{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36620592", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:978a4c8ccbb17a5f8dcaa519aea5d89daee35fb8c233aa89bd17b3aa40fd2028", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:10Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:51:01Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Neutrophil extracellular traps-associated modification patterns depict the tumor microenvironment, precision immunotherapy, and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2022.1094248", "pmid": "36620592", "authors": ["Zhi-Hai Teng", "Wen-Ce Li", "Zhi-Chao Li", "Ya-Xuan Wang", "Zhen-Wei Han", "Yan-Ping Zhang"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2022, "abstract": "Background: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are web-like structures formed by neutrophils, and their main function is antimicrobial defense. Moreover, NETs have numerous roles in the pathogenesis and progression of cancers. However, the potential roles of NET-related genes in renal cell carcinoma remain unclear. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the NETs patterns and their relationships with tumor environment (TME), clinicopathological features, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic benefits in the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cohort.\nMethods: We obtained the gene expression profiles, clinical characteristics, and somatic mutations of patients with ccRCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and ArrayExpress datasets, respectively. ConsensusCluster was performed to identify the NET clusters. The tumor environment scores were evaluated by the \"ESTIMATE,\" \"CIBERSORT,\" and ssGSEA methods. The differential analysis was performed by the \"limma\" R package. The NET-scores were constructed based on the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among the three cluster patterns using the ssGSEA method. The roles of NET scores in the prediction of immunotherapy were investigated by Immunophenoscores (TCIA database) and validated in two independent cohorts (GSE135222 and IMvigor210). The prediction of targeted drug benefits was implemented using the \"pRRophetic\" and Gene Set Cancer Analysis (GSCA) datasets. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to identify the reliability of the core genes' expression in kidney cancer cells.\nResults: Three NET-related clusters were identified in the ccRCC cohort. The patients in Cluster A had more metabolism-associated pathways and better overall survival outcomes, whereas the patients in Cluster C had more immune-related pathways, a higher immune score, and a poorer prognosis than those in Cluster B. Based on the DEGs among different subtypes, patients with ccRCC were divided into two gene clusters. These gene clusters demonstrated significantly different immune statuses and clinical features. The NET scores were calculated based on the ten core genes by the Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) package and then divided ccRCC patients into two risk groups. We observed that high NET scores were associated with favorable survival outcomes, which were validated in the E-MTAB-1980 dataset. Moreover, the NET scores were significantly associated with immune cell infiltration, targeted drug response, and immunotherapy benefits. Subsequently, we explored the expression profiles, methylation, mutation, and survival prediction of the 10 core genes in TCGA-KIRC. Though all of them were associated with survival information, only four out of the 10 core genes were differentially expressed genes in tumor samples compared to normal tissues. Finally, RT-PCR showed that MAP7, SLC16A12, and SLC27A2 decreased, while SLC3A1 increased, in cancer cells.\nConclusion: NETs play significant roles in the tumor immune microenvironment of ccRCC. Identifying NET clusters and scores could enhance our understanding of the heterogeneity of ccRCC, thus providing novel insights for precise individual treatment.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The “limma” (31) R package was used to perform a difference analysis. The Wilcoxon test was used for data that did not accord with a normal distribution. A t-test was used for normally distributed data. Univariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan–Meier method were used to assess the prognostic value of DEGs.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36620592", "locator": "sections[13] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The “limma” (31) R package was used to perform a difference analysis. The Wilcoxon test was used for data that did not accord with a normal distribution. A t-test was used for normally distributed data. Univariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan–Meier method were used to assess the prognostic value of DEGs."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36620592", "locator": "sections[25] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "High NET scores were associated with favorable survival outcomes and were associated with immune cell infiltration, targeted drug response, and immunotherapy benefits.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36620592", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We observed that high NET scores were associated with favorable survival outcomes, which were validated in the E-MTAB-1980 dataset."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:36620592", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Moreover, the NET scores were significantly associated with immune cell infiltration, targeted drug response, and immunotherapy benefits."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "High NET scores were associated with favorable survival outcomes and were associated with immune cell infiltration, targeted drug response, and immunotherapy benefits.