← All .science files
pmid:30480666
Columbia Open Health Data, clinical concept prevalence and co-occurrence from electronic health records.
Casey N Ta · Michel Dumontier · George Hripcsak · Nicholas P Tatonetti · Chunhua Weng
Scientific data · 2018 doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.273
Paper
complete
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
complete
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
paper object · 10 fields
authors array · 5 items
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 4 fields
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
assay_families array · 9 items
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
capability object · 4 fields
data object · 6 fields
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
assets array · 1 item
steps array · 1 item
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 5 fields
reader object · 5 fields
evidence_check object · 2 fields
usage object · 3 fields
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 3 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 3 fields
[2] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
agents array · 2 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 5 items
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:30480666", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:31668103d3d96e4893e7b836308968016e170158d86ddfdcbc73ff746b93cba2", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:39Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:21:47Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Columbia Open Health Data, clinical concept prevalence and co-occurrence from electronic health records.", "doi": "10.1038/sdata.2018.273", "pmid": "30480666", "authors": ["Casey N Ta", "Michel Dumontier", "George Hripcsak", "Nicholas P Tatonetti", "Chunhua Weng"], "journal": "Scientific data", "year": 2018, "abstract": "Columbia Open Health Data (COHD) is a publicly accessible database of electronic health record (EHR) prevalence and co-occurrence frequencies between conditions, drugs, procedures, and demographics. COHD was derived from Columbia University Irving Medical Center's Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) database. The lifetime dataset, derived from all records, contains 36,578 single concepts (11,952 conditions, 12,334 drugs, and 10,816 procedures) and 32,788,901 concept pairs from 5,364,781 patients. The 5-year dataset, derived from records from 2013-2017, contains 29,964 single concepts (10,159 conditions, 10,264 drugs, and 8,270 procedures) and 15,927,195 concept pairs from 1,790,431 patients. Exclusion of rare concepts (count ≤ 10) and Poisson randomization enable data sharing by eliminating risks to patient privacy. EHR prevalences are informative of healthcare consumption rates. Analysis of co-occurrence frequencies via relative frequency analysis and observed-expected frequency ratio are informative of associations between clinical concepts, useful for biomedical research tasks such as drug repurposing and pharmacovigilance. COHD is publicly accessible through a web application-programming interface (API) and downloadable from the Figshare repository. The code is available on GitHub.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The most common form of association analysis from co-occurrence data is the standard chi-square analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30480666", "locator": "sections[6] \"Chi-square\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The most common form of association analysis from co-occurrence data is the standard chi-square analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Data resulting from these analyses are available through the COHD API and downloadable from the Figshare data repository as flat-files (Data Citation 1).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30480666", "locator": "sections[4] \"EHR prevalence and co-occurrence analyses\" paragraph 8", "quote": "Data resulting from these analyses are available through the COHD API and downloadable from the Figshare data repository as flat-files (Data Citation 1)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:30480666"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:30480666", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.273", "sha256": "sha256:0efc74838526687351526becf869c54f3a93d99c55d97ddc230f89a0584429ac", "bytes": 46295, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1038/sdata.2018.273", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6257042", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The most common form of association analysis from co-occurrence data is the standard chi-square analysis."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: chi_square."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["Data resulting from these analyses are available through the COHD API and downloadable from the Figshare data repository as flat-files (Data Citation 1)."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:30480666"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:12:54Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 30280, "completion_tokens": 1360, "cached_tokens": 793}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:30480666", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30480666"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30480666", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30480666 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:30480666", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30480666"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30480666", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30480666 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-30480666", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:30480666"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:30480666", "parent_hash": "sha256:8efbf81439cc7d0449620c33a98909d6ccb140fa2f16787cb6904076525fa402", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "contingency_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The most common form of association analysis from co-occurrence data is the standard chi-square analysis."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}