{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36178365", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:27ec91543a573ea9e4552a8ea26aa619b58cdc27c6d109aeb59e65ab061004d9", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:15:28Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:07:40Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Establishment and validation of individualized clinical prognostic markers for LUAD patients based on autophagy-related genes.", "doi": "10.18632/aging.204097", "pmid": "36178365", "authors": ["Yuchang Fei", "Junyi Xu", "Liping Ge", "Luting Chen", "Huan Yu", "Lei Pan", "Peifeng Chen"], "journal": "Aging", "year": 2022, "abstract": "There is considerable heterogeneity in the genomic drivers of lung adenocarcinoma, which has a dismal prognosis. Bioinformatics analysis was performed on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) datasets to establish a multi-autophagy gene model to predict patient prognosis. LUAD data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database as a training set to construct a LUAD prognostic model. According to the risk score, a Kaplan-Meier cumulative curve was plotted to evaluate the prognostic value. Furthermore, a nomogram was established to predict the three-year and five-year survival of patients with LUAD based on their prognostic characteristics. Two genes (ITGB1 and EIF2AK3) were identified in the autophagy-related prognostic model, and the multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that risk score was an independent predictor of prognosis in LUAD patients (HR=3.3, 95%CI= 2.3 to 4.6, P< 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative curve showed that low-risk patients had significantly better overall (P<0.0001). The validation dataset GSE68465 further confirmed the nomogram's robust ability to assess the prognosis of LUAD patients. A prognosis model of autophagy-related genes based on a LUAD dataset was constructed and exhibited diagnostic value in the prognosis of LUAD patients. Moreover, real-time qPCR confirmed the expression patterns of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1 in LUAD cell lines. Two key autophagy-related genes have been suggested as prognostic markers for lung adenocarcinoma.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that risk score was an independent prognostic marker for LUAD (HR =3.30, 95%CI = 2.3-4.6, P< 0.0001) (Figure 7B).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36178365", "locator": "sections[7] \"Autophagy-related genes as an independent prognostic factor for LUAD\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that risk score was an independent prognostic marker for LUAD (HR =3.30, 95%CI = 2.3-4.6, P< 0.0001) (Figure 7B)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "We obtained datasets from publicly available databases for this analysis. These data are available in the following databases: TCGA: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; GEO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; HADb: http://www.autophagy.lu/autophagy.html.\n\nIn addition to the gene expression data of LUAD downloaded from the TCGA database, the original data in this manuscript also included clinical data of TCGA-LUAD, and clinical data of the GSE68465 dataset in the GEO database, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found in the four documents of TCGA-LUAD Clinical Data, GEO68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36178365", "locator": "sections[22] \"Availability of data and materials\" paragraphs 1-3", "quote": "We obtained datasets from publicly available databases for this analysis. These data are available in the following databases: TCGA: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; GEO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; HADb: http://www.autophagy.lu/autophagy.html.\n\nIn addition to the gene expression data of LUAD downloaded from the TCGA database, the original data in this manuscript also included clinical data of TCGA-LUAD, and clinical data of the GSE68465 dataset in the GEO database, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found in the four documents of TCGA-LUAD Clinical Data, GEO68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Two genes (ITGB1 and EIF2AK3) were identified in the autophagy-related prognostic model, and the multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that risk score was an independent predictor of prognosis in LUAD patients (HR=3.3, 95%CI= 2.3 to 4.6, P< 0.0001).", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "source": "Two genes (ITGB1 and EIF2AK3) were identified in