Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:32508318

Eight-gene signature predicts recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma.

Yongjian Zhang · Qiang Fan · Yingying Guo · Koujun Zhu

Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020 doi:10.3233/CBM-190329

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:32508318
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:26e7cb093689dfe9e1391f3e18e20d215b1b8ec51da09ad264246aff45f7c495
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:33:44Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:01:44Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Eight-gene signature predicts recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma.
doi
10.3233/CBM-190329
pmid
32508318
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Yongjian Zhang
[1]
Qiang Fan
[2]
Yingying Guo
[3]
Koujun Zhu
journal
Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers
year
2020
abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrence significantly influences the survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, there are less gene signatures that predict recurrence risk of LUAD. OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to construct a model to predict risk of recurrence in LUAD. METHODS: RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between recurrent and non-recurrent tumors in the training set were identified. Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The recurrence risk model that identifies patients at low and high risk for recurrence was constructed, followed by the validation of its performance in the validation set and a microarray dataset. RESULTS: In total, 378 DEGs, including 20 recurrence-associated DEGs, were identified between the recurrent and non-recurrent tumors in the training set. The signatures of 8 genes (including AZGP1, INPP5J, MYBPH, SPIB, GUCA2A, HTR1B, SLC15A1 and TNFSF11) were used to construct the prognostic model to assess the risk of recurrence. This model indicated that patients with high risk scores had shorter recurrence-free survival time compared with patients with low risk scores. ROC curve analysis of this model showed it had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) to predict LUAD recurrence in the TCGA cohort (the training and validation sets) and GSE50081 dataset. This prognostic model showed high predictive power and performance in predicting recurrence in LUAD. CONCLUSION: We concluded that this model might be of great value for evaluating the risk of recurrence of LUAD in clinics.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32508318
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32508318
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The recurrence risk model had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) for predicting LUAD recurrence in the TCGA training and validation sets and the GSE50081 dataset.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32508318
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 4
quote
ROC curve analysis of this model showed it had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) to predict LUAD recurrence in the TCGA cohort (the training and validation sets) and GSE50081 dataset.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The recurrence risk model had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) for predicting LUAD recurrence in the TCGA training and validation sets and the GSE50081 dataset.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32508318
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:32508318
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-190329
sha256
sha256:85b8147ceaf48e6aa08c3f17ccee5ce004d2a777bc770c7a2d21d1007b933d8f
bytes
1712
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3233/CBM-190329
