{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:30828567", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:9da81dac42945f4cefcac251d5034011d6482096b924e6e7d9e4f90e56f33a0f", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:43Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:00:25Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Development and Validation of a Prognostic Signature for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2019.00078", "pmid": "30828567", "authors": ["Jian-Guo Zhou", "Hua Zhong", "Juan Zhang", "Su-Han Jin", "Raheleh Roudi", "Hu Ma"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2019, "abstract": "Introduction: Dysregulated genes play a critical role in the development and progression of cancer, suggesting their potential as novel independent biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Prognostic model-based gene expression profiles are not widely utilized in clinical medicine. We investigated the prognostic significance of an expression profile-based gene signature for outcome prediction in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: The gene expression profiles of a large cohort of patients with MPM were obtained and analyzed by repurposing publicly available microarray data. A gene-based risk score model was developed with the training dataset and then validated with the TCGA-MESO (mesothelioma) dataset. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic performance of survival prediction. The biological function of the prognostic genes was predicted using bioinformatics analysis. Results: Three genes in the training dataset (GSE2549) were identified as significantly associated with the overall survival (OS) of patients with MPM and were combined to develop a three-gene prognostic signature to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. The MPM patients of the training dataset in the low-risk group exhibited longer OS than those in the high-risk group (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.56, P < 0.001). Similar prognostic values for the three-gene signature were observed in the validated TCGA-MESO cohort (HR = 0.53 95% CI = 0.33-0.85, P = 0.008). ROC analysis also demonstrated the good performance in predicting 3-year OS in the GEO and TCGA cohorts (KM-AUC for GEO = 0.989, KM-AUC for TCGA = 0.618). The C-statistic for the 3-gene model was 0.761. Validation with TCGA-MESO confirmed the model's ability to discriminate between risk groups in an alternative data set with fair performance (C-statistic: 0.68). Functional enrichment analysis suggested that these three genes may be involved in genetic and epigenetic events with known links to MPM. Conclusions: This study has identified and validated a novel 3-gene model to reliably discriminate patients at high and low risk of death in unselected populations of patients with MPM. Further larger, prospective multi-institutional cohort studies are necessary to validate this model.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for difference was performed by the R package survival (25).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30828567", "locator": "sections[4] \"Identification of Prognosis-Related Genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for difference was performed by the R package survival (25)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The 49 RNA expression profiles included data from MPM surgical specimens (n = 40), normal pleura specimens (n = 5), and normal lung specimens (n = 4) in GSE2549 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc = GSE2549) (21).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30828567", "locator": "sections[3] \"Data Processing and Computational Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The 49 RNA expression profiles included data from MPM surgical specimens (n = 40), normal pleura specimens (n = 5), and normal lung specimens (n = 4) in GSE2549 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc = GSE2549) (21)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:30828567"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE2549"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE2549"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:30828567", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00078", "sha256": "sha256:870ab42ac733ad971eaa2f0d7ab952606cb96183084ef6161c71e8d0f214772d", "bytes": 34512, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2019.00078", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6384238", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE2549", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE2549", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE2549", "version": null, "note": "The 49 RNA expression profiles included data from MPM surgical specimens (n = 40), normal pleura specimens (n = 5), and normal lung specimens (n = 4) in GSE2549 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc = GSE2549) (21).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The 49 RNA expression profiles included data from MPM surgical specimens (n = 40), normal pleura specimens (n = 5), and normal lung specimens (n = 4) in GSE2549 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc = GSE2549) (21).", "access_statement_kind": "repository_route_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM49564", "GSM49565", "GSM49566", "GSM49567", "GSM49568", "GSM49569", "GSM49570", "GSM49571", "GSM49572", "GSM49573", "GSM49574", "GSM49575", "GSM49576", "GSM49577", "GSM49578", "GSM49579", "GSM49580", "GSM49581", "GSM49582", "GSM49583", "GSM49584", "GSM49585", "GSM49586", "GSM49587", "GSM49588", "GSM49589", "GSM49590", "GSM49591", "GSM49592", "GSM49593", "GSM49594", "GSM49595", "GSM49596", "GSM49597", "GSM49598", "GSM49599", "GSM49600", "GSM49601", "GSM49602", "GSM49603", "GSM49604", "GSM49605", "GSM49606", "GSM49607", "GSM49608", "GSM49609", "GSM49610", "GSM49611", "GSM49612", "GSM49613", "GSM49614", "GSM49615", "GSM49616", "GSM49617"], "sample_count": 54, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Malignant pleural mesothelioma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30828567:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:368b85a9585b358d85426f16151b730e067db116f1a267d9dc7f4d92f4e815e8", "bytes": 856, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[7]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "Survival-associated gene signature screening using univariate Cox analysis.