the autophagy-related prognostic model, and the multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that risk score was an independent predictor of prognosis in LUAD patients (HR=3.3, 95%CI= 2.3 to 4.6, P< 0.0001)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36178365", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Two genes (ITGB1 and EIF2AK3) were identified in the autophagy-related prognostic model, and the multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that risk score was an independent predictor of prognosis in LUAD patients (HR=3.3, 95%CI= 2.3 to 4.6, P< 0.0001)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Two genes (ITGB1 and EIF2AK3) were identified in the autophagy-related prognostic model, and the multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that risk score was an independent predictor of prognosis in LUAD patients (HR=3.3, 95%CI= 2.3 to 4.6, P< 0.0001).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36178365"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE68465"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE68465"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36178365", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204097", "sha256": "sha256:b0a435ca2c2c250e6cb6b06b618c88f700ab6233d960a4b4da647147c319d32c", "bytes": 36957, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.18632/aging.204097", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9550247", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE68465", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE68465", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE68465", "version": null, "note": "We obtained datasets from publicly available databases for this analysis. These data are available in the following databases: TCGA: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; GEO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; HADb: http://www.autophagy.lu/autophagy.html.\n\nIn addition to the gene expression data of LUAD downloaded from the TCGA database, the original data in this manuscript also included clinical data of TCGA-LUAD, and clinical data of the GSE68465 dataset in the GEO database, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found in the four documents of TCGA-LUAD Clinical Data, GEO68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "We obtained datasets from publicly available databases for this analysis. These data are available in the following databases: TCGA: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; GEO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; HADb: http://www.autophagy.lu/autophagy.html.\n\nIn addition to the gene expression data of LUAD downloaded from the TCGA database, the original data in this manuscript also included clinical data of TCGA-LUAD, and clinical data of the GSE68465 dataset in the GEO database, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found in the four documents of TCGA-LUAD Clinical Data, GEO68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1672281", "GSM1672282", "GSM1672283", "GSM1672284", "GSM1672285", "GSM1672286", "GSM1672287", "GSM1672288", "GSM1672289", "GSM1672290", "GSM1672291", "GSM1672292", "GSM1672293", "GSM1672294", "GSM1672295", "GSM1672296", "GSM1672297", "GSM1672298", "GSM1672299", "GSM1672300", "GSM1672301", "GSM1672302", "GSM1672303", "GSM1672304", "GSM1672305", "GSM1672306", "GSM1672307", "GSM1672308", "GSM1672309", "GSM1672310", "GSM1672311", "GSM1672312", "GSM1672313", "GSM1672314", "GSM1672315", "GSM1672316", "GSM1672317", "GSM1672318", "GSM1672319", "GSM1672320", "GSM1672321", "GSM1672322", "GSM1672323", "GSM1672324", "GSM1672325", "GSM1672326", "GSM1672327", "GSM1672328", "GSM1672329", "GSM1672330", "GSM1672331", "GSM1672332", "GSM1672333", "GSM1672334", "GSM1672335", "GSM1672336", "GSM1672337", "GSM1672338", "GSM1672339", "GSM1672340", "GSM1672341", "GSM1672342", "GSM1672343", "GSM1672344", "GSM1672345", "GSM1672346", "GSM1672347", "GSM1672348", "GSM1672349", "GSM1672350", "GSM1672351", "GSM1672352", "GSM1672353", "GSM1672354", "GSM1672355", "GSM1672356", "GSM1672357", "GSM1672358", "GSM1672359", "GSM1672360", "GSM1672361", "GSM1672362", "GSM1672363", "GSM1672364", "GSM1672365", "GSM1672366", "GSM1672367", "GSM1672368", "GSM1672369", "GSM1672370", "GSM1672371", "GSM1672372", "GSM1672373", "GSM1672374", "GSM1672375", "GSM1672376", "GSM1672377", "GSM1672378", "GSM1672379", "GSM1672380", "GSM1672381", "GSM1672382", "GSM1672383", "GSM1672384", "GSM1672385", "GSM1672386", "GSM1672387", "GSM1672388", "GSM1672389", "GSM1672390", "GSM1672391", "GSM1672392", "GSM1672393", "GSM1672394", "GSM1672395", "GSM1672396", "GSM