Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:30572911

Identification of a multidimensional transcriptome signature for survival prediction of postoperative glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Wei-Zhen Gao · Lie-Mei Guo · Tian-Qi Xu · Yu-Hua Yin · Feng Jia

Journal of translational medicine · 2018 doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:30572911
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a3f06762e1806dc82837d7cdce271b553c30406ebe664f5b778b9eb3319929d9
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:40:40Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:43:41Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of a multidimensional transcriptome signature for survival prediction of postoperative glioblastoma multiforme patients.
doi
10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8
pmid
30572911
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Wei-Zhen Gao
[1]
Lie-Mei Guo
[2]
Tian-Qi Xu
[3]
Yu-Hua Yin
[4]
Feng Jia
journal
Journal of translational medicine
year
2018
abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with maximum surgical resection, radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) as the standard treatment. Diverse clinicopathological and molecular features are major obstacles to accurate predict survival and evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Reliable prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed for postoperative GBM patients. METHODS: The protein coding genes (PCGs) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) gene expression profiles of 233 GBM postoperative patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), TANRIC and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We randomly divided the TCGA set into a training (n = 76) and a test set (n = 77) and used GSE7696 (n = 80) as an independent validation set. Survival analysis and the random survival forest algorithm were performed to screen survival associated signature. RESULTS: Six PCGs (EIF2AK3, EPRS, GALE, GUCY2C, MTHFD2, RNF212) and five lncRNAs (CTD-2140B24.6, LINC02015, AC068888.1, CERNA1, LINC00618) were screened out by a risk score model and formed a PCG-lncRNA signature for its predictive power was strongest (AUC = 0.78 in the training dataset). The PCG-lncRNA signature could divide patients into high- risk or low-risk group with significantly different survival (median 7.47 vs. 18.27 months, log-rank test P < 0.001) in the training dataset. Similar result was observed in the test dataset (median 11.40 vs. 16.80 months, log-rank test P = 0.001) and the independent set (median 8.93 vs. 16.22 months, log-rank test P = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression analysis verified that it was an independent prognostic factor for the postsurgical patients with GBM. Compared with IDH mutation status, O-(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status and age, the signature was proved to have a superior predictive power. And stratified analysis found that the signature could further separated postoperative GBM patients who received TMZ-chemoradiation into high- and low-risk groups in TCGA and GEO dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The PCG-lncRNA signature was a novel prognostic marker to predict survival and TMZ-chemoradiation response in GBM patients after surgery.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:30572911
locator
sections[5] "Statistical analysis and bioinformatics analysis" paragraph 2
quote
The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:30572911
locator
sections[21] "Availability of data and materials" paragraphs 1-3
quote
The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:30572911
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE7696
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE7696
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 6 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:30572911
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8
sha256
sha256:0dfc524a9c37706fa6c488ab74ac652adcea9ddeddf86c81a440a1216a37d0ee
bytes
51559
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC6302404
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE7696
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7696
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE7696
version
null
note
The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 84 items
[0]
GSM187153
[1]
GSM187154
[2]
GSM187155
[3]
GSM187156
[4]
GSM187157
[5]
