Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:29844437

Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics.

Leslie Muller · Luc Fornecker · Marie Chion · Alain Van Dorsselaer · Sarah Cianférani · Thierry Rabilloud · Christine Carapito

Scientific reports · 2018 doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:29844437
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:962b7889cf7030173c65cc638c3e96bf3aabb36dfa2dd08d7be6d0ed261eb86f
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:40:34Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:21:27Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics.
doi
10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4
pmid
29844437
authors array · 7 items
[0]
Leslie Muller
[1]
Luc Fornecker
[2]
Marie Chion
[3]
Alain Van Dorsselaer
[4]
Sarah Cianférani
[5]
Thierry Rabilloud
[6]
Christine Carapito
journal
Scientific reports
year
2018
abstract
Sample preparation for quantitative proteomics is a crucial step to ensure the repeatability and the accuracy of the results. However, there is no universal method compatible with the wide variety of protein extraction buffers currently used. We have recently demonstrated the compatibility of tube-gel with SDS-based buffers and its efficiency for label-free quantitative proteomics by comparing it to stacking gel and liquid digestion. Here, we investigated the compatibility of tube-gel with alternatives to SDS-based buffers allowing notably the extraction of proteins in various pH conditions. We also explored the use of photopolymerization to extend the number of possibilities, as it is compatible with a wide range of pH and is non-oxidative. To achieve this goal, we compared six extraction buffers in combination with two polymerization conditions to further optimize the tube-gel protocol and evaluate its versatility. Identification and quantitative results demonstrated the compatibility of tube-gel with all tested conditions by overall raising quite comparable results. In conclusion, tube-gel is a versatile and simple sample preparation method for large-scale quantitative proteomics applications. Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29844437
locator
sections[16] "Data analysis" paragraph 2
quote
A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29844437
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 1
quote
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The paper used a statistical beta-binomial analysis of normalized weighted spectral count values to compare protocols with STC, and its complete source datasets are available through ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD008656.
kind
quantitative
target object · 4 fields
value
0.05
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
source
Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.
evidence array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29844437
locator
sections[4] "Comparison of the protocols for proteins quantification" paragraph 2
quote
Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:29844437
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 1
quote
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The paper used a statistical beta-binomial analysis of normalized weighted spectral count values to compare protocols with STC, and its complete source datasets are available through ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD008656.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:29844437
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:PXD008656
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:PXD008656
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 6 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:29844437
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4
sha256
sha256:8dcccaff530570108f81dcda1df6d4bc534a73ef2bfcac664a2fa00c59ee31af
bytes
32560
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC5974325
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:PXD008656
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=PXD008656
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
PXD008656
version
null
note
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 0 items
sample_count
null
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
null
taxon
null
title
Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics
resolution_checked_at
2026-10-31T18:35:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:29844437:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:7e95d51c7a37dbdd94571a25ad92938ab0b246cf73d81b3c60038d51b3950e56
bytes
1210
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[2]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
version
null
note
Summary and expected behavior of the ten tested protocols according to extraction buffer and polymerization type (chemical or photopolymerization) used.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC5974325
section_index
2
section_title
Results and Discussion
row_count
8
column_count
6
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Summary and expected behavior of the ten tested protocols according to extraction buffer and polymerization type (chemical or photopolymerization) used.
