{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37700277", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:ddd1326de3cf16da83a2a8364fcbb6fbde6f04acd6406224fa865e592208981d", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:30Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:31:31Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "GREM1, LRPPRC and SLC39A4 as potential biomarkers of intervertebral disc degeneration: a bioinformatics analysis based on multiple microarray and single-cell sequencing data.", "doi": "10.1186/s12891-023-06854-4", "pmid": "37700277", "authors": ["ZhaoLiang Zhang", "JianZhong Huo", "XingHua Ji", "LinDong Wei", "Jinfeng Zhang"], "journal": "BMC musculoskeletal disorders", "year": 2023, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) has drawn much widespread attention and is a major global health concern. In this field, intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is frequently the focus of classic studies. However, the mechanistic foundation of IVDD is unclear and has led to conflicting outcomes.\nMETHODS: Gene expression profiles (GSE34095, GSE147383) of IVDD patients alongside control groups were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the GEO database. GSE23130 and GSE70362 were applied to validate the yielded key genes from DEGs by means of a best subset selection regression. Four machine-learning models were established to assess their predictive ability. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to profile the correlation between overall immune infiltration levels with Thompson grades and key genes. The upstream targeting miRNAs of key genes (GSE63492) were also analyzed. A single-cell transcriptome sequencing data (GSE160756) was used to define several cell clusters of nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), and cartilaginous endplate (CEP) of human intervertebral discs and the distribution of key genes in different cell clusters was yielded.\nRESULTS: By developing appropriate p-values and logFC values, a total of 6 DEGs was obtained. 3 key genes (LRPPRC, GREM1, and SLC39A4) were validated by an externally validated predictive modeling method. The ssGSEA results indicated that key genes were correlated with the infiltration abundance of multiple immune cells, such as dendritic cells and macrophages. Accordingly, these 4 key miRNAs (miR-103a-3p, miR-484, miR-665, miR-107) were identified as upstream regulators targeting key genes using the miRNet database and external GEO datasets. Finally, the spatial distribution of key genes in AF, CEP, and NP was plotted. Pseudo-time series and GSEA analysis indicated that the expression level of GREM1 and the differentiation trajectory of NP chondrocytes are generally consistent. GREM1 may mainly exacerbate the degeneration of NP cells in IVDD.\nCONCLUSIONS: Our study gives a novel perspective for identifying reliable and effective gene therapy targets in IVDD.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The best subset selection for variable screening was employed due to the possibility of multicollinearity among the first screened DEGs, which could result in overfitting of the model if all of them were included in the modelingmodelling.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37700277", "locator": "sections[5] \"Definition of key genes set using a best subset selection regression\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The best subset selection for variable screening was employed due to the possibility of multicollinearity among the first screened DEGs, which could result in overfitting of the model if all of them were included in the modelingmodelling."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37700277", "locator": "sections[28] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The key genes showed predictive power for IVDD grade groups, with logistic regression achieving the highest validation AUC of 0.7857143.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37700277", "locator": "sections[14] \"Results of key genes and corresponding external validation\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The AUC value of the logistic regression classifier reached 0.7857143 while the same for SVM, RandomForest and XGboost were 0.6938776, 0.6071429 and 0.622449 respectively, which showed that key genes had some predictive power for the defined group divided by Thompson grades in either linear or non-linear models."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The key genes showed predictive power for IVDD grade groups, with logistic regression achieving the highest validation AUC of 0.7857143.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37700277"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE147383"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE147383"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37700277", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06854-4", "sha256": "sha256:ed9676d155c095bc1075a2f8b3540848cb35f502d0caedae7018baf91b20bfdf", "bytes": 50107, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12891-023-06854-4", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10498557", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE147383", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE147383", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE147383", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4429807", "GSM4429808", "GSM4429809", "GSM4429810", "GSM4429811", "GSM4429812", "GSM4429813", "GSM4429814"], "sample_count": 8, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression data for human intervertebral discs", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:43Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE160756", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160756", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE160756", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4878538", "GSM4878539", "GSM4878540", "GSM4878541", "GSM4878542", "GSM4878543", "GSM4878544"], "sample_count": 7, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "20795", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "A Single-cell Transcriptomic Atlas of Human Intervertebral Disc", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:46Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE23130", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE23130", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE23130", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM569830", "GSM569831", "GSM569832", "GSM569833", "GSM569834", "GSM569835", "GSM569836", "GSM569837", "GSM569838", "GSM569839", "GSM569840", "GSM569841", "GSM569842", "GSM569843", "GSM569844", "GSM569845", "GSM569846", "GSM569847", "GSM569848", "GSM569849", "GSM569850", "GSM569851", "GSM569852"], "sample_count": 23, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "1352", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene Array Data from Human Annulus Disc Tissue", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE34095", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE34095", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE34095", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM841717", "GSM841718", "GSM841719", "GSM841720", "GSM841721", "GSM841722"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "96", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data