Diagnostic performance of the nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

{"sci_version": "1.0", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:31363807", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 1, "content_hash": "sha256:0aa99745132f50cbb016a65338c6a4ddeda5398915a31a8ec14f1d5be90182dc", "created_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:48Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T10:25:48Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "converter": "sep_to_sci_v1", "source_package_schema": "urn:bntrg:sep:1.0.0"}, "paper": {"state": "partial", "title": "Diagnostic performance of the nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.", "doi": "10.1007/s00234-019-02248-3", "pmid": "31363807", "authors": null, "journal": "Neuroradiology", "year": 2019, "abstract": null, "claims": [{"id": "claim-1", "statement": "the pooled sensitivity of the nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis", "kind": "quantitative", "state": "complete", "target": {"value": 0.84, "unit": "sensitivity", "tolerance": null, "source": "chars 857-1005 of source sha256 ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06"}, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:31363807", "locator": "chars 857-1005 of source sha256 ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "quote": "The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99), respectively."}]}], "gaps": ["abstract", "authors"]}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": "the pooled sensitivity of the nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate and its interval from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The number a replication must land on, and the sentence it came from.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:31363807"], "outputs": ["the published estimate, its unit and its interval"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the study data behind the published pooled estimate", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The published estimate cannot be recomputed without the data the review pooled.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the pooled study data with its provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the analysis programme", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:not_determinable", "description": "Re-run the paper's analysis on the source data and produce the registered result.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["materials:the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807"], "outputs": ["the registered result"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": ["the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807", "the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate"], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:not_determinable"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:31363807", "role": "manuscript", "format": "txt", "media_type": "text/plain", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02248-3", "sha256": "sha256:ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "bytes": null, "access": "unknown", "state": "declared", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1007/s00234-019-02248-3", "version": null, "note": "Source read by the package builder: abstract_only.", "structure": {"access_state": "abstract_only"}}, {"id": "materials:the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807", "role": "raw", "format": "unknown", "media_type": "application/octet-stream", "uri": null, "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "unknown", "state": "unavailable", "reader": null, "reader_status": "unknown", "identifier": null, "version": null, "note": "the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807", "structure": {"material_kind": "dataset", "access_state": "not_identified"}}, {"id": "materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate", "role": "code", "format": "unknown", "media_type": "application/octet-stream", "uri": null, "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "unknown", "state": "unavailable", "reader": null, "reader_status": "unknown", "identifier": null, "version": null, "note": "the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate", "structure": {"material_kind": "code", "access_state": "absent"}}], "gaps": ["asset:materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate not verified", "asset:materials:the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807 not verified", "asset:source:pmid:31363807 not verified"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "meta_analysis", "specific": null, "label": "", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 0.0, "band": "low", "quote": null}}], "targets": [{"id": "target-1", "claim_id": "claim-1", "operation": null, "expected_value": 0.84, "unit": "sensitivity", "tolerance": null, "state": "complete"}], "gaps": ["method.corpus_not_determined", "method.operations"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["differential_expression", "gwas", "machine_learning", "meta_analysis", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "pca", "statistical_regression", "survival_analysis"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "method", "blocked_on": "method:not_determinable", "axes": {"method": {"axis": "method", "tier": "R4", "blocker": "method:not_determinable", "detail": {"outcome": "not_determinable", "reason": "No specific statistical method is stated in recognised wording. Full methods review is required.", "basis": "The title, abstract and methods text do not carry the method, so a person has to read the paper before it can be programmed."}}, "capability": {"axis": "capability", "tier": "R1", "blocker": null, "detail": {"families": [], "applies": false, "basis": "This paper needs no bench capability: it computes on data it already has."}}, "data": {"axis": "data", "tier": "R4", "blocker": "data:accession_absent", "detail": {"applies": true, "reachable": false, "basis": "The record names no repository accession and no data-availability statement, so the source data has to be requested from the authors."