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6384238", "section_index": 7, "section_title": "Identification of Prognostic Genes", "row_count": 9, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Survival-associated gene signature screening using univariate Cox analysis.", "rows": [["Gene ID", "Symbol", "HR", "z_score", "P-value", "FDR"], ["64151", "NCAPG", "1.027254347", "4.24991572", "2.14E−05", "0.025263053"], ["3002", "GZMB", "1.019847944", "4.218060896", "2.46E−05", "0.025263053"], ["55355", "HJURP", "1.026508209", "4.191920631", "2.77E−05", "0.025263053"], ["146909", "KIF18B", "1.019149889", "4.088171084", "4.35E−05", "0.029782941"], ["991", "CDC20", "1.018569099", "3.989784332", "6.61E−05", "0.033533683"], ["79801", "SHCBP1", "1.028501087", "3.952872889", "7.72E−05", "0.033533683"], ["29127", "RACGAP1", "1.018274577", "3.91248921", "9.13E−05", "0.033533683"], ["11157", "LSM6", "1.025921361", "3.895717234", "9.79E−05", "0.033533683"]], "row_count": 9, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 42, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[7]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30828567:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:fc30a187c5191b2ec1902ebfee39941b574dbb6ff95a7cc2643a2db06da092dd", "bytes": 564, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[8]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Survival-associated gene signature screening using forward selection.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6384238", "section_index": 8, "section_title": "Development and Validation of the Prognostic Signature", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Survival-associated gene signature screening using forward selection.", "rows": [["Model", "AIC"], ["CDC20 + LSM6 + GZMB + NCAPG + HJURP + SHCBP1 + KIF18B + RACGAP1", "169.04"], ["CDC20 + LSM6 + GZMB + HJURP + SHCBP1 + KIF18B + RACGAP1", "167.21"], ["LSM6 + GZMB + HJURP + SHCBP1 + KIF18B + RACGAP1", "165.4"], ["LSM6 + GZMB + HJURP + SHCBP1 + KIF18B", "164.05"], ["LSM6 + GZMB + HJURP + SHCBP1", "162.58"], ["LSM6 + GZMB + HJURP", "161.29"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 10, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[8]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30828567:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:e1524ffec4db7d29ac818c29cb726e752c9618794265c9880dc0fa8dd7cd917c", "bytes": 485, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[8]/table-wrap[2]#T3", "version": null, "note": "Details of the 3-gene model.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6384238", "section_index": 8, "section_title": "Development and Validation of the Prognostic Signature", "row_count": 4, "column_count": 9}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "Details of the 3-gene model.", "rows": [["Gene", "coef", "exp(coef)", "se(coef)", "exp(-coef)", "L", "U", "z-value", "P"], ["LSM6", "0.0133323", "1.013", "0.007", "0.9868", "0.9995", "1.027", "1.893", "0.0583"], ["GZMB", "0.01643", "1.017", "0.005", "0.9837", "1.0061", "1.027", "3.126", "0.002"], ["HJURP", "0.020926", "1.021", "0.007", "0.9793", "1.0077", "1.008", "3.105", "0.002"]], "row_count": 4, "column_count": 9, "numeric_cells": 24, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[8]/table-wrap[2]#T3"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE2549 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE2549 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for difference was performed by the R package survival (25)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "KM"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Limma"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC analysis"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: log_rank_test."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE2549"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE2549"], "statements": ["The 49 RNA expression profiles included data from MPM surgical specimens (n = 40), normal pleura specimens (n = 5), and normal lung specimens (n = 4) in GSE2549 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc = GSE2549) (21)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE2549 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:30828567", "data:geo:GSE2549", "asset:table:pmid:30828567:1", "asset:table:pmid:30828567:2", "asset:table:pmid:30828567:3"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE2549"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:14:07Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 27047, "completion_tokens": 1355, "cached_tokens": 784}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:30828567", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30828567"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30828567", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30828567 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE2549", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE2549"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:30828567", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30828567"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30828567", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30828567 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE2549", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE2549"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-30828567", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:30828567"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE2549", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE2549"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:30828567", "parent_hash": "sha256:3bd1201fb98b7ccb4025bb66b5462bf99fd056855482e2358b6856aaa69c5fd5", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE2549 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE2549 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test for difference was performed by the R package survival (25)."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:14:40+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}