on the body, we have recently established an animal model investigating the influence of orally administered LO in rat tissues, genome-wide. In this brief, we investigate the effect of LO ingestion in the blood of rat. Rats were administered LO at usual therapeutic dose (5 mg/kg) in humans, and following collection of the venous blood from the heart and extraction of total RNA, the differentially expressed genes were screened using a 4 × 44-K whole-genome rat chip (Agilent microarray platform; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) in conjunction with a two-color dye-swap approach. A total of 834 differentially expressed genes in the blood were identified: 362 up-regulated and 472 down-regulated. These genes were functionally categorized using bioinformatics tools. The gene expression inventory of rat blood transcriptome under LO, a first report, has been deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): GSE67499. The data will be a valuable resource in examining the effects of natural products, and which could also serve as a human model for further functional analysis and investigation.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The functional analysis identified the biological functions that were most significant to the dataset (p-value < 0.05) according to a right-tailed Fisher's exact test.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:27330992", "locator": "sections[7] \"Functional categorization of differentially expressed genes in the whole blood after LO ingestion and ingenuity pathway analysis of the whole blood transcriptome\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The functional analysis identified the biological functions that were most significant to the dataset (p-value < 0.05) according to a right-tailed Fisher's exact test."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The outputs (raw data) of the microarray analysis that were used in this study are open and freely available under the number series GSE 67499 (whole genome) at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public functional genomics data repository.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:27330992", "locator": "sections[9] \"Differentially expressed genes in the whole blood of rat after LO treatment\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The outputs (raw data) of the microarray analysis that were used in this study are open and freely available under the number series GSE 67499 (whole genome) at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public functional genomics data repository."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Using two-color dye-swap whole-genome microarray analysis, the study identified 834 differentially expressed blood genes, and the source data were deposited in GEO under accession GSE67499.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:27330992", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "A total of 834 differentially expressed genes in the blood were identified: 362 up-regulated and 472 down-regulated."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:27330992", "locator": "sections[6] \"Whole blood whole-genome DNA microarray analysis\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Statistical significance of the log ratio values obtained for individual microarray probes was calculated using the “most conservative error model” default function of the Feature Extraction software, by which both a propagated and a universal error model are evaluated, and the higher (more conservative estimate of error) p-value of two error models was reported [6; Agilent Technologies]."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:27330992", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The gene expression inventory of rat blood transcriptome under LO, a first report, has been deposited into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): GSE67499."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Using two-color dye-swap whole-genome microarray analysis, the study identified 834 differentially expressed blood genes, and the source data were deposited in GEO under accession GSE67499.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:27330992"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE67499"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE67499"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:27330992", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.05.005", "sha256": "sha256:5f3ec0b6d865c45f193541bd7c849cfe1d6bf5dcf2e7ccd95960b6f49c6a87fa", "bytes": 17079, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.gdata.2016.05.005", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC4907047", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE67499", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE67499", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE67499", "version": null, "note": "The outputs (raw data) of the microarray analysis that were used in this study are open and freely available under the number series GSE 67499 (whole genome) at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public functional genomics data repository.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The outputs (raw data) of the microarray analysis that were used in this study are open and freely available under the number series GSE 67499 (whole genome) at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public functional genomics data repository.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1648085", "GSM1648086"], "sample_count": 2, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "4135", "taxon": "Rattus norvegicus", "title": "Unraveling the rat blood genome-wide transcriptome after oral administration of Lavender oil by a two-color dye-swap DNA microarray approach", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:27330992:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:9af5bf6c2cb028f838681002ffa8f37bfbad1e493ba5397d01a61a34d9ab628b", "bytes": 716, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0005", "version": null, "note": null, "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC4907047", "section_index": 1, "section_title": "p", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": null, "caption": null, "rows": [["Specifications"], ["Organism/cell line/tissue", "Rattus norvegicus, Fischer, F334, whole blood"], ["Sex", "Male"], ["Sequencer or array type", "Agilent whole rat genome microarray G4131F"], ["Data format", "Raw data: TXT file, Normalized data: TXT"], ["Experimental factors", "Lavender oil (5 mg/kg) group vs. control group (10% ethanol, diluent)"], ["Experimental features", "Transcript profiling of differentially expressed genes in rat whole blood following oral ingestion of lavender oil"], ["Consent", "Data are publically available"], ["Sample source location", "Tokyo, Japan"]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 3, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0005"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE67499 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE67499 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "fisher_exact", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["contingency_table", "chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The functional analysis identified the biological functions that were most significant to the dataset (p-value < 0.05) according to a right-tailed Fisher's exact test."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["contingency_table", "chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: fisher_exact."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE67499"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE67499"], "statements": ["The outputs (raw data) of the microarray analysis that were used in this study are open and freely available under the number series GSE 67499 (whole genome) at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public functional genomics data repository."], "basis": "The paper names GSE67499 in NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["contingency_table", "chi_square_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:27330992", "data:geo:GSE67499", "asset:table:pmid:27330992:1"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE67499"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:28:47Z", "independence": "same_provider"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 8, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 33902, "completion_tokens": 2673, "cached_tokens": 1560}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:27330992", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:27330992"}, {"id": "source:pmid:27330992", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 27330992 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE67499", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE67499"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:27330992", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:27330992"}, {"id": "source:pmid:27330992", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 27330992 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE67499", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE67499"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-27330992", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:27330992"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE67499", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE67499"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:27330992", "parent_hash": "sha256:d3a5026a994b20c6459171c6dd3d14d061d3a2d07aa4333be2653f6b1f9d1b47", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE67499 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE67499 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Unraveling the rat blood genome-wide transcriptome after oral a", "effect of LO ingestion in the blood of rat. Rats were administered LO at usual therapeutic dose (5", "g the influence of orally administered LO in rat tissues, genome-wide. In this brief, we inve", "e the effect of LO ingestion in the blood of rat. Rats were administered LO at usual therapeu"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:0", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["of lavender oil by a two-color dye-swap DNA microarray approach.", "ng a 4 × 44-K whole-genome rat chip (Agilent microarray platform; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, C", "enome-wide [1] using the high-throughput DNA microarray analysis approach [2]. The first transcripto", "e small intestine, spleen and liver [1]. DNA microarray-based profiling using the Agilent platform h"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:77", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "contingency_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["contingency_table", "chi_square_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The functional analysis identified the biological functions that were most significant to the dataset (p-value < 0.05) according to a right-tailed Fisher's exact test."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:53:08+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}