{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:39702250", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:da8859da952b08a91166e5846a3fb496123326bbe1832eeec0a1b20d6a40dd11", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:30:01Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:55:52Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis indicates UCHL5 as a novel cancer biomarker and promotes cervical cancer progression through the Wnt signaling pathway.", "doi": "10.1186/s13062-024-00588-6", "pmid": "39702250", "authors": ["Lingling Bao", "Yuefei Wu", "Zhengting Ren", "Yi Huang", "Yue Jiang", "Kailang Li", "Xin Xu", "Yingquan Ye", "Zhongxuan Gui"], "journal": "Biology direct", "year": 2024, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: UCHL5 was initially recognized as a multifunctional molecule. While recent research has highlighted its involvement in tumor malignant biological behaviors, its specific role in promoting tumor cell apoptosis has drawn particular attention. However, the precise relationship between UCHL5 and various tumor types, as well as its influence within the immune microenvironment, remains unclear.\nMETHODS: The transcriptomic data and clinicopathological parameters across 33 cancer types were obtained from TCGA. Clinical pathological parameters of tumor patients, including gender, age, survival time, and staging, are utilized to evaluate the association between UCHL5 and pan-cancer characteristics. The prognostic significance of UCHL5 was evaluated through Cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods. Protein expression data for UCHL5 were obtained from The Human Protein Atlas database, and its subcellular localization was further investigated. Additionally, potential correlations between UCHL5 and factors such as tumor-infiltrating immune cells, immunomodulators, microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were explored. The relationship between UCHL5 and immunotherapy efficacy was also assessed in independent cohorts, including IMvigor210, GSE78220, GSE67501, and GSE168204. Finally, the impact of UCHL5 on the malignant biological behavior of cervical cancer cells was investigated through in vitro experiments, along with an exploration of the underlying mechanisms.\nRESULTS: We observed that UCHL5 expression levels were elevated in 11 types of cancer tissues compared to their corresponding normal tissues, while levels were lower in five tumor types. Additionally, UCHL5 expression displayed a significant correlation with tumor stage in BRCA, KIRC, LUAD, and TGCT. Cox and K-M analysis indicated that UCHL5 expression was significantly associated with prognosis in KIRC, KICH, CESC, ACC, and UVM. UCHL5 expression was negatively associated with stromal and immune scores in certain cancers. In terms of immune cell infiltration, UCHL5 expression in UCEC, SKCM, and COAD showed a negative correlation with regulatory T cells (Tregs). Furthermore, UCHL5 was widely associated with three types of immunomodulators. It also demonstrated a significant relationship with MSI and TMB in certain cancers and was connected to the immunotherapy efficacy. Finally, in vitro experiments confirmed that UCHL5 knockout enhances apoptosis in cervical cancer cells and disrupts Wnt/β-catenin signaling.\nCONCLUSIONS: Pan-cancer analysis indicates that UCHL5 is dysregulated in various tumor tissues and is closely associated with survival prognosis, the tumor immune microenvironment, and the efficacy of immunotherapy in certain cancer types. UCHL5 shows promise as a predictive biomarker, and its specific regulatory mechanisms across different cancers warrant further investigation.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Univariate Cox regression was conducted using the “survminer” and “survival” packages to evaluate the effect of UCHL5 expression on patient survival. The “forestplot” package was employed for visualizing the Cox analysis results. Finally, survival curves were created with the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the effect of UCHL5 expression on overall survival (OS) of patients.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39702250", "locator": "sections[4] \"Correlation of UCHL5 with clinical variables and survival prognosis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression was conducted using the “survminer” and “survival” packages to evaluate the effect of UCHL5 expression on patient survival. The “forestplot” package was employed for visualizing the Cox analysis results. Finally, survival curves were created with the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the effect of UCHL5 expression on overall survival (OS) of patients."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39702250", "locator": "sections[26] \"notes\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Cox and K-M analysis indicated that UCHL5 expression was significantly associated with prognosis in KIRC, KICH, CESC, ACC, and UVM.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:39702250", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Cox and K-M analysis indicated that UCHL5 expression was significantly associated with prognosis in KIRC, KICH, CESC, ACC, and UVM."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Cox and K-M analysis indicated that UCHL5 expression was significantly associated with prognosis in KIRC, KICH, CESC, ACC, and UVM.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:39702250"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE168204"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE168204"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:39702250", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00588-6", "sha256": "sha256:cae8fa75cc681ebb60431b4eab2d42d0789db7ba2bdfbd67824f67f4c1ad8899", "bytes": 42997, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s13062-024-00588-6", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC11660788", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE168204", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE168204", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE168204", "version": null, "note": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM5133918", "GSM5133919", "GSM5133920", "GSM5133921", "GSM5133922", "GSM5133923", "GSM5133924", "GSM5133925", "GSM5133926", "GSM5133927", "GSM5133928", "GSM5133929", "GSM5133930", "GSM5133931", "GSM5133932", "GSM5133933", "GSM5133934", "GSM5133935", "GSM5133936", "GSM5133937", "GSM5133938", "GSM5133939", "GSM5133940", "GSM5133941", "GSM5133942", "GSM5133943", "GSM5133944"], "sample_count": 27, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "18573;11154", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Pathway Signatures