GSM187158
[6]
GSM187159
[7]
GSM187160
[8]
GSM187161
[9]
GSM187162
[10]
GSM187163
[11]
GSM187164
[12]
GSM187165
[13]
GSM187166
[14]
GSM187167
[15]
GSM187168
[16]
GSM187169
[17]
GSM187170
[18]
GSM187171
[19]
GSM187172
[20]
GSM187173
[21]
GSM187174
[22]
GSM187175
[23]
GSM187176
[24]
GSM187177
[25]
GSM187178
[26]
GSM187179
[27]
GSM187180
[28]
GSM187181
[29]
GSM187182
[30]
GSM187183
[31]
GSM187184
[32]
GSM187185
[33]
GSM187186
[34]
GSM187187
[35]
GSM187188
[36]
GSM187189
[37]
GSM187190
[38]
GSM187191
[39]
GSM187192
[40]
GSM187193
[41]
GSM187194
[42]
GSM187195
[43]
GSM187196
[44]
GSM187197
[45]
GSM187198
[46]
GSM187199
[47]
GSM187200
[48]
GSM187201
[49]
GSM187202
[50]
GSM187203
[51]
GSM187204
[52]
GSM187205
[53]
GSM187206
[54]
GSM187207
[55]
GSM187208
[56]
GSM187209
[57]
GSM187210
[58]
GSM187211
[59]
GSM187212
[60]
GSM187213
[61]
GSM187214
[62]
GSM187215
[63]
GSM187216
[64]
GSM187217
[65]
GSM187218
[66]
GSM187219
[67]
GSM187220
[68]
GSM187221
[69]
GSM187222
[70]
GSM187223
[71]
GSM187224
[72]
GSM187225
[73]
GSM187226
[74]
GSM187227
[75]
GSM187228
[76]
GSM187229
[77]
GSM187230
[78]
GSM187231
[79]
GSM187232
[80]
GSM187233
[81]
GSM187234
[82]
GSM187235
[83]
GSM187236
sample_count
84
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Glioblastoma from a homogenous cohort of patients treated within clinical trial
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:30572911:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:b93abce11618f65c4309a6d477e08283f3a851f3c1bffa1c2402ab9d67df394a
bytes
770
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
version
null
note
Summary of patient demographics and clinical characteristics
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC6302404
section_index
3
section_title
Glioblastoma multiforme datasets
row_count
24
column_count
4
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Summary of patient demographics and clinical characteristics
rows array · 24 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Characteristic
[1]
Training set
[2]
Test set
[3]
Independent set
[1] array · 1 item
[0]
Age
[2] array · 4 items
[0]
≤ 60
[1]
41
[2]
35
[3]
64
[3] array · 4 items
[0]
> 60
[1]
35
[2]
42
[3]
16
[4] array · 1 item
[0]
Sex
[5] array · 4 items
[0]
Female
[1]
26
[2]
29
[3]
21
[6] array · 4 items
[0]
Male
[1]
50
[2]
48
[3]
59
[7] array · 1 item
[0]
Chemotherapy
[8] array · 4 items
[0]
No
[1]
14
[2]
15
[3]
28
[9] array · 4 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
53
[2]
55
[3]
52
[10] array · 4 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
9
[2]
7
[3]
0
[11] array · 1 item
[0]
Radiotherapy
[12] array · 4 items
[0]
No
[1]
8
[2]
13
[3]
0
[13] array · 4 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
62
[2]
63
[3]
80
[14] array · 4 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
6
[2]
1
[3]
0
[15] array · 1 item
[0]
TMZ-chemoradiation
[16] array · 4 items
[0]
No
[1]
41
[2]
42
[3]
28
[17] array · 4 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
33
[2]
29
[3]
52
[18] array · 4 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
2
[2]
6
[3]
0
[19] array · 1 item
[0]
Subtype
[20] array · 4 items
[0]
Classical
[1]
18
[2]
22
[3]
[21] array · 4 items
[0]
Mesenchymal
[1]
23
[2]
26
[3]
[22] array · 4 items
[0]
Neural
[1]
15
[2]
11
[3]
[23] array · 4 items
[0]
Proneural
[1]
20
[2]
17
[3]
locator
section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
[3] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:30572911:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:92a6ed57f7f2fa796bd669f1c41e5b4de9a5312a4a74b1e899cdaf9fdfa85c08
bytes
1003
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[8]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
version
null
note
Identities of PCGs and lncRNAs in the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature and their univariable cox association with prognosis in the training group
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC6302404
section_index
8
section_title
Identification of the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature in the training dataset
row_count
12
column_count
5
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
Identities of PCGs and lncRNAs in the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature and their univariable cox association with prognosis in the training group
rows array · 12 items
[0] array · 5 items
[0]
Ensembl database ID
[1]
Gene symbol
[2]
Coefficient a
[3]
P value a
[4]
Gene expression level association with poor prognosis
