{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37480572", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:8abb7c2a085f09454e772f0e5a9f9be314dfe73924c131da5b8e5330be4d1179", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:15Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:09:56Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Comparative analyses of the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment, and drug treatment response between left-sided and right-sided colon cancer by integrating scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data.", "doi": "10.18632/aging.204894", "pmid": "37480572", "authors": ["Lichao Cao", "Shenrui Zhang", "Danni Yao", "Ying Ba", "Qi Weng", "Jin Yang", "Hezi Zhang", "Yanan Ren"], "journal": "Aging", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment (TIM), and drug treatment response between left-sided (LCC) and right-sided (RCC) colon cancer to predict outcomes in patients with LCC and RCC.\nMETHODS: Based on identified differentially expressed genes and using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we constructed and validated a prognostic model for LCC and RCC patients in the TCGA-COAD cohort and GSE103479 cohort. Moreover, we compared the differences of TIM characteristics and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients.\nRESULTS: We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance. The RCC patients with higher risk scores were significantly associated with greater metastasis (P = 2.6×10-5), N stage (P = 0.012), advanced pathological stage (P = 1.4×10-4), and more stable microsatellite status (P = 0.007) but not T stage (P = 0.200). For LCC patients, the risk scores were not significantly associated with tumor stage and microsatellite status (P > 0.05). Additionally, immune infiltration by CD8 and regulatory T cells and M0, M1, and M2 macrophages differed significantly between LCC and RCC patients (P < 0.05). APC and TP53 mutations were significantly more common in LCC patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, KRAS, SYNE1, and MUC16 mutations were significantly more common in RCC patients (P < 0.05). In addition, tumor mutation burden values were significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P = 5.9×10-8). Moreover, the expression of immune checkpoint targets was significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that RCC patients maybe more sensitive to immunotherapy. However, LCC and RCC patients did not differ significantly in their sensitivity to eight selected chemicals or target drugs (P > 0.05). The average half-maximal inhibitory concentrations for camptothecin, teniposide, vinorelbine, and mitoxantrone were significantly lower in low-risk than in high-risk RCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that the lower risk score of RCC patients, the more sensitive they were to these four drugs.\nCONCLUSIONS: We investigated the differences in prognosis, TIM, and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients, which may contribute to accurate colon cancer prognosis and treatment of colon cancer.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Kaplan–Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the location-related DEGs in the LCC and RCC expression profile data with a cutoff criterion of P < 0.05. The genes with maximum prognostic value were selected for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Next, we established separate risk score models predicting LCC and RCC patient prognosis using a multivariate Cox regression analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37480572", "locator": "sections[5] \"Prognostic LCC and RCC signature identification and validation\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the location-related DEGs in the LCC and RCC expression profile data with a cutoff criterion of P < 0.05. The genes with maximum prognostic value were selected for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Next, we established separate risk score models predicting LCC and RCC patient prognosis using a multivariate Cox regression analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37480572", "locator": "sections[10] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37480572", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37480572"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE103479"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE103479"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37480572", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204894", "sha256": "sha256:1d0711d09db6bcb75048f230892baa4a2c32fa9e40a3637df9c0db2766028c7f", "bytes": 45756, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.18632/aging.204894", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10415577", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE103479", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE103479", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE103479", "version": null, "note": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2772122", "GSM2772123", "GSM2772124", "GSM2772125", "GSM2772126", "GSM2772127", "GSM2772128", "GSM2772129", "GSM2772130", "GSM2772131", "GSM2772132", "GSM2772133", "GSM2772134", "GSM2772135", "GSM2772136", "GSM2772137", "GSM2772138", "GSM2772139", "GSM2772140", "GSM2772141", "GSM2772142", "GSM2772143", "GSM2772144", "GSM2772145", "GSM2772146", "GSM2772147", "GSM2772148", "GSM2772149", "GSM2772150", "GSM2772151", "GSM2772152", "GSM2772153", "GSM2772154", "GSM2772155", "GSM2772156", "GSM2772157", "GSM2772158", "GSM2772159", "GSM2772160", "GSM2772161", "GSM2772162", "GSM2772163", "GSM2772164", "GSM2772165", "GSM2772166", "GSM2772167", "GSM2772168", "GSM2772169", "GSM2772170", "GSM2772171", "GSM2772172", "GSM2772173", "GSM2772174", "GSM2772175", "GSM2772176", "GSM2772177", "GSM2772178", "GSM2772179", "GSM2772180", "GSM2772181", "GSM2772182", "GSM2772183", "GSM2772184", "GSM2772185", "GSM2772186", "GSM2772187", "GSM2772188", "GSM2772189", "GSM2772190", "GSM2772191", "GSM2772192", "GSM2772193", "GSM2772194", "GSM2772195", "GSM2772196", "GSM2772197", "GSM2772198", "GSM2772199", "GSM2772200", "GSM2772201", "GSM2772202", "GSM2772203", "GSM2772204", "GSM2772205", "GSM2772206", "GSM2772207", "GSM2772208", "GSM2772209", "GSM2772210", "GSM2772211", "GSM2772212", "GSM2772213", "GSM2772214", "GSM2772215", "GSM2772216", "GSM2772217", "GSM2772218", "GSM2772219", "GSM2772220", "GSM2772221", "GSM2772222", "GSM2772223", "GSM2772224", "GSM2772225", "GSM2772226", "GSM2772227", "GSM2772228", "GSM2772229", "GSM2772230", "GSM2772231", "GSM2772232", "GSM2772233", "GSM2772234", "GSM2772235", "GSM2772236", "GSM2772237", "GSM2772238", "GSM2772239", "GSM2772240", "GSM2772241", "GSM2772242", "GSM2772243", "GSM2772244", "GSM2772245", "GSM2772246", "GSM2772247", "GSM2772248", "GSM2772249", "GSM2772250", "GSM2772251", "GSM2772252", "GSM2772253", "GSM2772254", "GSM2772255", "GSM2772256", "GSM2772257", "GSM2772258", "GSM2772259", "GSM2772260", "GSM2772261", "GSM2772262", "GSM2772263", "GSM2772264", "GSM2772265", "GSM2772266", "GSM2772267", "GSM2772268", "GSM2772269", "GSM2772270", "GSM2772271", "GSM2772272", "GSM2772273", "GSM2772274", "GSM2772275", "GSM2772276", "GSM2772277"], "sample_count": 156, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "23985", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression data from stage II and III treated and untreated colorectal cancer