{"data":{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40922956", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 2, "content_hash": "sha256:2001b010f46396d763d9fd5cfb49c58f230cd2edf719925b2599ab01ada8f044", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:53Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T14:01:47Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "mtDNA copy number/miR663/AATF axis in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.", "doi": "10.34172/bi.30792", "pmid": "40922956", "authors": null, "journal": "BioImpacts : BI", "year": 2025, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.139, "unit": "fold change", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 873-1019 of source sha256 3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40922956", "locator": "chars 873-1019 of source sha256 3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "quote": "A significant reduction in tumor miR663 expression was observed (fold change=0.139), with a strong correlation between miR663 and AATF expression."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40922956"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data behind the published result", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:not_downloaded", "description": "The published result cannot be recomputed without the data the paper analysed.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result. | SEP input not carried into the asset list: materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40922956", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40922956' does not resolve to a declared asset"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40922956", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.30792", "sha256": "sha256:3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.34172/bi.30792", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: full_text.", "structure": {"access_state": "full_text"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40922956:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:ad8d2f089ca3214b7f96b3340f20539ec9faf1cc4de74b4b62e9b2db7cd691a6", "bytes": 1154, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "Demographic information of the patients", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12413981", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Patients and samples", "row_count": 30, "column_count": 3}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Demographic information of the patients", "rows": [["Characteristics", "Sub-groups", "Frequency (%)"], ["Histology grade", "Grade I (low-well differentiated)", "4 (18.2)"], ["Grade II (intermediate-moderately differentiated)", "12 (54.5)"], ["Grade III (high-poor differentiated)", "5 (22.7)"], ["Missing", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Site of primary tumor", "Left breast", "9 (40.9)"], ["Right breast", "12 (54.5)"], ["Bilateral", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Lymphatic invasion", "Positive", "13 (59.1)"], ["Negative", "8 (36.4)"], ["Missing", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Estrogen receptor", "Positive", "18 (81.8)"], ["Negative", "3 (13.6)"], ["Missing", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Progesterone receptor", "Positive", "15 (68.2)"], ["Negative", "6 (27.3)"], ["Missing", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Her-2", "Positive (1-2)", "4 (18.2)"], ["Positive (3 + )", "3 (13.6)"], ["Negative", "14 (63.6)"], ["Missing", "1 (4.5)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"], ["Family history", "Positive", "8 (36.3)"], ["Negative", "14 (63.6)"], ["Total", "22 (100)"]], "row_count": 30, "column_count": 3, "numeric_cells": 32, "header_rows": 0, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:40922956:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:c43bd8e443d6b1022e585fe8fb75bfb85ce4ca340c12b1ad6eb703238d6389d4", "bytes": 780, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[5]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Primers and stem-loop sequences", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12413981", "section_index": 5, "section_title": "Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis", "row_count": 10, "column_count": 2}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Primers and stem-loop sequences", "rows": [["Primer", "Sequence (5'-3')"], ["MT-COX1", "Forward: TGATCTGCTGCAGTGCTCTGAReverse: TCAGGCCACCTACGGTGAA"], ["COX4", "Forward: GAAAGTGTTGTGAAGAGCGAAGACReverse: GTGGTCACGCCGATCCAT"], ["AATF", "Forward: TCGGTTTCATGTCCTTAGCAAGCReverse: GGAGGTGGGCGATGTCAATC"], ["PUM1", "Forward: TCGGAAGTAGCAGTTCTCTCGReverse: CTGTGTCCAATGGGGGTCAA"], ["miR663", "Forward: AGGCGGGGTGCTGCGGGA"], ["u47", "Forward: CCACTGCTGTAATGATTCTGC"], ["Universal reverse", "Reverse: CCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTA"], ["miR663 Stem-loop", "GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACGCGGTC"], ["U47 Stem-loop", "GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAACCTCAG"]], "row_count": 10, "column_count": 2, "numeric_cells": 5, "header_rows": 0, "locator": "section[5]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:source:pmid:40922956 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "absent", "methods": [], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method", "targets"]}, "capability": {"state": "absent", "requirements": [], "gaps": ["capability"]}, "readiness": {"state": "partial", "tier": null, "blocking_axis": null, "blocked_on": null, "axes": {}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:40922956", "asset:table:pmid:40922956:1", "asset:table:pmid:40922956:2"], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["xml"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:40922956"]}, "gaps": ["corpus_record_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "blocked", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "b15bd51a4ec28ba2cd759fcf47b9618c5332869d3190f2c4698db513841f953f", "source_hash": "3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:a8ef37bfa279085970bd3420816b2c8dd0df6e1092aa951712f0110d855f69b4", "raw_response_chars": 3557}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "full-text-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "a401653c400ee603179f138db5dded98a14f6736ec900e8538622b6c0764e4d6", "source_hash": "3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:8c1aca58c17931d19e674e895dcf3aad5de4d0dfd335612b9002822873cc6cce", "raw_response_chars": 64982}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "35963a54374fb1e0028da4876d9c637fa54e695c54c9410e39a965141b0d9151", "source_hash": "3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.139,\"unit\":\"fold change\",\"evidence\":\"A significant reduction in tumor miR663 expression was observed (fold change=0.139), with a strong correlation between miR663 and AATF expression.\",\"target_result\":\"The paper’s headline numerical result is a fold change of 0.139 for tumor miR663 expression.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.139, "unit": "fold change", "evidence": "A significant reduction in tumor miR663 expression was observed (fold change=0.139), with a strong correlation between miR663 and AATF expression.", "target_result": "The paper’s headline numerical result is a fold change of 0.139 for tumor miR663 expression.