rows array · 8 items
[0] array · 5 items
[0]
Extraction Buffer
[1]
Extraction temperature
[2]
Expected behaviour
[3]
Protocol name
[4]
Conditions
[1] array · 2 items
[0]
Chemical Polymerization (Temed + Ammonium Persulfate)
[1]
Photopolymerization (Methylene blue)
[2] array · 6 items
[0]
SDS/Tris (pH 7.5)
[1]
70 °C
[2]
Reference protocol [Muller et al., 2016]
[3]
STC
[4]
STP
[5]
Basic SDS
[3] array · 6 items
[0]
SDS/Glycine (pH 2.5)
[1]
70 °C
[2]
Remove DNA (at pH 2.5 DNA is less negatively charged and precipitate in contact with SDS)
[3]
SGC
[4]
SGP
[5]
Acidic SDS
[4] array · 6 items
[0]
Urea/Spermine/CHAPS (pH 8)
[1]
RT
[2]
Remove DNA (Precipitate in contact with Spermine)
[3]
USC
[4]
USP
[5]
Chaotropic agent
[5] array · 6 items
[0]
CTAC/Glycine (pH 2.5)
[1]
70 °C
[2]
Remove interfering anionic macromolecules by precipitation
[3]
/
[4]
CTP
[5]
Cationic detergent
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
CTAC/Glycine/Urea 4 M (pH 2.5)
[1]
RT
[2]
Remove interfering anionic macromolecules by precipitation
[3]
/
[4]
CUP
[7] array · 6 items
[0]
HEPES/KCl/EDTA/Spermidine/SB3–14
[1]
0 °C
[2]
Weak denaturation + Remove nucleus/DNA
[3]
NAC
[4]
NAP
[5]
Native
locator
section[2]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
[3] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:29844437:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:12b7f0ffa8717b65b3575c8da7429d14015dadf17dae00ac8d84314b13f8397a
bytes
650
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
version
null
note
Total number of peptides and protein sets identified with at least one unique peptide in the merged results of the four replicates for each tested protocol.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC5974325
section_index
3
section_title
Qualitative protocols comparison using proteins and peptides identification results
row_count
3
column_count
11
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
Total number of peptides and protein sets identified with at least one unique peptide in the merged results of the four replicates for each tested protocol.
rows array · 3 items
[0] array · 11 items
[0]
[1]
STC
[2]
STP
[3]
SGC
[4]
SGP
[5]
CTP
[6]
CUP
[7]
USC
[8]
USP
[9]
NAC
[10]
NAP
[1] array · 11 items
[0]
Number of identified protein sets with at least one unique peptide
[1]
2476
[2]
2181
[3]
2244
[4]
2167
[5]
2052
[6]
2232
[7]
2107
[8]
1962
[9]
1838
[10]
2017
[2] array · 11 items
[0]
Number of identified peptides unique to a protein set
[1]
16092
[2]
12425
[3]
13018
[4]
12905
[5]
11954
[6]
13308
[7]
11189
[8]
10937
[9]
11205
[10]
13583
locator
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
[4] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:29844437:3
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:9d678f912275f1d001eae41c0d23ff87ecbc34c18151a043c86360319b9f3c18
bytes
556
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[3]/table-wrap[2]#Tab3
version
null
note
Number of common and unique proteins identified when comparing STC to each other protocol.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC5974325
section_index
3
section_title
Qualitative protocols comparison using proteins and peptides identification results
row_count
4
column_count
10
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 3
caption
Number of common and unique proteins identified when comparing STC to each other protocol.
rows array · 4 items
[0] array · 10 items
[0]
STC versus:
[1]
STP
[2]
SGC
[3]
SGP
[4]
CTP
[5]
CUP
[6]
USC
[7]
USP
[8]
NAC
[9]
NAP
[1] array · 10 items
[0]
Common proteins (%)
[1]
78
[2]
79
[3]
76
[4]
68
[5]
74
[6]
72
[7]
70
[8]
60
[9]
62
[2] array · 10 items
[0]
Proteins only identified in STC (%)
[1]
17
[2]
15
[3]
18
[4]
24
[5]
18
[6]
21
[7]
25
[8]
32
[9]
27
[3] array · 10 items
[0]
Proteins only identified in the other protocol (%)
[1]
5
[2]
6
[3]
6
[4]
8
[5]
9
[6]
7
[7]
5
[8]
8
[9]
11
locator
section[3]/table-wrap[2]#Tab3
[5] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:29844437:4
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:83b6683a38f92228e8fbe46bbd6ea1a2aa3aeaaf02fd26cc7b88f6dd6423435b
bytes
844
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[4]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
version
null
note
Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC5974325
section_index
4
section_title
Comparison of the protocols for proteins quantification
row_count
10
column_count
4
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 4
caption
Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.