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36620592"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:E-MTAB-1980"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:E-MTAB-1980"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36620592", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1094248", "sha256": "sha256:c4215d80d2cee0d71af234d72005e3025ae0037846639448f9dfc56b316211be", "bytes": 38362, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2022.1094248", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9813599", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:E-MTAB-1980", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=E-MTAB-1980", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "E-MTAB-1980", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": [], "sample_count": null, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": null, "taxon": null, "title": null, "resolution_checked_at": "2026-10-31T18:28:57Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE135222", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE135222", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE135222", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3995402", "GSM3995403", "GSM3995404", "GSM3995405", "GSM3995406", "GSM3995407", "GSM3995408", "GSM3995409", "GSM3995410", "GSM3995411", "GSM3995412", "GSM3995413", "GSM3995414", "GSM3995415", "GSM3995416", "GSM3995417", "GSM3995418", "GSM3995419", "GSM3995420", "GSM3995421", "GSM3995422", "GSM3995423", "GSM3995424", "GSM3995425", "GSM3995426", "GSM3995427", "GSM3995428"], "sample_count": 27, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "16791", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "DNA methylation loss coupled with mitotic cell division promotes immune evasion of tumours with high mutation load [RNA-seq]", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE29609", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE29609", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE29609", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM733579", "GSM733580", "GSM733581", "GSM733582", "GSM733583", "GSM733584", "GSM733585", "GSM733586", "GSM733587", "GSM733588", "GSM733589", "GSM733590", "GSM733591", "GSM733592", "GSM733593", "GSM733594", "GSM733595", "GSM733596", "GSM733597", "GSM733598", "GSM733599", "GSM733600", "GSM733601", "GSM733602", "GSM733603", "GSM733604", "GSM733605", "GSM733606", "GSM733607", "GSM733608", "GSM733609", "GSM733610", "GSM733611", "GSM733612", "GSM733613", "GSM733614", "GSM733615", "GSM733616", "GSM733617"], "sample_count": 39, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "1708", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Clear-cell renal cell carcinomas tumors", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:E-MTAB-1980 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:E-MTAB-1980 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE135222 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE135222 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The “limma” (31) R package was used to perform a difference analysis. The Wilcoxon test was used for data that did not accord with a normal distribution. A t-test was used for normally distributed data. Univariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan–Meier method were used to assess the prognostic value of DEGs."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PCA"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "limma"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE29609", "E-MTAB-1980", "GSE135222"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE29609", "E-MTAB-1980", "GSE135222"], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names GSE29609, E-MTAB-1980, GSE135222 in GEO database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:36620592", "data:geo:E-MTAB-1980"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "group_comparison_wilcoxon", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:E-MTAB-1980"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:22:51Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10913, "completion_tokens": 2639, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36620592", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36620592"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36620592", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36620592 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:E-MTAB-1980", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO E-MTAB-1980"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36620592", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36620592"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36620592", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36620592 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:E-MTAB-1980", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO E-MTAB-1980"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36620592", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36620592"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-E-MTAB-1980", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:E-MTAB-1980"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36620592", "parent_hash": "sha256:6009f750f7b6d55093bcc43a3b66c766784a2ddae417e3049aea7d9f97bb1b1a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:E-MTAB-1980 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:E-MTAB-1980 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE135222 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE135222 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE29609 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["chased from the ATCC company. All cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 as previously described (28). Tota", "reviously described (28). Total RNA from the cultured cells was extracted using the Faster reagent"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:4108", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The “limma” (31) R package was used to perform a difference analysis. The Wilcoxon test was used for data that did not accord with a normal distribution. A t-test was used for normally distributed data. Univariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan–Meier method were used to assess the prognostic value of DEGs."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:10:06+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}