{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:38274323", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:9422dcfca728a3443b739f2e598a0b03ba414ae8d0c1955ed79cfebc54119623", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:20:12Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:11:07Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Single-cell data revealed CD14-type and FCGR3A-type macrophages and relevant prognostic factors for predicting immunotherapy and prognosis in stomach adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.16776", "pmid": "38274323", "authors": ["Mengling Li", "Ming Lu", "Jun Li", "Qingqing Gui", "Yibin Xia", "Chao Lu", "Hongchun Shu"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) exhibits profound tumor heterogeneity and represents a great therapeutic challenge. Single-cell sequencing technology is a powerful tool to identify characteristic cell types.\nMethods: Single-cell sequencing data (scRNA-seq) GSE167297 and bulk RNA-seq data from TCGA, GTEx, GSE26901 and GSE15459 database were included in this study. By downscaling and annotating the cellular data in scRNA-seq, critical cell types in tumor progression were identified by AUCell score. Relevant gene modules were then identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). A prognostic scoring system was constructed by identifying prognostic factors in STAD by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) COX model. The prognosis and model performance in the RiskScore groups were measured by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Nomogram was drawn based on RiskScore and prognosis-related clinical factors. In addition, we evaluated patient's feedback on immunotherapy in the RiskScore groups by TIMER, ESTIMATE and TIDE analysis. Finally, the expression levels of prognostic factors were verified in gastric cancer cell lines (MKN7 and MKN28) and human normal gastric mucosal epithelial cells (GES-1), and the effects of prognostic factors on the viability of gastric cancer cells were examined by the CCK8 assay and cell cycle.\nResults: scRNA-seq analysis revealed that 11 cell types were identified, and macrophages exhibited relatively higher AUCell scores and specifically expressed CD14 and FCGR3A. High macrophage scores worsened the prognosis of STAD patients. We intersected the specifically expressed genes in macrophages subgroups (670) and macrophage module genes (2,360) obtained from WGCNA analysis. Among 86 common genes, seven prognostic factors (RGS2, GNAI2, ANXA5, MARCKS, CD36, NRP1 and PDE4A) were identified and composed a RiskScore model. Patients in low Risk group showed a better survival advantage. Nomogram also provided a favorable prediction for survival at 1, 3 and 5 years in STAD patients. Besides, we found positive feedback to immunotherapy in patients with low RiskScore. The expression tendency of the seven prognostic factors in MKN7 and MKN28 was consistent with that in the RNA-seq data in addition to comparison of protein expression levels in the public HPA (The Human Protein Atlas) database. Further functional exploration disclosed that MARCKS was an important prognostic factor in regulating cell viability in STAD.\nConclusion: This study preliminary uncovered a single cell atlas for STAD patients, and Macrophages relevant gene signature and nomogram displayed favorable immunotherapy and prognostic prediction ability. Collectively, our work provides a new insight into the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approach for LUAD patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The model was trained based on 5-fold cross-validation to select the penalty parameter λ.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38274323", "locator": "sections[8] \"STAD prognostic system\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The model was trained based on 5-fold cross-validation to select the penalty parameter λ."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38274323", "locator": "sections[28] \"Additional Information and Declarations\" paragraph 4", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Among 86 common genes, seven prognostic factors (RGS2, GNAI2, ANXA5, MARCKS, CD36, NRP1 and PDE4A) were identified and composed a RiskScore model.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38274323", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Among 86 common genes, seven prognostic factors (RGS2, GNAI2, ANXA5, MARCKS, CD36, NRP1 and PDE4A) were identified and composed a RiskScore model."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:38274323", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "A prognostic scoring system was constructed by identifying prognostic factors in STAD by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) COX model."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Among 86 common genes, seven prognostic factors (RGS2, GNAI2, ANXA5, MARCKS, CD36, NRP1 and PDE4A) were identified and composed a RiskScore model.