{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:37942473", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:e10fc5a4e2ed3e33db180a341cf26ed6ecaa6ed529ac9073343fb7f57819cf30", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:50Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:10:37Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Integrative Analysis of Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing Reveals Prognostic Characteristics of Macrophage Polarization-Related Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.2147/IJGM.S430408", "pmid": "37942473", "authors": ["Ke Mi", "Lizhong Zeng", "Yang Chen", "Shuanying Yang"], "journal": "International journal of general medicine", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a group of cancers with poor prognosis. The combination of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can identify important genes involved in cancer development and progression from a broader perspective.\nMethods: The scRNA-seq data and bulk RNA-seq data of LUAD were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Analyzing scRNA-seq for core cells in the GSE131907 dataset, and the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was used for dimensionality reduction and cluster identification. Macrophage polarization-associated subtypes were acquired from the TCGA-LUAD dataset after analysis, followed by further identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the TCGA-LUAD dataset (normal/LUAD tissue samples, two subtypes). Venn diagrams were utilized to visualize differentially expressed and highly variable macrophage polarization-related genes. Subsequently, a prognostic risk model for LUAD patients was constructed by univariate Cox and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and the model was investigated for stability in the external data GSE72094. After analyzing the correlation between the trait genes and significantly mutated genes, the immune infiltration between the high/low-risk groups was then examined. The Monocle package was applied to analyze the pseudo-temporal trajectory analysis of different cell clusters in macrophage clusters. Subsequently, cell clusters of data macrophages were selected as key cell clusters to explore the role of characteristic genes in different cell populations and to identify transcription factors (TFs) that affect signature genes. Finally, qPCR were employed to validate the expression levels of prognosis signature genes in LUAD.\nResults: 424 macrophage highly variable genes, 3920 DEGs, and 9561 DEGs were obtained from macrophage clusters, the macrophage polarization-related subtypes, and normal/LUAD tissue samples, respectively. Twenty-eight differentially expressed and highly mutated MPRGs were obtained. A prognostic risk model with 7 DE-MPRGs (RGS13, ADRB2, DDIT4, MS4A2, ALDH2, CTSH, and PKM) was constructed. This prognostic model still has a good prediction effect in the GSE72094 dataset. ZNF536 and DNAH9 were mutated in the low-risk group, while COL11A1 was mutated in the high-risk group, and they were highly correlated with the characteristic genes. A total of 11 immune cells were significantly different in the high/low-risk groups. Five cell types were again identified in the macrophage cluster, and then NK cells: CD56hiCD62L+ differentiated earlier and were present mainly on 2 branches. While macrophages were present on 2 branches and differentiated later. It was found that the expression levels of BCLAF1 and MAX were higher in cluster 1, which might be the TFs affecting the expression of the characteristic genes. Moreover, qPCR confirmed that the expression of the prognosis genes was generally consistent with the results of the bioinformatic analysis.\nConclusion: Seven MPRGs (RGS13, ADRB2, DDIT4, MS4A2, ALDH2, CTSH, and PKM) were identified as prognostic genes for LUAD and revealed the mechanisms of MPRGs at the single-cell level.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "In this study, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the TCGA-LUAD dataset, and 13 genes were found to be significantly associated with OS (Figure 5A). Next, a LASSO algorithm was used to screen for genes to construct a model (Figure 5B).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37942473", "locator": "sections[17] \"Construction and Validation of a Seven-Characteristic Gene-Based Prognostic Risk Model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "In this study, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the TCGA-LUAD dataset, and 13 genes were found to be significantly associated with OS (Figure 5A). Next, a LASSO algorithm was used to screen for genes to construct a model (Figure 5B)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37942473", "locator": "sections[26] \"Data Sharing Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The study identified seven macrophage polarization-related prognostic genes for lung adenocarcinoma and constructed a seven-gene prognostic risk model.