{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36237271", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:ec0d50d3306dbf8bba35727c48c35ddfcd4786c3cd8dbfade66e4500dd4a5187", "created_at": "2026-11-01T18:15:36Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:29:12Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Construction and validation of prognostic prediction established on N6-methyladenosine related genes in cervical squamous cell carcinoma.", "doi": "10.21037/tcr-22-881", "pmid": "36237271", "authors": ["Danxia Chen", "Wenhao Guo", "Hailan Yu", "Jianhua Yang"], "journal": "Translational cancer research", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Cervical cancer (CESC) is the second most common cancer death in middle-aged women. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) plays an essential role in the epitranscriptomics of cancer and affects immune cell infiltration. Our study used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data to construct and validate prognostic prediction established on m6A-related genes in CESC.\nMethods: We gained gene expression and clinical characteristics from TCGA and GEO. After differentially expression analysis of the m6A-related genes, we identified eight genes of CESC development. Next, we executed consensus clustering to analyze CESC types established on the differential expression of the m6A-related genes and found different subtypes significantly correlate with survival prognosis, immune microenvironment, and PD-L1 expression. Then, based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis, a five-gene (IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2, HNRNPA2B1, YTHDF1, RBM15) predictive model was built in the TCGA training cohort. Finally, we checked the predictive model with survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve both in the training cohort (TCGA) and in the validation cohort (GSE44001). We found the expression and variation of the five genes significantly correlate with immune cell infiltration.\nResults: The CESC could be divided into subtypes according to eight expression m6A-related genes. Different subtypes are related to various immune cells, immune scores, and the expression of the PD-L1. We develop a risk prediction model: risk score = (0.023558929) * Exp IGF2BP1 + (0.021148829) * Exp IGF2BP2 + (0.045035491) * Exp HNRNPA2B1 + (-0.106566550) * Exp YTHDF1 + (-0.001037932) * Exp RBM15. Moreover, different m6A-related genes significantly correlated with immune cells.\nConclusions: The m6A-related genes risk prediction model plays an essential role in predicting CESC patients. The m6A-related genes affected the immune cell infiltration in CESC. These results suggest that the expression of m6A-related genes may influence the immune therapy of CESC and be the potential therapeutic target.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We used LASSO Cox regression analysis to calculate the 8 DE m6A genes (Figure 6A,6B).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36237271", "locator": "sections[15] \"Development of a predictive risk prediction model with DE m6A genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We used LASSO Cox regression analysis to calculate the 8 DE m6A genes (Figure 6A,6B)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36237271", "locator": "sections[19] \"Supplementary\" paragraphs 1-3", "quote": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The study developed and validated a five-gene m6A-related risk prediction model for cervical cancer.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36237271", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We develop a risk prediction model: risk score = (0.023558929) * Exp IGF2BP1 + (0.021148829) * Exp IGF2BP2 + (0.045035491) * Exp HNRNPA2B1 + (−0.106566550) * Exp YTHDF1 + (−0.001037932) * Exp RBM15."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The study developed and validated a five-gene m6A-related risk prediction model for cervical cancer.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36237271"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE44001"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE44001"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36237271", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-881", "sha256": "sha256:5e2a9ffa41817ca8b9bb6282695a3c5bf5cb88141f9b3206d405db73248aa39f", "bytes": 36973, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/tcr-22-881", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9552080", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE44001", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE44001", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE44001", "version": null, "note": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1076341", "GSM1076342", "GSM1076343", "GSM1076344", "GSM1076345", "GSM1076346", "GSM1076347", "GSM1076348", "GSM1076349", "GSM1076350", "GSM1076351", "GSM1076352", "GSM1076353", "GSM1076354", "GSM1076355", "GSM1076356", "GSM1076357", "GSM1076358", "GSM1076359", "GSM1076360", "GSM1076361", "GSM1076362", "GSM1076363", "GSM1076364", "GSM1076365", "GSM1076366", "GSM1076367", "GSM1076368", "GSM1076369", "GSM1076370", "GSM1076371", "GSM1076372", "GSM1076373", "GSM1076374", "GSM1076375", "GSM1076376", "GSM1076377", "GSM1076378", "GSM1076379", "GSM1076380", "GSM1076381", "GSM1076382", "GSM1076383", "GSM1076384", "GSM1076385", "GSM1076386", "GSM1076387", "GSM1076388", "GSM1076389", "GSM1076390", "GSM1076391", "GSM1076392", "GSM1076393", "GSM1076394", "GSM1076395", "GSM1076396", "GSM1076397", "GSM1076398", "GSM1076399", "GSM1076400", "GSM1076401", "GSM1076402", "GSM1076403", "GSM1076404", "GSM1076405", "GSM1076406", "GSM1076407", "GSM1076408", "GSM1076409", "GSM1076410", "GSM1076411", "GSM1076412", "GSM1076413", "GSM1076414", "GSM1076415", "GSM1076416", "GSM1076417", "GSM1076418", "GSM1076419", "GSM1076420", "GSM1076421", "GSM1076422", "GSM1076423", "GSM1076424", "GSM1076425", "GSM1076426", "GSM1076427", "GSM1076428", "GSM1076429", "GSM1076430", "GSM1076431", "GSM1076432", "GSM1076433", "GSM1076434", "GSM1076435", "GSM1076436", "GSM1076437", "GSM1076438", "GSM1076439", "GSM1076440", "GSM1076441", "GSM1076442", "GSM1076443", "GSM1076444", "GSM1076445", "GSM1076446", "GSM1076447", "GSM1076448", "GSM1076449", "GSM1076450", "GSM1076451", "GSM1076452", "GSM1076453", "GSM1076454", "GSM1076