{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39692961", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:425539dea41f5e55cdadd6721a04b0e145d6fe05cc92e8bd2776645fce459993", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:29:59Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:55:49Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Aging and head and neck cancer insights from single cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses.", "doi": "10.1007/s12672-024-01672-z", "pmid": "39692961", "authors": ["Yi Pei", "Zhuying Mou", "Lai Jiang", "Jinyan Yang", "Yuheng Gu", "Jie Min", "Lingyi Sunzhang", "Nan Xiong", "Xiang Xu", "Hao Chi", "Ke Xu", "Sinian Liu", "Huiyan Luo"], "journal": "Discover oncology", "year": 2024, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, with more than 890,000 new cases and 450,000 deaths annually. Its major risk factors include smoking, alcohol abuse, aging, and poor oral hygiene. Due to the lack of early and effective detection and screening methods, many patients are diagnosed at advanced stages with a five-year survival rate of less than 50%. In this study, we deeply explored the expression of Aging-related genes(ARGs) in HNSCC and analyzed their prognostic significance using single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics analysis. This research aims to provide new theoretical support and directions for personalized treatment. Annually, more than 890,000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are diagnosed globally, leading to 450,000 deaths, making it the sixth most common malignancy worldwide. The primary risk factors for HNSCC include smoking, alcohol abuse, aging, and poor oral hygiene. Many patients are diagnosed at advanced stages due to the absence of early and effective detection and screening methods, resulting in a five-year survival rate of less than 50%. In this research, single cell sequencing and spatial transcriptome analysis were used to investigate the expression of Aging-related genes (ARGs) in HNSCC and to analyse their prognostic significance. This research aims to provide new theoretical support and directions for personalized treatment.\nMETHODS: In this study, we investigated the association between HNSCC and AGRs by utilizing the GSE139324 series in the GEO database alongside the TCGA database, combined with single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics analysis. The data were analyzed using Seurat and tSNE tools to reveal intercellular communication networks. For the spatial transcriptome data, SCTransform and RunPCA were applied to examine the metabolic activities of the cells. Gene expression differences were determined through spacerxr and RCTD tools, while the limma package was employed to identify differentially expressed genes and to predict recurrence rates using Cox regression analysis and column line plots. These findings underscore the potential importance of molecular classification, prognostic assessment, and personalized treatment of HNSCC.\nRESULTS: This study utilized HNSCC single-cell sequencing data to highlight the significance of ARGs in the onset and prognosis of HNSCC. It revealed that the proportion of monocytes and macrophages increased, while the proportion of B cells decreased. Notably, high expression of the APOE gene in monocytes was closely associated with patient prognosis. Additionally, a Cox regression model was developed based on GSTP1 and age to provide personalized prediction tools for clinical use in predicting patient survival.\nCONCLUSIONS: We utilized single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics to explore the cellular characteristics of HNSCC and its interaction with the tumor microenvironment. Our findings reveal that HNSCC tissues show increased mononuclear cells and demonstrate enhanced activity in ARGs, thereby advancing our understanding of HNSCC development mechanisms.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Using the R package “limma” [38, 39], specifically designed for microarray data, we identified significantly differentially expressed genes between HNSCC and normal samples (adjusted P < 0.05 and logFC > 1). Subsequently, we conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on these genes, and presented the results using forest plots generated by the “forestplot” package [40, 41].", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39692961", "locator": "sections[7] \"HNSCC monocyte senescence-related key genes combined with bulk data for prognostic and immunotherapy analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Using the R package “limma” [38, 39], specifically designed for microarray data, we identified significantly differentially expressed genes between HNSCC and normal samples (adjusted P < 0.05 and logFC > 1). Subsequently, we conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on these genes, and presented the results using forest plots generated by the “forestplot” package [40, 41]."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets utilized in the present investigation are accessible via the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Moreover, the raw data files for the study can be obtained through the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/Dea3ZZ8Qn6zvDBjtv9QFIAA and are available for download.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39692961", "locator": "sections[26] \"Data availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets utilized in the present investigation are accessible via the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Moreover, the raw data files for the study can be obtained through the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/Dea3ZZ8Qn6zvDBjtv9QFIAA and are available for download."