{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34471638", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 5, "content_hash": "sha256:51f82418277ee59eba43485b38ad6d6fe29adb09e54bcad4b02ae36c0f919e91", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:50Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:04:37Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Uncovering the Mechanisms and Molecular Targets of Weibing Formula 1 against Gastritis: Coupling Network Pharmacology with GEO Database.", "doi": "10.1155/2021/5533946", "pmid": "34471638", "authors": ["Ke Chen", "Luojian Zhang", "Zhen Qu", "Feng Wan", "Jia Li", "Ye Yang", "Hui Yan", "Shile Huang"], "journal": "BioMed research international", "year": 2021, "abstract": "Weibing Formula 1, a classic traditional formula, has been widely used clinically to treat gastritis in recent years. However, the potential pharmacological mechanism of Weibing Formula 1 is still unclear to date. A network pharmacology-based strategy was performed to uncover the underlying mechanisms of Weibing Formula 1 against gastritis. Furthermore, we structured the drug-active ingredients-genes-disease network and PPI network of shared targets, and function enrichment analysis of these targets was carried out. Ultimately, Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets and real-time quantitative PCR were used to verify the related genes. We found 251 potential targets corresponding to 135 bioactive components of Weibing Formula 1. Then, 327 gastritis-related targets were known gastritis-related targets. Among which, 60 common targets were shared between potential targets of Weibing Formula 1 and known gastritis-related targets. The results of pathway enrichment analysis displayed that 60 common targets mostly participated in various pathways related to Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, and apoptosis. Based on the GSE60427 dataset, 15 common genes were shared between differentially expressed genes and 60 candidate targets. The verification results of the GSE5081 dataset showed that except for DUOX2 and VCAM1, the other 13 genes were significantly upregulated in gastritis, which was consistent with the results in the GSE60427 dataset. More importantly, real-time quantitative PCR results showed that the expressions of PTGS2, MMP9, CXCL2, and CXCL8 were significantly upregulated and NOS2, EGFR, and IL-10 were downregulated in gastritis patients, while the expressions of PTGS2, MMP9, CXCL2, and CXCL8 were significantly downregulated and NOS2, EGFR, and IL-10 were upregulated after the treatment of Weibing Formula 1. PTGS2, NOS2, EGFR, MMP9, CXCL2, CXCL8, and IL-10 may be the important direct targets of Weibing Formula 1 in gastritis treatment. Our study revealed the mechanism of Weibing Formula 1 in gastritis from an overall and systematic perspective, providing a theoretical basis for further knowing and application of this formula in the future.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Then, the Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to improve the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple comparisons.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34471638", "locator": "sections[10] \"2.8. GEO Data Preprocessing and Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Then, the Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to improve the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple comparisons."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34471638", "locator": "sections[22] \"Data Availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34471638"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE5081"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE5081"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34471638", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5533946", "sha256": "sha256:c0a31bcd901bf8d5b4591f96a93b9e29c2be657ad181b013e80c1ae3659cc284", "bytes": 40985, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1155/2021/5533946", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8405302", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE5081", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE5081", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE5081", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM114504", "GSM114505", "GSM114506", "GSM114507", "GSM114508", "GSM114509", "GSM114510", "GSM114511", "GSM114512", "GSM114513", "GSM114514", "GSM114515", "GSM114516", "GSM114517", "GSM114518", "GSM114519", "GSM114520", "GSM114521", "GSM114522", "GSM114523", "GSM114524", "GSM114525", "GSM114526", "GSM114527", "GSM114528", "GSM114529", "GSM114530", "GSM114531", "GSM114532", "GSM114533", "GSM114534", "GSM114535"], "sample_count": 32, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data from Helicobacter positive and negative human gastritis samples", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE60427", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE60427", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE60427", "version": null, "note": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1479654", "GSM1479655", "GSM1479656", "GSM1479657", "GSM1479658", "GSM1479659", "GSM1479660", "GSM1479661", "GSM1479662", "GSM1479663", "GSM1479664", "GSM1479665", "GSM1479666", "GSM1479667", "GSM1479668", "GSM1479669", "GSM1479670", "GSM1479671", "GSM1479672", "GSM1479673", "GSM1479674", "GSM1479675", "GSM1479676", "GSM1479677", "GSM1479678", "GSM1479679", "GSM1479680", "GSM1479681", "GSM1479682", "GSM1479683", "GSM1479684", "GSM1479685"], "sample_count": 32, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "17077", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Toll-like receptor 10 in Helicobacter pylori infection", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34471638:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:a7e323cd863cf273025ee6cc1e4bf4a81a6032adf1d95f7f8b99535700ecca9c", "bytes": 1176, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#tab1", "version": null, "note": "The top 10 active compounds in Weibing Formula 1.