{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37539127", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:7e866d97e4d9f1cb2997e78d3cf5a46e9d78bb4314c01739f967995db2a4fece", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:19Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:10:01Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Analysis and application of RNA binding protein gene pairs to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer.", "doi": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18242", "pmid": "37539127", "authors": ["Zhi-Kun Ning", "Hua-Kai Tian", "Jiang Liu", "Ce-Gui Hu", "Zi-Tao Liu", "Hui Li", "Zhen Zong"], "journal": "Heliyon", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Background: RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are closely related to tumors, but little is known about the mechanism of RBPs in tumorigenesis and progression of gastric cancer (GC). As genes do not usually act alone in the pathway deregulation, gene pair combinations are more likely to become stable and accurate biomarkers. The purpose of our research is to establish a novel signature based on RBP gene pairs to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.\nMethods: We downloaded genetic and clinical information from the TCGA and GEO database. TCGA and GSE13911 were used for screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The RBP genes were gathered from previous studies and employed to screen out DE-RBP genes after intersecting with DEGs. Samples were classified according to the relative expression of each pair of DE-RBP genes. The univariate Cox regression analysis and random forest were used to identify hub gene pairs to construct signature for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. Time-dependent ROC curves and KM survival curves were performed to evaluate the signature. GSEA was performed in TCGA training cohort and GSE62254 testing cohort to analyze enrichment pathways. Finally, the influence of these gene pairs on the prognosis of GC patients was further elucidated respectively through the combination of high and low expression of the two genes in each hub gene pair.\nResults: We screened out 6 hub RBP gene pairs (COL5A2/FEN1, POP1/GFRA1, EXO1/PLEKHS1, SLC39A10/CHI3L1, MMP7/PPP1R1 B and SLC5A6/BYSL) to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Using the optimal cut-off value to divide patients into high-risk and low-risk groups in the training and testing cohort, we found that the overall survival (OS) of the low-risk group was higher than that of the high-risk group (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curves for 1, 3, and 5 years were (0.659, 0.744, 0.758) and (0.624, 0.650, 0.653) in two cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that 6 RBP gene pairs signature were independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer (P < 0.05). In addition, the prognostic survival analysis showed that COL5A2-high/FEN1-low, POP1-low/GFRA1-high, EXO1-low/PLEKHS1-low,SLC39A10-high/CHI3L1-low, MMP7-high/PPP1R1 B-low, SLC5A6-low/BYSL-low had worse OS (P < 0.05). And the gene correlation analysis showed that there was no obvious correlation between the genes in each gene pairs except SLC5A6/BYSL and POP1/GFRA1. Finally, GSEA analysis showed that the high-risk group was enriched in tumor migration, invasion and growth-related pathways.\nConclusion: Our study identified a novel 6 RBP gene pairs signature to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and provide potential targets for clinical gene therapy.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis to identify independent prognostic factors using the “rms” R package in TCGA and GSE62254.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37539127", "locator": "sections[8] \"Independent prognostic factors\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis to identify independent prognostic factors using the “rms” R package in TCGA and GSE62254."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37539127", "locator": "sections[19] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Our study identified a novel 6 RBP gene pairs signature to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and provide potential targets for clinical gene therapy.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37539127", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "Our study identified a novel 6 RBP gene pairs signature to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and provide potential targets for clinical gene therapy."