{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35935823", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:f78a701a11d604d7456756bf9d63ccc589b11e74711705f16696a5f2a9dcef93", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:15:02Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:28:34Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Development and validation of a hypoxia-stemness-based prognostic signature in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.3389/fphar.2022.939542", "pmid": "35935823", "authors": ["Xiong Tian", "Jing Zheng", "Wanlan Mou", "Guoguang Lu", "Shuaishuai Chen", "Juping Du", "Yufen Zheng", "Shiyong Chen", "Bo Shen", "Jun Li", "Na Wang"], "journal": "Frontiers in pharmacology", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is one of the most aggressive and fatal gastrointestinal malignancies with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed the clinical significance of the interaction between the hypoxic microenvironment and cancer stemness in pancreatic cancer progression and therapies. This study aims to identify a hypoxia-stemness index-related gene signature for risk stratification and prognosis prediction in PAAD. Methods: The mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) data of PAAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were calculated based on the one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine learning algorithm. Univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression analyses were then performed to establish a hypoxia-mRNAsi-related gene signature, and its prognostic performance was verified in both the TCGA-PAAD and GSE62452 corhorts by Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Additionally, we further validated the expression levels of signature genes using the TCGA, GTEx and HPA databases as well as qPCR experiments. Moreover, we constructed a prognostic nomogram incorporating the eight-gene signature and traditional clinical factors and analyzed the correlations of the risk score with immune infiltrates and immune checkpoint genes. Results: The mRNAsi values of PAAD samples were significantly higher than those of normal samples (p < 0.001), and PAAD patients with high mRNAsi values exhibited worse overall survival (OS). A novel prognostic risk model was successfully constructed based on the eight-gene signature comprising JMJD6, NDST1, ENO3, LDHA, TES, ANKZF1, CITED, and SIAH2, which could accurately predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of PAAD patients in both the training and external validation datasets. Additionally, the eight-gene signature could distinguish PAAD samples from normal samples and stratify PAAD patients into low- and high-risk groups with distinct OS. The risk score was closely correlated with immune cell infiltration patterns and immune checkpoint molecules. Moreover, calibration analysis showed the excellent predictive ability of the nomogram incorporating the eight-gene signature and traditional clinical factors. Conclusion: We developed a hypoxia-stemness-related prognostic signature that reliably predicts the OS of PAAD. Our findings may aid in the risk stratification and individual treatment of PAAD patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) data of PAAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were calculated based on the one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine learning algorithm.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35935823", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) data of PAAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were calculated based on the one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine learning algorithm."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35935823", "locator": "sections[27] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Time-dependent ROC analysis suggested that the AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.762–0.853), 0.784 (95% CI: 0.709–0.821), and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.685–0.767), respectively (Figure 4D), which confirmed the stability of the eight-gene signature in survival prediction for PAAD.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Time-dependent ROC analysis suggested that the AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.762–0.853), 0.784 (95% CI: 0.709–0.821), and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.685–0.767), respectively (Figure 4D), which confirmed the stability of the eight-gene signature in survival prediction for PAAD."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35935823", "locator": "sections[19] \"Internal and external validation of the predictive performance of the eight-gene signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Time-dependent ROC analysis suggested that the AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.762–0.853), 0.784 (95% CI: 0.709–0.821), and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.685–0.767), respectively (Figure 4D), which confirmed the stability of the eight-gene signature in survival prediction for PAAD."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:35935823", "locator": "sections[19] \"Internal and external validation of the predictive performance of the eight-gene signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a notable correlation between high risk scores and the dismal prognosis of PAAD patients in the TCGA dataset (Figure 4A)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Time-dependent ROC analysis suggested that the AUCs for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.762–0.853), 0.784 (95% CI: 0.709–0.821), and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.685–0.767), respectively (Figure 4D), which confirmed the stability of the eight-gene signature in survival prediction for PAAD.