{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35372049", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:08866d3616e8b315fe7efdb6b54c8830e1c5dcffcec69473389ebcd5fd9c0993", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:14:11Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:06:14Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Establish of an Initial Platinum-Resistance Predictor in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients Regardless of Homologous Recombination Deficiency Status.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2022.847085", "pmid": "35372049", "authors": ["Yongmei Li", "Yufei Nie", "Hongyan Guo", "Hua Guo", "Chunfang Ha", "Yuan Li"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Backgrounds: Ovarian cancer (OC) is still the leading aggressive and lethal disease of gynecological cancers, and platinum-based regimes are the standard treatments. However, nearly 20%-30% of patients with OC are initial platinum resistant (IPR), and there is a lack of valid tools to predict whether they will be primary platinum resistant or not prior to chemotherapy.\nMethods: Transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was downloaded as the training data, and transcriptome data of GSE15622, GSE102073, GSE19829, and GSE26712 were retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) as the validation cohorts. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients from the training cohort, and multiple machine-learning algorithms [including random forest, XGboost, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression] were utilized to determine the candidate genes from DEGs. Then, we applied logistic regression to establish the IPR signature based on the expression. Finally, comprehensive clinical, genomic, and survival feature were analyzed to understand the application value of the established IPR signature.\nResults: A total of 532 DEGs were identified between platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive samples, and 11 of them were shared by these three-machine learning algorithms and utilized to construct an IPR prediction signature. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.841 and 0.796 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Notably, the prediction capacity of this signature was stable and robust regardless of the patients' homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and mutation burden status. Meanwhile, the genomic feature was concordant between samples with high- or low-IPR signature, except a significantly higher prevalence of gain at Chr19q.12 (regions including CCNE1) in the high-IPR signature samples. The efficacy of prediction of platinum resistance of IPR signature successfully transferred to the precise survival prediction, with the AUC of 0.71, 0.72, and 0.66 to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. At last, we found a significantly different tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes feature, including lower abundance of CD4+ naive T cells in the samples with high-IPR signature. A relatively lower tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) value and more sensitivity to multiple therapies including Gefitinib may suggest the potency to transfer from platinum-based therapy to immunotherapy or target therapies in patients with high-IPR signature.\nConclusion: Our study established an IPR signature based on the expression of 11 genes that could stably and robustly distinguish OC patients with IPR and/or poor outcomes, which may guide therapeutic regimes tailoring.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Next, by utilizing multivariate logistic regression analysis, an IPR prediction model was established, and the formula was as follow:", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35372049", "locator": "sections[13] \"Establishment of an IPR Signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Next, by utilizing multivariate logistic regression analysis, an IPR prediction model was established, and the formula was as follow:"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35372049", "locator": "sections[23] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The IPR signature predicted initial platinum resistance with AUC values of 0.841 and 0.796 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35372049", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.841 and 0.796 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The IPR signature predicted initial platinum resistance with AUC values of 0.841 and 0.796 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35372049"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE102073"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE102073"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35372049", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.847085", "sha256": "sha256:8d915c8c61dc03781bc224a473855319b9b7e281d87a898cddeea34315f0c4dc", "bytes": 