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Our study identified a novel 6 RBP gene pairs signature to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and provide potential targets for clinical gene therapy.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37539127"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE13911"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE13911"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37539127", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18242", "sha256": "sha256:836a096e765b76ed2cdb18652767a251178054695308f118cad2a12345fcb064", "bytes": 35008, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18242", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10393628", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13911", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE13911", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE13911", "version": null, "note": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM350411", "GSM350412", "GSM350413", "GSM350414", "GSM350415", "GSM350416", "GSM350417", "GSM350418", "GSM350419", "GSM350420", "GSM350421", "GSM350422", "GSM350423", "GSM350424", "GSM350425", "GSM350426", "GSM350427", "GSM350428", "GSM350429", "GSM350430", "GSM350431", "GSM350432", "GSM350433", "GSM350434", "GSM350435", "GSM350436", "GSM350437", "GSM350438", "GSM350439", "GSM350440", "GSM350441", "GSM350442", "GSM350443", "GSM350444", "GSM350445", "GSM350446", "GSM350447", "GSM350448", "GSM350449", "GSM350450", "GSM350451", "GSM350452", "GSM350453", "GSM350454", "GSM350455", "GSM350456", "GSM350457", "GSM350458", "GSM350459", "GSM350460", "GSM350461", "GSM350462", "GSM350463", "GSM350464", "GSM350465", "GSM350466", "GSM350467", "GSM350468", "GSM350469", "GSM350470", "GSM350471", "GSM350472", "GSM350473", "GSM350474", "GSM350475", "GSM350476", "GSM350477", "GSM350478", "GSM350479"], "sample_count": 69, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data from primary gastric tumors (MSI and MSS) and adjacent normal samples", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62254", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62254", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE62254", "version": null, "note": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1523727", "GSM1523728", "GSM1523729", "GSM1523744", "GSM1523745", "GSM1523746", "GSM1523747", "GSM1523748", "GSM1523765", "GSM1523768", "GSM1523769", "GSM1523770", "GSM1523771", "GSM1523772", "GSM1523773", "GSM1523774", "GSM1523775", "GSM1523776", "GSM1523777", "GSM1523778", "GSM1523779", "GSM1523780", "GSM1523781", "GSM1523782", "GSM1523783", "GSM1523784", "GSM1523785", "GSM1523786", "GSM1523787", "GSM1523788", "GSM1523789", "GSM1523790", "GSM1523791", "GSM1523792", "GSM1523793", "GSM1523794", "GSM1523795", "GSM1523796", "GSM1523797", "GSM1523798", "GSM1523799", "GSM1523800", "GSM1523801", "GSM1523802", "GSM1523803", "GSM1523804", "GSM1523805", "GSM1523806", "GSM1523807", "GSM1523808", "GSM1523809", "GSM1523810", "GSM1523811", "GSM1523812", "GSM1523813", "GSM1523814", "GSM1523815", "GSM1523816", "GSM1523817", "GSM1523818", "GSM1523819", "GSM1523820", "GSM1523821", "GSM1523822", "GSM1523823", "GSM1523824", "GSM1523825", "GSM1523826", "GSM1523827", "GSM1523828", "GSM1523829", "GSM1523830", "GSM1523831", "GSM1523832", "GSM1523833", "GSM1523834", "GSM1523835", "GSM1523836", "GSM1523837", "GSM1523838", "GSM1523839", "GSM1523840", "GSM1523841", "GSM1523842", "GSM1523843", "GSM1523844", "GSM1523845", "GSM1523846", "GSM1523847", "GSM1523848", "GSM1523849", "GSM1523850", "GSM1523851", "GSM1523852", "GSM1523853", "GSM1523854", "GSM1523855", "GSM1523856", "GSM1523857", "GSM1523858", "GSM1523859", "GSM1523860", "GSM1523861", "GSM1523862", "GSM1523863", "GSM1523864", "GSM1523865", "GSM1523866", "GSM1523867", "GSM1523868", "GSM1523869", "GSM1523870", "GSM1523871", "GSM1523872", "GSM1523873", "GSM1523874", "GSM1523875", "GSM1523876", "GSM1523877", "GSM1523878", "GSM1523879", "GSM1523880", "GSM1523881", "GSM1523882", "GSM1523883", "GSM1523884", "GSM1523885", "GSM1523886", "GSM1523887", "GSM1523888", "GSM1523889", "GSM1523890", "GSM1523891", "GSM1523892", "GSM1523893", "GSM1523894", "GSM1523895", "GSM1523896", "GSM1523897", "GSM1523898", "GSM1523899", "GSM1523901", "GSM1523903", "GSM1523904", "GSM1523905", "GSM1523906", "GSM1523908", "GSM1523909", "GSM1523910", "GSM1523911", "GSM1523918", "GSM1523919", "GSM1523920", "GSM1523921", "GSM1523922", "GSM1523923", "GSM1523924", "GSM1523925", "GSM1523926", "GSM1523927