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:37942473", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "Seven MPRGs (RGS13, ADRB2, DDIT4, MS4A2, ALDH2, CTSH, and PKM) were identified as prognostic genes for LUAD and revealed the mechanisms of MPRGs at the single-cell level."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The study identified seven macrophage polarization-related prognostic genes for lung adenocarcinoma and constructed a seven-gene prognostic risk model.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:37942473"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE131907"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE131907"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:37942473", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S430408", "sha256": "sha256:95565e4d4c0bcea9fd88fd5d51bb5e0e30153dd9c2c5ca2c94d2d9d3976447bd", "bytes": 63847, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.2147/IJGM.S430408", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10629586", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE131907", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE131907", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE131907", "version": null, "note": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3827114", "GSM3827115", "GSM3827116", "GSM3827117", "GSM3827118", "GSM3827119", "GSM3827120", "GSM3827121", "GSM3827122", "GSM3827123", "GSM3827124", "GSM3827125", "GSM3827126", "GSM3827127", "GSM3827128", "GSM3827129", "GSM3827130", "GSM3827131", "GSM3827132", "GSM3827133", "GSM3827134", "GSM3827135", "GSM3827136", "GSM3827137", "GSM3827138", "GSM3827139", "GSM3827140", "GSM3827141", "GSM3827142", "GSM3827143", "GSM3827144", "GSM3827145", "GSM3827146", "GSM3827147", "GSM3827148", "GSM3827149", "GSM3827150", "GSM3827151", "GSM3827152", "GSM3827153", "GSM3827154", "GSM3827155", "GSM3827156", "GSM3827157", "GSM3827158", "GSM3827159", "GSM3827160", "GSM3827161", "GSM3827162", "GSM3827163", "GSM3827164", "GSM3827165", "GSM3827166", "GSM3827167", "GSM3827168", "GSM3827169", "GSM3827170", "GSM3827171"], "sample_count": 58, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "16791", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Single cell RNA sequencing of lung adenocarcinoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:43Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE72094", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE72094", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE72094", "version": null, "note": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1854797", "GSM1854798", "GSM1854799", "GSM1854800", "GSM1854801", "GSM1854802", "GSM1854803", "GSM1854804", "GSM1854805", "GSM1854806", "GSM1854807", "GSM1854808", "GSM1854809", "GSM1854810", "GSM1854811", "GSM1854812", "GSM1854813", "GSM1854814", "GSM1854815", "GSM1854816", "GSM1854817", "GSM1854818", "GSM1854819", "GSM1854820", "GSM1854821", "GSM1854822", "GSM1854823", "GSM1854824", "GSM1854825", "GSM1854826", "GSM1854827", "GSM1854828", "GSM1854829", "GSM1854830", "GSM1854831", "GSM1854832", "GSM1854833", "GSM1854834", "GSM1854835", "GSM1854836", "GSM1854837", "GSM1854838", "GSM1854839", "GSM1854840", "GSM1854841", "GSM1854842", "GSM1854843", "GSM1854844", "GSM1854845", "GSM1854846", "GSM1854847", "GSM1854848", "GSM1854849", "GSM1854850", "GSM1854851", "GSM1854852", "GSM1854853", "GSM1854854", "GSM1854855", "GSM1854856", "GSM1854857", "GSM1854858", "GSM1854859", "GSM1854860", "GSM1854861", "GSM1854862", "GSM1854863", "GSM1854864", "GSM1854865", "GSM1854866", "GSM1854867", "GSM1854868", "GSM1854869", "GSM1854870", "GSM1854871", "GSM1854872", "GSM1854873", "GSM1854874", "GSM1854875", "GSM1854876", "GSM1854877", "GSM1854878", "GSM1854879", "GSM1854880", "GSM1854881", "GSM1854882", "GSM1854883", "GSM1854884", "GSM1854885", "GSM1854886", "GSM1854887", "GSM1854888", "GSM1854889", "GSM1854890", "GSM1854891", "GSM1854892", "GSM1854893", "GSM1854894", "GSM1854895", "GSM1854896", "GSM1854897", "GSM1854898", "GSM1854899", "GSM1854900", "GSM1854901", "GSM1854902", "GSM1854903", "GSM1854904", "GSM1854905", "GSM1854906", "GSM1854907", "GSM1854908", "GSM1854909", "GSM1854910", "GSM1854911", "GSM1854912", "GSM1854913", "GSM1854914", "GSM1854915", "GSM1854916", "GSM1854917", "GSM1854918