}}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": [], "steps": ["read_published_estimate"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": ["txt", "unknown"], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["source:pmid:31363807", "materials:the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807", "materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate"]}, "gaps": ["method:not_determinable"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"status": "passed", "providers": [{"provider": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "peer-review-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "306b04d6ca2f3566044ef2017cba392037978657a0067bb27346dc6f9b3651bb", "source_hash": "ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:66013fff085b70572829845986067e6fa3b9a311a0c9963752575274352a3950", "raw_response_chars": 1440}, {"provider": "minimax-m3", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "peer-review-reading-v1", "prompt_hash": "d6f2ed824a81becf94f67adb52f3df696937f008d44044ba3936c9b021fa632b", "source_hash": "ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "raw_response_sha256": "sha256:f481a4eef7ba43ece51a9fc7cb0cdb370056a585be24b789766e3c088c656909", "raw_response_chars": 1479}], "target_providers": [{"provider": "minimax-m3-1-flash", "model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "b08a058e6932aac300deba53d1ec363735daa807f2786eac6850a7759db05db9", "source_hash": "ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.84,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99), respectively.\",\"target_result\":\"Pooled sensitivity was 0.84.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.84, "unit": "", "evidence": "The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99), respectively.", "target_result": "Pooled sensitivity was 0.84.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 857-1005 of source sha256 ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T13:25:23.681001+00:00"}, {"provider": "minimax-m3", "model": "MiniMax-M3", "prompt_version": "replication-target-v2", "prompt_hash": "58678c46180f128ef5ca3c7950bd5333e74a9392ed534009e47c11868190e068", "source_hash": "ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06", "raw_response": "{\"parent_value\":0.84,\"unit\":\"\",\"evidence\":\"The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99), respectively.\",\"target_result\":\"The pooled sensitivity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84.\",\"number_stated\":true}", "reading": {"parent_value": 0.84, "unit": "", "evidence": "The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99), respectively.", "target_result": "The pooled sensitivity of the NRSS for the diagnosis of LSS was 0.84.", "number_stated": true, "source_locator": "chars 857-1005 of source sha256 ebbf4e3f2f242f39cecf55c0f0b18d560ee6014f367707e6c7539e0e45348c06"}, "recorded_at": "2026-10-31T13:25:29.821668+00:00"}], "agreement": true, "disagreements": {"target_result": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": "The pooled sensitivity of the nerve root sedimentation sign (NRSS) for diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91).", "minimax-m3": "Pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91) for the nerve root sedimentation sign in diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis.", "decisive": false}, "analysis_methods": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": ["Meta-analysis of 14 studies", "Calculation of pooled sensitivity and specificity", "Calculation of diagnostic odds ratio", "Calculation of positive and negative likelihood ratios", "Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis", "Fagan's plot analysis", "Likelihood ratio dot diagram", "Deek's funnel plot assessment of publication bias"], "minimax-m3": ["Meta-analysis of 14 studies", "Calculation of pooled sensitivity and specificity", "Diagnostic odds ratio and likelihood ratio calculations", "Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis", "Fagan's plot", "Likelihood ratio dot diagram", "Deek's funnel plot for publication bias assessment"], "decisive": false}, "source_claims": {"minimax-m3-1-flash": ["The meta-analysis included 14 studies with 1333 positive cases and 2658 negative controls.", "The pooled sensitivity of NRSS for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91).", "The pooled specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.81, 0.99).", "The study concluded that NRSS has high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis."], "minimax-m3": ["The meta-analysis included 14 studies with 1333 positive cases and 2658 negative controls.", "The pooled sensitivity of the nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75, 0.91)."], "decisive": false}}, "agreement_basis": {"policy": "decisive_fields", "decisive_fields": ["number_stated", "parent_value", "unit", "work_type"], "advisory_fields": ["analysis_methods", "source_claims", "target_result"]}, "blinded": true}, "human_critique": {"status": "not_run", "reviewer": null, "signed_at": null, "conflict_checked": false, "commentary": null}, "stages": [{"key": "target_materials", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "independent_readings", "status": "passed", "reason": null, "evidence": {"provider_errors": []}}, {"key": "source_resolution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "protocol_reconstruction", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_execution", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "control_comparison", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}, {"key": "publication", "status": "pending", "reason": null, "evidence": null}], "gaps": ["review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.passed"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "package:c514e0629b85c28f2821fafce52666c0026f1f5daa54e1c0d903e46f2b6cfec2", "type": "sep_package", "label": "SEP v1 package for pmid:31363807"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity:conversion:pmid:31363807", "type": "conversion", "used": ["package:c514e0629b85c28f2821fafce52666c0026f1f5daa54e1c0d903e46f2b6cfec2"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:minimax-m3", "type": "model", "label": "minimax-m3"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-m3-1-flash", "type": "model", "label": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}, {"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}], "source_run_id": "run-20261023T122449232913", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "a777b3d2-6fc5-4323-ae0c-f0283011f0eb", "parent_hash": "c514e0629b85c28f2821fafce52666c0026f1f5daa54e1c0d903e46f2b6cfec2", "fork_of": null, "generation": 1}, "gaps": ["abstract", "asset:materials:the analysis programme that recomputes the published estimate not verified", "asset:materials:the study data pooled behind the published estimate in pmid:31363807 not verified", "asset:source:pmid:31363807 not verified", "authors", "execution.not_run", "method.corpus_not_determined", "method.operations", "method:not_determinable", "review.human_critique", "review.machine_critique.passed", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:not_determinable"]}