", "GSM1523928", "GSM1523929", "GSM1523930", "GSM1523931", "GSM1523932", "GSM1523933", "GSM1523934", "GSM1523935", "GSM1523936", "GSM1523937", "GSM1523938", "GSM1523939", "GSM1523940", "GSM1523941", "GSM1523942", "GSM1523943", "GSM1523944", "GSM1523945", "GSM1523946", "GSM1523947", "GSM1523948", "GSM1523949", "GSM1523950", "GSM1523951", "GSM1523952", "GSM1523953", "GSM1523954", "GSM1523955", "GSM1523956", "GSM1523957", "GSM1523958", "GSM1523959", "GSM1523960", "GSM1523961", "GSM1523962", "GSM1523963", "GSM1523964", "GSM1523965", "GSM1523966", "GSM1523967", "GSM1523968", "GSM1523969", "GSM1523970", "GSM1523971", "GSM1523972", "GSM1523973", "GSM1523974", "GSM1523975", "GSM1523976", "GSM1523977", "GSM1523978", "GSM1523979", "GSM1523980", "GSM1523981", "GSM1523982", "GSM1523983", "GSM1523984", "GSM1523985", "GSM1523986", "GSM1523987", "GSM1523988", "GSM1523989", "GSM1523990", "GSM1523991", "GSM1523992", "GSM1523993", "GSM1523994", "GSM1523995", "GSM1523996", "GSM1523997", "GSM1523998", "GSM1523999", "GSM1524000", "GSM1524001", "GSM1524002", "GSM1524003", "GSM1524004", "GSM1524005", "GSM1524006", "GSM1524007", "GSM1524008", "GSM1524009", "GSM1524010", "GSM1524011", "GSM1524012", "GSM1524013", "GSM1524014", "GSM1524015", "GSM1524016", "GSM1524017", "GSM1524018", "GSM1524019", "GSM1524020", "GSM1524021", "GSM1524022", "GSM1524023", "GSM1524024", "GSM1524025", "GSM1524026", "GSM1524027", "GSM1524028", "GSM1524029", "GSM1524030", "GSM1524031", "GSM1524032", "GSM1524033", "GSM1524034", "GSM1524035", "GSM1524036", "GSM1524037", "GSM1524038", "GSM1524039", "GSM1524040", "GSM1524041", "GSM1524042", "GSM1524043", "GSM1524044", "GSM1524045", "GSM1524046", "GSM1524047", "GSM1524048", "GSM1524049", "GSM1524050", "GSM1524051", "GSM1524052", "GSM1524053", "GSM1524054", "GSM1524055", "GSM1524056", "GSM1524057", "GSM1524058", "GSM1524059", "GSM1524060", "GSM1524061", "GSM1524062", "GSM1524068", "GSM1524069", "GSM1524070", "GSM1524071", "GSM1524072"], "sample_count": 300, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE13911 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE13911 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "KM"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "deseq2", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "DESeq2"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}, {"id": "method-8", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-9", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis to identify independent prognostic factors using the “rms” R package in TCGA and GSE62254."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE13911", "GSE62254"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE13911", "GSE62254"], "statements": ["The authors are unable or have chosen not to specify which data has been used."], "basis": "The paper names GSE13911, GSE62254 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37539127", "data:geo:GSE13911"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE13911"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:48:54Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10304, "completion_tokens": 1855, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37539127", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37539127"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37539127", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37539127 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13911", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE13911"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37539127", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37539127"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37539127", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37539127 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE13911", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE13911"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37539127", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37539127"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE13911", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE13911"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37539127", "parent_hash": "sha256:ae124666c7705a002a92180c471676dbecfff26b0cd9371e198a053459cad764", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE13911 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE13911 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["KM"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:14:53+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}