{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:30740091", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 5, "content_hash": "sha256:3d52e6991e4d696d52a3bf579dd03f3eac319904a8437331ce52bf0ee472ceaa", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:42Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T18:50:28Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Binding Specificity of Native Odorant-Binding Protein Isoforms Is Driven by Phosphorylation and O-N-Acetylglucosaminylation in the Pig Sus scrofa.", "doi": "10.3389/fendo.2018.00816", "pmid": "30740091", "authors": ["Patricia Nagnan-Le Meillour", "Alexandre Joly", "Chrystelle Le Danvic", "Arul Marie", "Séverine Zirah", "Jean-Paul Cornard"], "journal": "Frontiers in endocrinology", "year": 2018, "abstract": "Odorant-binding proteins (OBP) are secreted in the nasal mucus at the vicinity of olfactory receptors (ORs). They act, at least, as an interface between hydrophobic and volatile odorant molecules and the hydrophilic medium bathing the ORs. They have also been hypothesized to be part of the molecular coding of odors and pheromones, by forming specific complexes with odorant molecules that could ultimately stimulate ORs to trigger the olfactory transduction cascade. In a previous study, we have evidenced that pig olfactory secretome was composed of numerous olfactory binding protein isoforms, generated by O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation. In addition, we have shown that recombinant OBP (stricto sensu) produced in yeast is made up of a mixture of isoforms that differ in their phosphorylation pattern, which in turn determines binding specificity. Taking advantage of the high amount of OBP secreted by a single animal, we performed a similar study, under exactly the same experimental conditions, on native isoforms isolated from pig, Sus scrofa, nasal tissue. Four fractions were obtained by using strong anion exchange HPLC. Mapping of phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation sites by CID-nanoLC-MS/MS allowed unambiguous localization of phosphosites at S13 and T122 and HexNAc sites at S13 and S19. T112 or T115 could also be phosphorylated. BEMAD analysis suggested extra phosphosites located at S23, S24, S41, S49, S57, S67, and T71. Due to the very low stoichiometry of GlcNAc-peptides and phosphopeptides, these sites were identified on total mixture of OBP isoforms instead of HPLC-purified OBP isoforms. Nevertheless, binding properties of native OBP isoforms to specific ligands in S. scrofa were monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy. Recombinant phosphorylated OBP-Pichia isoforms bind steroids and fatty acids with slight differences. Native isoforms, that are phosphorylated but also O-GlcNAcylated show radically different binding affinities for the same compounds, which strongly suggests that O-GlcNAcylation increases the binding specificity of OBP isoforms. These findings extend the role of O-GlcNAc in regulating the function of proteins involved in many mechanisms of metabolic homeostasis, including extracellular signaling in olfaction. Data is available via ProteomeXChange with identifier PXD011371.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011371 and 10.6019/PXD011371. The raw data (western-blot) supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30740091", "locator": "sections[25] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011371 and 10.6019/PXD011371. The raw data (western-blot) supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:30740091"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:PXD011371"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:PXD011371"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:30740091", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00816", "sha256": "sha256:9f2b49d24b366d8b4eb8262822973b24099ba22ac4153e288ebbf0a3df29e6dd", "bytes": 56885, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fendo.2018.00816", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6355697", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD011371", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=PXD011371", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "PXD011371", "version": null, "note": "The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011371 and 10.6019/PXD011371. The raw data (western-blot) supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011371 and 10.6019/PXD011371. The raw data (western-blot) supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": [], "sample_count": null, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": null, "taxon": null, "title": "binding specificity of Native Odorant-Binding Protein isoforms is driven by phosphorylation and O-N-acetylglucosamiylation in the pig (sus scrofa)", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-10-31T18:35:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30740091:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:876e8cbfb9d19906b1b233859e42999283b08c78d286561d636b4c949138e040", "bytes": 1382, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "Beta-elimination followed by Michael addition of dithiothreitol (BEMAD, DTT) performed on OBP isoforms to identify phosphorylation sites.