{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39525623", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:3e11ba10608dc9d8af34b64e216d0cdd01e9e68ced976c0b84b73738565a8fc5", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:47Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:55:35Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of lncRNA dual targeting PD-L1 and PD-L2 as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2024.1341056", "pmid": "39525623", "authors": ["Li-Na Zhang", "Jiong-Yu Chen", "Yu-Xin Liu", "Yue Zhang", "Liang-Li Hong", "Xin-Xin Li", "Shu-Hui Liu", "Shu-Qin Chen", "Lin Peng", "Yi-Teng Huang"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2024, "abstract": "Background: Although breakthroughs have been achieved in gastric cancer (GC) therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), the acquisition of high response rate remains a huge challenge for clinicians. It is imperative to identify novel biomarkers for predicting response to immunotherapy and explore alternative therapeutic strategy for GC.\nMethods: The transcriptomic profiles and clinical information of GC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) database was used to screen differentially expressed lncRNAs between the tumor specimens and the paracancerous tissues. The TargetScan, miRDB and miRcode database were then utilized to construct competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks and identify pivotal lncRNAs. An independent dataset from GEO (GSE70880) and 23 pairs of GC specimens of our cohort were subsequently performed for external validity. The relationship between clinical variables and gene expression were evaluated by Kruskal-wallis test and Wilcoxon signed-rank. The prognostic value of the candidate genes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. CIBERSORT and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to determine immune cell infiltration. Gastric adenocarcinoma AGS cells and human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells with knockdown of LINC01094 were generated by siRNA transfection, followed by detecting the alteration of the target miRNA and PD-L1/PD-L2 by RT-qPCR. Besides, the interaction between lncRNA and the miRNA-PD-L1/PD-L2 axis were verified by dual luciferase reporter assay.\nResults: Twenty-two intersecting lncRNAs were identified to be PD-L1/PD-L2-related lncRNAs and LINC01094-miR-17-5p-PD-L1/PD-L2 was constructed as a potential ceRNA network. LINC01094 was increased in tumor specimens than adjacent normal samples and was positively associated with advanced tumor stages and EBV and MSI status. Furthermore, LINC01094 expression was an independent risk factor for poor overall survival (OS) in GC patients. CD8+ T cell exhaustion-related genes were enriched in high-LINC01094 tissues and high-PD-L2 group. A strong positive association of LINC01094 expression was established with M2 macrophages, IL-10+ TAM, as well as PD-L1 and PD-L2 levels, therefore a LINC01094-miR-17-5p-IL-10 network was proposed in macrophages. Using the exoRBase database, LINC01094 was assumed in blood exosomes of GC patients The results of knockdown experiments and luciferase reporter assays revealed that LINC01094 interacted with miR-17-5p and served as a miRNA sponge to regulate the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2.\nConclusion: LINC01094 dually regulates the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 and shapes the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment via sponging miR-17-5p. LINC01094 may serve as a potential prognostic predictor and therapeutic target in GC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We applied the “limma” R package for the entire lncRNA data to identify the differentially-expressed lncRNAs (DE lncRNAs) between tumor and paracancerous specimens, with screening criteria set at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39525623", "locator": "sections[4] \"Identification of PD-L1/PD-L2-related differentially-expressed lncRNAs\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We applied the “limma” R package for the entire lncRNA data to identify the differentially-expressed lncRNAs (DE lncRNAs) between tumor and paracancerous specimens, with screening criteria set at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39525623", "locator": "sections[28] \"Data availability statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "LINC01094 was identified as a GC-associated lncRNA that dually regulates PD-L1 and PD-L2 through miR-17-5p and is associated with poor prognosis and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39525623", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "LINC01094 dually regulates the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 and shapes the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment via sponging miR-17-5p. LINC01094 may serve as a potential prognostic predictor and therapeutic target in GC."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "LINC01094 was identified as a GC-associated lncRNA that dually regulates PD-L1 and PD-L2 through miR-17-5p and is associated with poor prognosis and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39525623"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE70880"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE70880"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39525623", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1341056", "sha256": "sha256:fae571a56123d651c956b1fae3c23f874dfecdeb7cc63bed383ac7cec6826c03", "bytes": 