between human degenerative and non-degenerative intervertebral discs", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE63492", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE63492", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE63492", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1551024", "GSM1551025", "GSM1551026", "GSM1551027", "GSM1551028", "GSM1551029", "GSM1551030", "GSM1551031", "GSM1551032", "GSM1551033"], "sample_count": 10, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "19449", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Revisiting the microRNA expression profiling of human intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD)", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE70362", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70362", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE70362", "version": null, "note": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1725780", "GSM1725781", "GSM1725782", "GSM1725783", "GSM1725784", "GSM1725785", "GSM1725786", "GSM1725787", "GSM1725788", "GSM1725789", "GSM1725790", "GSM1725791", "GSM1725792", "GSM1725793", "GSM1725794", "GSM1725795", "GSM1725796", "GSM1725797", "GSM1725798", "GSM1725799", "GSM1725800", "GSM1725801", "GSM1725802", "GSM1725803", "GSM1725804", "GSM1725805", "GSM1725806", "GSM1725807", "GSM1725808", "GSM1725809", "GSM1725810", "GSM1725811", "GSM1725812", "GSM1725813", "GSM1725814", "GSM1725815", "GSM1725816", "GSM1725817", "GSM1725818", "GSM1725819", "GSM1725820", "GSM1725821", "GSM1725822", "GSM1725823", "GSM1725824", "GSM1725825", "GSM1725826", "GSM1725827"], "sample_count": 48, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "17810", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Interferon Signalling Molecules and IGFBP3 in Human Degenerative Annulus Fibrosus", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T17:30:42Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE147383 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE147383 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE160756 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE160756 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE23130 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE23130 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE34095 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE34095 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE63492 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE63492 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE70362 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE70362 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Best subset selection regression", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The best subset selection for variable screening was employed due to the possibility of multicollinearity among the first screened DEGs, which could result in overfitting of the model if all of them were included in the modelingmodelling."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "method", "blocked_on": "method:not_determinable", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (Best subset selection regression), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE34095", "GSE147383", "GSE23130", "GSE70362", "GSE63492", "GSE160756"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE34095", "GSE147383", "GSE23130", "GSE70362", "GSE63492", "GSE160756"], "statements": ["The datasets analysed during the current study are available in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/): GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE70632, GSE23130, GSE63492, GSE160756."], "basis": "The paper names GSE34095, GSE147383, GSE23130, GSE70362, GSE63492, GSE160756 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:37700277", "data:geo:GSE147383"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE147383"]}, "gaps": ["method:not_determinable"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:53:05Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 13040, "completion_tokens": 2132, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37700277", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37700277"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37700277", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37700277 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE147383", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE147383"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37700277", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37700277"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37700277", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37700277 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE147383", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE147383"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37700277", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37700277"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE147383", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE147383"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37700277", "parent_hash": "sha256:9bfe04c66a76cb345fa0e9995d66f24622035998ff478623ee3b2f3706c0a837", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE147383 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE147383 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE160756 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE160756 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE23130 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE23130 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE34095 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE34095 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE63492 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE63492 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE70362 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE70362 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["a bioinformatics analysis based on multiple microarray and single-cell sequencing data."], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:87", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Methods In vitro experimental validation (qPCR and Western Blot) “AF needle puncture” metho", "igure the reaction system and then performed qPCR. IVDD group and sham group were set up with"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2362", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["s In vitro experimental validation (qPCR and Western Blot) “AF needle puncture” method was used to con"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2368", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["of Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital. The rats were randomly divided into IVDD group (n = 4) and", "DD group (n = 4) and sham group (n = 4). The rats were anaesthetised using an intraperitoneal injec", "(3.5 mg / 100 g). After confirming that the rats were under anaesthesia, a longitudinal incision w", "n. Lumbar intervertebral discs in IVDD group rats were exposed via the posterior peritoneum and pso"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2445", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T03:13:22+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}