{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:28560281", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:1ef6ec1e7ce8f1a7d5f2283856aeb655cb3e41e8c561eb5ee38902e55ebf06ee", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:26Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:43:00Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Microarray data and gene expression statistics for Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to simulated asbestos mine drainage.", "doi": "10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.021", "pmid": "28560281", "authors": ["Heather E Driscoll", "Janet M Murray", "Erika L English", "Timothy C Hunter", "Kara Pivarski", "Elizabeth D Dolci"], "journal": "Data in brief", "year": 2017, "abstract": "Here we describe microarray expression data (raw and normalized), experimental metadata, and gene-level data with expression statistics from Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to simulated asbestos mine drainage from the Vermont Asbestos Group (VAG) Mine on Belvidere Mountain in northern Vermont, USA. For nearly 100 years (between the late 1890s and 1993), chrysotile asbestos fibers were extracted from serpentinized ultramafic rock at the VAG Mine for use in construction and manufacturing industries. Studies have shown that water courses and streambeds nearby have become contaminated with asbestos mine tailings runoff, including elevated levels of magnesium, nickel, chromium, and arsenic, elevated pH, and chrysotile asbestos-laden mine tailings, due to leaching and gradual erosion of massive piles of mine waste covering approximately 9 km2. We exposed yeast to simulated VAG Mine tailings leachate to help gain insight on how eukaryotic cells exposed to VAG Mine drainage may respond in the mine environment. Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Arrays were utilized to assess gene expression after 24-h exposure to simulated VAG Mine tailings runoff. The chemistry of mine-tailings leachate, mine-tailings leachate plus yeast extract peptone dextrose media, and control yeast extract peptone dextrose media is also reported. To our knowledge this is the first dataset to assess global gene expression patterns in a eukaryotic model system simulating asbestos mine tailings runoff exposure. Raw and normalized gene expression data are accessible through the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI GEO) Database Series GSE89875 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875).", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the individual gene expression data with respect to mine-tailings exposure, i.e. simulated asbestos mine drainage versus control.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[11] \"Gene expression statistical methods\" paragraph 3", "quote": "One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the individual gene expression data with respect to mine-tailings exposure, i.e. simulated asbestos mine drainage versus control."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[1] \"p\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The paper used one-way ANOVA on RMA-normalized gene-level data to identify differentially expressed genes between simulated asbestos mine drainage and control treatments, with multiple-comparison correction by a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05. The raw and normalized microarray data are available through NCBI GEO Series GSE89875.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.05, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "source": "Gene-level ANOVA with S. cerevisiae-only probesets found 735 genes that are differentially expressed between treatment and control groups (unadjusted p-value <0.05; fold change >|1.5|) (Supplementary Tables 2–3)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[5] \"Microarray data\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Gene-level ANOVA with S. cerevisiae-only probesets found 735 genes that are differentially expressed between treatment and control groups (unadjusted p-value <0.05; fold change >|1.5|) (Supplementary Tables 2–3)."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[11] \"Gene expression statistical methods\" paragraph 3", "quote": "One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the individual gene expression data with respect to mine-tailings exposure, i.e. simulated asbestos mine drainage versus control."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[11] \"Gene expression statistical methods\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Multiple comparison correction was performed using a FDR of 0.05 [8]."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:28560281", "locator": "sections[5] \"Microarray data\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Raw and normalized microarray data for all Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Array probesets are available through NCBI GEO Series GSE89875: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The paper used one-way ANOVA on RMA-normalized gene-level data to identify differentially expressed genes between simulated asbestos mine drainage and control treatments, with multiple-comparison correction by a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05. The raw and normalized microarray data are available through NCBI GEO Series GSE89875.