[1] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000172071
[1]
EIF2AK3
[2]
− 0.82
[3]
< 0.001
[4]
Low
[2] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000136628
[1]
EPRS
[2]
− 0.79
[3]
0.01
[4]
Low
[3] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000065911
[1]
MTHFD2
[2]
− 0.71
[3]
0.02
[4]
Low
[4] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000178222
[1]
RNF212
[2]
− 0.87
[3]
0.00
[4]
Low
[5] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000117308
[1]
GALE
[2]
0.71
[3]
0.01
[4]
High
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000070019
[1]
GUCY2C
[2]
0.6
[3]
0.03
[4]
High
[7] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000231574
[1]
LINC02015
[2]
− 0.84
[3]
< 0.001
[4]
Low
[8] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000271963
[1]
CTD-2140B24.6
[2]
− 0.74
[3]
0.01
[4]
Low
[9] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000225163
[1]
LINC00618
[2]
0.57
[3]
0.04
[4]
High
[10] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000257337
[1]
AC068888.1
[2]
0.61
[3]
0.03
[4]
High
[11] array · 5 items
[0]
ENSG00000259577
[1]
CERNA1
[2]
0.65
[3]
0.02
[4]
High
locator
section[8]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
[4] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:30572911:3
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:46fe5356051191b97ab6e5383f13d1f7319b807a1c67f50450ac97673ff4d3bd
bytes
1772
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[10]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3
version
null
note
Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of the PCG-lncRNA signature and survival of GBM patients
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC6302404
section_index
10
section_title
The PCG-lncRNA signature is an independent prognostic factor from other clinical variables and molecular features
row_count
35
column_count
9
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 3
caption
Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of the PCG-lncRNA signature and survival of GBM patients
rows array · 35 items
[0] array · 3 items
[0]
Variables
[1]
Univariable analysis
[2]
Multivariable analysis
[1] array · 6 items
[0]
HR
[1]
95% CI of HR
[2]
P
[3]
HR
[4]
95% CI of HR
[5]
P
[2] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Lower
[2]
Upper
[3]
[4]
[5]
Lower
[6]
Upper
[7]
[3] array · 1 item
[0]
The training set
[4] array · 1 item
[0]
Age
[5] array · 9 items
[0]
> 60 vs. ≤ 60
[1]
1.54
[2]
0.9
[3]
2.64
[4]
0.12
[5]
1.96
[6]
0.98
[7]
3.92
[8]
0.06
[6] array · 1 item
[0]
Sex
[7] array · 9 items
[0]
Male vs. female
[1]
0.68
[2]
0.39
[3]
1.2
[4]
0.18
[5]
0.65
[6]
0.33
[7]
1.28
[8]
0.21
[8] array · 1 item
[0]
KPS
[9] array · 9 items
[0]
> 70 vs. ≤ 70
[1]
0.86
[2]
0.42
[3]
1.74
[4]
0.04
[5]
2.48
[6]
1.05
[7]
5.87
[8]
0.04
[10] array · 1 item
[0]
The signature
[11] array · 9 items
[0]
High risk vs. low risk
[1]
4.68
[2]
2.48
[3]
8.80
[4]
< 0.001
[5]
5.94
[6]
2.66
[7]
13.25
[8]
< 0.001
[12] array · 1 item
[0]
The test set
[13] array · 1 item
[0]
Age
[14] array · 9 items
[0]
> 60 vs. ≤ 60
[1]
1.93
[2]
1.05
[3]
3.56
[4]
0.04
[5]
1.66
[6]
0.81
[7]
3.44
[8]
0.16
[15] array · 1 item
[0]
Sex
[16] array · 9 items
[0]
Male vs. female
[1]
0.8
[2]
0.45
[3]
1.43
[4]
0.45
[5]
1.16
[6]
0.52
[7]
2.59
[8]
0.71
[17] array · 1 item
[0]
KPS
[18] array · 9 items
[0]
> 70 vs. ≤ 70
[1]
0.51
[2]
0.25
[3]
1.07
[4]
0.08
[5]
0.53
[6]
0.24
[7]
1.17
[8]
0.12
[19] array · 1 item
[0]
The signature
[20] array · 9 items
[0]
High risk vs. low risk
[1]
2.77
[2]
1.49
[3]
5.16
[4]
0.001
[5]
2.89
[6]
1.35
[7]
6.20
[8]
0.01
[21] array · 1 item
[0]
The independent set
[22] array · 1 item
[0]
Age
[23] array · 9 items
[0]
> 60 vs. ≤ 60
[1]
1.65
[2]
0.92
[3]
2.96
[4]
0.09
[5]
1.54
[6]
0.85
[7]
2.79
[8]
0.15
[24] array · 1 item
[0]
Sex
[25] array · 9 items
[0]
Male vs. female
[1]
0.92
[2]
0.53
[3]
1.61
[4]
0.77
[5]
1.05
[6]
0.59
[7]
1.85
[8]
0.88
[26] array · 1 item
[0]
The signature
[27] array · 9 items
[0]
High risk vs. low risk
[1]
2.24
[2]
1.22
[3]
4.11
[4]
0.01
[5]
2.17
[6]
1.16
[7]
4.07
[8]
0.02
[28] array · 1 item
[0]
The entire TCGA set
[29] array · 1 item
[0]
MGMT
[30] array · 9 items
[0]
Methylated vs. unmethylated
[1]
0.92
[2]
0.48
[3]
1.77
[4]
0.80
[5]
0.94
[6]
0.49
[7]
1.83
[8]
0.87
[31] array · 1 item
[0]
IDH1
[32] array · 9 items
[0]
R132H vs. WT
[1]
0.27
[2]
0.04
[3]
2.01
[4]
0.20
[5]
0.46
[6]
0.06
[7]
3.57
[8]
0.46
[33] array · 1 item
[0]
The signature
[34] array · 9 items
[0]
High risk vs. low risk
[1]
4.00
[2]
1.97
[3]
8.12
[4]
< 0.001
[5]
3.71
[6]
1.80
[7]
7.62