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6355697", "section_index": 18, "section_title": "Analysis of OBP Phosphorylation by BEMAD", "row_count": 16, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Beta-elimination followed by Michael addition of dithiothreitol (BEMAD, DTT) performed on OBP isoforms to identify phosphorylation sites.", "rows": [["Calculated mass (Da)", "Measured mass (M + H)+", "Peptide", "Peptide sequence", "Modification site"], ["No DTT", "1 DTT", "2 DTT", "", "", "", ""], ["OBP-NATIVE-ISO1"], ["1711.7809", "1847.9808", "", "1847.4896 (T, 50%)", "1–15", "QEPQPEQDPFELS(*)GK", "S13"], ["1140.5354", "1276.7354", "", "1276.6440 (T+CT, 50%)", "39–47", "MRS(*)IEFDDK", "S41"], ["1357.6634", "1493.8634", "", "1493.7390 (T+CT, 50%)", "45–55", "DDKES(*)KVLNF", "S49"], ["1155.4986", "1291.6986", "", "1291.3486 (T, 25%)", "57–66", "S(*)KENGICEEF", "S57"], ["1262.5746", "1398.7746", "", "1398.6817 (T, 25%)", "121–131", "GT(*)DIEDQDLEK", "T122"], ["OBP-NATIVE-ISO-2"], ["1140.5354", "1276.7354", "", "1276.5677 (T+CT, 50%)", "57–66", "S(*)KENGICEEF", "S57"], ["1262.5746", "1398.7746", "", "1398.8314 (T+CT, 50%)", "121–131", "GT(*)DIEDQDLEK", "T122"], ["OBP-NATIVE-ISO3"], ["1950.9807", "", "2223.3807", "2223.5032 (CT, 50%)", "21–38", "IGS(*)S(*)DLEKIGENAPFQVF", "S23–S24"], ["1140.5354", "1276.7354", "", "1276.8341 (T+CT, 25%)", "39–47", "MRS(*)IEFDDK", "S41"], ["OBP-NATIVE-ISO-4"], ["1539.7359", "", "1812.1359", "1812.1110 (T, 25%)", "59–72", "ENGICEEFS(*)LIGT(*)K", "S67–T71"]], "row_count": 16, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 54, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30740091:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:40b98ca5251b0b86c620094edf83f8a37626935c081291bb1d89587748e1e2e7", "bytes": 745, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Values of [IC50] and calculated dissociation constants (Kd) relative to the binding of ligands to native OBP isoforms.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6355697", "section_index": 20, "section_title": "Monitoring of Ligand Binding by Fluorescence Spectroscopy", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 9}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Values of [IC50] and calculated dissociation constants (Kd) relative to the binding of ligands to native OBP isoforms.", "rows": [["Ligands", "OBP-native-iso1", "OBP-native-iso2", "OBP-native-iso3", "OBP-native-iso4"], ["", "IC50", "Kd", "IC50", "Kd", "IC50", "Kd", "IC50", "Kd"], ["Testosterone", "–", "–", "–", "–", "–", "–", "–", "–"], ["Androstenone", "–", "–", "–", "–", "1.28", "0.23", "1.89", "0.22"], ["Androstenol", "–", "–", "–", "–", "2.59", "0.49", "1.43", "0.16"], ["Palmitic acid", "1.03", "0.16", "1.51", "0.16", "–", "–", "–", "–"], ["Myristic acid", "0.33", "0.05", "1.03", "0.11", "–", "–", "–", "–"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 9, "numeric_cells": 20, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[20]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:PXD011371 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:PXD011371 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "operations"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "method", "blocked_on": "method:not_determinable", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (not named), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["PXD011371", "10.6019/PXD011371"], "resolved_accessions": ["PXD011371"], "statements": ["The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011371 and 10.6019/PXD011371. The raw data (western-blot) supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher."], "basis": "The paper names PXD011371 in ProteomeXchange consortium via the PRIDE partner repository and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:30740091", "data:geo:PXD011371", "asset:table:pmid:30740091:1", "asset:table:pmid:30740091:2"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:PXD011371"]}, "gaps": ["method:not_determinable"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:13:42Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": null, "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 46310, "completion_tokens": 780, "cached_tokens": 784}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:30740091", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30740091"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30740091", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30740091 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD011371", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO PXD011371"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:30740091", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30740091"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30740091", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30740091 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD011371", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO PXD011371"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-30740091", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:30740091"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-PXD011371", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:PXD011371"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:30740091", "parent_hash": "sha256:bd2eda8f091fcfaa91633c9c11a17da51ae7ab79e3528a11411868c4133009ea", "fork_of": null, "generation": 4}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:PXD011371 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:PXD011371 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method", "operations", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "mass_spectrometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ylated and only localized by high-resolution mass spectrometry. It is widely reported in the literature tha", "lization (data not shown). We thus performed mass spectrometry analyses to get more information on OBP isof", "ites. Analysis of OBP PTM by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Although we obtained 100% sequence coverage"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:4274", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:36:24+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}