{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:33564304", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:2a74580f613485efe57f661b8bc0f67bfe4f4e71e5ce723ccc6dbbba4963be38", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:24Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:46:05Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of Three Significant Genes Associated with Immune Cells Infiltration in Dysfunctional Adipose Tissue-Induced Insulin-Resistance of Obese Patients via Comprehensive Bioinformatics Analysis.", "doi": "10.1155/2021/8820089", "pmid": "33564304", "authors": ["Ming Zhai", "Peipei Luan", "Yefei Shi", "Bo Li", "Jianhua Kang", "Fan Hu", "Mingjie Li", "Lei Du", "Donglei Zhou", "Weixia Jian", "Wenhui Peng"], "journal": "International journal of endocrinology", "year": 2021, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Low-grade chronic inflammation in dysfunctional adipose tissue links obesity with insulin resistance through the activation of tissue-infiltrating immune cells. Numerous studies have reported on the pathogenesis of insulin-resistance. However, few studies focused on genes from genomic database. In this study, we would like to explore the correlation of genes and immune cells infiltration in adipose tissue via comprehensive bioinformatics analyses and experimental validation in mice and human adipose tissue.\nMETHODS: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE27951, GSE55200, and GSE26637) of insulin-resistant individuals or type 2 diabetes patients and normal controls were downloaded to get differently expressed genes (DEGs), and GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. Subsequently, we integrated DEGs from three datasets and constructed commonly expressed DEGs' PPI net-works across datasets. Center regulating module of DEGs and hub genes were screened through MCODE and cytoHubba in Cytoscape. Three most significant hub genes were further analyzed by GSEA analysis. Moreover, we verified the predicted hub genes by performing RT qPCR analysis in animals and human samples. Besides, the relative fraction of 22 immune cell types in adipose tissue was detected by using the deconvolution algorithm of CIBERSORT (Cell Type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts). Furthermore, based on the significantly changed types of immune cells, we performed correlation analysis between hub genes and immune cells. And, we performed immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis to verify that the hub genes were associated with adipose tissue macrophages (ATM).\nRESULTS: Thirty DEGs were commonly expressed across three datasets, most of which were upregulated. DEGs mainly participated in the process of multiple immune cells' infiltration. In protein-protein interaction network, we identified CSF1R, C1QC, and TYROBP as hub genes. GSEA analysis suggested high expression of the three hub genes was correlated with immune cells functional pathway's activation. Immune cell infiltration and correlation analysis revealed that there were significant positive correlations between TYROBP and M0 macrophages, CSF1R and M0 macrophages, Plasma cells, and CD8 T cells. Finally, hub genes were associated with ATMs infiltration by experimental verification.\nCONCLUSIONS: This article revealed that CSF1R, C1QC, and TYROBP were potential hub genes associated with immune cells' infiltration and the function of proinflammation, especially adipose tissue macrophages, in the progression of obesity-induced diabetes or insulin-resistance.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The “limma” package in R software (R Studio) was used to integrate and standardize the downloaded GEO expression chip to analyze the differentially expressed genes and their expression levels [21, 22].", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33564304", "locator": "sections[6] \"2.4. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The “limma” package in R software (R Studio) was used to integrate and standardize the downloaded GEO expression chip to analyze the differentially expressed genes and their expression levels [21, 22]."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33564304", "locator": "sections[27] \"Data Availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:33564304"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE26637"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE26637"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:33564304", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8820089", "sha256": "sha256:b44cb464a46b8bf874c25315a583ed7e9ef3818ba731cd42182882a9b8baf822", "bytes": 37467, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1155/2021/8820089", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7850849", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE26637", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE26637", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE26637", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM655603", "GSM655604", "GSM655605", "GSM655606", "GSM655607", "GSM655608", "GSM655609", "GSM655610", "GSM655611", "GSM655612", "GSM655613", "GSM655614", "GSM655615", "GSM655616", "GSM655617", "GSM655618", "GSM655619", "GSM655620", "GSM655621", "GSM655622"], "sample_count": 20, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Adipose tissue transcriptome in insulin resistance", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE27951", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE27951", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE27951", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM689397", "GSM689398", "GSM689399", "GSM689400", "GSM689401", "GSM689402", "GSM689403", "GSM689404", "GSM689405", "GSM689406", "GSM689407", "GSM689408", "GSM691122", "GSM691123", "GSM691124", "GSM691125", "GSM691126", "GSM691127", "GSM691128", "GSM691129", "GSM691130", "GSM691131", "GSM691132", "GSM691133", "GSM691134", "GSM691135", "GSM691136", "GSM691137", "GSM691138", "GSM691139", "GSM691140", "GSM691141", "GSM691142", "GSM691143", "GSM691144", "GSM691145", "GSM691146", "GSM691147", "GSM691148", "GSM691149", "GSM691150", "GSM691151", "GSM691152", "GSM691153", "GSM691154"], "sample_count": 45, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "13273;570", "taxon": "Mus musculus; Murid betaherpesvirus 1; JC polyomavirus; Human immunodeficiency virus 1; Human gammaherpesvirus 8; Human alphaherpesvirus 1; Human betaherpesvirus 5; human gammaherpesvirus 4; Betapolyomavirus macacae; Rattus norvegicus; Murid gammaherpesvirus 4; Betapolyomavirus hominis; Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene-chip studies of adipogenesis-regulated microRNAs in mouse primary adipocytes and human obesity", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE35411", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE35411", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE35411", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM867716", "GSM867717", "GSM867718", "GSM867719", "GSM867720", "GSM867721", "GSM867722", "GSM867723", "GSM867724", "GSM867725", "GSM867726", "GSM867727", "GSM867728", "GSM867729", "GSM867730", "GSM867731", "GSM867732", "GSM867733", "GSM867734", "GSM867735", "GSM867736", "GSM867737", "GSM867738", "GSM867739", "GSM867740", "GSM867741"], "sample_count": 26, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "10335", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Differential gene expression in adipose tissue from obese human subjects during weight loss and weight maintenance", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE55200", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE55200", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE55200", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1331431", "GSM1331432", "GSM1331433", "GSM1331434", "GSM1331435", "GSM1331436", "GSM1331437", "GSM1331438", "GSM1331439", "GSM1331440", "GSM1331441", "GSM1331442", "GSM1331443", "GSM1331444", "GSM1331445", "GSM1331446", "GSM1331447", "GSM1331448", "GSM1331449", "GSM1331450", "GSM1331451", "GSM1331452", "GSM1331453"], "sample_count": 23, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "17692", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression data from human subcutaneous adipose tissue", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE84599", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE84599", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE84599", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2242533", "GSM2242534", "GSM2242535", "GSM2242536", "GSM2242537", "GSM2242538", "GSM2242539", "GSM2242540", "GSM2242541", "GSM2242542", "GSM2242543", "GSM2242544", "GSM2242545", "GSM2242546", "GSM2242547", "GSM2242548"], "sample_count": 16, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "16699", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral adipose tissue gene expression profiles in Mexican patients with obesity", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE26637 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE26637 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE27951 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE27951 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE35411 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE35411 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE55200 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE55200 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE84599 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE84599 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The “limma” package in R software (R Studio) was used to integrate and standardize the downloaded GEO expression chip to analyze the differentially expressed genes and their expression levels [21, 22]."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "student_t_test", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["student_t"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Student's t test"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ANOVA"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "PPI"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: limma_voom."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE27951", "GSE55200", "GSE26637", "GSE35411", "GSE84599"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE27951", "GSE55200", "GSE26637", "GSE35411", "GSE84599"], "statements": ["The data used to support this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request (1931136@tongji.edu.cn)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE27951, GSE55200, GSE26637, GSE35411, GSE84599 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "assets": ["source:pmid:33564304", "data:geo:GSE26637"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE26637"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:26:53Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 27290, "completion_tokens": 1968, "cached_tokens": 784}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:33564304", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33564304"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33564304", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33564304 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE26637", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE26637"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:33564304", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33564304"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33564304", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33564304 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE26637", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE26637"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-33564304", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:33564304"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE26637", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE26637"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:33564304", "parent_hash": "sha256:c8128582961c864a51b897ef7bfb1a44bb411d36eb1801fce22b273e2f54c6d6", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE26637 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE26637 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE27951 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE27951 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE35411 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE35411 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE55200 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE55200 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE84599 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE84599 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["rmatics analyses and experimental validation in mice and human adipose tissue. METHODS: Gene Expr", "re (22 °C–25 °C). At 8 weeks of age, 14 male mice were randomly divided into 2 groups and fed for 1", "7). The food intake and body weight of each mouse were recorded weekly. After 12 weeks, we per", "we performed glucose tolerance tests of each mouse. Blood glucose concentrations (mg/dl) were m"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:650", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ied the predicted hub genes by performing RT qPCR analysis in animals and human samples. Besid", "able 2: summary of primer sequences used for RT-qPCR. Supplemental Table 3: 30 commonly expressed", "e 2: summary of primer sequences used for RT-qPCR. Supplemental Table 3: 30 commonly expressed"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1320", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ub genes and immune cells. And, we performed immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis to verify th", ". And, we performed immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis to verify that the hub genes were a", "fraction in AT of IRO was verified by IF or IHC analysis. Supplementary Materials Supplement"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1737", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "differential_expression", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The “limma” package in R software (R Studio) was used to integrate and standardize the downloaded GEO expression chip to analyze the differentially expressed genes and their expression levels [21, 22]."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:42:01+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}