{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:38568083", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:fcc85fdf544eef4437207559c581b19617b5f97439935e7f72c6b51ebc457907", "created_at": "2026-11-01T19:20:32Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:11:36Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Integrative analysis unveils ECM signatures and pathways driving hepatocellular carcinoma progression: A multi-omics approach and prognostic model development.", "doi": "10.1111/jcmm.18230", "pmid": "38568083", "authors": ["Zhen Liu", "Pengfei Zhao"], "journal": "Journal of cellular and molecular medicine", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) is a highly lethal form of cancer that is among the deadliest cancer types globally. In terms of cancer-related mortality rates, liver cancer ranks among the top three, underscoring the severity of this disease. Insufficient analysis has been conducted to fully understand the potential value of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in immune infiltration and the prognostic stratification of LIHC, despite its recognised importance in the development of this disease. The scRNA-seq data of GSE149614 was used to conduct single-cell analysis on 10 LIHC samples. CellChat scores were calculated for seven cell populations in the descending cohort to investigate cellular communication, while PROGENy scores were calculated to determine tumour-associated pathway scores in different cell populations. The pathway analysis using GO and KEGG revealed the enrichment of ECM-associated genes in the pathway, highlighting the potential role of the ECM in LIHC development. By utilizing the TCGA-LIHC cohort, an ECM-based prognostic model for LIHC was developed using Lasso regression. Immune infiltration scores were calculated using two methods, and the performance of the ECM-related risk score was evaluated using an independent cohort from the CheckMate study. To determine the precise expression of ECM-associated risk genes in LIHC, we evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines using a range of assays, including Western blotting, invasion assays and Transwell assays. Using single-cell transcriptome analysis, we annotated the spatially-specific distribution of major immune cell types in single-cell samples of LIHC. The main cell types identified and annotated included hepatocytes, T cells, myeloid cells, epithelial cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and B cells. The utilisation of cellchat and PROGENy analyses enabled the investigation and unveiling of signalling interactions, protein functionalities and the prominent influential pathways facilitated by the primary immune cell types within the LIHC. Numerous tumour pathways, including PI2K, EGFR and TGFb, demonstrated a close correlation with the involvement of ECM in LIHC. Moreover, an evaluation was conducted to assess the primary ECM-related functional changes and biological pathway enrichment in LIHC. Differential genes associated with ECM were identified and utilised to create prognostic models. The prognostic stratification value of these models for LIHC patients was confirmed through validation in multiple databases. Furthermore, through immune infiltration analysis, it was discovered that ECM might be linked to the irregular expression and regulation of numerous immune cells. Additionally, histone acetylation was mapped against gene mutation frequencies and differential expression profiles. The prognostic stratification efficacy of the ECM prediction model constructed in the context of PD-1 inhibitor therapy was also examined, and it exhibited strong stratification performance. Cellular experiments, including Western blotting, invasion and Transwell assays, revealed that ECM-associated risk genes have a promoting effect on the development of LIHC. The creation of biomarkers for LIHC using ECM-related genes unveiled substantial correlations with immune microenvironmental infiltration and functional mutations in various tumour pathways. This enlightens us to the possibility that the influence of ECM on tumours may extend beyond simply promoting the fibrotic process and the stromal composition of tumours.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Next, a prognostic model was constructed by selecting prognostically significant genes from the 22 genes based on Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression using TCGA‐LIHC cohort.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38568083", "locator": "sections[6] \"Biological construction and clinical validation of prognostic risk models for LIHC with ECM‐related genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Next, a prognostic model was constructed by selecting prognostically significant genes from the 22 genes based on Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression using TCGA‐LIHC cohort."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38568083", "locator": "sections[24] \"DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\" paragraph 2", "quote": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Using Lasso regression on 22 ECM-related genes in the TCGA-LIHC cohort, the study constructed a seven-gene prognostic model that separated patients with significantly different survival outcomes (p < 0.01) and achieved an AUC of 0.705 in the independent GSE14520 cohort.