{"data":{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:40998926", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:3def1a624331141e166efe9b91dce3546ccb51e8a2be8122d9f940d6ae31791c", "created_at": "2026-11-01T20:31:04Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:57:12Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Tabersonine inhibits inflammation and apoptosis through the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway to alleviate LPS-induced acute lung injury.", "doi": "10.1038/s41598-025-17885-3", "pmid": "40998926", "authors": ["Mingxia Ji", "Mengyan Chen", "Ning Zhang"], "journal": "Scientific reports", "year": 2025, "abstract": "Tabersonine (Tab) holds potential therapeutic value for acute lung injury (ALI), but its mechanism remains unraveled. In order to delve into the mechanism of Tab in ALI treatment, our research group initially conducted a network pharmacology prediction. The GSE225664 single-cell transcriptome data set concerning ALI was downloaded from the GEO database. Differential expression analysis combined with weighted gene co-expression network analysis were carried out for identifying ALI-related genes. The drug-related database was employed for the prediction of Tab targets. 28 ALI-Tab targets were predicted through network pharmacology. Core target identification, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, and molecular docking revealed that Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) is the potential target and the JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway is the potential target pathway for Tab in the treatment of ALI. An ALI mouse model, along with a RAW264.7 cell model, was established through lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation, with Tab administered as an intervention. Cells were pretreated with the JAK1 inhibitor. Lung tissue injury and inflammation was evaluated based on six parameters: (1) lung tissue histopathological features, (2) lung wet/dry ratio, (3) inflammatory cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, (4) total protein concentration, (5) lactate dehydrogenase, and (6) proinflammatory factors. Cell activity was assessed through cell counting kit-8 assay. TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling staining, Western blot, and flow cytometry were adopted to detect apoptosis. Tab pretreatment was proven to be effective in alleviating inflammation in mice with LPS-induced ALI and LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, and suppressing the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway activation. Co-culturing LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells with A549 cells led to significantly reduced A549 cell apoptosis. Further research demonstrated that the overexpression of JAK1 significantly inhibit the effects of Tab. The foregoing results prove that LPS-induced ALI is attenuated by Tab treatment, with the underlying mechanism believed to involve the JAK1/STAT3 pathway-mediated inflammation and apoptosis.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "A one-way ANOVA was applied for carrying out comparison between groups, and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was employed for conducting post-hoc analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40998926", "locator": "sections[18] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "A one-way ANOVA was applied for carrying out comparison between groups, and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was employed for conducting post-hoc analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The corresponding author is responsible for resolving any queries related to this article, and data supporting the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40998926", "locator": "sections[34] \"Data availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The corresponding author is responsible for resolving any queries related to this article, and data supporting the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The foregoing results prove that LPS-induced ALI is attenuated by Tab treatment, with the underlying mechanism believed to involve the JAK1/STAT3 pathway-mediated inflammation and apoptosis.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:40998926", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "The foregoing results prove that LPS-induced ALI is attenuated by Tab treatment, with the underlying mechanism believed to involve the JAK1/STAT3 pathway-mediated inflammation and apoptosis."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The foregoing results prove that LPS-induced ALI is attenuated by Tab treatment, with the underlying mechanism believed to involve the JAK1/STAT3 pathway-mediated inflammation and apoptosis.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:40998926"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE225664"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE225664"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:40998926", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17885-3", "sha256": "sha256:e8baed67c0291fe40dc98e07b081ad738c3d3863ebf3b70552c69322f5f1a895", "bytes": 40736, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1038/s41598-025-17885-3", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12464169", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE225664", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE225664", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE225664", "version": null, "note": "The corresponding author is responsible for resolving any queries related to this article, and data supporting