Derived from On-treatment Tumor Specimens Predict Response to Anti-PD1 Blockade in Metastatic Melanoma", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:46:34Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE67501", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE67501", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE67501", "version": null, "note": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1648114", "GSM1648115", "GSM1648116", "GSM1648117", "GSM1648118", "GSM1648119", "GSM1648120", "GSM1648121", "GSM1648122", "GSM1648123", "GSM1648124"], "sample_count": 11, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "14951", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Expression data in human renal cell carcinoma samples from patients who did or did not respond to anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab) immunotherapy", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T17:30:42Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE78220", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE78220", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE78220", "version": null, "note": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM2069823", "GSM2069824", "GSM2069825", "GSM2069826", "GSM2069827", "GSM2069828", "GSM2069829", "GSM2069830", "GSM2069831", "GSM2069832", "GSM2069833", "GSM2069834", "GSM2069835", "GSM2069836", "GSM2069837", "GSM2069838", "GSM2069839", "GSM2069840", "GSM2069841", "GSM2069842", "GSM2069843", "GSM2069844", "GSM2069845", "GSM2069846", "GSM2069847", "GSM2069848", "GSM2069849", "GSM2069850"], "sample_count": 28, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "11154", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "mRNA expressions in pre-treatment melanomas undergoing anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition therapy", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE168204 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE168204 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE67501 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE67501 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Univariate Cox regression was conducted using the “survminer” and “survival” packages to evaluate the effect of UCHL5 expression on patient survival. The “forestplot” package was employed for visualizing the Cox analysis results. Finally, survival curves were created with the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the effect of UCHL5 expression on overall survival (OS) of patients."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Wilcoxon"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox proportional hazards"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE78220", "GSE67501", "GSE168204"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE78220", "GSE67501", "GSE168204"], "statements": ["The data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. The R scripts utilised in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/dyz1989/Scripts.git."], "basis": "The paper names GSE78220, GSE67501, GSE168204 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:39702250", "data:geo:GSE168204"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE168204"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T19:42:41Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 11805, "completion_tokens": 2232, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:39702250", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39702250"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39702250", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39702250 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE168204", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE168204"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:39702250", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:39702250"}, {"id": "source:pmid:39702250", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 39702250 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE168204", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE168204"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-39702250", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:39702250"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE168204", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE168204"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:39702250", "parent_hash": "sha256:3dea649243b6b2bd4d439823422c7274430292a2082e558ab2de9e8d4ce26a35", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE168204 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE168204 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE67501 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE67501 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE78220 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["s, its specific role in promoting tumor cell apoptosis has drawn particular attention. However, the", "ments confirmed that UCHL5 knockout enhances apoptosis in cervical cancer cells and disrupts Wnt/β-"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:320", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "transfection", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Materials and methods Cell culture and transfection Siha and Hela cells were cultured in DMEM me", "an Type Culture Collection, USA). Cells were transfected with either non-targeting control siRNA (siN", "iUCHL5-2, GenePharma, China) using jetPRIME® transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection, France), fol", "ing jetPRIME® transfection reagent (Polyplus-transfection, France), following the manufacturer’s proto"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3074", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["re and transfection Siha and Hela cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific", "thods Cell culture and transfection Siha and Hela cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, T", "t 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The Siha and Hela cell lines were obtained from ATCC (American"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:3090", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Univariate Cox regression was conducted using the “survminer” and “survival” packages to evaluate the effect of UCHL5 expression on patient survival. The “forestplot” package was employed for visualizing the Cox analysis results. Finally, survival curves were created with the Kaplan-Meier method to assess the effect of UCHL5 expression on overall survival (OS) of patients."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:4"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T00:37:12+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}