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8405302", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "3.1. Bioactive Components in Weibing Formula 1", "row_count": 11, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "The top 10 active compounds in Weibing Formula 1.", "rows": [["Molecule ID", "Molecule name", "OB (%)", "DL", "Molecular structure", "Herb", "Number of targets"], ["MOL000098", "Quercetin", "46.43", "0.28", "", "Plantaginis Herba/Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge/Coptidis Rhizoma/Licorice", "152"], ["MOL000422", "Kaempferol", "41.88", "0.24", "", "Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge/Paeoniae Radix Alba/Licorice", "62"], ["MOL003896", "7-Methoxy-2-methyl isoflavone", "42.56", "0.2", "", "Licorice", "43"], ["MOL000392", "Formononetin", "69.67", "0.21", "", "Licorice", "39"], ["MOL000358", "Beta-sitosterol", "36.91", "0.75", "", "Paeoniae Radix Alba/Aurantii Fructus", "37"], ["MOL004328", "Naringenin", "59.29", "0.21", "", "Aurantii Fructus/Licorice", "37"], ["MOL000354", "Isorhamnetin", "49.6", "0.31", "", "Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge/Licorice", "36"], ["MOL005828", "Nobiletin", "61.67", "0.52", "", "Aurantii Fructus", "35"], ["MOL002565", "Medicarpin", "49.22", "0.34", "", "Licorice", "34"], ["MOL000449", "Stigmasterol", "43.83", "0.76", "", "Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge/Aucklandiae Radix/Herba Taraxaci", "32"]], "row_count": 11, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 41, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#tab1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34471638:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:f12fd534c2ecb884c58fdc56ee5f8d51348e7dad5b5f342a4835cc5005df9b8b", "bytes": 1481, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#tab2", "version": null, "note": "The top 20 differentially expressed genes between gastritis and normal control.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8405302", "section_index": 18, "section_title": "3.6. GEO Data Verified Differentially Expressed Genes", "row_count": 21, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "The top 20 differentially expressed genes between gastritis and normal control.", "rows": [["Symbol", "logFC", "AveExpr", "p value", "FDR value", "Up/down"], ["FCRL2", "3.676252", "6.396535", "1.29E-14", "2.81E-10", "Up"], ["CD180", "3.681265", "4.779778", "5.03E-14", "3.87E-10", "Up"], ["CCL20", "4.643928", "9.7374", "5.34E-14", "3.87E-10", "Up"], ["ADAMDEC1", "3.547777", "6.194662", "6.49E-13", "2.82E-09", "Up"], ["CD19", "5.24656", "8.950685", "6.50E-13", "2.82E-09", "Up"], ["CXCL1", "3.459952", "9.175125", "1.03E-12", "3.74E-09", "Up"], ["PLA2G7", "3.659776", "7.439826", "1.95E-12", "6.04E-09", "Up"], ["CXCL2", "3.227429", "9.547699", "2.35E-12", "6.37E-09", "Up"], ["LCN2", "3.91543", "13.39285", "3.50E-12", "8.45E-09", "Up"], ["FCRL5", "2.80746", "6.40599", "5.25E-12", "1.07E-08", "Up"], ["NMU", "-1.54903", "11.76094", "2.10E-08", "2.28E-06", "Down"], ["PRB2", "-1.69213", "2.736936", "1.03E-07", "7.44E-06", "Down"], ["FABP5", "-1.03799", "12.32549", "1.82E-07", "1.15E-05", "Down"], ["C6", "-3.59553", "7.529899", "2.51E-07", "1.49E-05", "Down"], ["EDA", "-1.10261", "6.242344", "3.97E-07", "2.20E-05", "Down"], ["FAM174B", "-1.0484", "11.10483", "5.76E-07", "2.90E-05", "Down"], ["DBP", "-1.65056", "8.455515", "9.36E-07", "4.38E-05", "Down"], ["MPV17L", "-1.17795", "6.826452", "1.06E-06", "4.81E-05", "Down"], ["IGFBP4", "-1.07855", "8.68517", "1.27E-06", "5.67E-05", "Down"], ["RASL11B", "-1.34426", "7.673157", "2.53E-06", "9.82E-05", "Down"]], "row_count": 21, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 86, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[18]/table-wrap[1]#tab2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34471638:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:c528a7ef327c07dcd4540ae088e756344447aef70e0bd367b2c110625873544b", "bytes": 1923, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[18]/table-wrap[2]#tab3", "version": null, "note": "The top 20 significantly enriched pathway between gastritis and normal control.