[8]
< 0.001
locator
section[10]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3
[5] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:30572911:4
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:1ee1762c1b3ab54cc886486e665acb09a7d9cc2e63ade00b95331482a5b58f87
bytes
1552
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[12]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
version
null
note
Association of the PCG-lncRNA signature with clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative GBM patients in TCGA dataset
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC6302404
section_index
12
section_title
Stratification analysis of TMZ-chemoradiation treatment
row_count
25
column_count
10
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 4
caption
Association of the PCG-lncRNA signature with clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative GBM patients in TCGA dataset
rows array · 25 items
[0] array · 7 items
[0]
Variables
[1]
Training set
[2]
P
[3]
Test set
[4]
P
[5]
Entire TCGA set
[6]
P
[1] array · 6 items
[0]
Low riska
[1]
High riska
[2]
Low riska
[3]
High riska
[4]
Low riska
[5]
High riska
[2] array · 10 items
[0]
Age
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.76
[4]
[5]
[6]
1
[7]
[8]
[9]
0.93
[3] array · 10 items
[0]
< 60
[1]
21
[2]
20
[3]
[4]
19
[5]
16
[6]
[7]
40
[8]
36
[9]
[4] array · 10 items
[0]
≥ 60
[1]
17
[2]
18
[3]
[4]
22
[5]
20
[6]
[7]
39
[8]
38
[9]
[5] array · 10 items
[0]
Sex
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.23
[4]
[5]
[6]
0.97
[7]
[8]
[9]
0.52
[6] array · 10 items
[0]
Female
[1]
10
[2]
16
[3]
[4]
16
[5]
13
[6]
[7]
26
[8]
29
[9]
[7] array · 10 items
[0]
Male
[1]
28
[2]
22
[3]
[4]
25
[5]
23
[6]
[7]
53
[8]
45
[9]
[8] array · 10 items
[0]
TMZ-chemotherapy
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.16
[4]
[5]
[6]
0.51
[7]
[8]
[9]
0.11
[9] array · 10 items
[0]
No
[1]
4
[2]
10
[3]
[4]
6
[5]
9
[6]
[7]
10
[8]
19
[9]
[10] array · 10 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
30
[2]
23
[3]
[4]
31
[5]
24
[6]
[7]
61
[8]
47
[9]
[11] array · 10 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
4
[2]
5
[3]
[4]
4
[5]
3
[6]
[7]
8
[8]
8
[9]
[12] array · 10 items
[0]
Radiotherapy
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.01
[4]
[5]
[6]
0.26
[7]
[8]
[9]
0.01
[13] array · 10 items
[0]
No
[1]
1
[2]
7
[3]
[4]
5
[5]
8
[6]
[7]
6
[8]
15
[9]
[14] array · 10 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
36
[2]
26
[3]
[4]
36
[5]
27
[6]
[7]
72
[8]
53
[9]
[15] array · 10 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
1
[2]
5
[3]
[4]
0
[5]
1
[6]
[7]
1
[8]
6
[9]
[16] array · 10 items
[0]
TMZ-chemoradiation
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.01
[4]
[5]
[6]
0.03
[7]
[8]
[9]
< 0.001
[17] array · 10 items
[0]
No
[1]
14
[2]
27
[3]
[4]
17
[5]
25
[6]
[7]
31
[8]
52
[9]
[18] array · 10 items
[0]
Yes
[1]
23
[2]
10
[3]
[4]
20
[5]
9
[6]
[7]
43
[8]
19
[9]
[19] array · 10 items
[0]
Unknown
[1]
1
[2]
1
[3]
[4]
2
[5]
4
[6]
[7]
3
[8]
5
[9]
[20] array · 10 items
[0]
Subtype
[1]
[2]
[3]
0.8
[4]
[5]
[6]
0.34
[7]
[8]
[9]
0.47
[21] array · 10 items
[0]
Classical
[1]
9
[2]
9
[3]
[4]
8
[5]
14
[6]
[7]
17
[8]
23
[9]
[22] array · 10 items
[0]
Mesenchymal
[1]
13
[2]
10
[3]
[4]
15
[5]
11
[6]
[7]
28
[8]
21
[9]
[23] array · 10 items
[0]
Neural
[1]
6
[2]
9
[3]
[4]
6
[5]
5
[6]
[7]
12
[8]
14
[9]
[24] array · 10 items
[0]
Proneural
[1]
10
[2]
10
[3]
[4]
11
[5]
6
[6]
[7]
21
[8]
16
[9]
locator
section[12]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE7696 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE7696 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
log-rank
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
correlation_analysis
specific
pearson
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pearson_r
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Pearson correlation
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
ROC analysis
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Chi square
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE7696
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE7696
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Additional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.
basis
The paper names GSE7696 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 6 items
[0]
source:pmid:30572911
[1]
data:geo:GSE7696
[2]
asset:table:pmid:30572911:1
[3]
asset:table:pmid:30572911:2
[4]
asset:table:pmid:30572911:3
[5]
asset:table:pmid:30572911:4
