Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:29734672

Meta-Analysis and Experimental Validation Identified FREM2 and SPRY1 as New Glioblastoma Marker Candidates.

Marko Vidak · Ivana Jovcevska · Neja Samec · Alja Zottel · Mirjana Liovic · Damjana Rozman · Saso Dzeroski · Peter Juvan · Radovan Komel

International journal of molecular sciences · 2018 doi:10.3390/ijms19051369

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:29734672
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a1ca6b644ccac35b94d9a7287c73b47abbc4b9a506b73dc2343f2349b391dbbb
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:40:33Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:21:25Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Meta-Analysis and Experimental Validation Identified FREM2 and SPRY1 as New Glioblastoma Marker Candidates.
doi
10.3390/ijms19051369
pmid
29734672
authors array · 9 items
[0]
Marko Vidak
[1]
Ivana Jovcevska
[2]
Neja Samec
[3]
Alja Zottel
[4]
Mirjana Liovic
[5]
Damjana Rozman
[6]
Saso Dzeroski
[7]
Peter Juvan
[8]
Radovan Komel
journal
International journal of molecular sciences
year
2018
abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive brain malignancy. Although some potential glioblastoma biomarkers have already been identified, there is a lack of cell membrane-bound biomarkers capable of distinguishing brain tissue from glioblastoma and/or glioblastoma stem cells (GSC), which are responsible for the rapid post-operative tumor reoccurrence. In order to find new GB/GSC marker candidates that would be cell surface proteins (CSP), we have performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three data repositories (GEO, ArrayExpress and GLIOMASdb). The search yielded ten appropriate datasets, and three (GSE4290/GDS1962, GSE23806/GDS3885, and GLIOMASdb) were used for selection of new GB/GSC marker candidates, while the other seven (GSE4412/GDS1975, GSE4412/GDS1976, E-GEOD-52009, E-GEOD-68848, E-GEOD-16011, E-GEOD-4536, and E-GEOD-74571) were used for bioinformatic validation. The selection identified four new CSP-encoding candidate genes—CD276, FREM2, SPRY1, and SLC47A1—and the bioinformatic validation confirmed these findings. A review of the literature revealed that CD276 is not a novel candidate, while SLC47A1 had lower validation test scores than the other new candidates and was therefore not considered for experimental validation. This validation revealed that the expression of FREM2—but not SPRY1—is higher in glioblastoma cell lines when compared to non-malignant astrocytes. In addition, FREM2 gene and protein expression levels are higher in GB stem-like cell lines than in conventional glioblastoma cell lines. FREM2 is thus proposed as a novel GB biomarker and a putative biomarker of glioblastoma stem cells. Both FREM2 and SPRY1 are expressed on the surface of the GB cells, while SPRY1 alone was found overexpressed in the cytosol of non-malignant astrocytes.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29734672
locator
sections[2] "2. Results and Discussion" paragraph 2
quote
We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29734672
locator
sections[3] "2.1. Selection of Glioblastoma Datasets" paragraph 3
quote
These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
Meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from GEO, ArrayExpress, and GLIOMASdb identified FREM2 as a novel glioblastoma marker candidate and a putative biomarker of glioblastoma stem cells.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:29734672
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:29734672
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051369
sha256
sha256:8cdd1cb36ac5309c6468b4d534c1e031c15e4528c84564385f7f078b2f3d716f
bytes
56064
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3390/ijms19051369
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC5983642
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
null
specific
null
label
Meta-analysis
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (Meta-analysis), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 4 items
[0]
GSE4290/GDS1962
[1]
GSE23806/GDS3885
[2]
GSE4412/GDS1975
[3]
GSE4412/GDS1976
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2).
basis
The paper names GSE4290/GDS1962, GSE23806/GDS3885, GSE4412/GDS1975, GSE4412/GDS1976, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:29734672
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:34:20Z
independence
same_provider
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
null
calls
8
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
114478
completion_tokens
4713
cached_tokens
29192
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:29734672
type
paper
label
pmid:29734672
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:29734672
type
manuscript
label
PMID 29734672 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:29734672
type
paper
label
pmid:29734672
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:29734672
type
manuscript
label
PMID 29734672 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-29734672
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:29734672
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:29734672
parent_hash
sha256:5428d7e6daf9082dfec4a3bce4405a31afb336b2042326bfcfe1b1f56e5d7a5d
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
cell_culture
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.85
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
rimental Validation 3.6.1. Cell Cultures All cell lines were grown in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Human a
order_basis
paper_text_order:2814
