{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39144363", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:b727e134d06332beef21b5d0cfa29a20d82b5fda87761415fee605e96febce1d", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:14Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:12:28Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Bioinformatic analysis of differentially expressed genes in lung cancer bone metastasis and their implications for disease progression in lung cancer patients.", "doi": "10.21037/jtd-24-1081", "pmid": "39144363", "authors": ["Qiaojun Hong", "Haiyan Hu", "Dandan Liu", "Xiaojian Hu", "Zhanggui Wang", "Daoping Zhou"], "journal": "Journal of thoracic disease", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Moreover, it is highly susceptible to distant metastasis, which is the main cause of pain in advanced lung cancer, and frequently occurs in the bone. This study aimed to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to metastatic bone disease in lung cancer using bioinformatics methods and to analyze the risk factors influencing the incidence of secondary bone metastasis in lung cancer.\nMethods: Gene expression profiles from the GSE175601 and GSE10799 datasets in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were analyzed to screen for the DEGs associated with lung cancer bone metastasis. The STRING database was used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and the MCODE plugin was used to identify the key genes. The expression of these important genes in lung tumor tissues and their correlation with prognosis were validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. An examination of clinical data from patients diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated at the Anhui No. 2 Provincial People's Hospital was conducted. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression of key genes in lung cancer tumor tissues. A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the interactions in the expression of critical genes associated with bone metastasis in lung carcinoma patients.\nResults: In total, 59 DEGs were identified in the GSE175601 and GSE10799 datasets through Venn diagram construction. The PPI network analysis revealed two significant modules and eight candidate genes (LAPTM5, LCP2, CD53, ARHGAP25, C1QA, DES, MYH11, and VIM). According to TCGA database analysis, in carcinogenic tissues of the lung, the expression of these eight critical genes is downregulated. Further, only the lung cancer patients who had high expressions of ARHGAP25 had an improved progress-free interval (PFI) (P<0.05), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Of the 49 with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients included in the study, 27 (55.10%) developed bone metastasis. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score of ARHGAP25 was significantly lower in the group with bone metastasis (3.93±2.95) than the group without bone metastasis (6.64±3.62) (P=0.006). The proportion of patients with low ARHGAP25 expression was significantly higher in the group with bone metastasis (70.37%, 19/27) than the group without bone metastasis (31.82%, 7/22) (P=0.007). The binary logistic regression analysis identified serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ARHGAP25 expression levels as independent risk factors for the occurrence of secondary bone metastatic disease in lung carcinoma patients.\nConclusions: The key gene ARHGAP25 identified through bioinformatics for lung cancer bone metastasis was significantly downregulated. Its low expression constitutes an independent risk factor for secondary bone metastatic disease in patients with lung carcinoma.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the binary logistic regression tool.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39144363", "locator": "sections[10] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the binary logistic regression tool."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39144363", "locator": "sections[25] \"Data Sharing Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss"}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score of ARHGAP25 was significantly lower in the group with bone metastasis (3.93±2.95) than the group without bone metastasis (6.64±3.62) (P=0.006).", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.006, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "source": "The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score of ARHGAP25 was significantly lower in the group with bone metastasis (3.93±2.95) than the group without bone metastasis (6.64±3.62) (P=0.006)."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39144363", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score of ARHGAP25 was significantly lower in the group with bone metastasis (3.93±2.95) than the group without bone metastasis (6.64±3.62) (P=0.006)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score of ARHGAP25 was significantly lower in the group with bone metastasis (3.93±2.95) than the group without bone metastasis (6.64±3.62) (P=0.006).", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39144363"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE10799"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE10799"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39144363", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1081", "sha256": "sha256:42b3f017ff93931d8c3ed83b55f29f39ab0f1514f98f4bae389dcd8564c71858", "bytes": 40643, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.21037/jtd-24-1081", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11320291", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE10799", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE10799", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE10799", "version": null, "note": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM272754", "GSM272755", "GSM272756", "GSM272757", "GSM272758", "GSM272759", "GSM272760", "GSM272761", "GSM272762", "GSM272763", "GSM272764", "GSM272765", "GSM272766", "GSM272767", "GSM272768", "GSM272769", "GSM272770", "GSM272771", "GSM272772"], "sample_count": 19, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene expression profile of lung tumors", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE175601", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE175601", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE175601", "version": null, "note": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM5342379", "GSM5342380", "GSM5342381", "GSM5342382", "GSM5342383", "GSM5342384"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21185", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Identification of differentially expressed genes using microarray analysis and COL6A1 induction of bone metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE10799 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE10799 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE175601 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE175601 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "logistic", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the binary logistic regression tool."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "mann_whitney", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_mann_whitney"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Mann-Whitney"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Chi-square"}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "build_graph", "expected_value": 0.006, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: logistic."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE175601", "GSE10799"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE175601", "GSE10799"], "statements": ["Available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1081/dss"], "basis": "The paper names GSE175601, GSE10799 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39144363", "data:geo:GSE10799"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE10799"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:28:16Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 11134, "completion_tokens": 1960, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39144363", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39144363"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39144363", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39144363 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE10799", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE10799"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39144363", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39144363"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39144363", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39144363 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE10799", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE10799"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39144363", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39144363"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE10799", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE10799"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39144363", "parent_hash": "sha256:a79aed13deb20a1d2b114259fd48ac844e43325aeaf98fc4a2830c17718e1b1a", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE10799 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE10799 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE175601 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE175601 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "ihc", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Provincial People's Hospital was conducted. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine the expression of key ge", ", 27 (55.10%) developed bone metastasis. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression", "ed bone metastasis. The immunohistochemical (IHC) results indicated that the expression score"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1304", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "regression_modelling", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["glm_logit_fit"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the binary logistic regression tool."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T00:39:17+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}