{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39458974", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 3, "content_hash": "sha256:0616ddcc0f0ea819bbe3c7e91caa03424e34356d0117c8a60df4eb47268ba36c", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:43Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:13:01Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "The Identification of New Pharmacological Targets for the Treatment of Glaucoma: A Network Pharmacology Approach.", "doi": "10.3390/ph17101333", "pmid": "39458974", "authors": ["Erika Giuffrida", "Chiara Bianca Maria Platania", "Francesca Lazzara", "Federica Conti", "Nicoletta Marcantonio", "Filippo Drago", "Claudio Bucolo"], "journal": "Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by the neurodegeneration and death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), leading to blindness. Current glaucoma interventions reduce intraocular pressure but do not address retinal neurodegeneration. In this effort, to identify new pharmacological targets for glaucoma management, we employed a network pharmacology approach. Methods: We first retrieved transcriptomic data from GEO, an NCBI database, and carried out GEO2R (an interactive web tool aimed at comparing two or more groups of samples in a GEO dataset). The GEO2R statistical analysis aimed at identifying the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and used these as input of STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) app within Cytoscape software, which builds networks of proteins starting from input DEGs. Analyses of centrality metrics using Cytoscape were carried out to identify nodes (genes or proteins) involved in network stability. We also employed the web-server software MIRNET 2.0 to build miRNA-target interaction networks for a re-analysis of the GSE105269 dataset, which reports analyses of microRNA expressions. Results: The pharmacological targets, identified in silico through analyses of the centrality metrics carried out with Cytoscape, were rescored based on correlations with entries in the PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases. When there was no match (82 out of 135 identified central nodes, in 8 analyzed networks), targets were considered \"potential innovative\" targets for the treatment of glaucoma, after further validation studies. Conclusions: Several druggable targets, such as GPCRs (e.g., 5-hydroxytryptamine 5A (5-HT5A) and adenosine A2B receptors) and enzymes (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase A or monoamine oxidase B), were found to be rescored as \"potential innovative\" pharmacological targets for glaucoma treatment.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "DEGs (p < 0.05) for each sample of the GEO datasets (e.g., glaucoma vs. healthy control) were identified using the GEO2R statistical analysis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/geo2r.html accessed on 1 March 2022), applying the Benjamini and Hochberg (false discovery rate) method for the adjustment of p-values using standard parameters in GEO2R [23,123,124].", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39458974", "locator": "sections[14] \"4.1. GEO Dataset\" paragraph 2", "quote": "DEGs (p < 0.05) for each sample of the GEO datasets (e.g., glaucoma vs. healthy control) were identified using the GEO2R statistical analysis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/geo2r.html accessed on 1 March 2022), applying the Benjamini and Hochberg (false discovery rate) method for the adjustment of p-values using standard parameters in GEO2R [23,123,124]."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39458974", "locator": "sections[23] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Across six GEO datasets, 82 of 135 central genes had no match in PubMed or clinicaltrials.gov and were classified as potential innovative pharmacological targets for glaucoma treatment.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39458974", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "When there was no match (82 out of 135 identified central nodes, in 8 analyzed networks), targets were considered “potential innovative” targets for the treatment of glaucoma, after further validation studies."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:39458974", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Several druggable targets, such as GPCRs (e.g., 5-hydroxytryptamine 5A (5-HT5A) and adenosine A2B receptors) and enzymes (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase A or monoamine oxidase B), were found to be rescored as “potential innovative” pharmacological targets for glaucoma treatment."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Across six GEO datasets, 82 of 135 central genes had no match in PubMed or clinicaltrials.gov and were classified as potential innovative pharmacological targets for glaucoma treatment.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39458974"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE105269"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE105269"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39458974", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101333", "sha256": "sha256:d1fc13c822c1d8922648d46d7238019a5c543f10b514759c838c978e9245b81b", "bytes": 60923, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/ph17101333", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11509888", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE105269", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE105269", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE105269", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2825371", "GSM2825372", "GSM2825373", "GSM2825374", "GSM2825375", "GSM2825376", "GSM2825377", "GSM2825378", "GSM2825379", "GSM2825380", "GSM2825381", "GSM2825382", "GSM2825383", "GSM2825384", "GSM2825385", "GSM2825386", "GSM2825387", "GSM2825388", "GSM2825389", "GSM2825390", "GSM2825391", "GSM2825392", "GSM2825393", "GSM2825394", "GSM2825395", "GSM2825396", "GSM2825397", "GSM2825398", "GSM2825399", "GSM2825400", "GSM2825401", "GSM2825402", "GSM2825403", "GSM2825404", "GSM2825405"], "sample_count": 35, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "24158", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Differentially expressed microRNAs in the aqueous humor of patients with exfoliation glaucoma or primary open-angle glaucoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE133563", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE133563", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE133563", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM3912156", "GSM3912157", "GSM3912158", "GSM3912159", "GSM3912160", "GSM3912161", "GSM3912162", "GSM3912163"], "sample_count": 8, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "14745", "taxon": "Rattus norvegicus", "title": "Transcriptional profiling of the rat retina after optic nerve crush uncovers sustained activation of the complement cascade and Delta-Notch signaling pathways", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE27276", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE27276", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE27276", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM674408", "GSM674409", "GSM674410", "GSM674411", "GSM674412", "GSM674413", "GSM674414", "GSM674415", "GSM674416", "GSM674417", "GSM674418", "GSM674419", "GSM674420", "GSM674421", "GSM674422", "GSM674423", "GSM674424", "GSM674425", "GSM674426", "GSM674427", "GSM674428", "GSM674429", "GSM674430", "GSM674431", "GSM674432", "GSM674433", "GSM674434", "GSM674435", "GSM674436", "GSM674437", "GSM674438", "GSM674439", "GSM674440", "GSM674441", "GSM674442", "GSM674443"], "sample_count": 36, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "2507", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Genome-wide Expression