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8405302", "section_index": 18, "section_title": "3.6. GEO Data Verified Differentially Expressed Genes", "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "The top 20 significantly enriched pathway between gastritis and normal control.", "rows": [["Name", "Size", "ES", "NES", "NOM p val", "FDR q val", "FWER p val"], ["Pathways in cancer", "322", "-0.444", "-1.662", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.051", "0.402"], ["MAPK signaling pathway", "264", "-0.403", "-1.47", "0.004", "0.104", "0.841"], ["Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction", "252", "-0.706", "-1.703", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.043", "0.313"], ["Regulation of actin cytoskeleton", "211", "-0.362", "-1.396", "0.03", "0.142", "0.913"], ["Focal adhesion", "197", "-0.463", "-1.491", "0.045", "0.09", "0.804"], ["Chemokine signaling pathway", "183", "-0.747", "-1.793", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.039", "0.146"], ["Endocytosis", "176", "-0.407", "-1.86", "0.004", "0.028", "0.079"], ["Jak Stat signaling pathway", "147", "-0.572", "-1.731", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.044", "0.247"], ["Alzheimer's disease", "143", "-0.384", "-1.463", "0.032", "0.107", "0.848"], ["Insulin signaling pathway", "137", "-0.356", "-1.45", "0.046", "0.115", "0.864"], ["Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)", "130", "-0.701", "-1.652", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.053", "0.425"], ["Natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity", "124", "-0.634", "-1.707", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.044", "0.304"], ["Neurotrophin signaling pathway", "124", "-0.407", "-1.624", "0.011", "0.052", "0.502"], ["Leukocyte transendothelial migration", "115", "-0.645", "-1.686", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.044", "0.348"], ["Vascular smooth muscle contraction", "112", "-0.468", "-1.431", "0.016", "0.127", "0.884"], ["T cell receptor signaling pathway", "106", "-0.641", "-1.758", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.043", "0.2"], ["Melanogenesis", "101", "-0.414", "-1.409", "0.032", "0.135", "0.899"], ["GnRH signaling pathway", "100", "-0.439", "-1.528", "0.01", "0.071", "0.734"], ["Parkinson's disease", "98", "-0.41", "-1.584", "0.025", "0.065", "0.615"], ["Toll-like receptor signaling pathway", "96", "-0.681", "-1.77", "p ≤ 0.001", "0.042", "0.175"]], "row_count": 21, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 120, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[18]/table-wrap[2]#tab3"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE5081 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE5081 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE60427 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE60427 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "PPI"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Benjamini-Hochberg method", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Then, the Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to improve the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple comparisons."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: ppi_network."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE60427", "GSE5081"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE60427", "GSE5081"], "statements": ["The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article."], "basis": "The paper names GSE60427, GSE5081 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34471638", "data:geo:GSE5081", "asset:table:pmid:34471638:1", "asset:table:pmid:34471638:2", "asset:table:pmid:34471638:3"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE5081"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:34:21Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 31705, "completion_tokens": 1173, "cached_tokens": 785}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34471638", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34471638"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34471638", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34471638 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE5081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE5081"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34471638", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34471638"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34471638", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34471638 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE5081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE5081"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34471638", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34471638"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE5081", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE5081"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34471638", "parent_hash": "sha256:2ab2f6ffe76ce8aa7a0e14f83daf9cda87f95f3b6e51d700aefd10775624565c", "fork_of": null, "generation": 4}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE5081 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE5081 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE60427 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE60427 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": [", Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets and real-time quantitative PCR were used to verify the related genes. We fo", "s in the GSE60427 dataset. More importantly, real-time quantitative PCR results showed that the expressions of PTGS2"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:669", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.69, "evidence": ["on pathway, chemokine signaling pathway, and apoptosis. Based on the GSE60427 dataset, 15 common ge"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1301", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "network_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["PPI"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:46:51+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}