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 873-1019 of source sha256 3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:34:21.418736+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax_alt", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "023a6c1233b31bddfa2c32a73cf39e8f3afb5942c97bb81249b1d3d9f39c020a", "source_hash": "3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2", "raw_response": "<think>We need answer JSON only. Need identify single numerical result replication registered target headline numerical result paper states for main finding. Likely fold change = 0.139, unit maybe \"fold change\". Need exact contiguous quote containing number, whole clause for attribution. Need distinguish perhaps headline result main finding: significant reduction tumor miR663 expression fold change 0.139. The title mtDNA copy number/miR663/AATF axis. Abstract results specifically numerical headline. So parent_value 0.139, unit \"fold change\" (unit paper prints perhaps no physical unit). Evidence exact quote: \"A significant reduction in tumor miR663 expression was observed (fold change=0.139), with a strong correlation between miR663 and AATF expression.\" They insist exact contiguous quote and not shorten. This has number. Could quote more detailed sentence: \"The results demonstrated a significant decrease in miR663 expression in breast tumors compared to paired adjacent non-tumor tissues (fold change = 0.139, P = 0.000), as illustrated in Fig. 2A.\" It contains target attribution clearly. Unit should paper prints: fold change. Value number only 0.139. target_result perhaps \"The paper states a significant decrease in miR663 expression in breast tumors compared with paired adjacent non-tumor tissues, with a fold change of 0.139.\" Evidence exact quote. Number stated true.\n\nNeed consider \"headline numerical result the paper states for its main finding\" perhaps abstract's number. Single numerical result. The source has many numbers. Registered target broad. Likely expected 0.139 fold change. Need ensure unit perhaps \"\" because fold change is not unit? Prompt says unit must be unit paper prints. Paper prints \"(fold change=0.139)\" so unit \"fold change\" likely. Could unit be \"fold change\" rather than \"fold-change\". Use exact printed spelling in abstract: \"fold change=0.139\". Detailed section says \"fold change = 0.139\". Unit \"fold change\". JSON valid. Evidence exact contiguous quote, likely one sentence. target_result concise.\n\nLet's formulate no markdown.</think>\n\n{\"parent_value\":0.139,\"unit\":\"fold change\",\"evidence\":\"The results demonstrated a significant decrease in miR663 expression in breast tumors compared to paired adjacent non-tumor tissues (fold change = 0.139, P = 0.000), as illustrated in Fig. 2A.\",\"target_result\":\"miR663 expression was significantly decreased in breast tumors compared with paired adjacent non-tumor tissues, with a fold change of 0.139.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.139, "unit": "fold change", "evidence": "The results demonstrated a significant decrease in miR663 expression in breast tumors compared to paired adjacent non-tumor tissues (fold change = 0.139, P = 0.000), as illustrated in Fig. 2A.", "target_result": "miR663 expression was significantly decreased in breast tumors compared with paired adjacent non-tumor tissues, with a fold change of 0.139.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 4693-4885 of source sha256 3c9564175e5e0fd9adee4d2a0d6f4499ac66fc5b97d9c6f3b29ce0971f6de9e2"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T15:34:23.175565+00:00"}], "agreement": false, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax": "Significant reduction in tumor miR663 expression compared with paired adjacent non-tumor tissues (fold change = 0.139, P = 0.000).", "minimax_alt": "miR663 expression was significantly decreased in breast tumors compared with paired adjacent non-tumor tissues (fold change = 0.139, P = 0.000).", "decisive": false}, "physical_methods": {"minimax": ["Real-time PCR", "mtDNA copy number quantification using COX1 as the mitochondrial gene and COX4 as the nuclear control gene", "Relative gene-expression analysis using GraphPad Prism and REST software"], "minimax_alt": ["Real-time PCR", "Paired primary breast tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissue analysis", "miR663 relative-expression quantification normalized to U47", "AATF mRNA quantification using PUM1 as the internal control", "mtDNA copy-number quantification using COX1 as the mitochondrial gene and COX4 as the nuclear control gene"], "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax": ["2-ΔΔCt fold-change analysis", "Wilcoxon test", "Mann-Whitney U test", "Kruskal-Wallis test", "Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient", "TCGA in silico expression analysis"], "minimax_alt": ["2-ΔΔCt fold-change analysis", "Wilcoxon nonparametric test", "Mann-Whitney U test", "Kruskal-Wallis test", "Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient", "Z-score comparison between miR663 expression and mtDNA copy number", "In silico TCGA expression analysis across breast cancer stages and subtypes"], "decisive": false}, "statistical_method": {"minimax": "2-ΔΔCt fold-change method with nonparametric tests, including Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests", "minimax_alt": "Wilcoxon test for the paired miR663 tumor-versus-adjacent-tissue comparison; fold change calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.", "decisive": true}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["work_type", "number_stated", "parent_value", "unit"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "blocked", "reason": "The independent readings are incomplete or disagree; the source evidence must resolve the difference.", "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:770dad98162ccd13cd64521ed359608cb69d21548194134acc85b54897217e60", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:40922956"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:40922956", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:770dad98162ccd13cd64521ed359608cb69d21548194134acc85b54897217e60"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax", "type": "model", "label": "minimax"}, {"id": "agent:minimax_alt", "type": "model", "label": "minimax_alt"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40922956", "parent_hash": "sha256:7f935309c898895a6ba9508f946d478b69a86a653f2fabeafcee7f726ff26c09", "fork_of": null, "generation": 2}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:source:pmid:40922956 not verified", "authors", "capability", "corpus_record_absent", "execution.not_run", "method", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.blocked", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:not_downloaded", "step:run_analysis blocked on no owned computational capability is bound to this experiment", "step:run_analysis input 'materials:the source data behind the published result in pmid:40922956' does not resolve to a declared asset", "targets"]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:22:41+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}