the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The corresponding author is responsible for resolving any queries related to this article, and data supporting the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM7053950", "GSM7053951", "GSM7053952", "GSM7053953", "GSM7053954", "GSM7053955"], "sample_count": 6, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "19057", "taxon": "Mus musculus", "title": "Coordinated chemokine expression defines macrophage subsets across tissues [scRNA-seq: mLu]", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T20:16:08Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE225664 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE225664 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "A one-way ANOVA was applied for carrying out comparison between groups, and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was employed for conducting post-hoc analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "pathway enrichment"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE225664"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE225664"], "statements": ["The corresponding author is responsible for resolving any queries related to this article, and data supporting the findings of this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request."], "basis": "The paper names GSE225664 in GEO database and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:40998926", "data:geo:GSE225664"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE225664"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T20:01:53Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12372, "completion_tokens": 802, "cached_tokens": 264}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:40998926", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40998926"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40998926", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40998926 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE225664", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE225664"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:40998926", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:40998926"}, {"id": "source:pmid:40998926", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 40998926 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE225664", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE225664"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-40998926", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:40998926"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE225664", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE225664"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:40998926", "parent_hash": "sha256:06b22d1706b03800afb7779ed8b20352fa68b5ea89725eacce1a3c467beebc14", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE225664 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE225664 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Tabersonine inhibits inflammation and apoptosis through the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway to", "t, and flow cytometry were adopted to detect apoptosis. Tab pretreatment was proven to be effective", "cells led to significantly reduced A549 cell apoptosis. Further research demonstrated that the over", "JAK1/STAT3 pathway-mediated inflammation and apoptosis."], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:0", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "animal_model", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["hway for Tab in the treatment of ALI. An ALI mouse model, along with a RAW264.7 cell model, was estab", "to be effective in alleviating inflammation in mice with LPS-induced ALI and LPS-stimulated RAW2", "hway for Tab in the treatment of ALI. An ALI mouse model, along with a RAW264.7 cell model, was", "ion and grouping Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were procured from an accredited supplier and kep"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1028", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["dT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling staining, Western blot, and flow cytometry were adopted to detect a"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1631", "id": "assay:3"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "flow_cytometry", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["ick-end labeling staining, Western blot, and flow cytometry were adopted to detect apoptosis. Tab pretre"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1649", "id": "assay:4"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["culturing LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells with A549 cells led to significantly reduced A549 cell", "with A549 cells led to significantly reduced A549 cell apoptosis. Further research demonstrate", "AW264.7 cells (CL-0190, Procell, China) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (C11330500B", "64.7 cell supernatant was taken to stimulate A549 cells (CL-0016, Procell, China) for 24 h. Af"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1943", "id": "assay:5"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "transfection", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.85, "evidence": ["K1 were constructed using Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent (L3000150, Thermo Fisher Scientific,"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:6906", "id": "assay:6"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["A one-way ANOVA was applied for carrying out comparison between groups, and Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was employed for