{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:30949322", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:054d036030d28eaf02a290dc11dd16ceb771b3ca31c57fc7d6d231374b663117", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:44Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:00:29Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Investigation of health benefits of cocoa in human colorectal cancer cell line, HT-29 through interactome analysis.", "doi": null, "pmid": "30949322", "authors": ["Mona Zamanian-Azodi", "Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani"], "journal": "Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench", "year": 2019, "abstract": "AIM: This bioinformatics study aims to identify the potential key genes influenced by cocoa extraction treatment on colon cancer cell line HT-29 after 24h.\nBACKGROUND: Cocoa consumption has been claimed to have beneficial effects on human body including protection against diseases such as different types of cancers. However, the mechanisms behind this is still remained to be studied.\nMETHODS: The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis. The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h. Afterwards, the top significant DEGs were assigned for protein-protein interaction network construction and analysis by Cytoscape v 3.7.0. and the related applications.\nRESULTS: The findings indicate that there are 222 up-regulated and 28 down-regulated genes among 250 top-ranked DEGs in cocoa incubated group. What is more, centrality analysis of the DEGs network identified 10 hub-bottlenecks that ISG15, MX 1, and STAT1 were among the significant differential expression genes with the contribution in type 1 interferon signaling pathway, positive regulation of erythrocyte differentiation, and negative regulation of viral genome replication.\nCONCLUSION: In conclusion, the underlying mechanisms of cocoa treatment could be clarified by its up-regulatory and modulatory effect on prominent genes of tumor suppressor family. In other words, valuable clues for future clinical studies of cocoa health benefits are highlighted as anticancer agent in this study once validation studies are carried out.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "In GEO2R, at first data were preprocessed via box plot analysis and then the DEGs were analyzed by the application of t-test, and the top ranked genes (250 significant ones) were screened and assigned by the consideration of adj. P-value via Benjamini and Hochberg correction method.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30949322", "locator": "sections[2] \"Methods\" paragraph 2", "quote": "In GEO2R, at first data were preprocessed via box plot analysis and then the DEGs were analyzed by the application of t-test, and the top ranked genes (250 significant ones) were screened and assigned by the consideration of adj. P-value via Benjamini and Hochberg correction method."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis. The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h. The study identifies with Series Accession: GSE94154 and Platform: GPL570 that was conducted by Ciudad CJ, et al. in 2018 entitled, “Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells (Homo sapiens)”.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30949322", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:30949322", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:30949322", "locator": "sections[2] \"Methods\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The study identifies with Series Accession: GSE94154 and Platform: GPL570 that was conducted by Ciudad CJ, et al. in 2018 entitled, “Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells (Homo sapiens)”."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": ["doi"]}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:30949322"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE94154"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE94154"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:30949322", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:7b37b37d10809fc6161760fea5a05dda03fb2c9d9ff72722d6adbba7e3c3b42a", "bytes": 23064, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "30949322", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6441487", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE94154", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE94154", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE94154", "version": null, "note": "The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis. The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h. The study identifies with Series Accession: GSE94154 and Platform: GPL570 that was conducted by Ciudad CJ, et al. in 2018 entitled, “Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells (Homo sapiens)”.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis. The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h. The study identifies with Series Accession: GSE94154 and Platform: GPL570 that was conducted by Ciudad CJ, et al. in 2018 entitled, “Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells (Homo sapiens)”.", "access_statement_kind": "repository_route_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2471152", "GSM2471153", "GSM2471154", "GSM2471155", "GSM2471156", "GSM2471157"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30949322:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:03f1f53638771f33cbe6866b29a8ec05d0008c2899fd30df8a013c4224762f74", "bytes": 1053, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "The list of hub-bottlenecks of network of colon cancer cell line HT-29 treated with cocoa extraction. BC refers to betweenness centrality", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6441487", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Results", "row_count": 11, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "The list of hub-bottlenecks of network of colon cancer cell line HT-29 treated with cocoa extraction. BC refers to betweenness centrality", "rows": [["R", "Display name", "Description", "Degree", "BC", "Query term"], ["1", "ISG15", "ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier", "111", "0.02", "ISG15"], ["2", "STAT1", "signal transducer and activator of transcription 1, 91kDa", "105", "0.03", "STAT1"], ["3", "MX1", "myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1, interferon-inducible protein p78 (mouse)", "95", "0.02", "MX1"], ["4", "TP53", "tumor protein p53", "89", "0.04", "-"], ["5", "GAPDH", "glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase", "87", "0.02", "-"], ["6", "PRDM10", "PR domain containing 10", "85", "0.03", "-"], ["7", "EGR1", "early growth response 1", "80", "0.02", "-"], ["8", "IL6", "interleukin 6 (interferon, beta 2)", "78", "0.02", "-"], ["9", "AKT1", "v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1", "76", "0.04", "-"], ["10", "TNF", "tumor necrosis factor", "76", "0.02", "-"]], "row_count": 11, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 43, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30949322:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:e694f6433e2328815c10de73c4afdf6464ac1cc06d9b8ccbf018296d65d1fd82", "bytes": 620, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Abbreviations S-DE-HB, FC, FDR, and NS indicate significant differentially expressed hub-bottlenecks, fold change, false discovery rate, and number of spots, respectively", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6441487", "section_index": 4, "section_title": "Discussion", "row_count": 4, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Abbreviations S-DE-HB, FC, FDR, and NS indicate significant differentially expressed hub-bottlenecks, fold change, false discovery rate, and number of spots, respectively", "rows": [["Rank", "S-DE-HB", "Protein name", "Expression Condition", "FC", "FDR", "NS"], ["12", "MX1", "MX dynamin like GTPase 1", "Up", "4.5", "0.00007", "1"], ["211", "ISG15", "ISG15 ubiquitin-like modifier", "Up", "2.3", "0.0008", "1"], ["38", "STAT1", "signal transducer and activator of transcription 1", "UP", "2.3", "0.00014", "7"]], "row_count": 4, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 16, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE94154 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE94154 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "centrality", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "centrality"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "t-test", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "In GEO2R, at first data were preprocessed via box plot analysis and then the DEGs were analyzed by the application of t-test, and the top ranked genes (250 significant ones) were screened and assigned by the consideration of adj. P-value via Benjamini and Hochberg correction method."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: ppi_network."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE94154"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE94154"], "statements": ["The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) extraction through GEO2R analysis. The comparison was between 3 controls of colorectal cell line HT-29 and 3 ones incubated with 500 µg cocoa extraction after 24 h. The study identifies with Series Accession: GSE94154 and Platform: GPL570 that was conducted by Ciudad CJ, et al. in 2018 entitled, “Gene expression after 24h Cocoa Extract incubation in HT29 cells (Homo sapiens)”."], "basis": "The paper names GSE94154 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "assets": ["source:pmid:30949322", "data:geo:GSE94154", "asset:table:pmid:30949322:1", "asset:table:pmid:30949322:2"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE94154"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:14:29Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 17866, "completion_tokens": 1445, "cached_tokens": 520}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:30949322", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30949322"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30949322", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30949322 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE94154", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE94154"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:30949322", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30949322"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30949322", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30949322 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE94154", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE94154"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-30949322", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:30949322"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE94154", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE94154"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:30949322", "parent_hash": "sha256:df36fc5fa9b4d412c8ae5637d35619b638975ec2dee97d76519fe4d5bf8b88c3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE94154 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE94154 not downloaded", "doi", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["s still remained to be studied. METHODS: The microarray dataset (GSE94154) from GEO, was the source"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:471", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "network_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["protein-protein interaction"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:43:49+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}