42294, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2024.1341056", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11544118", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE70880", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE70880", "version": null, "note": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1821083", "GSM1821084", "GSM1821085", "GSM1821086", "GSM1821087", "GSM1821088", "GSM1821089", "GSM1821090", "GSM1821091", "GSM1821092", "GSM1821093", "GSM1821094", "GSM1821095", "GSM1821096", "GSM1821097", "GSM1821098", "GSM1821099", "GSM1821100", "GSM1821101", "GSM1821102", "GSM1821103", "GSM1821104", "GSM1821105", "GSM1821106", "GSM1821107", "GSM1821108", "GSM1821109", "GSM1821110", "GSM1821111", "GSM1821112", "GSM1821113", "GSM1821114", "GSM1821115", "GSM1821116", "GSM1821117", "GSM1821118", "GSM1821119", "GSM1821120", "GSM1821121", "GSM1821122", "GSM1821123", "GSM1821124", "GSM1821125", "GSM1821126", "GSM1821127", "GSM1821128", "GSM1821129", "GSM1821130", "GSM1821131", "GSM1821132", "GSM1821133", "GSM1821134", "GSM1821135", "GSM1821136", "GSM1821137", "GSM1821138", "GSM1821139", "GSM1821140", "GSM1821141", "GSM1821142", "GSM1821143", "GSM1821144", "GSM1821145", "GSM1821146", "GSM1821147", "GSM1821148", "GSM1821149", "GSM1821150", "GSM1821151", "GSM1821152", "GSM1821153", "GSM1821154", "GSM1821155", "GSM1821156", "GSM1821157", "GSM1821158", "GSM1821159", "GSM1821160", "GSM1821161", "GSM1821162", "GSM1821163", "GSM1821164", "GSM1821165", "GSM1821166", "GSM1821167", "GSM1821168", "GSM1821169", "GSM1821170", "GSM1821171", "GSM1821172", "GSM1821173", "GSM1821174", "GSM1821175", "GSM1821176", "GSM1821177", "GSM1821178", "GSM1821179", "GSM1821180", "GSM1821181", "GSM1821182", "GSM1821183", "GSM1821184", "GSM1821185", "GSM1821186", "GSM1821187", "GSM1821188", "GSM1821189", "GSM1821190", "GSM1821191", "GSM1821192", "GSM1821193", "GSM1821194", "GSM1821195", "GSM1821196", "GSM1821197", "GSM1821198", "GSM1821199", "GSM1821200", "GSM1821201", "GSM1821202", "GSM1821203", "GSM1821204", "GSM1821205", "GSM1821206", "GSM1821207", "GSM1821208", "GSM1821209", "GSM1821210", "GSM1821211", "GSM1821212", "GSM1821213", "GSM1821214", "GSM1821215", "GSM1821216", "GSM1821217", "GSM1821218", "GSM1821219", "GSM1821220", "GSM1821221", "GSM1821222", "GSM1821223", "GSM1821224", "GSM1821225", "GSM1821226", "GSM1821227", "GSM1821228", "GSM1821229", "GSM1821230", "GSM1821231", "GSM1821232", "GSM1821233", "GSM1821234"], "sample_count": 152, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "19748", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression of mRNAs and lncRNAs in cancer revealed by microarray", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE70880 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE70880 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We applied the “limma” R package for the entire lncRNA data to identify the differentially-expressed lncRNAs (DE lncRNAs) between tumor and paracancerous specimens, with screening criteria set at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {"fold_change": "ng criteria set at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjust", "log2fc_threshold": "et at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjusted p-va"}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE70880"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE70880"], "statements": ["Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE70880."], "basis": "The paper names GSE70880 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39525623", "data:geo:GSE70880"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE70880"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:38:12Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12799, "completion_tokens": 1690, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39525623", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39525623"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39525623", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39525623 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE70880", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE70880"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39525623", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39525623"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39525623", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39525623 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE70880", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE70880"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39525623", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39525623"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE70880", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE70880"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39525623", "parent_hash": "sha256:56d9130f11b7aadb23351f19bed6928cd4037ea0dbca5b8fbc0ffee6457bbfa3", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE70880 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE70880 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "transfection", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ockdown of LINC01094 were generated by siRNA transfection, followed by detecting the alteration of the", "n embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells with knockdown of LINC01094 were generated by siRNA transfe", "blood exosomes of GC patients The results of knockdown experiments and luciferase reporter assays r", "ith knockdown of LINC01094 were generated by siRNA transfection, followed by detecting the alte"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1455", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "qpcr", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ation of the target miRNA and PD-L1/PD-L2 by RT-qPCR. Besides, the interaction between lncRNA and", "on of the target miRNA and PD-L1/PD-L2 by RT-qPCR. Besides, the interaction between lncRNA and", "70880 datasets ( Figure 4A ). Similarly, the RT-qPCR results of our cohort showed LINC01094 level", "), Relative LINC01094 expression detected by RT-qPCR in 23 paired gastric cancer and noncancerous"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1592", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["s study is shown in Figure 1 . In total, 375 microarray profiles obtained from the dataset in TCGA-S"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:4696", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["We applied the “limma” R package for the entire lncRNA data to identify the differentially-expressed lncRNAs (DE lncRNAs) between tumor and paracancerous specimens, with screening criteria set at |log fold change (logFC)| > 1 and adjusted p-value < 0.05."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:50:21+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}