{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:36880837", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:613523517a945c646fb8f7e05079520b9313a74196de6f83e9b02625bd8d98f3", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:01:31Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:09:00Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "A novel fatty-acid metabolism-based classification for triple negative breast cancer.", "doi": "10.18632/aging.204552", "pmid": "36880837", "authors": ["Xia Yang", "Wen Tang", "Yongtao He", "Huimin An", "Jin Wang"], "journal": "Aging", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: The high heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the main clinical challenge for individualized therapy. Considering that fatty acid metabolism (FAM) plays an indispensable role in tumorigenesis and development of TNBC, we proposed a novel FAM-based classification to characterize the tumor microenvironment immune profiles and heterogeneous for TNBC.\nMETHODS: Weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify FAM-related genes from 221 TNBC samples in Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset. Then, non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering analysis was applied to determine FAM clusters based on the prognostic FAM-related genes, which chosen from the univariate/multivariate Cox regression model and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm. Then, a FAM scoring scheme was constructed to further quantify FAM features of individual TNBC patient based on the prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different FAM clusters. Systematically analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between the FAM scoring system (FS) with survival outcomes, genomic characteristics, tumor microenvironment (TME) features and immunotherapeutic response for TNBC, which were further validated in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE58812 datasets. Moreover, the expression level and clinical significancy of the selected FS gene signatures were further validated in our cohort.\nRESULTS: 1860 FAM-genes were screened out using WGCNA. Three distinct FAM clusters were determined by NMF clustering analysis, which allowed to distinguish different groups of patients with distinct clinical outcomes and tumor microenvironment (TME) features. Then, prognostic gene signatures based on the DEGs between different FAM clusters were identified using univariate Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression algorithm. A FAM scoring scheme was constructed, which could divide TNBC patients into high and low-FS subgroups. Low FS subgroup, characterized by better prognosis and abundance with effective immune infiltration. While patients with higher FS were featured with poorer survival and lack of effective immune infiltration. In addition, two independent immunotherapy cohorts (Imvigor210 and GSE78220) confirmed that patients with lower FS demonstrated significant therapeutic advantages from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and durable clinical benefits. Further analyses in our cohort found that the differential expression of CXCL13, FBP1 and PLCL2 were significantly associated with clinical outcomes of TNBC samples.\nCONCLUSIONS: This study revealed FAM plays an indispensable role in formation of TNBC heterogeneity and TME diversity. The novel FAM-based classification could provide a promising prognostic predictor and guide more effective immunotherapy strategies for TNBC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The prognostic significance of the FAM-related genes which obtained from the WGCNA was analyzed by univariate Cox regression model using the R package “survival”. Then, LASSO Cox regression algorithm was applied to further select prognostic FAM genes using the R package “glmet” [21]. Subsequently, the most robust prognostic gene signatures for OS were chosen by performing multivariate Cox regression model in METABRIC-TNBC patients.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36880837", "locator": "sections[5] \"Prognostic value analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The prognostic significance of the FAM-related genes which obtained from the WGCNA was analyzed by univariate Cox regression model using the R package “survival”. Then, LASSO Cox regression algorithm was applied to further select prognostic FAM genes using the R package “glmet” [21]. Subsequently, the most robust prognostic gene signatures for OS were chosen by performing multivariate Cox regression model in METABRIC-TNBC patients."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36880837", "locator": "sections[17] \"Availability of data and materials\" paragraph 2", "quote": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The study identified three distinct fatty acid metabolism clusters and constructed a FAM scoring system that divided TNBC patients into low- and high-FS subgroups with different survival, immune-infiltration, and immunotherapy-response characteristics.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:36880837", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Three distinct FAM clusters were determined by NMF clustering analysis, which allowed to distinguish different groups of patients with distinct clinical outcomes and tumor microenvironment (TME) features."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:36880837", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "A FAM scoring scheme was constructed, which could divide TNBC patients into high and low-FS subgroups."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The study identified three distinct fatty acid metabolism clusters and constructed a FAM scoring system that divided TNBC patients into low- and high-FS subgroups with different survival, immune-infiltration, and immunotherapy-response characteristics.