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC12662370
source
ncbi_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50081
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE50081
version
null
note
RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).
access_statement_kind
repository_route_statement
sample_accessions array · 181 items
[0]
GSM1213669
[1]
GSM1213670
[2]
GSM1213671
[3]
GSM1213672
[4]
GSM1213673
[5]
GSM1213674
[6]
GSM1213675
[7]
GSM1213676
[8]
GSM1213677
[9]
GSM1213678
[10]
GSM1213679
[11]
GSM1213680
[12]
GSM1213681
[13]
GSM1213682
[14]
GSM1213683
[15]
GSM1213684
[16]
GSM1213685
[17]
GSM1213686
[18]
GSM1213687
[19]
GSM1213688
[20]
GSM1213689
[21]
GSM1213690
[22]
GSM1213691
[23]
GSM1213692
[24]
GSM1213693
[25]
GSM1213694
[26]
GSM1213695
[27]
GSM1213696
[28]
GSM1213697
[29]
GSM1213698
[30]
GSM1213699
[31]
GSM1213700
[32]
GSM1213701
[33]
GSM1213702
[34]
GSM1213703
[35]
GSM1213704
[36]
GSM1213705
[37]
GSM1213706
[38]
GSM1213707
[39]
GSM1213708
[40]
GSM1213709
[41]
GSM1213710
[42]
GSM1213711
[43]
GSM1213712
[44]
GSM1213713
[45]
GSM1213714
[46]
GSM1213715
[47]
GSM1213716
[48]
GSM1213717
[49]
GSM1213718
[50]
GSM1213719
[51]
GSM1213720
[52]
GSM1213721
[53]
GSM1213722
[54]
GSM1213723
[55]
GSM1213724
[56]
GSM1213725
[57]
GSM1213726
[58]
GSM1213727
[59]
GSM1213728
[60]
GSM1213729
[61]
GSM1213730
[62]
GSM1213731
[63]
GSM1213732
[64]
GSM1213733
[65]
GSM1213734
[66]
GSM1213735
[67]
GSM1213736
[68]
GSM1213737
[69]
GSM1213738
[70]
GSM1213739
[71]
GSM1213740
[72]
GSM1213741
[73]
GSM1213742
[74]
GSM1213743
[75]
GSM1213744
[76]
GSM1213745
[77]
GSM1213746
[78]
GSM1213747
[79]
GSM1213748
[80]
GSM1213749
[81]
GSM1213750
[82]
GSM1213751
[83]
GSM1213752
[84]
GSM1213753
[85]
GSM1213754
[86]
GSM1213755
[87]
GSM1213756
[88]
GSM1213757
[89]
GSM1213758
[90]
GSM1213759
[91]
GSM1213760
[92]
GSM1213761
[93]
GSM1213762
[94]
GSM1213763
[95]
GSM1213764
[96]
GSM1213765
[97]
GSM1213766
[98]
GSM1213767
[99]
GSM1213768
[100]
GSM1213769
[101]
GSM1213770
[102]
GSM1213771
[103]
GSM1213772
[104]
GSM1213773
[105]
GSM1213774
[106]
GSM1213775
[107]
GSM1213776
[108]
GSM1213777
[109]
GSM1213778
[110]
GSM1213779
[111]
GSM1213780
[112]
GSM1213781
[113]
GSM1213782
[114]
GSM1213783
[115]
GSM1213784
[116]
GSM1213785
[117]
GSM1213786
[118]
GSM1213787
[119]
GSM1213788
[120]
GSM1213789
[121]
GSM1213790
[122]
GSM1213791
[123]
GSM1213792
[124]
GSM1213793
[125]
GSM1213794
[126]
GSM1213795
[127]
GSM1213796
[128]
GSM1213797
[129]
GSM1213798
[130]
GSM1213799
[131]
GSM1213800
[132]
GSM1213801
[133]
GSM1213802
[134]
GSM1213803
[135]
GSM1213804
[136]
GSM1213805
[137]
GSM1213806
[138]
GSM1213807
[139]
GSM1213808
[140]
GSM1213809
[141]
GSM1213810
[142]
GSM1213811
[143]
GSM1213812
[144]
GSM1213813
[145]
GSM1213814
[146]
GSM1213815
[147]
GSM1213816
[148]
GSM1213817
[149]
GSM1213818
[150]
GSM1213819
[151]
GSM1213820
[152]
GSM1213821
[153]
GSM1213822
[154]
GSM1213823
[155]
GSM1213824
[156]
GSM1213825
[157]
GSM1213826
[158]
GSM1213827
[159]
GSM1213828
[160]
GSM1213829
[161]
GSM1213830
[162]
GSM1213831
[163]
GSM1213832
[164]
GSM1213833
[165]
GSM1213834
[166]
GSM1213835
[167]
GSM1213836
[168]
GSM1213837
[169]
GSM1213838
[170]
GSM1213839
[171]
GSM1213840
[172]
GSM1213841
[173]
GSM1213842
[174]
GSM1213843
[175]
GSM1213844
[176]
GSM1213845
[177]
GSM1213846
[178]
GSM1213847
[179]
GSM1213848
[180]
GSM1213849
sample_count
181
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Validation of a histology-independent prognostic gene signature for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer including stage IA patients
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 2 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC curve
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE50081
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE50081
statements array · 1 item
[0]
RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).