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE7696
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:13:08Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
42129
completion_tokens
1947
cached_tokens
520
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:30572911
type
paper
label
pmid:30572911
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:30572911
type
manuscript
label
PMID 30572911 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE7696
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE7696
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:30572911
type
paper
label
pmid:30572911
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:30572911
type
manuscript
label
PMID 30572911 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE7696
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE7696
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-30572911
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:30572911
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE7696
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE7696
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:30572911
parent_hash
sha256:d890b951d7862cf41fa00bb4b3b985080a01871991a0a4174fa1ae516d222052
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE7696 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE7696 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed.
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:30572911", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:a3f06762e1806dc82837d7cdce271b553c30406ebe664f5b778b9eb3319929d9", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:40:40Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:43:41Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of a multidimensional transcriptome signature for survival prediction of postoperative glioblastoma multiforme patients.", "doi": "10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8", "pmid": "30572911", "authors": ["Wei-Zhen Gao", "Lie-Mei Guo", "Tian-Qi Xu", "Yu-Hua Yin", "Feng Jia"], "journal": "Journal of translational medicine", "year": 2018, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiform (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with maximum surgical resection, radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) as the standard treatment. Diverse clinicopathological and molecular features are major obstacles to accurate predict survival and evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Reliable prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed for postoperative GBM patients.\nMETHODS: The protein coding genes (PCGs) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) gene expression profiles of 233 GBM postoperative patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), TANRIC and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. We randomly divided the TCGA set into a training (n = 76) and a test set (n = 77) and used GSE7696 (n = 80) as an independent validation set. Survival analysis and the random survival forest algorithm were performed to screen survival associated signature.\nRESULTS: Six PCGs (EIF2AK3, EPRS, GALE, GUCY2C, MTHFD2, RNF212) and five lncRNAs (CTD-2140B24.6, LINC02015, AC068888.1, CERNA1, LINC00618) were screened out by a risk score model and formed a PCG-lncRNA signature for its predictive power was strongest (AUC = 0.78 in the training dataset). The PCG-lncRNA signature could divide patients into high- risk or low-risk group with significantly different survival (median 7.47 vs. 18.27 months, log-rank test P < 0.001) in the training dataset. Similar result was observed in the test dataset (median 11.40 vs. 16.80 months, log-rank test P = 0.001) and the independent set (median 8.93 vs. 16.22 months, log-rank test P = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression analysis verified that it was an independent prognostic factor for the postsurgical patients with GBM. Compared with IDH mutation status, O-(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status and age, the signature was proved to have a superior predictive power. And stratified analysis found that the signature could further separated postoperative GBM patients who received TMZ-chemoradiation into high- and low-risk groups in TCGA and GEO dataset.\nCONCLUSIONS: The PCG-lncRNA signature was a novel prognostic marker to predict survival and TMZ-chemoradiation response in GBM patients after surgery.