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39692961"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE139324"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE139324"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39692961", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01672-z", "sha256": "sha256:23888f6ec671d3edd271d7ce73c1c21fc8a99b164c299c1cabe8ac85bfcfb24c", "bytes": 69016, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1007/s12672-024-01672-z", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11655923", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE139324", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE139324", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE139324", "version": null, "note": "The datasets utilized in the present investigation are accessible via the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Moreover, the raw data files for the study can be obtained through the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/Dea3ZZ8Qn6zvDBjtv9QFIAA and are available for download.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The datasets utilized in the present investigation are accessible via the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Moreover, the raw data files for the study can be obtained through the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/Dea3ZZ8Qn6zvDBjtv9QFIAA and are available for download.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4138110", "GSM4138111", "GSM4138112", "GSM4138113", "GSM4138114", "GSM4138115", "GSM4138116", "GSM4138117", "GSM4138118", "GSM4138119", "GSM4138120", "GSM4138121", "GSM4138122", "GSM4138123", "GSM4138124", "GSM4138125", "GSM4138126", "GSM4138127", "GSM4138128", "GSM4138129", "GSM4138130", "GSM4138131", "GSM4138132", "GSM4138133", "GSM4138134", "GSM4138135", "GSM4138136", "GSM4138137", "GSM4138138", "GSM4138139", "GSM4138140", "GSM4138141", "GSM4138142", "GSM4138143", "GSM4138144", "GSM4138145", "GSM4138146", "GSM4138147", "GSM4138148", "GSM4138149", "GSM4138150", "GSM4138151", "GSM4138152", "GSM4138153", "GSM4138154", "GSM4138155", "GSM4138156", "GSM4138157", "GSM4138158", "GSM4138159", "GSM4138160", "GSM4138161", "GSM4138162", "GSM4138163", "GSM4138164", "GSM4138165", "GSM4138166", "GSM4138167", "GSM4138168", "GSM4138169", "GSM4138170", "GSM4138171", "GSM4138172"], "sample_count": 63, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "18573", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Immune landscape of viral- and carcinogen-drived head and neck cancer", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE139324 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE139324 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Using the R package “limma” [38, 39], specifically designed for microarray data, we identified significantly differentially expressed genes between HNSCC and normal samples (adjusted P < 0.05 and logFC > 1). Subsequently, we conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on these genes, and presented the results using forest plots generated by the “forestplot” package [40, 41]."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE139324"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE139324"], "statements": ["The datasets utilized in the present investigation are accessible via the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Moreover, the raw data files for the study can be obtained through the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/Dea3ZZ8Qn6zvDBjtv9QFIAA and are available for download."], "basis": "The paper names GSE139324 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39692961", "data:geo:GSE139324"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE139324"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:42:08Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 16484, "completion_tokens": 2299, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39692961", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39692961"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39692961", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39692961 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE139324", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE139324"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39692961", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39692961"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39692961", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39692961 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE139324", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE139324"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39692961", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39692961"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE139324", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE139324"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39692961", "parent_hash": "sha256:635775540b7f335a61aad03ac8cee447271b7ffb4a06c2081941acdb7d4cd5d6", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE139324 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE139324 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["reveal the structure of cell communities in single-cell RNA sequencing data by showing the distribution of differen", "rature. To increase the depth and breadth of single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis, we employed five different sc", "ssociated genes. Subsequently, we integrated single-cell RNA sequencing data with spatial location information using"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:4106", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Using the R package “limma” [38, 39], specifically designed for microarray data, we identified significantly differentially expressed genes between HNSCC and normal samples (adjusted P < 0.05 and logFC > 1). Subsequently, we conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses on these genes, and presented the results using forest plots generated by the “forestplot” package [40, 41]."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:47:05+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}