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:29734672", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:a1ca6b644ccac35b94d9a7287c73b47abbc4b9a506b73dc2343f2349b391dbbb", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:33Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:21:25Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Meta-Analysis and Experimental Validation Identified FREM2 and SPRY1 as New Glioblastoma Marker Candidates.", "doi": "10.3390/ijms19051369", "pmid": "29734672", "authors": ["Marko Vidak", "Ivana Jovcevska", "Neja Samec", "Alja Zottel", "Mirjana Liovic", "Damjana Rozman", "Saso Dzeroski", "Peter Juvan", "Radovan Komel"], "journal": "International journal of molecular sciences", "year": 2018, "abstract": "Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive brain malignancy. Although some potential glioblastoma biomarkers have already been identified, there is a lack of cell membrane-bound biomarkers capable of distinguishing brain tissue from glioblastoma and/or glioblastoma stem cells (GSC), which are responsible for the rapid post-operative tumor reoccurrence. In order to find new GB/GSC marker candidates that would be cell surface proteins (CSP), we have performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three data repositories (GEO, ArrayExpress and GLIOMASdb). The search yielded ten appropriate datasets, and three (GSE4290/GDS1962, GSE23806/GDS3885, and GLIOMASdb) were used for selection of new GB/GSC marker candidates, while the other seven (GSE4412/GDS1975, GSE4412/GDS1976, E-GEOD-52009, E-GEOD-68848, E-GEOD-16011, E-GEOD-4536, and E-GEOD-74571) were used for bioinformatic validation. The selection identified four new CSP-encoding candidate genes—CD276, FREM2, SPRY1, and SLC47A1—and the bioinformatic validation confirmed these findings. A review of the literature revealed that CD276 is not a novel candidate, while SLC47A1 had lower validation test scores than the other new candidates and was therefore not considered for experimental validation. This validation revealed that the expression of FREM2—but not SPRY1—is higher in glioblastoma cell lines when compared to non-malignant astrocytes. In addition, FREM2 gene and protein expression levels are higher in GB stem-like cell lines than in conventional glioblastoma cell lines. FREM2 is thus proposed as a novel GB biomarker and a putative biomarker of glioblastoma stem cells. Both FREM2 and SPRY1 are expressed on the surface of the GB cells, while SPRY1 alone was found overexpressed in the cytosol of non-malignant astrocytes.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:29734672", "locator": "sections[2] \"2. Results and Discussion\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:29734672", "locator": "sections[3] \"2.1. Selection of Glioblastoma Datasets\" paragraph 3", "quote": "These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "Meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from GEO, ArrayExpress, and GLIOMASdb identified FREM2 as a novel glioblastoma marker candidate and a putative biomarker of glioblastoma stem cells.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:29734672"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:29734672", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051369", "sha256": "sha256:8cdd1cb36ac5309c6468b4d534c1e031c15e4528c84564385f7f078b2f3d716f", "bytes": 56064, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/ijms19051369", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5983642", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Meta-analysis", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We performed meta-analysis of genome-scale mRNA expression data from three unrelated public repositories."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (Meta-analysis), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": ["GSE4290/GDS1962", "GSE23806/GDS3885", "GSE4412/GDS1975", "GSE4412/GDS1976"], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["These datasets were the GEO datasets GSE4290/GDS1962 and GSE23806/GDS3885, as well as the single GLIOMASdb dataset (see Table 2)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE4290/GDS1962, GSE23806/GDS3885, GSE4412/GDS1975, GSE4412/GDS1976, but the accession does not resolve in the repository (no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded, no reason recorded), so the data cannot be reached from here. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:29734672"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:34:20Z", "independence": "same_provider"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 8, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 114478, "completion_tokens": 4713, "cached_tokens": 29192}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:29734672", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:29734672"}, {"id": "source:pmid:29734672", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 29734672 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:29734672", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:29734672"}, {"id": "source:pmid:29734672", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 29734672 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-29734672", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:29734672"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:29734672", "parent_hash": "sha256:5428d7e6daf9082dfec4a3bce4405a31afb336b2042326bfcfe1b1f56e5d7a5d", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "cell_culture", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.85, "evidence": ["rimental Validation 3.6.1. Cell Cultures All cell lines were grown in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Human a"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2814", "id": "assay:1"}]}