patients", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE14473", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE14473", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE14473", "version": null, "note": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM361147", "GSM361271", "GSM361273", "GSM361274", "GSM361277", "GSM361286", "GSM361287", "GSM361288", "GSM361289", "GSM361290", "GSM361291", "GSM361292", "GSM361293", "GSM361294", "GSM361295", "GSM361308", "GSM361309", "GSM361318", "GSM361319", "GSM361320", "GSM361391", "GSM361392", "GSM361393", "GSM551204", "GSM551206", "GSM551208", "GSM551210", "GSM551212", "GSM551214", "GSM551216", "GSM551218", "GSM551220", "GSM551222", "GSM551224", "GSM551226", "GSM551228", "GSM551230", "GSM551232", "GSM551234", "GSM551236", "GSM551238", "GSM551240", "GSM551242"], "sample_count": 43, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6793;6955", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Comprehensive Characterization of microRNAs and mRNAs in Maintenance and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:46Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE144735", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE144735", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE144735", "version": null, "note": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4294474", "GSM4294475", "GSM4294476", "GSM4294477", "GSM4294478", "GSM4294479", "GSM4294480", "GSM4294481", "GSM4294482", "GSM4294483", "GSM4294484", "GSM4294485", "GSM4294486", "GSM4294487", "GSM4294488", "GSM4294489", "GSM4294490", "GSM4294491"], "sample_count": 18, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "24676", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Single cell 3' RNA sequencing of 6 Belgian colorectal cancer patients", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE200997", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE200997", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE200997", "version": null, "note": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM6048346", "GSM6048347", "GSM6048348", "GSM6048349", "GSM6048350", "GSM6048351", "GSM6048352", "GSM6048353", "GSM6048354", "GSM6048355", "GSM6048356", "GSM6048357", "GSM6048358", "GSM6048359", "GSM6048360", "GSM6048361", "GSM6048362", "GSM6048363", "GSM6048364", "GSM6048365", "GSM6048366", "GSM6048367", "GSM6048368"], "sample_count": 23, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21697", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Refining Colorectal Cancer Classification and Clinical Stratification Through a Single-Cell Atlas", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:46Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE103479 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE103479 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE14473 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE14473 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE144735 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE144735 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE200997 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE200997 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the location-related DEGs in the LCC and RCC expression profile data with a cutoff criterion of P < 0.05. The genes with maximum prognostic value were selected for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Next, we established separate risk score models predicting LCC and RCC patient prognosis using a multivariate Cox regression analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE200997", "GSE144735", "GSE103479", "GSE14473"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE200997", "GSE144735", "GSE103479", "GSE14473"], "statements": ["The TCGA-COAD cohort was available in the UCSC Xena (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). The scRNA-seq datasets GSE200997, GSE14473 and bulk RNA-seq data GSE103479 were download from NCBI-GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE200997, GSE144735, GSE103479, GSE14473 in US National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37480572", "data:geo:GSE103479"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE103479"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:47:36Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 13418, "completion_tokens": 1985, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37480572", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37480572"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37480572", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37480572 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE103479", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE103479"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37480572", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37480572"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37480572", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37480572 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE103479", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE103479"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37480572", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37480572"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE103479", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE103479"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37480572", "parent_hash": "sha256:bf5e24f3cc569319674325f77ab274f489c4f3fcf43c5ea989d57f40bf41b293", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE103479 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE103479 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE14473 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE14473 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE144735 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE144735 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE200997 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE200997 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["and right-sided colon cancer by integrating scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data.", "ied differentially expressed genes and using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we constructed and validated a prognos", "expression level in each cell types based on scRNA-seq dataset GSE200997, (F) RCC cells, (G) LCC ce"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:117", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["lon cancer by integrating scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data.", "tially expressed genes and using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we constructed and validated a prognos"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:135", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.642, "evidence": ["CC patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, Kirsten rat sarcoma virus proto-oncogene GTPase (KRAS),"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:14831", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Kaplan–Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the location-related DEGs in the LCC and RCC expression profile data with a cutoff criterion of P < 0.05. The genes with maximum prognostic value were selected for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Next, we established separate risk score models predicting LCC and RCC patient prognosis using a multivariate Cox regression analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:52:26+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}