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:28560281"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE89875"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE89875"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:28560281", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.021", "sha256": "sha256:66ddba17dabee9d2c592a440f65f9b5c8eac4d1b39fa3e6b7eeb1e3274f514d3", "bytes": 18433, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.021", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5440250", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE89875", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE89875", "version": null, "note": "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2392394", "GSM2392395", "GSM2392396", "GSM2392397", "GSM2392398", "GSM2392399", "GSM2392400"], "sample_count": 7, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "2529", "taxon": "Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Schizosaccharomyces pombe", "title": "Expression data from budding yeast exposed to simulated asbestos mine drainage", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:28560281:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:952c7e35cb333fe54a41e4914c19df80ec65adb87ba193476ec741f7128ce4c0", "bytes": 1358, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015", "version": null, "note": null, "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5440250", "section_index": 1, "section_title": "p", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": null, "caption": null, "rows": [["Subject area", "Biology"], ["More specific subject area", "Transcriptomics, environmental toxicology"], ["Type of data", "Data tables and corresponding visualizations"], ["How data was acquired", "Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Array, Robust Multichip Average normalization, statistical analysis"], ["Data formats", "Raw and normalized microarray data tableWater and media chemistry metadata tableOne-way analysis of variance results gene tableDifferentially expressed gene table"], ["Experimental factors", "Treatment (asbestos mine tailings-exposed) vs. control"], ["Experimental features", "Total RNA was recovered from four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain NRRLY-12632 (ATCC® 18824) replicates exposed to simulated asbestos mine tailings runoff for a 24-h period and three control replicates."], ["Data source location", "Lowell tailings pile, Vermont Asbestos Group Mine, Lowell, Vermont, USA (near 44°45׳51.8\"N 72°31׳22.2\"W)"], ["Data accessibility", "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article."]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 4, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:28560281:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:952c7e35cb333fe54a41e4914c19df80ec65adb87ba193476ec741f7128ce4c0", "bytes": 1358, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015", "version": null, "note": null, "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5440250", "section_index": 2, "section_title": "p", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": null, "caption": null, "rows": [["Subject area", "Biology"], ["More specific subject area", "Transcriptomics, environmental toxicology"], ["Type of data", "Data tables and corresponding visualizations"], ["How data was acquired", "Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Array, Robust Multichip Average normalization, statistical analysis"], ["Data formats", "Raw and normalized microarray data tableWater and media chemistry metadata tableOne-way analysis of variance results gene tableDifferentially expressed gene table"], ["Experimental factors", "Treatment (asbestos mine tailings-exposed) vs. control"], ["Experimental features", "Total RNA was recovered from four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain NRRLY-12632 (ATCC® 18824) replicates exposed to simulated asbestos mine tailings runoff for a 24-h period and three control replicates."], ["Data source location", "Lowell tailings pile, Vermont Asbestos Group Mine, Lowell, Vermont, USA (near 44°45׳51.8\"N 72°31׳22.2\"W)"], ["Data accessibility", "Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article."]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 4, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[1]/table-wrap[1]#t0015"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:28560281:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:368d983dddb09ede90a439ab74cba35d2d794f9b1ce79466afa431b368e2aa1e", "bytes": 1447, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#t0005", "version": null, "note": "Select parameters from simulated asbestos mine drainage water chemistry from this study compared to previously analyzed environmental samples from VT-ANR water quality reports/surface water analyses [1].", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5440250", "section_index": 4, "section_title": "Water and media chemistry data", "row_count": 14, "column_count": 9}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Select parameters from simulated asbestos mine drainage water chemistry from this study compared to previously analyzed environmental samples from VT-ANR water quality reports/surface water analyses [1].", "rows": [["Parameter", "Units", "Simulated asbestos mine drainage prepared on two dates in 2014 (Spring/Summer)", "Burgess Br. Trib. 8 (control)2007", "Burgess Br. 5.0(impaired)2007 2009", "Hutchins Br. 3.1(control)2007", "Hutchins Br. 2.1(impaired)2007 2009"], ["pH", "", "9.2/-", "7.8", "8.53", "8.39", "7.65", "8.44", "8.04"], ["Alkalinity", "mg/L", "-/-", "43.5", "246", "276", "48.8", "134", "95.3"], ["Conductivity", "umho", "-/541", "98.3", "495", "534", "103", "278", "186"], ["Mg2+", "mg/L", "120/120", "6.61", "59.5", "67.8", "7.78", "32.7", "20.9"], ["Fe2+/3+", "μg/L", "<20/<20", "129", "<50", "103", "<50", "<50", "54.3"], ["Ca2+", "mg/L", "1.3/1.4", "7.27", "13.8", "15.6", "6.76", "8.43", "7.64"], ["SO42−", "mg/L", "-/2.7", "5.08", "22.8", "24.6", "3.97", "10.7", "6.47"], ["Cl−", "mg/L", "-/<2.5", "<2", "3.31", "3.5", "<2", "<2", "<2"], ["Ni2+", "μg/L", "<5/<5", "<5", "16.6", "15.4", "<5", "73.9", "38.7"], ["Mn2+", "μg/L", "<20/<20", "21.2", "24.4", "76.6", "<5", "<5", "5.05"], ["K+", "mg/L", "<0.5/<0.5", "0.35", "1.2", "1.36", "0.14", "0.34", "0.25"], ["Na+", "mg/L", "<0.5/<0.5", "1", "2.47", "2.89", "0.43", "0.73", "0.53"], ["As", "μg/L", "<1/<1", "1", "2.7", "3.1", "0.86", "12.2", "3.13"]], "row_count": 14, "column_count": 9, "numeric_cells": 97, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#t0005"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:28560281:4", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:f8cba5bb5954273daa7bd7e3ac9ec7f27722c6a01b0f830d18a2fc7b9d713b69", "bytes": 2015, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[4]/table-wrap[2]#t0010", "version": null, "note": "Complete chemistry from simulated asbestos mine drainage media and control media.