{"data":{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40657397", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:0a03aa3d40fdadb9bfb65cc4b3b0d3e2b1bd37cb3ee6e29505ca9b79a3b76b3b", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:51Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:51Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Ginsenoside Rh7 affects β-catenin nuclear translocation by inhibiting SHCBP1 expression, thereby inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells.", "doi": "10.7150/ijms.112622", "pmid": "40657397", "authors": null, "journal": "International journal of medical sciences", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "qualitative", "state": "blocked", "target": {"value": null, "unit": null, "tolerance": null, "source": null}, "evidence": []}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40657397"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40657397", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40657397' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40657397", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.112622", "sha256": "sha256:281104de5489b0f3426fc2725f70326b565a490e1764cff7ebb446aa12569751", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7150/ijms.112622", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40657397 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40657397"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40657397"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "6cfd35bb5bfe83bbef6ce823adf9a013f2fa03102d80dfb79daf7baf9de06361", "source_hash": "281104de5489b0f3426fc2725f70326b565a490e1764cff7ebb446aa12569751", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:c65709bbffbd868d0836330a0684e5daf3a6b4cba152930d07d6c72db624e561", "raw_response_chars": 4876}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "cb609fa59321d015062e7c057cdcc0719942cf3d918bf3ea84c7bd8882156fb3", "source_hash": "281104de5489b0f3426fc2725f70326b565a490e1764cff7ebb446aa12569751", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:aff0f965683195febd34503af7afa7cb1bca593fc45f4c40bcc9544c75981386", "raw_response_chars": 74881}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "b9c9322be052afdb18a4d0c84cb6ec9320c3157749b750e48f663a07bf719552", "source_hash": "281104de5489b0f3426fc2725f70326b565a490e1764cff7ebb446aa12569751", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"\",\"target_result\":\"The paper states that ginsenoside Rh7 inhibits gastric cancer cell invasion, migration, and proliferation dose-dependently by downregulating SHCBP1 expression, but it does not state a numerical result for this main finding.\",\"number_stated\":false}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0, "unit": "", "evidence": "", "target_result": "The paper states that ginsenoside Rh7 inhibits gastric cancer cell invasion, migration, and proliferation dose-dependently by downregulating SHCBP1 expression, but it does not state a numerical result for this main finding.", "number_stated": false, "source_locator": null}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:27:12.098915+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "c497cb3f36d96039dcc5a309caf343adae7573eda1d21a45acd239279192e66e", "source_hash": "281104de5489b0f3426fc2725f70326b565a490e1764cff7ebb446aa12569751", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need interpret task. Need find single numerical result replication of registered target main finding. Source text seems abstract/results no specific quantitative headline number except counts and thresholds, no effect size/IC50 etc. \"headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" likely no number stated. Need set false parent_value 0 unit empty evidence empty, target_result state what text states instead. Need ensure target result string perhaps describe qualitative findings. Exact source wording perhaps can quote? User says if no number for registered target, set number_stated false, leave parent_value at 0, leave unit and evidence empty, and say in target_result what text does state instead. So target_result can paraphrase? \"The text states qualitatively that...\" Need no invented source. We can quote exact wording, perhaps full conclusion sentence. JSON valid. Since no headline numerical result for main finding. We need maybe registered target means main finding headline numerical result. Text states effects but no numerical magnitude. Thus:\n{\"parent_value\":0,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"\",\"target_result\":\"The text states that ginsenoside Rh7 suppresses GC progression by regulating SHCBP1-mediated β-catenin nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion, but it gives no numerical result for this main finding.\",\"number_stated\":false}\nIs target_result asked \"what text does state instead\" perhaps quote exact clause. Use source exact wording: \"Ginsenoside Rh7 suppresses GC progression by regulating SHCBP1-mediated β-catenin nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion.\" This is exact contiguous. Then mention no number? target_result could state exact quote + no numerical magnitude. Need only headline number? Since absent. Let's answer.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"\",\"target_result\":\"The text states that “Ginsenoside Rh7 suppresses GC progression by regulating SHCBP1-mediated β-catenin nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion,” but reports no numerical result for this main finding.\",\"number_stated\":false}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0, "unit": "", "evidence": "", "target_result": "The text states that “Ginsenoside Rh7 suppresses GC progression by regulating SHCBP1-mediated β-catenin nuclear translocation, thereby inhibiting EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion,” but reports no numerical result for this main finding.", "number_stated": false, "source_locator": null}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:27:14.265256+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "unclear", "minimax_alt": "Ginsenoside Rh7 inhibited GC cell invasion, migration, and proliferation dose-dependently by downregulating SHCBP1 expression; the supplied text does not state a numerical effect magnitude for this headline finding.", "decisive": false}, "physical_methods": {"minimax": ["Transcriptome sequencing", "Immunoprecipitation (IP)", "Transwell assays", "Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays", "Colony assays", "In vivo tumor models", "Rescue experiments involving SHCBP1 overexpression"], "minimax_alt": ["Transcriptome sequencing", "Immunoprecipitation (IP)", "Transwell assays", "Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays", "Colony assays", "In vivo tumor models", "SHCBP1-overexpression rescue experiments"], "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)", "Differential expression analysis using the Limma package", "Intersection analysis", "Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis", "MNC (Maximum Neighborhood Component) ranking", "DMNC (Density of Maximum Neighborhood Component) ranking", "Topological analysis", "Kaplan-Meier (KM) method", "Log-rank test"], "minimax_alt": ["Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)", "Differential expression analysis using the Limma package in R", "Venn diagram overlap and intersection analysis", "Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis using STRING", "cytoHubba topological ranking using MNC (Maximum Neighborhood Component) and DMNC (Density of Maximum Neighborhood Component)", "Boxplot gene-expression analysis using Sangerbox", "Transcriptome-sequencing expression analysis", "Student's t-test", "Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test", "Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and log-rank test"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "", "minimax_alt": "Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:9e3c41a6d1602d0a4fae9affc3a2cef522674d12242dd086e279c8860bb25c45", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40657397"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40657397", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:9e3c41a6d1602d0a4fae9affc3a2cef522674d12242dd086e279c8860bb25c45"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "6b013275-13b3-4b50-bcc9-f7e6c1b62228", "parent_hash": "9e3c41a6d1602d0a4fae9affc3a2cef522674d12242dd086e279c8860bb25c45", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40657397 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40657397' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T03:00:06+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}