{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36506325", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:5ab799a3ac8261da06794961d019d34f71babdf3ae55cb3834263eaaeeb624eb", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:00Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:08:18Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Construction of the model for predicting prognosis by key genes regulating EGFR-TKI resistance.", "doi": "10.3389/fgene.2022.968376", "pmid": "36506325", "authors": ["Jinke Zhuge", "Xiuqing Wang", "Jingtai Li", "Tongyuan Wang", "Hongkang Wang", "Mingxing Yang", "Wen Dong", "Yong Gao"], "journal": "Frontiers in genetics", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Previous studies have suggested that patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) will significantly benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, many LUAD patients will develop resistance to EGFR-TKI. Thus, our study aims to develop models to predict EGFR-TKI resistance and the LUAD prognosis. Methods: Two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE31625 and GSE34228) were used as the discovery datasets to find the common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in EGFR-TKI resistant LUAD profiles. The association of these common DEGs with LUAD prognosis was investigated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Moreover, we constructed the risk score for prognosis prediction of LUAD by LASSO analysis. The performance of the risk score for predicting LUAD prognosis was calculated using an independent dataset (GSE37745). A random forest model by risk score genes was trained in the training dataset, and the diagnostic ability for distinguishing sensitive and EGFR-TKI resistant samples was validated in the internal testing dataset and external testing datasets (GSE122005, GSE80344, and GSE123066). Results: From the discovery datasets, 267 common upregulated genes and 374 common downregulated genes were identified. Among these common DEGs, there were 59 genes negatively associated with prognosis, while 21 genes exhibited positive correlations with prognosis. Eight genes (ABCC2, ARL2BP, DKK1, FUT1, LRFN4, PYGL, SMNDC1, and SNAI2) were selected to construct the risk score signature. In both the discovery and independent validation datasets, LUAD patients with the higher risk score had a poorer prognosis. The nomogram based on risk score showed good performance in prognosis prediction with a C-index of 0.77. The expression levels of ABCC2, ARL2BP, DKK1, LRFN4, PYGL, SMNDC1, and SNAI2 were positively related to the resistance of EGFR-TKI. However, the expression level of FUT1 was favorably correlated with EGFR-TKI responsiveness. The RF model worked wonderfully for distinguishing sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI samples in the internal and external testing datasets, with predictive area under the curves (AUC) of 0.973 and 0.817, respectively. Conclusion: Our investigation revealed eight genes associated with EGFR-TKI resistance and provided models for EGFR-TKI resistance and prognosis prediction in LUAD patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Then, based on the eight genes, we constructed a random forest model by the “caret” R package (Kuhn, 2008) to distinguish sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI patients on the training dataset.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36506325", "locator": "sections[9] \"2.7 Construction and validation of the random forest model to distinguish sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI patients\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Then, based on the eight genes, we constructed a random forest model by the “caret” R package (Kuhn, 2008) to distinguish sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI patients on the training dataset."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36506325", "locator": "sections[24] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "A random forest model based on eight genes distinguished EGFR-TKI-sensitive from EGFR-TKI-resistant samples with an AUC of 0.973 in internal testing and 0.817 in external testing.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36506325", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The RF model worked wonderfully for distinguishing sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI samples in the internal and external testing datasets, with predictive area under the curves (AUC) of 0.973 and 0.817, respectively."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "A random forest model based on eight genes distinguished EGFR-TKI-sensitive from EGFR-TKI-resistant samples with an AUC of 0.973 in internal testing and 0.817 in external testing.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36506325"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE122005"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:machine_learning_random_forest", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE122005"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36506325", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.968376", "sha256": "sha256:4c1ec39ad4e0e50e902cb646bb7880cddbc2aee0d693166150f993851c5c3e04", "bytes": 33533, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fgene.2022.968376", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9732098", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE122005", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE122005", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE122005", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3452888", "GSM3452889", "GSM3452890", "GSM3452891", "GSM3452892", "GSM3452893"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Activation of IGFBP7 Drives Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in Lung Cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE123066", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE123066", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE123066", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3494550", "GSM3494551", "GSM3494552", "GSM3494553", "GSM3494554", "GSM3494555", "GSM3494556", "GSM3494557", "GSM3494558"], "sample_count": 9, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "10904", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Transcriptomic analysis of gefitinib-resistant EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE31625", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE31625", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE31625", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM785569", "GSM785570", "GSM785571", "GSM785572", "GSM785573", "GSM785574", "GSM785575", "GSM785576", "GSM785577", "GSM785578", "GSM785579", "GSM785580", "GSM785581", "GSM785582", "GSM785583", "GSM785584", "GSM785585", "GSM785586", "GSM785587", "GSM785588", "GSM785589", "GSM785590", "GSM785591", "GSM785592", "GSM785593", "GSM785594", "GSM785595", "GSM785596", "GSM785597", "GSM785598", "GSM785599", "GSM785600", "GSM785601", "GSM785602", "GSM785603", "GSM785604", "GSM785605", "GSM785606", "GSM785607", "GSM785608", "GSM785609", "GSM785610", "GSM785611", "GSM785612", "GSM785613", "GSM785614", "GSM785615", "GSM785616"], "sample_count": 48, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene Expression Patterns that Predict Sensitivity to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Cell Lines and Human Lung Tumors", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE34228", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE34228", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE34228", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM844917", "GSM844918", "GSM844919", "GSM844920", "GSM844921", "GSM844922", "GSM844923", "GSM844924", "GSM844925", "GSM844926", "GSM844927", "GSM844928", "GSM844929", "GSM844930", "GSM844931", "GSM844932", "GSM844933", "GSM844934", "GSM844935", "GSM844936", "GSM844937", "GSM844938", "GSM844939", "GSM844940", "GSM844941", "GSM844942", "GSM844943", "GSM844944", "GSM844945", "GSM844946", "GSM844947", "GSM844948", "GSM844949", "GSM844950", "GSM844951", "GSM844952", "GSM844953", "GSM844954", "GSM844955", "GSM844956", "GSM844957", "GSM844958", "GSM844959", "GSM844960", "GSM844961", "GSM844962", "GSM844963", "GSM844964", "GSM844965", "GSM844966", "GSM844967", "GSM844968", "GSM844969", "GSM844970", "GSM844971", "GSM844972", "GSM844973", "GSM844974", "GSM844975", "GSM844976", "GSM844977", "GSM844978", "GSM844979", "GSM844980", "GSM844981", "GSM844982", "GSM844983", "GSM844984", "GSM844985", "GSM844986", "GSM844987", "GSM844988", "GSM844989", "GSM844990", "GSM844991", "GSM844992", "GSM844993", "GSM844994", "GSM844995", "GSM844996", "GSM844997", "GSM844998", "GSM844999", "GSM845000", "GSM845001", "GSM845002", "GSM845003", "GSM845004", "GSM845005", "GSM845006", "GSM845007", "GSM845008", "GSM845009", "GSM845010", "GSM845011", "GSM845012", "GSM845013", "GSM845014", "GSM845015", "GSM845016", "GSM845017", "GSM845018", "GSM845019", "GSM845020", "GSM845021", "GSM845022", "GSM845023", "GSM845024", "GSM845025", "GSM845026", "GSM845027", "GSM845028", "GSM845029", "GSM845030", "GSM845031", "GSM845032", "GSM845033", "GSM845034", "GSM845035", "GSM845036", "GSM845037", "GSM845038", "GSM845039", "GSM845040", "GSM845041", "GSM845042", "GSM845043", "GSM845044", "GSM845045", "GSM845046", "GSM845047", "GSM845048", "GSM845049", "GSM845050", "GSM845051", "GSM845052", "GSM845053", "GSM845054", "GSM845055", "GSM845056", "GSM845057", "GSM845058", "GSM845059", "GSM845060", "GSM845061", "GSM845062", "GSM845063", "GSM845064", "GSM845065", "GSM845066", "GSM845067", "GSM845068", "GSM845069", "GSM845070", "GSM845071", "GSM845072", "GSM845073", "GSM845074", "GSM845075", "GSM845076", "GSM845077", "GSM845078", "GSM845079", "GSM845080", "GSM845081", "GSM845082", "GSM845083", "GSM845084", "GSM845085", "GSM845086", "GSM845087", "GSM845088", "GSM845089", "GSM845090", "GSM845091", "GSM845092", "GSM845093", "GSM845094", "GSM845095", "GSM845096", "GSM845097", "GSM845098", "GSM845099", "GSM845100", "GSM845101", "GSM845102", "GSM845103", "GSM845104", "GSM845105", "GSM845106", "GSM845107", "GSM845108", "GSM845109", "GSM845110", "GSM845111", "GSM845112", "GSM845113", "GSM845114", "GSM845115", "GSM845116", "GSM845117", "GSM845118", "GSM845119", "GSM845120", "GSM845121", "GSM845122", "GSM845123", "GSM845124"], "sample_count": 208, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "4133", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Time-course gene expression profiles of gefitinib-sensitive or -resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells stimulated with EGF, in the presence or absence of gefitinib, EGF receptor tyrosine kinase-specific inhibitor", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE37745", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE37745", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE37745", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1019138", "GSM1019139", "GSM1019140", "GSM1019141", "GSM1019142", "GSM1019143", "GSM1019144", "GSM1019145", "GSM1019146", "GSM1019147", "GSM1019148", "GSM1019149", "GSM1019150", "GSM1019151", "GSM1019152", "GSM1019153", "GSM1019154", "GSM1019155", "GSM1019156", "GSM1019157", "GSM1019158", "GSM1019159", "GSM1019160", "GSM1019161", "GSM1019162", "GSM1019163", "GSM1019164", "GSM1019165", "GSM1019166", "GSM1019167", "GSM1019168", "GSM1019169", "GSM1019170", "GSM1019171", "GSM1019172", "GSM1019173", "GSM1019174", "GSM1019175", "GSM1019176", "GSM1019177", "GSM1019178", "GSM1019179", "GSM1019180", "GSM1019181", "GSM1019182", "GSM1019183", "GSM1019184", "GSM1019185", "GSM1019186", "GSM1019187", "GSM1019188", "GSM1019189", "GSM1019190", "GSM1019191", "GSM1019192", "GSM1019193", "GSM1019194", "GSM1019195", "GSM1019196", "GSM1019197", "GSM1019198", "GSM1019199", "GSM1019200", "GSM1019201", "GSM1019202", "GSM1019203", "GSM1019204", "GSM1019205", "GSM1019206", "GSM1019207", "GSM1019208", "GSM1019209", "GSM1019210", "GSM1019211", "GSM1019212", "GSM1019213", "GSM1019214", "GSM1019215", "GSM1019216", "GSM1019217", "GSM1019218", "GSM1019219", "GSM1019220", "GSM1019221", "GSM1019222", "GSM1019223", "GSM1019224", "GSM1019225", "GSM1019226", "GSM1019227", "GSM1019228", "GSM1019229", "GSM1019230", "GSM1019231", "GSM1019232", "GSM1019233", "GSM1019234", "GSM1019235", "GSM1019236", "GSM1019237", "GSM1019238", "GSM1019239", "GSM1019240", "GSM1019241", "GSM1019242", "GSM1019243", "GSM1019244", "GSM1019245", "GSM1019246", "GSM1019247", "GSM1019