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5440250", "section_index": 4, "section_title": "Water and media chemistry data", "row_count": 33, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Complete chemistry from simulated asbestos mine drainage media and control media.", "rows": [["Parameter", "Simulated asbestos mine drainage media", "Control media", "Units", "Method"], ["pH", "7.23", "6.38", "", ""], ["Conductivity", "2780", "2490", "umhos/cm", "EPA 120.1"], ["Aluminum, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Antimony, total", "<0.002", "<0.002", "mg/L", "SM20 3113B"], ["Arsenic, total", "0.001", "<0.001", "mg/L", "SM20 3113B"], ["Beryllium, total", "<0.002", "<0.002", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Bromide", "<25", "<25", "mg/L", "EPA 9056A"], ["Cadmium, total", "<0.004", "<0.004", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Calcium, total", "7.1", "5.7", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Chloride", "330", "210", "mg/L", "EPA 300.0"], ["Chromium, total", "<0.010", "<0.010", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Cobalt, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Copper, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Iron, total", "0.47", "0.3", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Lead, total", "<0.001", "<0.001", "mg/L", "SM20 3113B"], ["Magnesium, total", "100", "2.6", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Manganese, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Mercury, total", "<0.0002", "<0.0002", "mg/L", "EPA 245.1"], ["Molybdenum, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Nickel, total", "<0.010", "<0.010", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Nitrate as N", "2.9", "<2.0", "mg/L", "EPA 300.0"], ["Nitrite as N", "<2.0", "<2.0", "mg/L", "EPA 300.0"], ["Phosphorus, total", "190", "180", "mg/L", "EPA 6010C"], ["Potassium, total", "510", "490", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Selenium, total", "<0.002", "<0.002", "mg/L", "SM20 3113B"], ["Silver, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Sodium, total", "300", "290", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Sulfate", "160", "100", "mg/L", "EPA 300.0"], ["Thallium, total", "<0.001", "<0.001", "mg/L", "SM20 3113B-04"], ["Tin, total", "<0.040", "<0.040", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"], ["Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)", "840", "890", "mg/L", "EPA 351.2, R.2"], ["Zinc, total", "0.96", "0.93", "mg/L", "EPA 200.7"]], "row_count": 33, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 95, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[4]/table-wrap[2]#t0010"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE89875 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE89875 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the individual gene expression data with respect to mine-tailings exposure, i.e. simulated asbestos mine drainage versus control."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PCA"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "bootstrap_mean_difference", "expected_value": 0.05, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE89875"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE89875"], "statements": ["Microarray data and some sample metadata are available at NCBI GEO SeriesGSE89875: rhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE89875.Water and media chemistry data tables as well as gene statistical data tables are available in this article."], "basis": "The paper names GSE89875 in National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI GEO) Database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:28560281", "data:geo:GSE89875", "asset:table:pmid:28560281:1", "asset:table:pmid:28560281:2", "asset:table:pmid:28560281:3", "asset:table:pmid:28560281:4"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE89875"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:31:08Z", "independence": "same_provider"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 8, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 42743, "completion_tokens": 3358, "cached_tokens": 2080}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:28560281", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:28560281"}, {"id": "source:pmid:28560281", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 28560281 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE89875", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE89875"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:28560281", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:28560281"}, {"id": "source:pmid:28560281", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 28560281 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE89875", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE89875"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-28560281", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:28560281"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE89875", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE89875"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:28560281", "parent_hash": "sha256:71ebdc08ee31a733949836a179745de0ba53e3742c79af1d0e5f9603da8337a5", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE89875 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE89875 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Microarray data and gene expression statistics for Sacc", "Here we describe microarray expression data (raw and normalized), experi", "rainage may respond in the mine environment. Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Arrays were utili", "s in this study. Abbreviations: Probeset ID, Affymetrix GeneChip® Yeast Genome 2.0 Array probeset id"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:0", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the individual gene expression data with respect to mine-tailings exposure, i.e. simulated asbestos mine drainage versus control."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:11:13+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}