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30572911", "locator": "sections[5] \"Statistical analysis and bioinformatics analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\nAdditional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:30572911", "locator": "sections[21] \"Availability of data and materials\" paragraphs 1-3", "quote": "The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\nAdditional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:30572911"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE7696"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE7696"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:30572911", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8", "sha256": "sha256:0dfc524a9c37706fa6c488ab74ac652adcea9ddeddf86c81a440a1216a37d0ee", "bytes": 51559, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12967-018-1744-8", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6302404", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE7696", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7696", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE7696", "version": null, "note": "The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\nAdditional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\nAdditional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM187153", "GSM187154", "GSM187155", "GSM187156", "GSM187157", "GSM187158", "GSM187159", "GSM187160", "GSM187161", "GSM187162", "GSM187163", "GSM187164", "GSM187165", "GSM187166", "GSM187167", "GSM187168", "GSM187169", "GSM187170", "GSM187171", "GSM187172", "GSM187173", "GSM187174", "GSM187175", "GSM187176", "GSM187177", "GSM187178", "GSM187179", "GSM187180", "GSM187181", "GSM187182", "GSM187183", "GSM187184", "GSM187185", "GSM187186", "GSM187187", "GSM187188", "GSM187189", "GSM187190", "GSM187191", "GSM187192", "GSM187193", "GSM187194", "GSM187195", "GSM187196", "GSM187197", "GSM187198", "GSM187199", "GSM187200", "GSM187201", "GSM187202", "GSM187203", "GSM187204", "GSM187205", "GSM187206", "GSM187207", "GSM187208", "GSM187209", "GSM187210", "GSM187211", "GSM187212", "GSM187213", "GSM187214", "GSM187215", "GSM187216", "GSM187217", "GSM187218", "GSM187219", "GSM187220", "GSM187221", "GSM187222", "GSM187223", "GSM187224", "GSM187225", "GSM187226", "GSM187227", "GSM187228", "GSM187229", "GSM187230", "GSM187231", "GSM187232", "GSM187233", "GSM187234", "GSM187235", "GSM187236"], "sample_count": 84, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Glioblastoma from a homogenous cohort of patients treated within clinical trial", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30572911:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:b93abce11618f65c4309a6d477e08283f3a851f3c1bffa1c2402ab9d67df394a", "bytes": 770, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1", "version": null, "note": "Summary of patient demographics and clinical characteristics", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6302404", "section_index": 3, "section_title": "Glioblastoma multiforme datasets", "row_count": 24, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Summary of patient demographics and clinical characteristics", "rows": [["Characteristic", "Training set", "Test set", "Independent set"], ["Age"], ["≤ 60", "41", "35", "64"], ["> 60", "35", "42", "16"], ["Sex"], ["Female", "26", "29", "21"], ["Male", "50", "48", "59"], ["Chemotherapy"], ["No", "14", "15", "28"], ["Yes", "53", "55", "52"], ["Unknown", "9", "7", "0"], ["Radiotherapy"], ["No", "8", "13", "0"], ["Yes", "62", "63", "80"], ["Unknown", "6", "1", "0"], ["TMZ-chemoradiation"], ["No", "41", "42", "28"], ["Yes", "33", "29", "52"], ["Unknown", "2", "6", "0"], ["Subtype"], ["Classical", "18", "22", ""], ["Mesenchymal", "23", "26", ""], ["Neural", "15", "11", ""], ["Proneural", "20", "17", ""]], "row_count": 24, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 49, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[3]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30572911:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:92a6ed57f7f2fa796bd669f1c41e5b4de9a5312a4a74b1e899cdaf9fdfa85c08", "bytes": 1003, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[8]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2", "version": null, "note": "Identities of PCGs and lncRNAs in the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature and their univariable cox association with prognosis in the training group", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6302404", "section_index": 8, "section_title": "Identification