", "GSM1854919", "GSM1854920", "GSM1854921", "GSM1854922", "GSM1854923", "GSM1854924", "GSM1854925", "GSM1854926", "GSM1854927", "GSM1854928", "GSM1854929", "GSM1854930", "GSM1854931", "GSM1854932", "GSM1854933", "GSM1854934", "GSM1854935", "GSM1854936", "GSM1854937", "GSM1854938", "GSM1854939", "GSM1854940", "GSM1854941", "GSM1854942", "GSM1854943", "GSM1854944", "GSM1854945", "GSM1854946", "GSM1854947", "GSM1854948", "GSM1854949", "GSM1854950", "GSM1854951", "GSM1854952", "GSM1854953", "GSM1854954", "GSM1854955", "GSM1854956", "GSM1854957", "GSM1854958", "GSM1854959", "GSM1854960", "GSM1854961", "GSM1854962", "GSM1854963", "GSM1854964", "GSM1854965", "GSM1854966", "GSM1854967", "GSM1854968", "GSM1854969", "GSM1854970", "GSM1854971", "GSM1854972", "GSM1854973", "GSM1854974", "GSM1854975", "GSM1854976", "GSM1854977", "GSM1854978", "GSM1854979", "GSM1854980", "GSM1854981", "GSM1854982", "GSM1854983", "GSM1854984", "GSM1854985", "GSM1854986", "GSM1854987", "GSM1854988", "GSM1854989", "GSM1854990", "GSM1854991", "GSM1854992", "GSM1854993", "GSM1854994", "GSM1854995", "GSM1854996", "GSM1854997", "GSM1854998", "GSM1854999", "GSM1855000", "GSM1855001", "GSM1855002", "GSM1855003", "GSM1855004", "GSM1855005", "GSM1855006", "GSM1855007", "GSM1855008", "GSM1855009", "GSM1855010", "GSM1855011", "GSM1855012", "GSM1855013", "GSM1855014", "GSM1855015", "GSM1855016", "GSM1855017", "GSM1855018", "GSM1855019", "GSM1855020", "GSM1855021", "GSM1855022", "GSM1855023", "GSM1855024", "GSM1855025", "GSM1855026", "GSM1855027", "GSM1855028", "GSM1855029", "GSM1855030", "GSM1855031", "GSM1855032", "GSM1855033", "GSM1855034", "GSM1855035", "GSM1855036", "GSM1855037", "GSM1855038", "GSM1855039", "GSM1855040", "GSM1855041", "GSM1855042", "GSM1855043", "GSM1855044", "GSM1855045", "GSM1855046", "GSM1855047", "GSM1855048", "GSM1855049", "GSM1855050", "GSM1855051", "GSM1855052", "GSM1855053", "GSM1855054", "GSM1855055", "GSM1855056", "GSM1855057", "GSM1855058", "GSM1855059", "GSM1855060", "GSM1855061", "GSM1855062", "GSM1855063", "GSM1855064", "GSM1855065", "GSM1855066", "GSM1855067", "GSM1855068", "GSM1855069", "GSM1855070", "GSM1855071", "GSM1855072", "GSM1855073", "GSM1855074", "GSM1855075", "GSM1855076", "GSM1855077", "GSM1855078", "GSM1855079", "GSM1855080", "GSM1855081", "GSM1855082", "GSM1855083", "GSM1855084", "GSM1855085", "GSM1855086", "GSM1855087", "GSM1855088", "GSM1855089", "GSM1855090", "GSM1855091", "GSM1855092", "GSM1855093", "GSM1855094", "GSM1855095", "GSM1855096", "GSM1855097", "GSM1855098", "GSM1855099", "GSM1855100", "GSM1855101", "GSM1855102", "GSM1855103", "GSM1855104", "GSM1855105", "GSM1855106", "GSM1855107", "GSM1855108", "GSM1855109", "GSM1855110", "GSM1855111", "GSM1855112", "GSM1855113", "GSM1855114", "GSM1855115", "GSM1855116", "GSM1855117", "GSM1855118", "GSM1855119", "GSM1855120", "GSM1855121", "GSM1855122", "GSM1855123", "GSM1855124", "GSM1855125", "GSM1855126", "GSM1855127", "GSM1855128", "GSM1855129", "GSM1855130", "GSM1855131", "GSM1855132", "GSM1855133", "GSM1855134", "GSM1855135", "GSM1855136", "GSM1855137", "GSM1855138", "GSM1855139", "GSM1855140", "GSM1855141", "GSM1855142", "GSM1855143", "GSM1855144", "GSM1855145", "GSM1855146", "GSM1855147", "GSM1855148", "GSM1855149", "GSM1855150", "GSM1855151", "GSM1855152", "GSM1855153", "GSM1855154", "GSM1855155", "GSM1855156", "GSM1855157", "GSM1855158", "GSM1855159", "GSM1855160", "GSM1855161", "GSM1855162", "GSM1855163", "GSM1855164", "GSM1855165", "GSM1855166", "GSM1855167", "GSM1855168", "GSM1855169", "GSM1855170", "GSM1855171", "GSM1855172", "GSM1855173", "GSM1855174", "GSM1855175", "GSM1855176", "GSM1855177", "GSM1855178", "GSM1855179", "GSM1855180", "GSM1855181", "GSM1855182", "GSM1855183", "GSM1855184", "GSM1855185", "GSM1855186", "GSM1855187", "GSM1855188", "GSM1855189", "GSM1855190", "GSM1855191", "GSM1855192", "GSM1855193", "GSM1855194", "GSM1855195", "GSM1855196", "GSM1855197", "GSM1855198", "GSM1855199", "GSM1855200", "GSM1855201", "GSM1855202", "GSM1855203", "GSM1855204", "GSM1855205", "GSM1855206", "GSM1855207", "GSM1855208", "GSM1855209", "GSM1855210", "GSM1855211", "GSM1855212", "GSM1855213", "GSM1855214", "GSM1855215", "GSM1855216", "GSM1855217", "GSM1855218", "GSM1855219", "GSM1855220", "GSM1855221", "GSM1855222", "GSM1855223", "GSM1855224", "GSM1855225", "GSM1855226", "GSM1855227", "GSM1855228", "GSM1855229", "GSM1855230", "GSM1855231", "GSM1855232", "GSM1855233", "GSM1855234", "GSM1855235", "GSM1855236", "GSM1855237", "GSM1855238"], "sample_count": 442, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "15048", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "KRAS mutation-associated gene expression, p53 and STK11 