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:38274323"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE15459"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE15459"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:38274323", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16776", "sha256": "sha256:b0ff748002700f6f99f15ad67cd2a007b70799bc89d216fb01bddd833e6047d1", "bytes": 43673, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.16776", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10809984", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE15459", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE15459", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE15459", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM387788", "GSM387789", "GSM387790", "GSM387791", "GSM387792", "GSM387793", "GSM387794", "GSM387795", "GSM387796", "GSM387797", "GSM387798", "GSM387799", "GSM387800", "GSM387801", "GSM387802", "GSM387803", "GSM387804", "GSM387805", "GSM387806", "GSM387807", "GSM387808", "GSM387809", "GSM387810", "GSM387811", "GSM387812", "GSM387813", "GSM387814", "GSM387815", "GSM387816", "GSM387817", "GSM387818", "GSM387819", "GSM387820", "GSM387821", "GSM387822", "GSM387823", "GSM387824", "GSM387825", "GSM387826", "GSM387827", "GSM387828", "GSM387829", "GSM387830", "GSM387831", "GSM387832", "GSM387833", "GSM387834", "GSM387835", "GSM387836", "GSM387837", "GSM387838", "GSM387839", "GSM387840", "GSM387841", "GSM387842", "GSM387843", "GSM387844", "GSM387845", "GSM387846", "GSM387847", "GSM387848", "GSM387849", "GSM387850", "GSM387851", "GSM387852", "GSM387853", "GSM387854", "GSM387855", "GSM387856", "GSM387857", "GSM387858", "GSM387859", "GSM387860", "GSM387861", "GSM387862", "GSM387863", "GSM387864", "GSM387865", "GSM387866", "GSM387867", "GSM387868", "GSM387869", "GSM387870", "GSM387871", "GSM387872", "GSM387873", "GSM387874", "GSM387875", "GSM387876", "GSM387877", "GSM387878", "GSM387879", "GSM387880", "GSM387881", "GSM387882", "GSM387883", "GSM387884", "GSM387885", "GSM387886", "GSM387887", "GSM387888", "GSM387889", "GSM387890", "GSM387891", "GSM387892", "GSM387893", "GSM387894", "GSM387895", "GSM387896", "GSM387897", "GSM387898", "GSM387899", "GSM387900", "GSM387901", "GSM387902", "GSM387903", "GSM387904", "GSM387905", "GSM387906", "GSM387907", "GSM387908", "GSM387909", "GSM387910", "GSM387911", "GSM387912", "GSM387913", "GSM387914", "GSM387915", "GSM387916", "GSM387917", "GSM387918", "GSM387919", "GSM387920", "GSM387921", "GSM387922", "GSM387923", "GSM387924", "GSM387925", "GSM387926", "GSM387927", "GSM387928", "GSM387929", "GSM387930", "GSM387931", "GSM387932", "GSM387933", "GSM387934", "GSM387935", "GSM387936", "GSM387937", "GSM387938", "GSM387939", "GSM387940", "GSM387941", "GSM387942", "GSM387943", "GSM387944", "GSM387945", "GSM387946", "GSM387947", "GSM387948", "GSM387949", "GSM387950", "GSM387951", "GSM387952", "GSM387953", "GSM387954", "GSM387955", "GSM387956", "GSM387957", "GSM387958", "GSM387959", "GSM387960", "GSM387961", "GSM387962", "GSM387963", "GSM387964", "GSM387965", "GSM387966", "GSM387967", "GSM387968", "GSM387969", "GSM387970", "GSM387971", "GSM387972", "GSM387973", "GSM387974", "GSM387975", "GSM387976", "GSM387977", "GSM387978", "GSM387979", "GSM387980", "GSM387981", "GSM387982", "GSM387983", "GSM387984", "GSM387985", "GSM387986", "GSM387987"], "sample_count": 200, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gastric Cancer Project '08 (Singapore Patient Cohort)", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE167297", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE167297", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE167297", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM5101013", "GSM5101014", "GSM5101015", "GSM5101016", "GSM5101017", "GSM5101018", "GSM5101019", "GSM5101020", "GSM5101021", "GSM5101022", "GSM5101023", "GSM5101024", "GSM5101025", "GSM5101026"], "sample_count": 14, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "20301", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Spatially distinct reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment based on tumor invasion in diffuse-type gastric cancers", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T19:09:46Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE26901", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE26901", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE26901", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM662509", "GSM662510", "GSM662511", "GSM662512", "GSM662513", "GSM662514", "GSM662515", "GSM662516", "GSM662517", "GSM662518", "GSM662519", "GSM662520", "GSM662521", "GSM662522", "GSM662523", "GSM662524", "GSM662525", "GSM662526", "GSM662527", "GSM662528", "GSM662529", "GSM662530", "GSM662531", "GSM662532", "GSM662533", "GSM662534", "GSM662535", "GSM662536", "GSM662537", "GSM662538", "GSM662539", "GSM662540", "GSM662541", "GSM662542", "GSM662543", "GSM662544", "GSM662545", "GSM662546", "GSM662547", "GSM662548", "GSM662549", "GSM662550", "GSM662551", "GSM662552", "GSM662553", "GSM662554", "GSM662555", "GSM662556", "GSM662557", "GSM662558", "GSM662559", "GSM662560", "GSM662561", "GSM662562", "GSM662563", "GSM662564", "GSM662565", "GSM662566", "GSM662567", "GSM662568", "GSM662569", "GSM662570", "GSM662571", "GSM662572", "GSM662573", "GSM662574", "GSM662575", "GSM662576", "GSM662577", "GSM662578", "GSM662579", "GSM662580", "GSM662581", "GSM662582", "GSM662583", "GSM662584", "GSM662585", "GSM662586", "GSM662587", "GSM662588", "GSM662589", "GSM662590", "GSM662591", "GSM662592", "GSM662593", "GSM662594", "GSM662595", "GSM662596", "GSM662597", "GSM662598", "GSM662599", "GSM662600", "GSM662601", "GSM662602", "GSM662603", "GSM662604", "GSM662605", "GSM662606", "GSM662607", "GSM662608", "GSM662609", "GSM662610", "GSM662611", "GSM662612", "GSM662613", "GSM662614", "GSM662615", "GSM662616", "GSM662617"], "sample_count": 109, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6947", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Characterization of gene expression profiles of gastric cancer in Kosin University cohort", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE15459 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE15459 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE167297 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE167297 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE26901 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE26901 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The model was trained based on 5-fold cross-validation to select the penalty parameter λ."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "analysis of variance"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Log Rank"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE167297", "GSE26901", "GSE15459"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE167297", "GSE26901", "GSE15459"], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:The data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459and the raw measurements are available at GitHub and Zenodo:- https://github.com/Shu12q/Raw-data.git.- Shu12q. (2023). Shu12q/Raw-data: First release of my data (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8374644."], "basis": "The paper names GSE167297, GSE26901, GSE15459 in GENE EXPRESSION OMNIBUS (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:38274323", "data:geo:GSE15459"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE15459"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:06:42Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12329, "completion_tokens": 2859, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:38274323", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38274323"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38274323", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38274323 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE15459", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE15459"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:38274323", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38274323"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38274323", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38274323 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE15459", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE15459"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-38274323", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:38274323"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE15459", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE15459"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:38274323", "parent_hash": "sha256:c5ccb8f9e5c38f208669cd5f5cbeb0bd7b90c498947bc6605be12db424e931ea", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE15459 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE15459 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE167297 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE167297 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE26901 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE26901 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["types. Methods: Single-cell sequencing data (scRNA-seq) GSE167297 and bulk RNA-seq data from TCGA,", "nscaling and annotating the cellular data in scRNA-seq, critical cell types in tumor progression we", "d by the CCK8 assay and cell cycle. Results: scRNA-seq analysis revealed that 11 cell types were id", "ata from STAD patients This study included a single-cell RNA sequencing project of STAD patients (registration numbe"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:377", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["quencing data (scRNA-seq) GSE167297 and bulk RNA-seq data from TCGA, GTEx, GSE26901 and GSE15459", "459 datasets, and 359 normal stomach tissues transcriptome sequencing data from The Genotype-Tissue Exp", "N7 and MKN28 was consistent with that in the RNA-seq data in addition to comparison of protein ex", "of qRT-PCR matched the expression levels in RNA-seq data analysis. WB was conducted to detect th"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:407", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["of gastric cancer cells were examined by the CCK8 assay and cell cycle. Results: scRNA-seq ana", "observed by cell cycle (Figs. 7I and 7J) and CCK8 assays (Figs. 7K and 7L). Experimental valid", "MARCK5 expression. (K and L) Representative CCK8 results following inhibition of MARCK5 expre"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1518", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The model was trained based on 5-fold cross-validation to select the penalty parameter λ."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:54:03+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}