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.705, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "source": "The results of ROC curve showed that signature in the testing cohort had good test efficiency (AUC = 0.705)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:38568083", "locator": "sections[17] \"Biological construction and clinical validation of prognostic risk models for LIHC with ECM‐associated genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Using the TCGA‐LIHC cohort, we selected seven prognostic ECM genes from 22 genes using Lasso regression and constructed a prognostic model."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:38568083", "locator": "sections[17] \"Biological construction and clinical validation of prognostic risk models for LIHC with ECM‐associated genes\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The analysis indicated that high‐risk group patients, with higher ECM expression, had poorer survival rates (p < 0.01) compared to those in the low‐risk group, who exhibited significantly longer survival times."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:38568083", "locator": "sections[17] \"Biological construction and clinical validation of prognostic risk models for LIHC with ECM‐associated genes\" paragraph 4", "quote": "The results of ROC curve showed that signature in the testing cohort had good test efficiency (AUC = 0.705)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Using Lasso regression on 22 ECM-related genes in the TCGA-LIHC cohort, the study constructed a seven-gene prognostic model that separated patients with significantly different survival outcomes (p < 0.01) and achieved an AUC of 0.705 in the independent GSE14520 cohort.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:38568083"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE14520"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE14520"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:38568083", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.18230", "sha256": "sha256:bc7c5980506a4033f430bf5e34b9aac767a6eccaca308f8880ebc51477616295", "bytes": 65718, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1111/jcmm.18230", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC10989547", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE14520", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE14520", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE14520", "version": null, "note": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM362947", "GSM362948", "GSM362949", "GSM362950", "GSM362951", "GSM362952", "GSM362953", "GSM362954", "GSM362955", "GSM362956", "GSM362957", "GSM362958", "GSM362959", "GSM362960", "GSM362961", "GSM362962", "GSM362963", "GSM362964", "GSM362965", "GSM362966", "GSM362967", "GSM362968", "GSM362969", "GSM362970", "GSM362971", "GSM362972", "GSM362973", "GSM362974", "GSM362975", "GSM362976", "GSM362977", "GSM362978", "GSM362979", "GSM362980", "GSM362981", "GSM362982", "GSM362983", "GSM362984", "GSM362985", "GSM362986", "GSM362987", "GSM362988", "GSM362989", "GSM362990", "GSM362991", "GSM362992", "GSM362993", "GSM362994", "GSM362995", "GSM362996", "GSM362997", "GSM362998", "GSM362999", "GSM363000", "GSM363001", "GSM363002", "GSM363003", "GSM363004", "GSM363005", "GSM363006", "GSM363007", "GSM363008", "GSM363009", "GSM363010", "GSM363011", "GSM363012", "GSM363013", "GSM363014", "GSM363015", "GSM363016", "GSM363017", "GSM363018", "GSM363019", "GSM363020", "GSM363021", "GSM363022", "GSM363023", "GSM363024", "GSM363025", "GSM363026", "GSM363027", "GSM363028", "GSM363029", "GSM363030", "GSM363031", "GSM363032", "GSM363033", "GSM363034", "GSM363035", "GSM363036", "GSM363037", "GSM363038", "GSM363039", "GSM363040", "GSM363041", "GSM363042", "GSM363043", "GSM363044", "GSM363045", "GSM363046", "GSM363047", "GSM363048", "GSM363049", "GSM363050", "GSM363051", "GSM363052", "GSM363053", "GSM363054", "GSM363055", "GSM363056", "GSM363057", "GSM363058", "GSM363059", "GSM363060", "GSM363061", "GSM363062", "GSM363063", "GSM363064", "GSM363065", "GSM363066", "GSM363067", "GSM363068", "GSM363069", "GSM363070", "GSM363071", "GSM363072", "GSM363073", "GSM363074", "GSM363075", "GSM363076", "GSM363077", "GSM363078", "GSM363079", "GSM363080", "GSM363081", "GSM363082", "GSM363083", "GSM363084", "GSM363085", "GSM363086", "GSM363087", "GSM363088", "GSM363089", "GSM363090", "GSM363091", "GSM363092", "GSM363093", "GSM363094", "GSM363095", "GSM363096", "GSM363097", "GSM363098", "GSM363099", "GSM363100", "GSM363101", "GSM363102", "GSM363103", "GSM363104", "GSM363105", "GSM363106", "GSM363107", "GSM363108", "GSM363109", "GSM363110", "GSM363111", "GSM363112", "GSM363113", "GSM363114", "GSM363115", "GSM363116", "GSM363117", "GSM363118", "GSM363119", "GSM363120", "GSM363121", "GSM363122", "GSM363123", "GSM363124", "GSM363125", "GSM363126", "GSM363127", "GSM363128", "GSM363129", "GSM363130", "GSM363131", "GSM363132", "GSM363133", "GSM363134", "GSM363135", "GSM363136", "GSM363137", "GSM363138", "GSM363139", "GSM363140", "GSM363141", "GSM363142", "GSM363143", "GSM363144", "GSM363145", "GSM363146", "GSM363147", "GSM363148", "GSM363149", "GSM363150", "GSM363151", "GSM363152", "GSM363153", "GSM363154", "GSM363155", "GSM363156", "GSM363157", "GSM363158", "GSM363159", "GSM363160", "GSM363161", "GSM363162", "GSM363163", "GSM363164", "GSM363165", "GSM363166