50531, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2022.847085", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8971787", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE102073", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE102073", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE102073", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2722881", "GSM2722883", "GSM2722885", "GSM2722888", "GSM2722890", "GSM2722892", "GSM2722894", "GSM2722896", "GSM2722898", "GSM2722900", "GSM2722902", "GSM2722905", "GSM2722907", "GSM2722909", "GSM2722911", "GSM2722913", "GSM2722915", "GSM2722917", "GSM2722920", "GSM2722921", "GSM2722923", "GSM2722926", "GSM2722928", "GSM2722930", "GSM2722932", "GSM2722934", "GSM2722936", "GSM2722938", "GSM2722940", "GSM2722942", "GSM2722944", "GSM2722946", "GSM2722948", "GSM2722950", "GSM2722952", "GSM2722955", "GSM2722957", "GSM2722959", "GSM2722961", "GSM2722963", "GSM2722966", "GSM2722968", "GSM2722970", "GSM2722972", "GSM2722974", "GSM2722976", "GSM2722978", "GSM2722980", "GSM2722982", "GSM2722984", "GSM2722986", "GSM2722988", "GSM2722990", "GSM2722992", "GSM2722994", "GSM2722996", "GSM2722998", "GSM2723000", "GSM2723002", "GSM2723004", "GSM2723006", "GSM2723008", "GSM2723011", "GSM2723013", "GSM2723014", "GSM2723016", "GSM2723019", "GSM2723021", "GSM2723023", "GSM2723026", "GSM2723027", "GSM2723029", "GSM2723031", "GSM2723033", "GSM2723035", "GSM2723038", "GSM2723040", "GSM2723042", "GSM2723044", "GSM2723046", "GSM2723048", "GSM2723050", "GSM2723052", "GSM2723054", "GSM2723056"], "sample_count": 85, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "16791", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Molecular analysis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with and without associated serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma [RNA-Seq]", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T17:30:42Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE15622", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE15622", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE15622", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM391038", "GSM391039", "GSM391040", "GSM391041", "GSM391042", "GSM391043", "GSM391044", "GSM391045", "GSM391046", "GSM391047", "GSM391048", "GSM391049", "GSM391050", "GSM391051", "GSM391052", "GSM391053", "GSM391054", "GSM391055", "GSM391056", "GSM391057", "GSM391058", "GSM391059", "GSM391060", "GSM391061", "GSM391062", "GSM391063", "GSM391064", "GSM391065", "GSM391066", "GSM391067", "GSM391068", "GSM391069", "GSM391070", "GSM391071", "GSM391072", "GSM391073", "GSM391074", "GSM391075", "GSM391076", "GSM391077", "GSM391078", "GSM391079", "GSM391080", "GSM391081", "GSM391082", "GSM391083", "GSM391084", "GSM391085", "GSM391086", "GSM391087", "GSM391088", "GSM391089", "GSM391090", "GSM391091", "GSM391092", "GSM391093", "GSM391094", "GSM391095", "GSM391096", "GSM391097", "GSM391098", "GSM391099", "GSM391100", "GSM391101", "GSM391102", "GSM391103", "GSM391104", "GSM391105", "GSM391106"], "sample_count": 69, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "8414", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data from the CTCR-OV01 study", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:43Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE19829", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE19829", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE19829", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM495139", "GSM495140", "GSM495141", "GSM495142", "GSM495143", "GSM495144", "GSM495145", "GSM495146", "GSM495147", "GSM495148", "GSM495149", "GSM495150", "GSM495151", "GSM495152", "GSM495153", "GSM495154", "GSM495155", "GSM495156", "GSM495157", "GSM495158", "GSM495159", "GSM495160", "GSM495161", "GSM495162", "GSM495163", "GSM495164", "GSM495165", "GSM495166", "GSM495167", "GSM495168", "GSM495169", "GSM495170", "GSM495171", "GSM495172", "GSM495173", "GSM495174", "GSM495175", "GSM495176", "GSM495177", "GSM495178", "GSM495179", "GSM495180", "GSM495181", "GSM495182", "GSM495183", "GSM495184", "GSM495185", "GSM495186", "GSM495187", "GSM495188", "GSM495189", "GSM495190", "GSM495191", "GSM495192", "GSM495193", "GSM495194", "GSM495195", "GSM495196", "GSM495197", "GSM495198", "GSM495199", "GSM495200", "GSM495201", "GSM495202", "GSM495203", "GSM495204", "GSM495205", "GSM495206", "GSM495207", "GSM495208"], "sample_count": 70, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570;8300", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "A gene expression profile of BRCAness that is associated with outcome in ovarian cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE26712", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE26712", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE26712", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM657519", "GSM657520", "GSM657521", "GSM657522", "GSM657523", "GSM657524", "GSM657525", "GSM657526", "GSM657527", "GSM657528", "GSM657529", "GSM657530", "GSM657531", "GSM657532", "GSM657533", "GSM657534", "GSM657535", "GSM657536", "GSM657537", "GSM657538", "GSM657539", "GSM657540", "GSM657541", "GSM657542", "GSM657543", "GSM657544", "GSM657545", "GSM657546", "GSM657547", "GSM657548", "GSM657549", "GSM657550", "GSM657551", "GSM657552", "GSM657553", "GSM657554", "GSM657555", "GSM657556", "GSM657557", "GSM657558", "GSM657559", "GSM657560", "GSM657561", "GSM657562", "GSM657563", "GSM657564", "GSM657565", "GSM657566", "GSM657567", "GSM657568", "GSM657569", "GSM657570", "GSM657571", "GSM657572", "GSM657573", "GSM657574", "GSM657575", "GSM657576", "GSM657577", "GSM657578", "GSM657579", "GSM657580", "GSM657581", "GSM657582", "GSM657583", "GSM657584", "GSM657585", "GSM657586", "GSM657587", "GSM657588", "GSM657589", "GSM657590", "GSM657591", "GSM657592", "GSM657593", "GSM657594", "GSM657595", "GSM657596", "GSM657597", "GSM657598", "GSM657599", "GSM657600", "GSM657601", "GSM657602", "GSM657603", "GSM657604", "GSM657605", "GSM657606", "GSM657607", "GSM657608", "GSM657609", "GSM657610", "GSM657611", "GSM657612", "GSM657613", "GSM657614", "GSM657615", "GSM657616", "GSM657617", "GSM657618", "GSM657619", "GSM657620", "GSM657621", "GSM657622", "GSM657623", "GSM657624", "GSM657625", "GSM657626", "GSM657627", "GSM657628", "GSM657629", "GSM657630", "GSM657631", "GSM657632", "GSM657633", "GSM657634", "GSM657635", "GSM657636", "GSM657637", "GSM657638", "GSM657639", "GSM657640", "GSM657641", "GSM657642", "GSM657643", "GSM657644", "GSM657645", "GSM657646", "GSM657647", "GSM657648", "GSM657649", "GSM657650", "GSM657651", "GSM657652", "GSM657653", "GSM657654", "GSM657655", "GSM657656", "GSM657657", "GSM657658", "GSM657659", "GSM657660", "GSM657661", "GSM657662", "GSM657663", "GSM657664", "GSM657665", "GSM657666", "GSM657667", "GSM657668", "GSM657669", "GSM657670", "GSM657671", "GSM657672", "GSM657673", "GSM657674", "GSM657675", "GSM657676", "GSM657677", "GSM657678", "GSM657679", "GSM657680", "GSM657681", "GSM657682", "GSM657683", "GSM657684", "GSM657685", "GSM657686", "GSM657687", "GSM657688", "GSM657689", "GSM657690", "GSM657691", "GSM657692", "GSM657693", "GSM657694", "GSM657695", "GSM657696", "GSM657697", "GSM657698", "GSM657699", "GSM657700", "GSM657701", "GSM657702", "GSM657703", "GSM657704", "GSM657705", "GSM657706", "GSM657707", "GSM657708", "GSM657709", "GSM657710", "GSM657711", "GSM657712", "GSM657713"], "sample_count": 195, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "A Gene Signature Predicting for Survival in Suboptimally Debulked Patients with Ovarian Cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE102073 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE102073 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE15622 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE15622 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE19829 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE19829 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE26712 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE26712 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Next, by utilizing multivariate logistic regression analysis, an IPR prediction model was established, and the formula was as follow:"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Limma"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "gradient_boosting", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "XGboost"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: logistic."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE15622", "GSE102073", "GSE19829", "GSE26712"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE15622", "GSE102073", "GSE19829", "GSE26712"], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors."], "basis": "The paper names GSE15622, GSE102073, GSE19829, GSE26712 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35372049", "data:geo:GSE102073"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE102073"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:40:39Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14653, "completion_tokens": 1529, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35372049", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35372049"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35372049", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35372049 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE102073", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE102073"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35372049", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35372049"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35372049", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35372049 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE102073", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE102073"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35372049", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35372049"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE102073", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE102073"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35372049", "parent_hash": "sha256:7fb153834949a66a9a68db37a9220ad96b9c9f479f275c16b2a7d3c50ed7b1a0", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE102073 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE102073 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE15622 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE15622 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE19829 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE19829 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE26712 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE26712 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "regression_modelling", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Next, by utilizing multivariate logistic regression analysis, an IPR prediction model was established, and the formula was as follow:"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:39:28+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}