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35935823"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE62452"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE62452"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35935823", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.939542", "sha256": "sha256:79114d1a9ea73283c39bca0877b068408baf7139c9358ba6a53aef63b2a9c4c7", "bytes": 44093, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fphar.2022.939542", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9350896", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62452", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62452", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE62452", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1527105", "GSM1527106", "GSM1527107", "GSM1527108", "GSM1527109", "GSM1527110", "GSM1527111", "GSM1527112", "GSM1527113", "GSM1527114", "GSM1527115", "GSM1527116", "GSM1527117", "GSM1527118", "GSM1527119", "GSM1527120", "GSM1527121", "GSM1527122", "GSM1527123", "GSM1527124", "GSM1527125", "GSM1527126", "GSM1527127", "GSM1527128", "GSM1527129", "GSM1527130", "GSM1527131", "GSM1527132", "GSM1527133", "GSM1527134", "GSM1527135", "GSM1527136", "GSM1527137", "GSM1527138", "GSM1527139", "GSM1527140", "GSM1527141", "GSM1527142", "GSM1527143", "GSM1527144", "GSM1527145", "GSM1527146", "GSM1527147", "GSM1527148", "GSM1527149", "GSM1527150", "GSM1527151", "GSM1527152", "GSM1527153", "GSM1527154", "GSM1527155", "GSM1527156", "GSM1527157", "GSM1527158", "GSM1527159", "GSM1527160", "GSM1527161", "GSM1527162", "GSM1527163", "GSM1527164", "GSM1527165", "GSM1527166", "GSM1527167", "GSM1527168", "GSM1527169", "GSM1527170", "GSM1527171", "GSM1527172", "GSM1527173", "GSM1527174", "GSM1527175", "GSM1527176", "GSM1527177", "GSM1527178", "GSM1527179", "GSM1527180", "GSM1527181", "GSM1527182", "GSM1527183", "GSM1527184", "GSM1527185", "GSM1527186", "GSM1527187", "GSM1527188", "GSM1527189", "GSM1527190", "GSM1527191", "GSM1527192", "GSM1527193", "GSM1527194", "GSM1527195", "GSM1527196", "GSM1527197", "GSM1527198", "GSM1527199", "GSM1527200", "GSM1527201", "GSM1527202", "GSM1527203", "GSM1527204", "GSM1527205", "GSM1527206", "GSM1527207", "GSM1527208", "GSM1527209", "GSM1527210", "GSM1527211", "GSM1527212", "GSM1527213", "GSM1527214", "GSM1527215", "GSM1527216", "GSM1527217", "GSM1527218", "GSM1527219", "GSM1527220", "GSM1527221", "GSM1527222", "GSM1527223", "GSM1527224", "GSM1527225", "GSM1527226", "GSM1527227", "GSM1527228", "GSM1527229", "GSM1527230", "GSM1527231", "GSM1527232", "GSM1527233", "GSM1527234"], "sample_count": 130, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6244", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Microarray gene-expression profiles of 69 pancreatic tumors and 61 adjacent non-tumor tissue from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE62452 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE62452 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) data of PAAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were calculated based on the one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine learning algorithm."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Cox regression"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "cox_ph", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: logistic."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE62452"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE62452"], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."], "basis": "The paper names GSE62452 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35935823", "data:geo:GSE62452"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE62452"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:58:54Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12241, "completion_tokens": 3015, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35935823", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35935823"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35935823", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35935823 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62452", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE62452"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35935823", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35935823"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35935823", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35935823 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62452", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE62452"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35935823", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35935823"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE62452", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE62452"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35935823", "parent_hash": "sha256:c950fbf3a47806fb42a35916ea2d543ad63809f2df5e6fd6a76c6c3645b26969", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE62452 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE62452 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Ningbo, China). BxPC-3 and PANC-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone, United States) wi", "°C with 100% air. Meanwhile, HPNE cells were cultured in 70.5% glycoprival DMEM medium with 5% fetal"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2872", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "regression_modelling", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) data of PAAD samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were calculated based on the one-class logistic regression (OCLR) machine learning algorithm."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T03:12:31+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}