mutations, proliferation and immune surveillance in lung adenocarcinoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE131907 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE131907 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE72094 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE72094 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "In this study, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the TCGA-LUAD dataset, and 13 genes were found to be significantly associated with OS (Figure 5A). Next, a LASSO algorithm was used to screen for genes to construct a model (Figure 5B)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE131907", "GSE72094"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE131907", "GSE72094"], "statements": ["The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials."], "basis": "The paper names GSE131907, GSE72094 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:37942473", "data:geo:GSE131907"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE131907"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T18:58:36Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 17982, "completion_tokens": 1456, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:37942473", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37942473"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37942473", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37942473 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE131907", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE131907"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:37942473", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:37942473"}, {"id": "source:pmid:37942473", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 37942473 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE131907", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE131907"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-37942473", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:37942473"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE131907", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE131907"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:37942473", "parent_hash": "sha256:3a96385172e71f8407dbec1a4f41ad60aa63c7cf47efe5d6a72b3e5bf67efdfa", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE131907 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE131907 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE72094 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE72094 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Integrative Analysis of Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing Reveals Prognostic Characteristics of Macrop", "uencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can identify important genes involved in ca", "ective. Methods: The scRNA-seq data and bulk RNA-seq data of LUAD were downloaded from the Gene E", "or prognosis. The combination of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:0", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["cers with poor prognosis. The combination of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq", "e combination of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can ident", "ion from a broader perspective. Methods: The scRNA-seq data and bulk RNA-seq data of LUAD were down", "ncer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Analyzing scRNA-seq for core cells in the GSE131907 dataset, and"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:216", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["(TFs) that affect signature genes. Finally, qPCR were employed to validate the expression lev", "ssion of the characteristic genes. Moreover, qPCR confirmed that the expression of the prognos"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1885", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["ion of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity, apoptosis process, and leukocyte aggregation. In terms", "also enriched in pathways such as IL-17 and Apoptosis (Figure 4C). The final PPI network of the in"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:6623", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["In this study, univariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the TCGA-LUAD dataset, and 13 genes were found to be significantly associated with OS (Figure 5A). Next, a LASSO algorithm was used to screen for genes to construct a model (Figure 5B)."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:5"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:44:16+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}