248", "GSM1019249", "GSM1019250", "GSM1019251", "GSM1019252", "GSM1019253", "GSM1019254", "GSM1019255", "GSM1019256", "GSM1019257", "GSM1019258", "GSM1019259", "GSM1019260", "GSM1019261", "GSM1019262", "GSM1019263", "GSM1019264", "GSM1019265", "GSM1019266", "GSM1019267", "GSM1019268", "GSM1019269", "GSM1019270", "GSM1019271", "GSM1019272", "GSM1019273", "GSM1019274", "GSM1019275", "GSM1019276", "GSM1019277", "GSM1019278", "GSM1019279", "GSM1019280", "GSM1019281", "GSM1019282", "GSM1019283", "GSM1019284", "GSM1019285", "GSM1019286", "GSM1019287", "GSM1019288", "GSM1019289", "GSM1019290", "GSM1019291", "GSM1019292", "GSM1019293", "GSM1019294", "GSM1019295", "GSM1019296", "GSM1019297", "GSM1019298", "GSM1019299", "GSM1019300", "GSM1019301", "GSM1019302", "GSM1019303", "GSM1019304", "GSM1019305", "GSM1019306", "GSM1019307", "GSM1019308", "GSM1019309", "GSM1019310", "GSM1019311", "GSM1019312", "GSM1019313", "GSM1019314", "GSM1019315", "GSM1019316", "GSM1019317", "GSM1019318", "GSM1019319", "GSM1019320", "GSM1019321", "GSM1019322", "GSM1019323", "GSM1019324", "GSM1019325", "GSM1019326", "GSM1019327", "GSM1019328", "GSM1019329", "GSM1019330", "GSM1019331", "GSM1019332", "GSM1019333"], "sample_count": 196, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Biomarker discovery in non-small cell lung cancer: integrating gene expression profiling, meta-analysis and tissue microarray validation", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE80344", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE80344", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE80344", "version": null, "note": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2124846", "GSM2124847", "GSM2124848", "GSM2124849", "GSM2124850", "GSM2124851", "GSM2124852", "GSM2124853", "GSM2124854", "GSM2124855", "GSM2124856", "GSM2124857", "GSM2124858", "GSM2124859", "GSM2124860", "GSM2124861"], "sample_count": 16, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "16699", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression profiling of Erlotinib sensitive and resistant human non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE122005 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE122005 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE123066 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE123066 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE31625 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE31625 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE34228 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE34228 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE80344 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE80344 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Then, based on the eight genes, we constructed a random forest model by the “caret” R package (Kuhn, 2008) to distinguish sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI patients on the training dataset."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "method.machine_learning_random_forest"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: random_forest."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE31625", "GSE34228", "GSE122005", "GSE80344", "GSE123066", "GSE37745"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE31625", "GSE34228", "GSE122005", "GSE80344", "GSE123066", "GSE37745"], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."], "basis": "The paper names GSE31625, GSE34228, GSE122005, GSE80344, GSE123066, GSE37745 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:36506325", "data:geo:GSE122005"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "machine_learning_random_forest", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE122005"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:19:23Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10078, "completion_tokens": 2226, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36506325", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36506325"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36506325", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36506325 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE122005", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE122005"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36506325", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36506325"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36506325", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36506325 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE122005", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE122005"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36506325", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36506325"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE122005", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE122005"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36506325", "parent_hash": "sha256:763b1fbb06bd3c271b0facbd24dc3243ab2e3727f785b0ad9c6049ee825311a8", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE122005 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE122005 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE123066 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE123066 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE31625 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE31625 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE34228 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE34228 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE37745 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE80344 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE80344 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.machine_learning_random_forest", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:machine_learning_random_forest"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "machine_learning", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Then, based on the eight genes, we constructed a random forest model by the “caret” R package (Kuhn, 2008) to distinguish sensitive and resistant EGFR-TKI patients on the training dataset."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T03:03:46+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}