of Trabecular Meshwork in POAG", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:43Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE3554", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE3554", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE3554", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM81688", "GSM81689", "GSM81690", "GSM81691", "GSM81692", "GSM81693"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "1261", "taxon": "Mus musculus", "title": "Microarray Analysis of Retinal Gene Expression in the DBA/2J Model of Glaucoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE4316", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE4316", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE4316", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM98622", "GSM98624", "GSM98625", "GSM98626", "GSM98627", "GSM98628", "GSM98629", "GSM98630"], "sample_count": 8, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Genome-wide expression profile of human trabecular meshwork cultured cells, non-glaucomatous and POAG tissue", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE45570", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE45570", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE45570", "version": null, "note": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1109867", "GSM1109868", "GSM1109869", "GSM1109870", "GSM1109871", "GSM1109872", "GSM1109873", "GSM1109874", "GSM1109875", "GSM1109876", "GSM1109877", "GSM1109878", "GSM1109879", "GSM1109880", "GSM1109881", "GSM1109882", "GSM1109883", "GSM1109884"], "sample_count": 18, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "5175", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "An Investigation of Global Gene Expression Patterns in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Derived Optic Nerve Heads", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE105269 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE105269 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE133563 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE133563 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE27276 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE27276 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE3554 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE3554 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE4316 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE4316 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE45570 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE45570 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "centrality", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "centrality"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "GEO2R statistical analysis with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate adjustment", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "DEGs (p < 0.05) for each sample of the GEO datasets (e.g., glaucoma vs. healthy control) were identified using the GEO2R statistical analysis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/geo2r.html accessed on 1 March 2022), applying the Benjamini and Hochberg (false discovery rate) method for the adjustment of p-values using standard parameters in GEO2R [23,123,124]."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: centrality."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE133563", "GSE105269", "GSE27276", "GSE4316", "GSE45570", "GSE3554"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE133563", "GSE105269", "GSE27276", "GSE4316", "GSE45570", "GSE3554"], "statements": ["All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article."], "basis": "The paper names GSE133563, GSE105269, GSE27276, GSE4316, GSE45570, GSE3554 in Gene Expression Omnibus and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39458974", "data:geo:GSE105269"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE105269"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:36:45Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 16528, "completion_tokens": 2291, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39458974", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39458974"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39458974", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39458974 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE105269", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE105269"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39458974", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39458974"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39458974", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39458974 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE105269", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE105269"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39458974", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39458974"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE105269", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE105269"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39458974", "parent_hash": "sha256:432e7cfbfdb22ada8b9d5c6731bbede3a879ec72bfc90b7072fdf90ad40bcaa9", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE105269 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE105269 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE133563 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE133563 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE27276 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE27276 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE3554 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE3554 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE4316 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE4316 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE45570 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE45570 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["rotoninergic agonist) decreased the IOP in a mouse model of steroid-induced ocular hypertension [87].", "ady been investigated as a modulator of IOPs in vivo [50,51]. With respect to adrenergic receptor", "olvement of lipocalin 2 was confirmed in two in vivo models of glaucoma, spontaneous glaucomatous", "erimental animal models of glaucoma, such as in mice [37] and rats [38]. 2.2. GSE105269: Analysis"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:5367", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["genes related to the AKT and Bcl-2-regulated apoptosis signaling pathways were identified as gene t", "T1, and GRB2); the “p53 signaling pathway”; “Apoptosis”; and “Axon guidance”. Pathways such as “Cho", "in which plays key roles in innate immunity, apoptosis, and cell proliferation. Moreover, the invol", "kine promotes caspase activation, leading to apoptosis, and IOP elevation in a rat model of ocular"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:7030", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "clinical_trial", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["bosentan is currently under evaluation in a randomized controlled trial (NCT02377271) including patients with nonart", "rovascular dysfunctions [76]. Furthermore, a phase I clinical trial was carried out on POAG subjects treated wit"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:20262", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["], validated, with a quantitative RT-PCR the microarray results for ceruloplasmin, chitinase 3-like"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:28307", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "network_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.7, "evidence": ["centrality"], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:5"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T00:33:11+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}