{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37483592", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:be53ede79ed5ee33bb4d7ff4cda40438240d87d780a2a9457803811059a2f456", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:15Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:09:56Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Insight of a lipid metabolism prognostic model to identify immune landscape and potential target for retroperitoneal liposarcoma.", "doi": "10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209396", "pmid": "37483592", "authors": ["Zhenyu Wang", "Ping Tao", "Peidang Fan", "Jiongyuan Wang", "Tao Rong", "Yingyong Hou", "Yuhong Zhou", "Weiqi Lu", "Liang Hong", "Lijie Ma", "Yong Zhang", "Hanxing Tong"], "journal": "Frontiers in immunology", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Introduction: The exploration of lipid metabolism dysregulation may provide novel perspectives for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS). In our study, we aimed to investigate potential targets and facilitate further understanding of immune landscape in RPLS, through lipid metabolism-associated genes (LMAGs) based prognostic model.\nMethods: Gene expression profiles and corresponding clinical information of 234 cases were enrolled from two public databases and the largest retroperitoneal tumor research center of East China, including cohort-TCGA (n=58), cohort-GSE30929 (n=92), cohort-FD (n=50), cohort-scRNA-seq (n=4) and cohort-validation (n=30). Consensus clustering analysis was performed to identify lipid metabolism-associated molecular subtypes (LMSs). A prognostic risk model containing 13 LMAGs was established using LASSO algorithm and multivariate Cox analysis in cohort-TCGA. ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, XCELL and MCP analyses were performed to visualize the immune landscape. WGCNA was used to identify three hub genes among the 13 model LMAGs, and preliminarily validated in both cohort-GSE30929 and cohort-FD. Moreover, TIMER was used to visualize the correlation between antigen-presenting cells and potential targets. Finally, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of four RPLS and multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were performed in cohort-validation to validate the discoveries of bioinformatics analysis.\nResults: LMS1 and LMS2 were characterized as immune-infiltrated and -excluded tumors, with significant differences in molecular features and clinical prognosis, respectively. Elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 2 (ELOVL2), the enzyme that catalyzed the elongation of long chain fatty acids, involved in the maintenance of lipid metabolism and cellular homeostasis in normal cells, was identified and negatively correlated with antigen-presenting cells and identified as a potential target in RPLS. Furthermore, ELOVL2 was enriched in LMS2 with significantly lower immunoscore and unfavorable prognosis. Finally, a high-resolution dissection through scRNA-seq was performed in four RPLS, revealing the entire tumor ecosystem and validated previous findings.\nDiscussion: The LMS subgroups and risk model based on LMAGs proposed in our study were both promising prognostic classifications for RPLS. ELOVL2 is a potential target linking lipid metabolism to immune regulations against RPLS, specifically for patients with LMS2 tumors.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "24 LMAGs were found to be considerably linked to the OS of patients through LASSO regression analysis ( Figures 4A, B ), 13 of which were tested and selected for the risk score model from multivariate Cox analysis ( Supplementary Figure 4A ).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37483592", "locator": "sections[25] \"Development of survival and relapse risk models and nomograms based on LMAGs\" paragraph 3", "quote": "24 LMAGs were found to be considerably linked to the OS of patients through LASSO regression analysis ( Figures 4A, B ), 13 of which were tested and selected for the risk score model from multivariate Cox analysis ( Supplementary Figure 4A )."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37483592", "locator": "sections[29] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Specifically, this OS related model indicated a great accuracy with AUC values of 0.94 in 1 year, 0.97 in 3 years and 0.97 in 5 years ( Figure 4E ).", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37483592", "locator": "sections[25] \"Development of survival and relapse risk models and nomograms based on LMAGs\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Specifically, this OS related model indicated a great accuracy with AUC values of 0.94 in 1 year, 0.97 in 3 years and 0.97 in 5 years ( Figure 4E )."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Specifically, this OS related model indicated a great accuracy with AUC values of 0.94 in 1 year, 0.97 in 3 years and 0.97 in 5 years ( Figure 4E ).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37483592"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE30929"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE30929"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37483592", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209396", "sha256": "sha256:38d3f24b5f11350ba3653128096853355f897b7d4e9e6f8e10c6f6a979e26e32", "bytes": 