455", "GSM1076456", "GSM1076457", "GSM1076458", "GSM1076459", "GSM1076460", "GSM1076461", "GSM1076462", "GSM1076463", "GSM1076464", "GSM1076465", "GSM1076466", "GSM1076467", "GSM1076468", "GSM1076469", "GSM1076470", "GSM1076471", "GSM1076472", "GSM1076473", "GSM1076474", "GSM1076475", "GSM1076476", "GSM1076477", "GSM1076478", "GSM1076479", "GSM1076480", "GSM1076481", "GSM1076482", "GSM1076483", "GSM1076484", "GSM1076485", "GSM1076486", "GSM1076487", "GSM1076488", "GSM1076489", "GSM1076490", "GSM1076491", "GSM1076492", "GSM1076493", "GSM1076494", "GSM1076495", "GSM1076496", "GSM1076497", "GSM1076498", "GSM1076499", "GSM1076500", "GSM1076501", "GSM1076502", "GSM1076503", "GSM1076504", "GSM1076505", "GSM1076506", "GSM1076507", "GSM1076508", "GSM1076509", "GSM1076510", "GSM1076511", "GSM1076512", "GSM1076513", "GSM1076514", "GSM1076515", "GSM1076516", "GSM1076517", "GSM1076518", "GSM1076519", "GSM1076520", "GSM1076521", "GSM1076522", "GSM1076523", "GSM1076524", "GSM1076525", "GSM1076526", "GSM1076527", "GSM1076528", "GSM1076529", "GSM1076530", "GSM1076531", "GSM1076532", "GSM1076533", "GSM1076534", "GSM1076535", "GSM1076536", "GSM1076537", "GSM1076538", "GSM1076539", "GSM1076540", "GSM1076541", "GSM1076542", "GSM1076543", "GSM1076544", "GSM1076545", "GSM1076546", "GSM1076547", "GSM1076548", "GSM1076549", "GSM1076550", "GSM1076551", "GSM1076552", "GSM1076553", "GSM1076554", "GSM1076555", "GSM1076556", "GSM1076557", "GSM1076558", "GSM1076559", "GSM1076560", "GSM1076561", "GSM1076562", "GSM1076563", "GSM1076564", "GSM1076565", "GSM1076566", "GSM1076567", "GSM1076568", "GSM1076569", "GSM1076570", "GSM1076571", "GSM1076572", "GSM1076573", "GSM1076574", "GSM1076575", "GSM1076576", "GSM1076577", "GSM1076578", "GSM1076579", "GSM1076580", "GSM1076581", "GSM1076582", "GSM1076583", "GSM1076584", "GSM1076585", "GSM1076586", "GSM1076587", "GSM1076588", "GSM1076589", "GSM1076590", "GSM1076591", "GSM1076592", "GSM1076593", "GSM1076594", "GSM1076595", "GSM1076596", "GSM1076597", "GSM1076598", "GSM1076599", "GSM1076600", "GSM1076601", "GSM1076602", "GSM1076603", "GSM1076604", "GSM1076605", "GSM1076606", "GSM1076607", "GSM1076608", "GSM1076609", "GSM1076610", "GSM1076611", "GSM1076612", "GSM1076613", "GSM1076614", "GSM1076615", "GSM1076616", "GSM1076617", "GSM1076618", "GSM1076619", "GSM1076620", "GSM1076621", "GSM1076622", "GSM1076623", "GSM1076624", "GSM1076625", "GSM1076626", "GSM1076627", "GSM1076628", "GSM1076629", "GSM1076630", "GSM1076631", "GSM1076632", "GSM1076633", "GSM1076634", "GSM1076635", "GSM1076636", "GSM1076637", "GSM1076638", "GSM1076639", "GSM1076640"], "sample_count": 300, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "14951", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Genetic profiling to predict recurrence of early cervical cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE7803", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7803", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE7803", "version": null, "note": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM189381", "GSM189382", "GSM189383", "GSM189384", "GSM189385", "GSM189386", "GSM189387", "GSM189388", "GSM189389", "GSM189390", "GSM189391", "GSM189392", "GSM189393", "GSM189394", "GSM189395", "GSM189396", "GSM189397", "GSM189398", "GSM189399", "GSM189400", "GSM189401", "GSM189402", "GSM189403", "GSM189404", "GSM189405", "GSM189406", "GSM189407", "GSM189408", "GSM189409", "GSM189410", "GSM189411", "GSM189412", "GSM189413", "GSM189414", "GSM189415", "GSM189416", "GSM189417", "GSM189418", "GSM189419", "GSM189420", "GSM189421"], "sample_count": 41, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Human pre-invasive and invasive cervical squamous cell carcinomas and normal cervical epithelia", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE44001 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE44001 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE7803 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE7803 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We used LASSO Cox regression analysis to calculate the 8 DE m6A genes (Figure 6A,6B)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "chi-square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE44001", "GSE7803"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE44001", "GSE7803"], "statements": ["The article’s supplementary files as\n10.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-88110.21037/tcr-22-881"], "basis": "The paper names GSE44001, GSE7803 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36237271", "data:geo:GSE44001"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE44001"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:10:42Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 11443, "completion_tokens": 1838, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36237271", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36237271"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36237271", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36237271 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE44001", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE44001"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36237271", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36237271"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36237271", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36237271 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE44001", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE44001"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36237271", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36237271"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE44001", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE44001"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36237271", "parent_hash": "sha256:2aa09777edd965794fde87f3c8826e8ea81292087e6548321765d165479921c4", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE44001 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE44001 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE7803 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE7803 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["We used LASSO Cox regression analysis to calculate the 8 DE m6A genes (Figure 6A,6B)."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:19:43+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}