1672397", "GSM1672398", "GSM1672399", "GSM1672400", "GSM1672401", "GSM1672402", "GSM1672403", "GSM1672404", "GSM1672405", "GSM1672406", "GSM1672407", "GSM1672408", "GSM1672409", "GSM1672410", "GSM1672411", "GSM1672412", "GSM1672413", "GSM1672414", "GSM1672415", "GSM1672416", "GSM1672417", "GSM1672418", "GSM1672419", "GSM1672420", "GSM1672421", "GSM1672422", "GSM1672423", "GSM1672424", "GSM1672425", "GSM1672426", "GSM1672427", "GSM1672428", "GSM1672429", "GSM1672430", "GSM1672431", "GSM1672432", "GSM1672433", "GSM1672434", "GSM1672435", "GSM1672436", "GSM1672437", "GSM1672438", "GSM1672439", "GSM1672440", "GSM1672441", "GSM1672442", "GSM1672443", "GSM1672444", "GSM1672445", "GSM1672446", "GSM1672447", "GSM1672448", "GSM1672449", "GSM1672450", "GSM1672451", "GSM1672452", "GSM1672453", "GSM1672454", "GSM1672455", "GSM1672456", "GSM1672457", "GSM1672458", "GSM1672459", "GSM1672460", "GSM1672461", "GSM1672462", "GSM1672463", "GSM1672464", "GSM1672465", "GSM1672466", "GSM1672467", "GSM1672468", "GSM1672469", "GSM1672470", "GSM1672471", "GSM1672472", "GSM1672473", "GSM1672474", "GSM1672475", "GSM1672476", "GSM1672477", "GSM1672478", "GSM1672479", "GSM1672480", "GSM1672481", "GSM1672482", "GSM1672483", "GSM1672484", "GSM1672485", "GSM1672486", "GSM1672487", "GSM1672488", "GSM1672489", "GSM1672490", "GSM1672491", "GSM1672492", "GSM1672493", "GSM1672494", "GSM1672495", "GSM1672496", "GSM1672497", "GSM1672498", "GSM1672499", "GSM1672500", "GSM1672501", "GSM1672502", "GSM1672503", "GSM1672504", "GSM1672505", "GSM1672506", "GSM1672507", "GSM1672508", "GSM1672509", "GSM1672510", "GSM1672511", "GSM1672512", "GSM1672513", "GSM1672514", "GSM1672515", "GSM1672516", "GSM1672517", "GSM1672518", "GSM1672519", "GSM1672520", "GSM1672521", "GSM1672522", "GSM1672523", "GSM1672524", "GSM1672525", "GSM1672526", "GSM1672527", "GSM1672528", "GSM1672529", "GSM1672530", "GSM1672531", "GSM1672532", "GSM1672533", "GSM1672534", "GSM1672535", "GSM1672536", "GSM1672537", "GSM1672538", "GSM1672539", "GSM1672540", "GSM1672541", "GSM1672542", "GSM1672543", "GSM1672544", "GSM1672545", "GSM1672546", "GSM1672547", "GSM1672548", "GSM1672549", "GSM1672550", "GSM1672551", "GSM1672552", "GSM1672553", "GSM1672554", "GSM1672555", "GSM1672556", "GSM1672557", "GSM1672558", "GSM1672559", "GSM1672560", "GSM1672561", "GSM1672562", "GSM1672563", "GSM1672564", "GSM1672565", "GSM1672566", "GSM1672567", "GSM1672568", "GSM1672569", "GSM1672570", "GSM1672571", "GSM1672572", "GSM1672573", "GSM1672574", "GSM1672575", "GSM1672576", "GSM1672577", "GSM1672578", "GSM1672579", "GSM1672580", "GSM1672581", "GSM1672582", "GSM1672583", "GSM1672584", "GSM1672585", "GSM1672586", "GSM1672587", "GSM1672588", "GSM1672589", "GSM1672590", "GSM1672591", "GSM1672592", "GSM1672593", "GSM1672594", "GSM1672595", "GSM1672596", "GSM1672597", "GSM1672598", "GSM1672599", "GSM1672600", "GSM1672601", "GSM1672602", "GSM1672603", "GSM1672604", "GSM1672605", "GSM1672606", "GSM1672607", "GSM1672608", "GSM1672609", "GSM1672610", "GSM1672611", "GSM1672612", "GSM1672613", "GSM1672614", "GSM1672615", "GSM1672616", "GSM1672617", "GSM1672618", "GSM1672619", "GSM1672620", "GSM1672621", "GSM1672622", "GSM1672623", "GSM1672624", "GSM1672625", "GSM1672626", "GSM1672627", "GSM1672628", "GSM1672629", "GSM1672630", "GSM1672631", "GSM1672632", "GSM1672633", "GSM1672634", "GSM1672635", "GSM1672636", "GSM1672637", "GSM1672638", "GSM1672639", "GSM1672640", "GSM1672641", "GSM1672642", "GSM1672643", "GSM1672644", "GSM1672645", "GSM1672646", "GSM1672647", "GSM1672648", "GSM1672649", "GSM1672650", "GSM1672651", "GSM1672652", "GSM1672653", "GSM1672654", "GSM1672655", "GSM1672656", "GSM1672657", "GSM1672658", "GSM1672659", "GSM1672660", "GSM1672661", "GSM1672662", "GSM1672663", "GSM1672664", "GSM1672665", "GSM1672666", "GSM1672667", "GSM1672668", "GSM1672669", "GSM1672670", "GSM1672671", "GSM1672672", "GSM1672673", "GSM1672674", "GSM1672675", "GSM1672676", "GSM1672677", "GSM1672678", "GSM1672679", "GSM1672680", "GSM1672681", "GSM1672682", "GSM1672683", "GSM1672684", "GSM1672685", "GSM1672686", "GSM1672687", "GSM1672688", "GSM1672689", "GSM1672690", "GSM1672691", "GSM1672692", "GSM1672693", "GSM1672694", "GSM1672695", "GSM1672696", "GSM1672697", "GSM1672698", "GSM1672699", "GSM1672700", "GSM1672701", "GSM1672702", "GSM1672703", "GSM1672704", "GSM1672705", "GSM1672706", "GSM1672707", "GSM1672708", "GSM1672709", "GSM1672710", "GSM1672711", "GSM1672712", "GSM1672713", "GSM1672714", "GSM1672715", "GSM1672716", "GSM1672717", "GSM1672718", "GSM1672719", "GSM1672720", "GSM1672721", "GSM1672722", "GSM1672723", "GSM1672724", "GSM1672725", "GSM1672726", "GSM1672727", "GSM1672728", "GSM1672729", "GSM1672730", "GSM1672731", "GSM1672732", "GSM1672733", "GSM1672734", "GSM1672735", "GSM1672736", "GSM1672737", "GSM1672738", "GSM1672739", "GSM1672740", "GSM1672741", "GSM1672742"], "sample_count": 462, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "caArray_jacob-00182: Gene expression-based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE68465 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE68465 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that risk score was an independent prognostic marker for LUAD (HR =3.30, 95%CI = 2.3-4.6, P< 0.0001) (Figure 7B)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "model_calibration", "specific": "decision_curve", "label": "Model calibration / clinical utility", "dsl_operations": ["calibration_bins", "net_benefit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictions_and_outcomes"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Decision Curve Analysis"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "calibration_bins", "expected_value": 95.0, "unit": "per cent", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}, {"id": "target-published-estimate-hazard-ratio", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "calibration_bins", "expected_value": 3.3, "unit": "hazard ratio", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}, {"id": "target-published-estimate-p-value", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "calibration_bins", "expected_value": 0.0001, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE68465"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE68465"], "statements": ["We obtained datasets from publicly available databases for this analysis. These data are available in the following databases: TCGA: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; GEO: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; HADb: http://www.autophagy.lu/autophagy.html.\n\nIn addition to the gene expression data of LUAD downloaded from the TCGA database, the original data in this manuscript also included clinical data of TCGA-LUAD, and clinical data of the GSE68465 dataset in the GEO database, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found in the four documents of TCGA-LUAD Clinical Data, GEO68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials."], "basis": "The paper names GSE68465 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36178365", "data:geo:GSE68465"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE68465"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:07:18Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10493, "completion_tokens": 2262, "cached_tokens": 265}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36178365", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36178365"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36178365", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36178365 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE68465", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE68465"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36178365", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36178365"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36178365", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36178365 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE68465", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE68465"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36178365", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36178365"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE68465", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE68465"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36178365", "parent_hash": "sha256:f0a87d00c5207ca15cbd74ebfe01f7af147d468b1b6b5cc613aba849f902eb8e", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE68465 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE68465 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["gnosis of LUAD patients. Moreover, real-time qPCR confirmed the expression patterns of EIF2AK3", "e, collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found", "collation of autophagy-related genes, and RT-qPCR data of EIF2AK3 and ITGB1. They can be found", "68465 Clinical Data, Autophagy Genes, and RT-qPCR Data in the Supplementary Materials. Supplem"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1394", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model showed that risk score was an independent prognostic marker for LUAD (HR =3.30, 95%CI = 2.3-4.6, P< 0.0001) (Figure 7B)."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:48:44+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}