{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:38107572", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:72f8fd839ccbcecba03efdf535bfa929d4ef6b7701d60ad095a9d53739394382", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:03:02Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:10:53Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "CXCL10-based gene cluster model serves as a potential diagnostic biomarker for premature ovarian failure.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.16659", "pmid": "38107572", "authors": ["Ying Qin", "Canliang Wen", "Huijiao Wu"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2023, "abstract": "Objective: Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a disease with high clinical heterogeneity. Subsequently, its diagnosis is challenging. CXCL10 which is a small signaling protein involved in immune response and inflammation may have diagnostic potential in detection of premature ovarian insufficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate CXCL10 based diagnostic biomarkers for POF.\nMethods: Transcriptome data for POF was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE39501). Principal component analysis (PCA) assessed CXCL10 expression in patients with POF. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, analyzed using PlotROC, demonstrated the diagnostic potential of CXCL10 and CXCL10-based models for POF. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the control group of POF were identified using DEbylimma. PlotVenn was used to determine the overlap between the POF-control group and the high-/low-expression CXCL10 groups. QuadrantPlot was employed to detect CXCL10-dysregulated genes in POF. Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were conducted on DEGs using RunMulti Group cluster Profiler. A POF model was induced with cisplatin (DDP) using KGN cells. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to measure the expression of CXCL10, apoptosis-related proteins, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway-related proteins in this model, following siRNA-mediated silencing of CXCL10. Flow cytometry was employed to assess the apoptosis of KGN cells after CXCL10 downregulation.\nResults: The expression of CXCL10 is dysregulated in POF, and it shows promising diagnostic potential for POF, as evidenced by an area under the curve value of 1. In POF, we found 3,362 up-regulated and 3,969 down-regulated DEGs compared to healthy controls, while the high- and low-expression groups of POF (comprising samples above and below the median CXCL10 expression) exhibited 1,304 up-regulated and 1,315 down-regulated DEGs. Among these, 786 DEGs consistently displayed dysregulation in POF due to CXCL10 influence. Enrichment analysis indicated that the PPAR signaling pathway was activated by CXCL10 in POF. The CXCL10-based model (including CXCL10, Itga2, and Raf1) holds potential as a diagnostic biomarker for POF. Additionally, in the DDP-induced KGN cell model, interfering with CXCL10 expression promoted the secretion of estradiol, and reduced apoptosis. Furthermore, CXCL10 silencing led to decreased expression levels of PPARβ and long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1 compared to the Si-NC group. These results suggest that CXCL10 influences the progression of POF through the PPAR signaling pathway.\nConclusion: The CXCL10-based model, demonstrating perfect diagnostic accuracy for POF and comprising CXCL10, Itga2, and Raf1, holds potential as a valuable diagnostic biomarker. Thus, the expression levels of these genes may collectively provide valuable diagnostic information for POF.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "ROC analysis was performed to assess the optimum cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We utilized Baiyin Cloud to implement RunLASSO for selecting feature genes impacted by CXCL10 in POF with diagnostic potential.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38107572", "locator": "sections[5] \"Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve\" paragraph 2", "quote": "ROC analysis was performed to assess the optimum cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with a 95% confidence interval (CI)."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:38107572", "locator": "sections[5] \"Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We utilized Baiyin Cloud to implement RunLASSO for selecting feature genes impacted by CXCL10 in POF with diagnostic potential."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38107572", "locator": "sections[23] \"Additional Information and Declarations\" paragraph 4", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The CXCL10-based model comprising CXCL10, ITGA2, and RAF1 achieved an AUC of 1 for POF diagnosis in the training set.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 1.0, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "Finally, the ROC curve (Fig. 5C) demonstrates that the CXCL10-based model possesses excellent diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 1) for POF in the training set, serving as a potential diagnostic biomarker for POF."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38107572", "locator": "sections[18] \"Diagnostic efficacy of CXCL10-based clinical model\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Finally, the ROC curve (Fig. 5C) demonstrates that the CXCL10-based model possesses excellent diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 1) for POF in the training set, serving as a potential diagnostic biomarker for POF."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The CXCL10-based model comprising CXCL10, ITGA2, and RAF1 achieved an AUC of 1 for POF diagnosis in the training set.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:38107572"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE39501"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE39501"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:38107572", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16659", "sha256": "sha256:c29efcaa7bab55d4bd08a0b07e51a013b59e22c09e007885c6bc71ee50607108", "bytes": 36871, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.16659", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10725173", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE39501", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39501", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE39501", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM970248", "GSM970249", "GSM970250", "GSM970251", "GSM970252", "GSM970253", "GSM970254", "GSM970255", "GSM970256"], "sample_count": 9, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6887", "taxon": "Mus musculus", "title": "Genomic profiling of SSCs (spermatogonial stem cells) transplanted recipients (SSCTR), premature ovarian failure (POF) and wild-type (WT) control ovaries.", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:46Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE39501 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE39501 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "analysis of variance"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC analysis"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "χ2"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "reordered", "quote": "ROC analysis was performed to assess the optimum cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We utilized Baiyin Cloud to implement RunLASSO for selecting feature genes impacted by CXCL10 in POF with diagnostic potential."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "bootstrap_mean_difference", "expected_value": 1.0, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE39501"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE39501"], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental Files."], "basis": "The paper names GSE39501 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:38107572", "data:geo:GSE39501"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE39501"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:02:54Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "reordered", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 10600, "completion_tokens": 1333, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:38107572", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38107572"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38107572", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38107572 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE39501", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE39501"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:38107572", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38107572"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38107572", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38107572 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE39501", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE39501"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-38107572", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:38107572"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE39501", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE39501"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:38107572", "parent_hash": "sha256:f9f87f6605ac05a1063c629ba54daea6a0ab8ddcd5be75f58ecab0b13ee83054", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE39501 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE39501 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["nduced with cisplatin (DDP) using KGN cells. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to measure the ex", "ced with cisplatin (DDP) using KGN cells. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to measure the ex"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1315", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["cisplatin (DDP) using KGN cells. RT-qPCR and Western blot were used to measure the expression of CXCL1"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1327", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["re used to measure the expression of CXCL10, apoptosis-related proteins, and peroxisome proliferato", "0. Flow cytometry was employed to assess the apoptosis of KGN cells after CXCL10 downregulation. Re", "oted the secretion of estradiol, and reduced apoptosis. Furthermore, CXCL10 silencing led to decrea"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1387", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "transfection", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ay-related proteins in this model, following siRNA-mediated silencing of CXCL10. Flow cytometry", "Materials and Methods Cell culture and transfection Human ovarian granulosa cells (KGN cells) we", ", and 80 μg/mL) for 24 or 48 h. The utilized siRNA sequences were as follows: Si-CXCL10, 5′-GCC"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1529", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "flow_cytometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["ollowing siRNA-mediated silencing of CXCL10. Flow cytometry was employed to assess the apoptosis of KGN"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1565", "id": "assay:5"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["analysis of variance"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:6"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:42:18+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}