rows array · 10 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Comparison of the Beta-Binomial Test
[1]
% of Proteins with p < 0.05 and FC > 2
[2]
% of Proteins with p < 0.05 and FC < 0.5
[3]
% of proteins differentially quantified with p < 0.05 and FC > 2 or < 0.5
[1] array · 4 items
[0]
STP vs STC
[1]
1
[2]
1
[3]
2
[2] array · 4 items
[0]
SGC vs STC
[1]
1
[2]
1
[3]
2
[3] array · 4 items
[0]
SGP vs STC
[1]
1
[2]
2
[3]
3
[4] array · 4 items
[0]
CTP vs STC
[1]
7
[2]
10
[3]
17
[5] array · 4 items
[0]
CUP vs STC
[1]
2
[2]
4
[3]
6
[6] array · 4 items
[0]
USC vs STC
[1]
4
[2]
5
[3]
9
[7] array · 4 items
[0]
USP vs STC
[1]
3
[2]
5
[3]
8
[8] array · 4 items
[0]
NAC vs STC
[1]
9
[2]
10
[3]
19
[9] array · 4 items
[0]
NAP vs STC
[1]
8
[2]
10
[3]
18
locator
section[4]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:PXD008656 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:PXD008656 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
principal_component_analysis
specific
pca
label
Principal component analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
wide_numeric_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Principal Component Analysis
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
clustering
specific
hierarchical
label
Clustering
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
hierarchical_cluster
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Hierarchical Clustering
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
null
specific
null
label
Beta-binomial test
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25.
targets array · 1 item
[0] object · 8 fields
id
target-published-estimate
claim_id
claim-target-result
operation
hierarchical_cluster
unit
p-value
tolerance
null
state
complete
note
The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold.
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: pca.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
PXD008656
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
PXD008656
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.
basis
The paper names PXD008656 in ProteomeXchange and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
assets array · 6 items
[0]
source:pmid:29844437
[1]
data:geo:PXD008656
[2]
asset:table:pmid:29844437:1
[3]
asset:table:pmid:29844437:2
[4]
asset:table:pmid:29844437:3
[5]
asset:table:pmid:29844437:4
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:PXD008656
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:34:37Z
independence
same_provider
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
8
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
62580
completion_tokens
3294
cached_tokens
2088
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:29844437
type
paper
label
pmid:29844437
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:29844437
type
manuscript
label
PMID 29844437 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:PXD008656
type
dataset
label
GEO PXD008656
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:29844437
type
paper
label
pmid:29844437
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:29844437
type
manuscript
label
PMID 29844437 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:PXD008656
type
dataset
label
GEO PXD008656
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-29844437
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:29844437
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-PXD008656
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:PXD008656
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:29844437
parent_hash
sha256:0338ef4673dd394deeef1954dbd085e8d68342182811ddf59df8c4b9599f2d20
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:PXD008656 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:PXD008656 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
principal_component_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Principal Component Analysis
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:29844437", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:962b7889cf7030173c65cc638c3e96bf3aabb36dfa2dd08d7be6d0ed261eb86f", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:34Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:21:27Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics.", "doi": "10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4", "pmid": "29844437", "authors": ["Leslie Muller", "Luc Fornecker", "Marie Chion", "Alain Van Dorsselaer", "Sarah Cianférani", "Thierry Rabilloud", "Christine Carapito"], "journal": "Scientific reports", "year": 2018, "abstract": "Sample preparation for quantitative proteomics is a crucial step to ensure the repeatability and the accuracy of the results. However, there is no universal method compatible with the wide variety of protein extraction buffers currently used. We have recently demonstrated the compatibility of tube-gel with SDS-based buffers and its efficiency for label-free quantitative proteomics by comparing it to stacking gel and liquid digestion. Here, we investigated the compatibility of tube-gel with alternatives to SDS-based buffers allowing notably the extraction of proteins in various pH conditions. We also explored the use of photopolymerization to extend the number of possibilities, as it is compatible with a wide range of pH and is non-oxidative. To achieve this goal, we compared six extraction buffers in combination with two polymerization conditions to further optimize the tube-gel protocol and evaluate its versatility. Identification and quantitative results demonstrated the compatibility of tube-gel with all tested conditions by overall raising quite comparable results. In conclusion, tube-gel is a versatile and simple sample preparation method for large-scale quantitative proteomics applications. Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:29844437", "locator": "sections[16] \"Data analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:29844437", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The paper used a statistical beta-binomial analysis of normalized weighted spectral count values to compare protocols with STC, and its complete source datasets are available through ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD008656.", "kind": "quantitative", "target": {"value": 0.05, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "source": "Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol."}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:29844437", "locator": "sections[4] \"Comparison of the protocols for proteins quantification\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:29844437", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 1", "quote": "Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The paper used a statistical beta-binomial analysis of normalized weighted spectral count values to compare protocols with STC, and its complete source datasets are available through ProteomeXchange under identifier PXD008656.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:29844437"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:PXD008656"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:PXD008656"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:29844437", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4", "sha256": "sha256:8dcccaff530570108f81dcda1df6d4bc534a73ef2bfcac664a2fa00c59ee31af", "bytes": 32560, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1038/s41598-018-26600-4", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5974325", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD008656", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=PXD008656", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "PXD008656", "version": null, "note": "Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": [], "sample_count": null, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": null, "taxon": null, "title": "Extended investigation of tube-gel sample preparation: a versatile and simple choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-10-31T18:35:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:29844437:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:7e95d51c7a37dbdd94571a25ad92938ab0b246cf73d81b3c60038d51b3950e56", "bytes": 1210, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[2]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1", "version": null, "note": "Summary and expected behavior of the ten tested protocols according to extraction buffer and polymerization type (chemical or photopolymerization) used.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5974325", "section_index": 2, "section_title": "Results and Discussion", "row_count": 8, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Summary and expected behavior of the ten tested protocols according to extraction buffer and polymerization type (chemical or photopolymerization) used.", "rows": [["Extraction Buffer", "Extraction temperature", "Expected behaviour", "Protocol name", "Conditions"], ["Chemical Polymerization (Temed + Ammonium Persulfate)", "Photopolymerization (Methylene blue)"], ["SDS/Tris (pH 7.5)", "70 °C", "Reference protocol [Muller et al., 2016]", "STC", "STP", "Basic SDS"], ["SDS/Glycine (pH 2.5)", "70 °C", "Remove DNA (at pH 2.5 DNA is less negatively charged and precipitate in contact with SDS)", "SGC", "SGP", "Acidic SDS"], ["Urea/Spermine/CHAPS (pH 8)", "RT", "Remove DNA (Precipitate in contact with Spermine)", "USC", "USP", "Chaotropic agent"], ["CTAC/Glycine (pH 2.5)", "70 °C", "Remove interfering anionic macromolecules by precipitation", "/", "CTP", "Cationic detergent"], ["CTAC/Glycine/Urea 4 M (pH 2.5)", "RT", "Remove interfering anionic macromolecules by precipitation", "/", "CUP"], ["HEPES/KCl/EDTA/Spermidine/SB3–14", "0 °C", "Weak denaturation + Remove nucleus/DNA", "NAC", "NAP", "Native"]], "row_count": 8, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 12, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[2]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:29844437:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:12b7f0ffa8717b65b3575c8da7429d14015dadf17dae00ac8d84314b13f8397a", "bytes": 650, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2", "version": null, "note": "Total number of peptides and protein sets identified with at least one unique peptide in the merged results of the four replicates for each tested protocol.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5974325", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Qualitative protocols comparison using proteins and peptides identification results", "row_count": 3, "column_count": 11}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Total number of peptides and protein sets identified with at least one unique peptide in the merged results of the four replicates for each tested protocol.", "rows": [["", "STC", "STP", "SGC", "SGP", "CTP", "CUP", "USC", "USP", "NAC", "NAP"], ["Number of identified protein sets with at least one unique peptide", "2476", "2181", "2244", "2167", "2052", "2232", "2107", "1962", "1838", "2017"], ["Number of identified peptides unique to a protein set", "16092", "12425", "13018", "12905", "11954", "13308", "11189", "10937", "11205", "13583"]], "row_count": 3, "column_count": 11, "numeric_cells": 20, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:29844437:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:9d678f912275f1d001eae41c0d23ff87ecbc34c18151a043c86360319b9f3c18", "bytes": 556, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[2]#Tab3", "version": null, "note": "Number of common and unique proteins identified when comparing STC to each other protocol.