", "GSM363167", "GSM363168", "GSM363169", "GSM363170", "GSM363171", "GSM363172", "GSM363173", "GSM363174", "GSM363175", "GSM363176", "GSM363177", "GSM363178", "GSM363179", "GSM363180", "GSM363181", "GSM363182", "GSM363183", "GSM363184", "GSM363185", "GSM363186", "GSM363187", "GSM363188", "GSM363189", "GSM363190", "GSM363191", "GSM363192", "GSM363193", "GSM363194", "GSM363195", "GSM363196", "GSM363197", "GSM363198", "GSM363199", "GSM363200", "GSM363201", "GSM363202", "GSM363203", "GSM363204", "GSM363205", "GSM363206", "GSM363207", "GSM363208", "GSM363209", "GSM363210", "GSM363211", "GSM363212", "GSM363213", "GSM363214", "GSM363215", "GSM363216", "GSM363217", "GSM363218", "GSM363219", "GSM363220", "GSM363221", "GSM363222", "GSM363223", "GSM363224", "GSM363225", "GSM363226", "GSM363227", "GSM363228", "GSM363229", "GSM363230", "GSM363231", "GSM363232", "GSM363233", "GSM363234", "GSM363235", "GSM363236", "GSM363237", "GSM363238", "GSM363239", "GSM363240", "GSM363241", "GSM363242", "GSM363243", "GSM363244", "GSM363245", "GSM363246", "GSM363247", "GSM363248", "GSM363249", "GSM363250", "GSM363251", "GSM363252", "GSM363253", "GSM363254", "GSM363255", "GSM363256", "GSM363257", "GSM363258", "GSM363259", "GSM363260", "GSM363261", "GSM363262", "GSM363263", "GSM363264", "GSM363265", "GSM363266", "GSM363267", "GSM363268", "GSM363269", "GSM363270", "GSM363271", "GSM363272", "GSM363273", "GSM363274", "GSM363275", "GSM363276", "GSM363277", "GSM363278", "GSM363279", "GSM363280", "GSM363281", "GSM363282", "GSM363283", "GSM363284", "GSM363285", "GSM363286", "GSM363287", "GSM363288", "GSM363289", "GSM363290", "GSM363291", "GSM363292", "GSM363293", "GSM363294", "GSM363295", "GSM363296", "GSM363297", "GSM363298", "GSM363299", "GSM363300", "GSM363301", "GSM363302", "GSM363303", "GSM363304", "GSM363305", "GSM363306", "GSM363307", "GSM363308", "GSM363309", "GSM363310", "GSM363311", "GSM363312", "GSM363313", "GSM363314", "GSM363315", "GSM363316", "GSM363317", "GSM363318", "GSM363319", "GSM363320", "GSM363321", "GSM363322", "GSM363323", "GSM363324", "GSM363325", "GSM363326", "GSM363327", "GSM363328", "GSM363329", "GSM363330", "GSM363331", "GSM363332", "GSM363333", "GSM363334", "GSM363335", "GSM363336", "GSM363337", "GSM363338", "GSM363339", "GSM363340", "GSM363341", "GSM363342", "GSM363343", "GSM363344", "GSM363345", "GSM363346", "GSM363347", "GSM363348", "GSM363349", "GSM363350", "GSM363351", "GSM363352", "GSM363353", "GSM363354", "GSM363355", "GSM363356", "GSM363357", "GSM363358", "GSM363359", "GSM363360", "GSM363361", "GSM363362", "GSM363363", "GSM363364", "GSM363365", "GSM363366", "GSM363367", "GSM363368", "GSM363369", "GSM363370", "GSM363371", "GSM363372", "GSM363373", "GSM363374", "GSM363375", "GSM363376", "GSM363378", "GSM363380", "GSM363381", "GSM363382", "GSM363384", "GSM363386", "GSM363388", "GSM363391", "GSM363393", "GSM363397", "GSM363400", "GSM363402", "GSM363404", "GSM363407", "GSM363417", "GSM363420", "GSM363421", "GSM363422", "GSM363423", "GSM363424", "GSM363425", "GSM363426", "GSM363427", "GSM363428", "GSM363429", "GSM363430", "GSM363431", "GSM363432", "GSM363433", "GSM363434", "GSM363435", "GSM363436", "GSM363437", "GSM363438", "GSM363439", "GSM363440", "GSM363441", "GSM363442", "GSM363443", "GSM363444", "GSM363445", "GSM363446", "GSM363447", "GSM363448", "GSM363449", "GSM363450", "GSM363451", "GSM712532", "GSM712533", "GSM712534", "GSM712535", "GSM712536", "GSM712537", "GSM712538", "GSM712539", "GSM712540", "GSM712541", "GSM712542"], "sample_count": 488, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "3921;571", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression data of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE149614", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE149614", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE149614", "version": null, "note": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4505944", "GSM4505945", "GSM4505946", "GSM4505947", "GSM4505948", "GSM4505949", "GSM4505950", "GSM4505951", "GSM4505952", "GSM4505953", "GSM4505954", "GSM4505955", "GSM4505956", "GSM4505957", "GSM4505958", "GSM4505959", "GSM4505960", "GSM4505961", "GSM4505962", "GSM4505963", "GSM4505964"], "sample_count": 21, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "24676", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "A Single-Cell Atlas of the Multicellular Ecosystem of Primary and Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE14520 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE14520 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE149614 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE149614 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ANOVA"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"hazard_ratio": "ysis for SPP1 and UROD (HR > 1)"}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "multi_omics_integration", "specific": "pathway_progeny", "label": "Multi-omics integration", "dsl_operations": ["multiomics_factor_analysis", "joint_pathway_score"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["aligned_multi_layer_matrices"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "PROGENy"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Next, a prognostic model was constructed by selecting prognostically significant genes from the 22 genes based on Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression using TCGA‐LIHC cohort."