of the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature in the training dataset", "row_count": 12, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Identities of PCGs and lncRNAs in the prognostic PCG-lncRNA signature and their univariable cox association with prognosis in the training group", "rows": [["Ensembl database ID", "Gene symbol", "Coefficient a", "P value a", "Gene expression level association with poor prognosis"], ["ENSG00000172071", "EIF2AK3", "− 0.82", "< 0.001", "Low"], ["ENSG00000136628", "EPRS", "− 0.79", "0.01", "Low"], ["ENSG00000065911", "MTHFD2", "− 0.71", "0.02", "Low"], ["ENSG00000178222", "RNF212", "− 0.87", "0.00", "Low"], ["ENSG00000117308", "GALE", "0.71", "0.01", "High"], ["ENSG00000070019", "GUCY2C", "0.6", "0.03", "High"], ["ENSG00000231574", "LINC02015", "− 0.84", "< 0.001", "Low"], ["ENSG00000271963", "CTD-2140B24.6", "− 0.74", "0.01", "Low"], ["ENSG00000225163", "LINC00618", "0.57", "0.04", "High"], ["ENSG00000257337", "AC068888.1", "0.61", "0.03", "High"], ["ENSG00000259577", "CERNA1", "0.65", "0.02", "High"]], "row_count": 12, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 38, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[8]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30572911:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:46fe5356051191b97ab6e5383f13d1f7319b807a1c67f50450ac97673ff4d3bd", "bytes": 1772, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[10]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3", "version": null, "note": "Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of the PCG-lncRNA signature and survival of GBM patients", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6302404", "section_index": 10, "section_title": "The PCG-lncRNA signature is an independent prognostic factor from other clinical variables and molecular features", "row_count": 35, "column_count": 9}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of the PCG-lncRNA signature and survival of GBM patients", "rows": [["Variables", "Univariable analysis", "Multivariable analysis"], ["HR", "95% CI of HR", "P", "HR", "95% CI of HR", "P"], ["", "Lower", "Upper", "", "", "Lower", "Upper", ""], ["The training set"], ["Age"], ["> 60 vs. ≤ 60", "1.54", "0.9", "2.64", "0.12", "1.96", "0.98", "3.92", "0.06"], ["Sex"], ["Male vs. female", "0.68", "0.39", "1.2", "0.18", "0.65", "0.33", "1.28", "0.21"], ["KPS"], ["> 70 vs. ≤ 70", "0.86", "0.42", "1.74", "0.04", "2.48", "1.05", "5.87", "0.04"], ["The signature"], ["High risk vs. low risk", "4.68", "2.48", "8.80", "< 0.001", "5.94", "2.66", "13.25", "< 0.001"], ["The test set"], ["Age"], ["> 60 vs. ≤ 60", "1.93", "1.05", "3.56", "0.04", "1.66", "0.81", "3.44", "0.16"], ["Sex"], ["Male vs. female", "0.8", "0.45", "1.43", "0.45", "1.16", "0.52", "2.59", "0.71"], ["KPS"], ["> 70 vs. ≤ 70", "0.51", "0.25", "1.07", "0.08", "0.53", "0.24", "1.17", "0.12"], ["The signature"], ["High risk vs. low risk", "2.77", "1.49", "5.16", "0.001", "2.89", "1.35", "6.20", "0.01"], ["The independent set"], ["Age"], ["> 60 vs. ≤ 60", "1.65", "0.92", "2.96", "0.09", "1.54", "0.85", "2.79", "0.15"], ["Sex"], ["Male vs. female", "0.92", "0.53", "1.61", "0.77", "1.05", "0.59", "1.85", "0.88"], ["The signature"], ["High risk vs. low risk", "2.24", "1.22", "4.11", "0.01", "2.17", "1.16", "4.07", "0.02"], ["The entire TCGA set"], ["MGMT"], ["Methylated vs. unmethylated", "0.92", "0.48", "1.77", "0.80", "0.94", "0.49", "1.83", "0.87"], ["IDH1"], ["R132H vs. WT", "0.27", "0.04", "2.01", "0.20", "0.46", "0.06", "3.57", "0.46"], ["The signature"], ["High risk vs. low risk", "4.00", "1.97", "8.12", "< 0.001", "3.71", "1.80", "7.62", "< 0.001"]], "row_count": 35, "column_count": 9, "numeric_cells": 120, "header_rows": 3, "locator": "section[10]/table-wrap[1]#Tab3"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:30572911:4", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:1ee1762c1b3ab54cc886486e665acb09a7d9cc2e63ade00b95331482a5b58f87", "bytes": 1552, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4", "version": null, "note": "Association of the PCG-lncRNA signature with clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative GBM patients in TCGA dataset", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC6302404", "section_index": 12, "section_title": "Stratification analysis of TMZ-chemoradiation treatment", "row_count": 25, "column_count": 10}, "table": {"label": "Table 4", "caption": "Association of the PCG-lncRNA signature with clinicopathological