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:36880837"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE58812"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE58812"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:36880837", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204552", "sha256": "sha256:fff0267fb804439151de47252ff65fb957658817a56ac938d0bc31359721ff73", "bytes": 50690, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.18632/aging.204552", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10008496", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE58812", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE58812", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE58812", "version": null, "note": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1419942", "GSM1419943", "GSM1419944", "GSM1419945", "GSM1419946", "GSM1419947", "GSM1419948", "GSM1419949", "GSM1419950", "GSM1419951", "GSM1419952", "GSM1419953", "GSM1419954", "GSM1419955", "GSM1419956", "GSM1419957", "GSM1419958", "GSM1419968", "GSM1419969", "GSM1419970", "GSM1419971", "GSM1419972", "GSM1419973", "GSM1419974", "GSM1419975", "GSM1419976", "GSM1419977", "GSM1419978", "GSM1419979", "GSM1419980", "GSM1419981", "GSM1419982", "GSM1419983", "GSM1419984", "GSM1419985", "GSM1419986", "GSM1419987", "GSM1419988", "GSM1419989", "GSM1419990", "GSM1419991", "GSM1419992", "GSM1419993", "GSM1419994", "GSM1419995", "GSM1419996", "GSM1419997", "GSM1419998", "GSM1419999", "GSM1420000", "GSM1420001", "GSM1420002", "GSM1420003", "GSM1420004", "GSM1420005", "GSM1420006", "GSM1420007", "GSM1420008", "GSM1420009", "GSM1420010", "GSM1420011", "GSM1420012", "GSM1420013", "GSM1420014", "GSM1420015", "GSM1420016", "GSM1420017", "GSM1420018", "GSM1420019", "GSM1420020", "GSM1420021", "GSM1420022", "GSM1420023", "GSM1420024", "GSM1420025", "GSM1420026", "GSM1420027", "GSM1420028", "GSM1420029", "GSM1420030", "GSM1420031", "GSM1420032", "GSM1420033", "GSM1420034", "GSM1420035", "GSM1420036", "GSM1420037", "GSM1420038", "GSM1420039", "GSM1420040", "GSM1420041", "GSM1420042", "GSM1420043", "GSM1420044", "GSM1420045", "GSM1420046", "GSM1420047", "GSM1420048", "GSM1420049", "GSM1420050", "GSM1420051", "GSM1420052", "GSM1420053", "GSM1420054", "GSM1420055", "GSM1420056", "GSM1420057"], "sample_count": 107, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE78220", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE78220", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE78220", "version": null, "note": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2069823", "GSM2069824", "GSM2069825", "GSM2069826", "GSM2069827", "GSM2069828", "GSM2069829", "GSM2069830", "GSM2069831", "GSM2069832", "GSM2069833", "GSM2069834", "GSM2069835", "GSM2069836", "GSM2069837", "GSM2069838", "GSM2069839", "GSM2069840", "GSM2069841", "GSM2069842", "GSM2069843", "GSM2069844", "GSM2069845", "GSM2069846", "GSM2069847", "GSM2069848", "GSM2069849", "GSM2069850"], "sample_count": 28, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "11154", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "mRNA expressions in pre-treatment melanomas undergoing anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition therapy", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE58812 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE58812 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The prognostic significance of the FAM-related genes which obtained from the WGCNA was analyzed by univariate Cox regression model using the R package “survival”. Then, LASSO Cox regression algorithm was applied to further select prognostic FAM genes using the R package “glmet” [21]. Subsequently, the most robust prognostic gene signatures for OS were chosen by performing multivariate Cox regression model in METABRIC-TNBC patients."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ANOVA"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE58812", "GSE78220"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE58812", "GSE78220"], "statements": ["All data used in this work can be acquired from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE78220 and GSE58812, METABRIC and the TCGA portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE58812, GSE78220 in Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:36880837", "data:geo:GSE58812"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE58812"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:32:50Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14372, "completion_tokens": 1968, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:36880837", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36880837"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36880837", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36880837 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE58812", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE58812"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:36880837", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:36880837"}, {"id": "source:pmid:36880837", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 36880837 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE58812", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE58812"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-36880837", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:36880837"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE58812", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE58812"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:36880837", "parent_hash": "sha256:67eddfc9b3000112b6b6583ac8d7ddd62dea078fec4ff1ea7946829a860bda6e", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE58812 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE58812 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["SYBR Green PCR MasterMix (Takara, China), RT qPCR was performed according to the manufacturer’"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3455", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The prognostic significance of the FAM-related genes which obtained from the WGCNA was analyzed by univariate Cox regression model using the R package “survival”. Then, LASSO Cox regression algorithm was applied to further select prognostic FAM genes using the R package “glmet” [21]. Subsequently, the most robust prognostic gene signatures for OS were chosen by performing multivariate Cox regression model in METABRIC-TNBC patients."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:14:48+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}