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "bootstrap_mean_difference", "expected_value": 0.705, "unit": "auc", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The published estimate as the reader quoted it from the paper. No tolerance is published because the paper states none."}, {"id": "target-published-estimate-p-value", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "bootstrap_mean_difference", "expected_value": 0.01, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE14520", "GSE149614"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE14520", "GSE149614"], "statements": ["All datasets generated for this study are included in the article material, including TCGA‐LIHC, GSE14520 and GSE149614."], "basis": "The paper names GSE14520, GSE149614 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:38568083", "data:geo:GSE14520"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE14520"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:14:25Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 15269, "completion_tokens": 2734, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:38568083", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38568083"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38568083", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38568083 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE14520", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE14520"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:38568083", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:38568083"}, {"id": "source:pmid:38568083", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 38568083 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE14520", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE14520"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-38568083", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:38568083"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE14520", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE14520"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:38568083", "parent_hash": "sha256:db538ce2764bcf5cc93d152d11633bdb324f1b309d386b7f5522bfdc3f581f3f", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE14520 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE14520 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE149614 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE149614 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["ance in the development of this disease. The scRNA-seq data of GSE149614 was used to conduct single"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:620", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ell lines using a range of assays, including Western blotting, invasion assays and Transwell assays. Using", "performance. Cellular experiments, including Western blotting, invasion and Transwell assays, revealed tha", "stical analysis of intergroup differences in Western blot, colony formation assay and Transwell assay,", "SPP1 in HepG2 and SNU‐387 cell lines through Western blot. (B) Quantitative analysis of the results of"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1563", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "amplicon_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["s Conventional second‐generation sequencing (NGS) analyses the genome of a group of cells, in"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3814", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "transfection", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["e PD‐1 inhibitor nivolumab. Cell culture and transfection The hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 and SNU‐3", "of culture medium. Twenty‐four hours before transfection, all groups were switched to serum‐free medi", "μL of Opti‐MEM medium (Thermo, USA), and the transfection reagent Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo, USA) was", "in 125 μL of Opti‐MEM medium. The siRNA and transfection reagent mixture was incubated in the dark at"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:14043", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["emperature cell incubator (37°C, 5% CO2) and cultured in high‐glucose Dulbecco's modified eagle mediu", "nd transfection The hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 and SNU‐387O2 cell lines were obtained from", "ted that as the culture time increased, both HepG2 (Figure 6C) and SNU‐387 (Figure 6D) cell lin", "ation of the knockdown efficiency of SPP1 in HepG2 and SNU‐387 cell lines through Western blot."], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:14085", "id": "assay:5"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["were employed. Statistical analysis for the CCK8 assay was performed using two‐way ANOVA. A s", "epatocellular carcinoma cell lines using the CCK8 assay. The results indicated that as the cul", "absorbance of three groups of HepG2 cells in CCK8 experiments. (D) Time‐dependent changes in a", "sorbance of three groups of SNU‐387 cells in CCK8 experiments. (E) Photographs of colony forma"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:16104", "id": "assay:6"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["ANOVA"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:7"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T02:27:06+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}