characteristics in postoperative GBM patients in TCGA dataset", "rows": [["Variables", "Training set", "P", "Test set", "P", "Entire TCGA set", "P"], ["Low riska", "High riska", "Low riska", "High riska", "Low riska", "High riska"], ["Age", "", "", "0.76", "", "", "1", "", "", "0.93"], ["< 60", "21", "20", "", "19", "16", "", "40", "36", ""], ["≥ 60", "17", "18", "", "22", "20", "", "39", "38", ""], ["Sex", "", "", "0.23", "", "", "0.97", "", "", "0.52"], ["Female", "10", "16", "", "16", "13", "", "26", "29", ""], ["Male", "28", "22", "", "25", "23", "", "53", "45", ""], ["TMZ-chemotherapy", "", "", "0.16", "", "", "0.51", "", "", "0.11"], ["No", "4", "10", "", "6", "9", "", "10", "19", ""], ["Yes", "30", "23", "", "31", "24", "", "61", "47", ""], ["Unknown", "4", "5", "", "4", "3", "", "8", "8", ""], ["Radiotherapy", "", "", "0.01", "", "", "0.26", "", "", "0.01"], ["No", "1", "7", "", "5", "8", "", "6", "15", ""], ["Yes", "36", "26", "", "36", "27", "", "72", "53", ""], ["Unknown", "1", "5", "", "0", "1", "", "1", "6", ""], ["TMZ-chemoradiation", "", "", "0.01", "", "", "0.03", "", "", "< 0.001"], ["No", "14", "27", "", "17", "25", "", "31", "52", ""], ["Yes", "23", "10", "", "20", "9", "", "43", "19", ""], ["Unknown", "1", "1", "", "2", "4", "", "3", "5", ""], ["Subtype", "", "", "0.8", "", "", "0.34", "", "", "0.47"], ["Classical", "9", "9", "", "8", "14", "", "17", "23", ""], ["Mesenchymal", "13", "10", "", "15", "11", "", "28", "21", ""], ["Neural", "6", "9", "", "6", "5", "", "12", "14", ""], ["Proneural", "10", "10", "", "11", "6", "", "21", "16", ""]], "row_count": 25, "column_count": 10, "numeric_cells": 122, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[12]/table-wrap[1]#Tab4"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE7696 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE7696 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Pearson correlation"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "ROC analysis"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Chi square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE7696"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE7696"], "statements": ["The data generated or analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.\nAdditional material can be mentioned in the link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1TKcsqUHUGxN0Y9jlSRVQ_A."], "basis": "The paper names GSE7696 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:30572911", "data:geo:GSE7696", "asset:table:pmid:30572911:1", "asset:table:pmid:30572911:2", "asset:table:pmid:30572911:3", "asset:table:pmid:30572911:4"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE7696"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:13:08Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 42129, "completion_tokens": 1947, "cached_tokens": 520}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:30572911", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30572911"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30572911", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30572911 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE7696", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE7696"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:30572911", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:30572911"}, {"id": "source:pmid:30572911", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 30572911 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE7696", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE7696"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-30572911", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:30572911"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE7696", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE7696"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:30572911", "parent_hash": "sha256:d890b951d7862cf41fa00bb4b3b985080a01871991a0a4174fa1ae516d222052", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE7696 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE7696 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess and compare survival differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups. ROC analysis was tested to compare the survival predictive power. Furthermore, to test whether the signature was an independent prognostic factor, multivariable Cox regression analysis and data stratification analysis were performed."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}