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5974325", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Qualitative protocols comparison using proteins and peptides identification results", "row_count": 4, "column_count": 10}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "Number of common and unique proteins identified when comparing STC to each other protocol.", "rows": [["STC versus:", "STP", "SGC", "SGP", "CTP", "CUP", "USC", "USP", "NAC", "NAP"], ["Common proteins (%)", "78", "79", "76", "68", "74", "72", "70", "60", "62"], ["Proteins only identified in STC (%)", "17", "15", "18", "24", "18", "21", "25", "32", "27"], ["Proteins only identified in the other protocol (%)", "5", "6", "6", "8", "9", "7", "5", "8", "11"]], "row_count": 4, "column_count": 10, "numeric_cells": 27, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[2]#Tab3"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:29844437:4", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:83b6683a38f92228e8fbe46bbd6ea1a2aa3aeaaf02fd26cc7b88f6dd6423435b", "bytes": 844, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4", "version": null, "note": "Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC5974325", "section_index": 4, "section_title": "Comparison of the protocols for proteins quantification", "row_count": 10, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "Table 4", "caption": "Percentage of proteins identified as differentially quantified (p-value < 0.05 and FC >2 or <0.5) by a statistical beta-binomial analysis performed on normalized weighted spectral count values for each comparison of STC versus another protocol.", "rows": [["Comparison of the Beta-Binomial Test", "% of Proteins with p < 0.05 and FC > 2", "% of Proteins with p < 0.05 and FC < 0.5", "% of proteins differentially quantified with p < 0.05 and FC > 2 or < 0.5"], ["STP vs STC", "1", "1", "2"], ["SGC vs STC", "1", "1", "2"], ["SGP vs STC", "1", "2", "3"], ["CTP vs STC", "7", "10", "17"], ["CUP vs STC", "2", "4", "6"], ["USC vs STC", "4", "5", "9"], ["USP vs STC", "3", "5", "8"], ["NAC vs STC", "9", "10", "19"], ["NAP vs STC", "8", "10", "18"]], "row_count": 10, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 30, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[4]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:PXD008656 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:PXD008656 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Principal Component Analysis"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "clustering", "specific": "hierarchical", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Hierarchical Clustering"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Beta-binomial test", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "A beta-binomial test was performed to compare each protocol to STC using an in house-developed software (MSDA: Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis, https://msda.unistra.fr)25."}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-published-estimate", "claim_id": "claim-target-result", "operation": "hierarchical_cluster", "expected_value": 0.05, "unit": "p-value", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete", "note": "The threshold the paper applied to its own result, as the paper states it. A run that reproduces the effect is judged against this threshold."}], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: pca."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["PXD008656"], "resolved_accessions": ["PXD008656"], "statements": ["Complete datasets are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008656."], "basis": "The paper names PXD008656 in ProteomeXchange and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "assets": ["source:pmid:29844437", "data:geo:PXD008656", "asset:table:pmid:29844437:1", "asset:table:pmid:29844437:2", "asset:table:pmid:29844437:3", "asset:table:pmid:29844437:4"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:PXD008656"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:34:37Z", "independence": "same_provider"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 8, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 62580, "completion_tokens": 3294, "cached_tokens": 2088}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:29844437", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:29844437"}, {"id": "source:pmid:29844437", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 29844437 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD008656", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO PXD008656"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:29844437", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:29844437"}, {"id": "source:pmid:29844437", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 29844437 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:PXD008656", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO PXD008656"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-29844437", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:29844437"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-PXD008656", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:PXD008656"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:29844437", "parent_hash": "sha256:0338ef4673dd394deeef1954dbd085e8d68342182811ddf59df8c4b9599f2d20", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:PXD008656 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:PXD008656 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "principal_component_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["pca_fit"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["Principal Component Analysis"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}