56883, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209396", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10359070", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE30929", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE30929", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE30929", "version": null, "note": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM766533", "GSM766534", "GSM766535", "GSM766536", "GSM766537", "GSM766538", "GSM766539", "GSM766540", "GSM766541", "GSM766542", "GSM766543", "GSM766544", "GSM766545", "GSM766546", "GSM766547", "GSM766548", "GSM766549", "GSM766550", "GSM766551", "GSM766552", "GSM766553", "GSM766554", "GSM766555", "GSM766556", "GSM766557", "GSM766558", "GSM766559", "GSM766560", "GSM766561", "GSM766562", "GSM766563", "GSM766564", "GSM766565", "GSM766566", "GSM766567", "GSM766568", "GSM766569", "GSM766570", "GSM766571", "GSM766572", "GSM766573", "GSM766574", "GSM766575", "GSM766576", "GSM766577", "GSM766578", "GSM766579", "GSM766580", "GSM766581", "GSM766582", "GSM766583", "GSM766584", "GSM766585", "GSM766586", "GSM766587", "GSM766588", "GSM766589", "GSM766590", "GSM766591", "GSM766592", "GSM766593", "GSM766594", "GSM766595", "GSM766596", "GSM766597", "GSM766598", "GSM766599", "GSM766600", "GSM766601", "GSM766602", "GSM766603", "GSM766604", "GSM766605", "GSM766606", "GSM766607", "GSM766608", "GSM766609", "GSM766610", "GSM766611", "GSM766612", "GSM766613", "GSM766614", "GSM766615", "GSM766616", "GSM766617", "GSM766618", "GSM766619", "GSM766620", "GSM766621", "GSM766622", "GSM766623", "GSM766624", "GSM766625", "GSM766626", "GSM766627", "GSM766628", "GSM766629", "GSM766630", "GSM766631", "GSM766632", "GSM766633", "GSM766634", "GSM766635", "GSM766636", "GSM766637", "GSM766638", "GSM766639", "GSM766640", "GSM766641", "GSM766642", "GSM766643", "GSM766644", "GSM766645", "GSM766646", "GSM766647", "GSM766648", "GSM766649", "GSM766650", "GSM766651", "GSM766652", "GSM766653", "GSM766654", "GSM766655", "GSM766656", "GSM766657", "GSM766658", "GSM766659", "GSM766660", "GSM766661", "GSM766662", "GSM766663", "GSM766664", "GSM766665", "GSM766666", "GSM766667", "GSM766668", "GSM766669", "GSM766670", "GSM766671", "GSM766672"], "sample_count": 140, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Whole-transcript expression data for liposarcoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:PRJNA987378", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=PRJNA987378", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "PRJNA987378", "version": null, "note": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": [], "sample_count": null, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": null, "taxon": null, "title": null, "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:51Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE30929 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE30929 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:PRJNA987378 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:PRJNA987378 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "24 LMAGs were found to be considerably linked to the OS of patients through LASSO regression analysis ( Figures 4A, B ), 13 of which were tested and selected for the risk score model from multivariate Cox analysis ( Supplementary Figure 4A )."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"n_components": "The top 50 principal components (PCAs) were used for gr"}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PCA"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE30929", "PRJNA987378"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE30929"], "statements": ["The transcriptome data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, accession number PRJNA987378."], "basis": "The paper names GSE30929 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37483592", "data:geo:GSE30929"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE30929"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:47:41Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14819, "completion_tokens": 1836, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37483592", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37483592"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37483592", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37483592 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE30929", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE30929"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37483592", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37483592"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37483592", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37483592 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE30929", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE30929"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37483592", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37483592"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE30929", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE30929"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37483592", "parent_hash": "sha256:ba43ae94c74fbef8e8c75895daa010360bcb5c240a2ff0936f0e43b336a1f10a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE30929 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE30929 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:PRJNA987378 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:PRJNA987378 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["rt-GSE30929 (n=92), cohort-FD (n=50), cohort-scRNA-seq (n=4) and cohort-validation (n=30). Consensu", "argets. Finally, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of four RPLS and multiplexed immun", "inally, a high-resolution dissection through scRNA-seq was performed in four RPLS, revealing the en", "Fudan University between 2018 and 2020. For scRNA-seq, four fresh surgical specimens (four primary"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:690", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["and potential targets. Finally, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of four RPLS and multip", "n Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 . Single-cell transcriptome data processing The output of the cell-gene"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1337", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["A-seq) analysis of four RPLS and multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were performed in cohort-validation t"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1401", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["24 LMAGs were found to be considerably linked to the OS of patients through LASSO regression analysis ( Figures 4A, B ), 13 of which were tested and selected for the risk score model from multivariate Cox analysis ( Supplementary Figure 4A )."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:36:34+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}