conducting post-hoc analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:7"}]},"meta":{"api_version":"v1","automation_ladder_snapshot":"ba34b49490d9bfaf","automation_ladder_caveats":["Method extraction is rule-based and has no hand-judged accuracy sample. Evidence bands order textual support; method agreement intervals are null (n=0), never probabilities. Work-type validation does not validate methods.","Operation coverage describes only explicitly named methods. It does not prove a complete protocol, compatible parameters, successful compilation or re-execution. Unrecognised or ambiguous methods require review.","Data reachability is a textual accession or public-data statement. No dataset was downloaded or checked for access, completeness or licence.","Capabilities are planning states seeded from the dated equipment register. No bench ownership, completed quote or partner booking is inferred. Procurement counts are dependencies, not guaranteed replications or financial returns.","Tier and blocker counts are deterministic assessments of this corpus, not measured agreement. R3 is reserved for procurement; unresolved methods and data require human work (R4). The most restrictive axis wins, with capability, method, data as tie-breaks. Resolving one blocker can leave another at the same tier."],"engine":"corpus_engine","engine_provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","run_id":"run-20261023T122449232913","source":"esearch","source_detail":"PubMed mirror biomed_pubmed (read-only)","run_status":"complete","imported_at":"2026-11-03T20:16:52+00:00","generated_at":"2026-11-04T01:23:02+00:00","total_papers":5529,"total_assays_tracked":29,"automatable_assay_families":6,"validated":true,"caveat_count":9,"blocking_caveats":5,"caveats":[{"code":"low_evidence_dominates","basis":["4,152 of 5,529 classifications (75.1%) matched no cue evidence and sit at the 0.05 floor.","34 of 230 data_only calls (14.8%) are in that group."],"claim":"Work type and confidence bands","gloss":"Most records were classified from their title and framing alone, with assay-cue coverage at zero.","detail":"Most classifications in this run rest on no matched evidence at all. At the evidence floor the work type comes from title framing and a fixed prior, not from anything in the paper, so the published work-type split should be read as a rough triage signal rather than a measured distribution. The impact is bounded but not removed: since 2026-10-23 the engine excludes floor-confidence records from the shortlist entirely and publishes them separately as held out, so the recommendation is unaffected even though the census is.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"runtime_is_modelled","basis":["Runtime is summed from published per-assay hour figures. Timing awaits the first executed replication.","4,407 of 5,529 records (79.7%) model to 0.00 hours because no assay was matched, which the ranking then reads as \"cheapest\".","0 of 10 shortlisted records carry a 0.00-hour estimate."],"claim":"Estimated replication runtime","gloss":"The hour figures are estimates built from assay mentions; timing awaits the first executed replication.","detail":"The hour figures are a cost model derived from the bench steps implied by each matched assay family. The first executed replication will supply measured timing. Records without an assay match currently receive a zero-hour model value.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"signal_score_without_citations","basis":["5,529 of 5,529 records (100.0%) have no citation count from the source metadata."],"claim":"Signal score","gloss":"The signal score uses publication-type weight because the mirror supplied zero citation counts.","detail":"The source supplied no citation counts for any record in this run, so the signal score is publication-type weight only. The citation term of the ranking is inert here, and the shortlist is ordered by publication type alone.","status":"unverified","severity":"high"},{"code":"abstract_absent","basis":["1,667 of 5,529 records (30.2%) carry no abstract at all."],"claim":"Evidence base for classification","gloss":"Some records contain a title and publication type only, defining the available classification evidence.","detail":"Where the mirror contains a title and publication types only, those fields define the classifier evidence. A methods section is required for fuller automated and human review.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"},{"code":"classifier_agreement_measured","basis":["Published two-way decision agreement 77.7% (310 of 399 decidable records) from a stratified hand-check of 438 real records.","Three-way diagnostic agreement 73.9% (288 of 390 decidable records).","data_only agreement 75.2% (100 of 133 decidable).","48 record(s) could not be decided from title and abstract and were excluded from the denominator.","56 analysis-only records were published under another work type, so the data_only share is not an upper bound."],"claim":"Published automatable decision","gloss":"This figure has been checked against a human reading the same papers, so we know how often it is right.","detail":"The published automatable / not-automatable distribution comes from a rule-based classifier that was hand-checked against a fixed ground-truth definition. The agreement rates below are measured, not estimated. The three-way work type remains a diagnostic and is reported separately.","status":"measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"llm_comparison_not_measured","basis":["rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f produced 5,529 of 5,529 classifications.","Measured on 438 labelled records; these are RULE-BASED figures, not model results."],"claim":"Rule-based versus LLM agreement","gloss":"Every number here is the rule engine’s own. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","detail":"The published two-way decision agreed with a human reading on 310 of 399 decidable records (77.7%). The diagnostic three-way label agreed on 288 of 390 decidable records (73.9%). Every percentage in this run belongs to the rule engine. Model comparison begins when a working API credential is connected and measured.","status":"not_measured","severity":"high"},{"code":"confidence_is_a_band","basis":["low band: 135 of 210 hand-judged records were correct, 64.3% [57.6, 70.5] (95% CI).","medium band: 80 of 104 hand-judged records were correct, 76.9% [68.0, 84.0] (95% CI).","high band: 73 of 76 hand-judged records were correct, 96.0% [89.0, 98.7] (95% CI).","A fitted calibrated probability was built, measured and withdrawn: it overstated held-out accuracy and reorders nothing."],"claim":"Confidence band and evidence score","gloss":"The confidence band carries a measured accuracy interval; 0.85 represents relative rank strength.","detail":"Confidence on this run is a BAND plus its measured accuracy interval. The number stored alongside each record is a monotone evidence score that orders records; 0.85 represents relative rank strength. A fitted probability was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy. Threshold on the band.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"three_way_split_is_diagnostic","basis":["The corpus is published at the two-way decision: automatable or not-automatable. The three-way split (data_only / physical / mixed) is published as a diagnostic with its measured reliability attached, not as a claim, because the rule engine's `mixed` call cannot be defended.","The engine called 22 record(s) mixed; 10 matched the human judgement (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9-65.3).","The engine's `mixed` call is right on 10/22 hand-judged records (45.5%, 95% CI 26.9%-65.3%); a constant `physical` guess scores 36.4%.","The engine's `mixed` call does not reliably beat a constant `physical` guess on the hand-judged records it labels mixed.","The sign of that difference flips between two independent samples, so the three-way refinement is not demonstrably informative.","The mixed stratum contributes a disproportionate share of errors relative to its size.","At title-only depth the physical/mixed split collapses: a title says that work was done, not whether it was also analysed."],"claim":"The published decision is two-way","gloss":"The three-way split is shown for diagnosis only. The published split is two ways.","detail":"Count and filter the corpus on automatable versus not-automatable. The data_only / physical / mixed split remains an internal engine diagnostic because the mixed call has lower measured reliability.","status":"measured","severity":"medium"},{"code":"automatable_flag_unproven","basis":["6 of 29 assay families are marked automatable now: meta_analysis, machine_learning, survival_analysis, pca, molecular_docking, differential_expression.","The flag is a rule over assay family and work type; validation begins with the first executed replication.","It inherits the 75.2% data_only agreement rate, because the flag requires the record to be analysis-only."],"claim":"Automatable now","gloss":"This flag marks assay families the rules classify as data-only. The first executed replication will validate it.","detail":"This flag marks families the rules consider replicable from data alone. Its validity depends on the analysis-only classification and will be measured through an executed replication.","status":"unverified","severity":"medium"}],"confidence_policy":"band_with_measured_interval","confidence_contract":{"policy":"band_with_measured_interval","summary":"Confidence is reported as a BAND with a measured accuracy interval. The raw evidence score supplies monotone ordering. A fitted point estimate was withdrawn after it overstated held-out accuracy.","evidence_score":"A monotone evidence score in [0,1] built from cue mass, axis separation and text coverage. Use it to order records. Interpret 0.85 as relative rank strength.","confidence_band":"low | medium | high. Consumers threshold on this value.","band_accuracy":"Wilson 95% interval on the measured agreement of the hand-judged records in this band.","calibrated_confidence":"WITHDRAWN. Reintroduction requires held-out evidence demonstrating reliable estimates across every bin."},"band_accuracy":{"low":{"n":210,"low":0.576,"band":"low","high":0.7046,"agree":135,"accuracy":0.6429},"high":{"n":76,"low":0.8903,"band":"high","high":0.9865,"agree":73,"accuracy":0.9605},"medium":{"n":104,"low":0.6795,"band":"medium","high":0.8397,"agree":80,"accuracy":0.7692}},"provider":"rule_based_v1+lex99e1195c7d6f","lexicon_id":"99e1195c7d6f","contract_published_at":"2026-10-23T12:25:29.022232+00:00","confidence_is_band":true,"confidence_is_probability":false,"decision_taxonomy":"two_way","decidable_fraction_two_way":0.8854,"decidable_fraction_two_way_low":0.8565,"decidable_fraction_two_way_high":0.9143,"decidable_fraction_three_way":0.8586,"decidable_fraction_three_way_low":0.8287,"decidable_fraction_three_way_high":0.8884,"decidable_population":5529,"validation_sample_size":438,"three_way_cost_fraction":0.0268,"three_way_cost_records":148,"decision_counts":{"automatable":230,"not_automatable":5299},"decision_split":{"automatable":{"count":230,"share":0.04159884246699222},"not_automatable":{"count":5299,"share":0.9584011575330078}},"diagnostic_work_type_counts":{"mixed":24,"physical":5275,"data_only":230}}}