{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34557343", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:1746aa4c3b0caad2042fb7ce703f62b051bcb5a1fc3d18847440352d87797e39", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:53Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:26:17Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Clinicopathological value of long non-coding RNA profiles in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.11946", "pmid": "34557343", "authors": ["Yan Zhao", "Xinxin Liu", "Keshuai Xiao", "Liwen Wang", "Yuping Li", "Mingyun Kan", "Zhiwei Jiang"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2021, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been implicated in diagnosis and prognosis in various cancers. However, few lncRNA signatures have been established for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We aimed to explore a lncRNA signature profile that associated with clinical relevance by mining data from Gene Expression Ominus (GEO) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.\nMETHODS: Using a lncRNA-mining approach, we performed non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) consensus algorithm in Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) cohorts (61 patients from GSE8167 and GSE17743) to cluster LncRNA expression profiles. Comparative markers selection, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) algorithm were performed between distinct molecular subtypes of GIST. The survival rate of GIST patients from SEER stratified by gender were compared by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. lncRNA-mRNA co-expression analysis was performed by Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) using R package LINC. Somatic copy number alterations of GIST patients (GSE40966) were analyzed via web server GenePattern GISTIC2 algorithm.\nRESULTS: A total of four lncRNA molecular subtypes of GIST were identified with distinct biological pathways and clinical characteristics. LncRNA expression profiles well clustered the GIST samples into small size (<5 mm) and large size tumors (>5 mm), which is a fundamental index for GIST malignancy diagnosis. Several lncRNAs with abundant expression (LRRC75A-AS1, HYMAI, NEAT1, XIST and FTX) were closely associated with tumor size, which may suggest to be biomarkers for the GIST malignancy. Particularly, LRRC75A-AS1 was positively associated with tumor diameters and suggested an oncogene in GIST. Co-expression analysis suggested that chromosome region 17p11.2-p12 may contribute to the oncogenic process in malignant GIST. Interestingly, the gender had a strong influence on clustering by lncRNA expression profile. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were further explored and 7983 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs from 1973 to 2014 were enrolled for analysis. The results also showed the favorable prognosis for female patients. The survival rate between male and female with GIST was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated distinct pathways between female and male, and malignant GIST was associated with several cancer metabolism and cell cycle associated pathways.\nCONCLUSIONS: This lncRNAs-based classification for GISTs may provide a molecular classification applicable to individual GIST that has implications to influence lncRNA markers selection and prediction of tumor progression.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The survival rate of GIST patients from SEER stratified by gender were compared by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34557343", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The survival rate of GIST patients from SEER stratified by gender were compared by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34557343", "locator": "sections[31] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraphs 1-3", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34557343"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE17743"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE17743"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34557343", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11946", "sha256": "sha256:2214724de7939127ad543fee4ed4acf1eca9e44a561b85e75d796384e9e0e892", "bytes": 53099, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.11946", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8420874", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE17743", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE17743", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE17743", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM442936", "GSM442937", "GSM442938", "GSM442939", "GSM442940", "GSM442941", "GSM442942", "GSM442943", "GSM442944", "GSM442945", "GSM442946", "GSM442947", "GSM442948", "GSM442949", "GSM442950", "GSM442951", "GSM442952", "GSM442953", "GSM442954", "GSM442955", "GSM442956", "GSM442957", "GSM442958", "GSM442959", "GSM442960", "GSM442961", "GSM442962", "GSM442963", "GSM442964"], "sample_count": 29, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression profiles differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumours according to KIT mutations and expression", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE20709", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE20709", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE20709", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM520391", "GSM520392", "GSM520393", "GSM520394", "GSM520395", "GSM520396", "GSM520397", "GSM520398", "GSM520399", "GSM520400", "GSM520401", "GSM520402", "GSM520403", "GSM520404", "GSM520405", "GSM520406", "GSM520407", "GSM520408", "GSM520409", "GSM520410", "GSM520411", "GSM520412", "GSM520413", "GSM520414", "GSM520415"], "sample_count": 25, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6801", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Copy number data from GIST with KIT mutation", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE8167", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE8167", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE8167", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM202197", "GSM202198", "GSM202199", "GSM202200", "GSM202201", "GSM202202", "GSM202203", "GSM202204", "GSM202205", "GSM202206", "GSM202207", "GSM202208", "GSM202209", "GSM202210", "GSM202211", "GSM202212", "GSM202213", "GSM202214", "GSM202215", "GSM202216", "GSM202217", "GSM202218", "GSM202219", "GSM202220", "GSM202221", "GSM202222", "GSM202223", "GSM202224", "GSM202225", "GSM202226", "GSM202227", "GSM202228"], "sample_count": 32, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Distinct gene-expression-defined classes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34557343:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:4fab05ca5229d7df7c71476c31c0acd0b25b0d6baf2c4096bb6fdbbb354d9343", "bytes": 696, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#table-1", "version": null, "note": "Association analysis of clinical characteristics of GIST patients and 4 subtypes clustered by lncRNA profile.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8420874", "section_index": 12, "section_title": "LncRNAs clustering GIST subtypes were associated with tumor size and gender", "row_count": 5, "column_count": 10}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Association analysis of clinical characteristics of GIST patients and 4 subtypes clustered by lncRNA profile.", "rows": [["Subtypes", "Cases", "Age", "F:M", "Locationintestinal:gastric", "MutationKIT:WT:PDGRF", "Diameter (mm)", "Sig.(p)", "Diameter (mm)", "Sig.(p)"], ["G1", "11", "59.0 + 10.8", "11:0", "2:9", "6:5:0", "9.09 + 7.34", "0.995a", "10.45 + 7.90*", "0.000c"], ["G2", "20", "63.6 + 12.4", "1:19", "7:13", "16:4:0", "11.2 + 8.28"], ["G3", "11", "–", "3:8", "0:11", "6:1:4", "48.73 + 25.16", "0.921b", "52.17 + 30.89*"], ["G4", "19", "–", "4:15", "0:19", "10:2:7", "54.16 + 34.27"]], "row_count": 5, "column_count": 10, "numeric_cells": 27, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#table-1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34557343:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:25d3a6222a62317864e9bd510f6c92e58875ac4d46ea4d5ad9b3684c3d6d563e", "bytes": 2746, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#table-2", "version": null, "note": "Equilibrium comparison of baseline characteristics of GIST patients before and after propensity score matching. stratified by gender (male vs. female).", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8420874", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "Female GIST patients showed favorable survival time by SEER database", "row_count": 35, "column_count": 8}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Equilibrium comparison of baseline characteristics of GIST patients before and after propensity score matching. stratified by gender (male vs. female).", "rows": [["", "Before matching", "", "", "After matching", ""], ["Characteristics", "Male", "Female", "p", "", "Male", "Female", "p"], ["", "4,139 (51.8%)", "3,844 (48.2%)", "", "", "2,567 (50%)", "2,567 (50%)", ""], ["Tumor site", "", "", "0.054", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["Stomach", "2,192 (53.0%)", "2,188 (56.9%)", "", "", "1,467 (57.1%)", "1,467 (57.1%)", ""], ["Small intestine", "1,177 (28.4%)", "977 (25.4%)", "", "", "716 (27.9%)", "716 (27.9%)", ""], ["Rectum", "138 (3.3%)", "85 (2.2%)", "", "", "37 (1.4%)", "37 (1.4%)", ""], ["Colon", "112 (2.7%)", "107 (2.8%)", "", "", "40 (1.6%)", "40 (1.6%)", ""], ["Others", "520 (12.6%)", "487 (12.7%)", "", "", "307 (12.0%)", "307 (12.0%)", ""], ["Age", "", "", "<0.001", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["≤60", "1,958 (47.3%)", "1,607 (41.8%)", "", "", "1,259 (49.0%)", "1,259 (49.0%)", ""], [">60", "2,181 (52.7%)", "2,237 (58.2%)", "", "", "1,308 (51.0%)", "1,308 (51.0%)", ""], ["Therapy", "", "", "<0.001", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["Surgery", "3,190 (77.1%)", "3,086 (80.3%)", "", "", "2,090 (81.4%)", "2,090 (81.4%)", ""], ["No surgery", "911 (22.0%)", "731 (19.0%)", "", "", "473 (18.4%)", "473 (18.4%)", ""], ["Unknown", "38 (0.9%)", "27 (0.7%)", "", "", "4 (0.2%)", "4 (0.2%)", ""], ["Marital status", "", "", "<0.001", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["Married", "2,751 (66.5%)", "1,861 (48.4%)", "", "", "1,675 (65.3%)", "1,675 (65.3%)", ""], ["Widowed", "189 (4.6%)", "773 (20.1%)", "", "", "157 (6.1%)", "157 (6.1%)", ""], ["Single/unmarried", "678 (16.4%)", "636 (16.5%)", "", "", "438 (17.1%)", "438 (17.1%)", ""], ["Divorced/separated", "318 (7.7%)", "386 (10.0%)", "", "", "199 (7.8%)", "199 (7.8%)", ""], ["Unknown", "203 (4.9%)", "188 (4.9%)", "", "", "98 (3.8%)", "98 (3.8%)", ""], ["Race", "", "", "0.62", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["White", "2,891 (69.8%)", "2,578 (67.1%)", "", "", "1,849 (72.0%)", "1,849 (72.0%)", ""], ["Black", "680 (16.4%)", "729 (19.0%)", "", "", "399 (15.5%)", "399 (15.5%)", ""], ["Others", "568 (13.7%)", "537 (14.0%)", "", "", "319 (12.4%)", "319 (12.4%)", ""], ["Grade", "", "", "0.37", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["I/II", "715 (17.3%)", "765 (19.9%)", "", "", "467 (18.2%)", "467 (18.2%)", ""], ["III/IV", "482 (11.6%)", "387 (10.1%)", "", "", "230 (9.0%)", "230 (9.0%)", ""], ["Unknown", "2942 (71.1%)", "2692 (70.0%)", "", "", "1,870 (72.8%)", "1,870 (72.8%)", ""], ["Tumor size", "", "", "<0.001", "", "", "", "1.0"], ["≤2 cm", "203 (4.9%)", "276 (7.2%)", "", "", "121 (4.7%)", "121 (4.7%)", ""], ["2–5 cm", "717 (17.3%)", "775 (7.2%)", "", "", "480 (18.7%)", "480 (18.7%)", ""], ["5–10 cm", "933 (22.5%)", "870 (22.6%)", "", "", "578 (22.5%)", "578 (22.5%)", ""], [">10 cm", "2,286 (55.2%)", "1,923 (50.0%)", "", "", "1,388 (54.1%)", "1,388 (54.1%)", ""]], "row_count": 35, "column_count": 8, "numeric_cells": 124, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#table-2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34557343:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:ef1c6e111587440d7c2077ba931aaff76fd2f21b9b414cfd26606fd041b86cc9", "bytes": 719, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#table-3", "version": null, "note": "Co-relation analysis between featured lncRNA and clinical characteristics.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8420874", "section_index": 15, "section_title": "lncRNA Markers selection and associated expression pattern between four subtypes", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 8}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "Co-relation analysis between featured lncRNA and clinical characteristics.", "rows": [["Pearsoncorrelation", "LRRC75A-AS1", "HYMAI", "MALAT1", "NEAT1", "XIST", "FTX"], ["Age", "Coef.", "0.059", "0.163", "−0.314", "−0.424*", "0.179", "−0.244"], ["p", "0.747", "0.373", "0.080", "0.016", "0.327", "0.179"], ["Dimeter", "Coef.", "0.610**", "−0.580**", "0.171", "−0.415**", "−0.330**", "−0.439**"], ["p", "0.000", "0.000", "0.189", "0.001", "0.009", "0.000"], ["Group_k4", "Coef.", "0.711**", "−0.680**", "0.196", "−0.541**", "−0.646**", "−0.629**"], ["p", "0.000", "0.000", "0.130", "0.000", "0.000", "0.000"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 8, "numeric_cells": 37, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#table-3"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE17743 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE17743 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE20709 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE20709 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE8167 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE8167 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The survival rate of GIST patients from SEER stratified by gender were compared by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: log_rank_test."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE17743", "GSE8167", "GSE20709"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE17743", "GSE8167", "GSE20709"], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe raw data is available in the Supplemental File and at NCBI GEO: GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709."], "basis": "The paper names GSE17743, GSE8167, GSE20709 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34557343", "data:geo:GSE17743", "asset:table:pmid:34557343:1", "asset:table:pmid:34557343:2", "asset:table:pmid:34557343:3"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE17743"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:35:09Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 44188, "completion_tokens": 2480, "cached_tokens": 784}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34557343", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34557343"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34557343", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34557343 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE17743", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE17743"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34557343", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34557343"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34557343", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34557343 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE17743", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE17743"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34557343", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34557343"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE17743", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE17743"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34557343", "parent_hash": "sha256:988e52a1ba2d3576d4924055fd525f8c2382198e229c8fce6a0431e6ce658405", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE17743 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE17743 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE20709 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE20709 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE8167 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE8167 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Materials & Methods Microarray data processing and lncRNA profile mining Th", "Supplemental Information 1Case summary from microarray data GSE8167 and GSE17743.10.7717/peerj.1194", "(2016) and Zhang et al. (2012). Briefly, the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 probe set IDs were mapped t", "otated lncRNA transcripts with corresponding Affymetrix probe IDs were generated. Some lncRNA signat"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2851", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The survival rate of GIST patients from SEER stratified by gender were compared by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:42:46+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}