basis
The paper names GSE50081 in GSE50081 and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:32508318
[1]
data:geo:GSE50081
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:00:17Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
null
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
1993
completion_tokens
814
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32508318
type
paper
label
pmid:32508318
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32508318
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32508318 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE50081
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32508318
type
paper
label
pmid:32508318
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32508318
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32508318 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE50081
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-32508318
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32508318
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE50081
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:32508318
parent_hash
sha256:9b510aadb720a3743f719364f18580eeb17ea9d99bdd206827ed0e67ffbc8b43
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 3 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
predict risk of recurrence in LUAD. METHODS: RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downlo
order_basis
paper_text_order:308
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
microarray
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
its performance in the validation set and a microarray dataset. RESULTS: In total, 378 DEGs, includ
order_basis
paper_text_order:866
id
assay:2
[2] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:3
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:32508318", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:26e7cb093689dfe9e1391f3e18e20d215b1b8ec51da09ad264246aff45f7c495", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:33:44Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:01:44Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Eight-gene signature predicts recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.3233/CBM-190329", "pmid": "32508318", "authors": ["Yongjian Zhang", "Qiang Fan", "Yingying Guo", "Koujun Zhu"], "journal": "Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers", "year": 2020, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Recurrence significantly influences the survival in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, there are less gene signatures that predict recurrence risk of LUAD.\nOBJECTIVE: We performed this study to construct a model to predict risk of recurrence in LUAD.\nMETHODS: RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between recurrent and non-recurrent tumors in the training set were identified. Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The recurrence risk model that identifies patients at low and high risk for recurrence was constructed, followed by the validation of its performance in the validation set and a microarray dataset.\nRESULTS: In total, 378 DEGs, including 20 recurrence-associated DEGs, were identified between the recurrent and non-recurrent tumors in the training set. The signatures of 8 genes (including AZGP1, INPP5J, MYBPH, SPIB, GUCA2A, HTR1B, SLC15A1 and TNFSF11) were used to construct the prognostic model to assess the risk of recurrence. This model indicated that patients with high risk scores had shorter recurrence-free survival time compared with patients with low risk scores. ROC curve analysis of this model showed it had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) to predict LUAD recurrence in the TCGA cohort (the training and validation sets) and GSE50081 dataset. This prognostic model showed high predictive power and performance in predicting recurrence in LUAD.\nCONCLUSION: We concluded that this model might be of great value for evaluating the risk of recurrence of LUAD in clinics.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32508318", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32508318", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The recurrence risk model had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) for predicting LUAD recurrence in the TCGA training and validation sets and the GSE50081 dataset.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32508318", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "ROC curve analysis of this model showed it had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) to predict LUAD recurrence in the TCGA cohort (the training and validation sets) and GSE50081 dataset."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The recurrence risk model had high predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.8) for predicting LUAD recurrence in the TCGA training and validation sets and the GSE50081 dataset.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:32508318"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:32508318", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-190329", "sha256": "sha256:85b8147ceaf48e6aa08c3f17ccee5ce004d2a777bc770c7a2d21d1007b933d8f", "bytes": 1712, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3233/CBM-190329", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC12662370", "source": "ncbi_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50081", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE50081", "version": null, "note": "RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213).", "access_statement_kind": "repository_route_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1213669", "GSM1213670", "GSM1213671", "GSM1213672", "GSM1213673", "GSM1213674", "GSM1213675", "GSM1213676", "GSM1213677", "GSM1213678", "GSM1213679", "GSM1213680", "GSM1213681", "GSM1213682", "GSM1213683", "GSM1213684", "GSM1213685", "GSM1213686", "GSM1213687", "GSM1213688", "GSM1213689", "GSM1213690", "GSM1213691", "GSM1213692", "GSM1213693", "GSM1213694", "GSM1213695", "GSM1213696", "GSM1213697", "GSM1213698", "GSM1213699", "GSM1213700", "GSM1213701", "GSM1213702", "GSM1213703", "GSM1213704", "GSM1213705", "GSM1213706", "GSM1213707", "GSM1213708", "GSM1213709", "GSM1213710", "GSM1213711", "GSM1213712", "GSM1213713", "GSM1213714", "GSM1213715", "GSM1213716", "GSM1213717", "GSM1213718", "GSM1213719", "GSM1213720", "GSM1213721", "GSM1213722", "GSM1213723", "GSM1213724", "GSM1213725", "GSM1213726", "GSM1213727", "GSM1213728", "GSM1213729", "GSM1213730", "GSM1213731", "GSM1213732", "GSM1213733", "GSM1213734", "GSM1213735", "GSM1213736", "GSM1213737", "GSM1213738", "GSM1213739", "GSM1213740", "GSM1213741", "GSM1213742", "GSM1213743", "GSM1213744", "GSM1213745", "GSM1213746", "GSM1213747", "GSM1213748", "GSM1213749", "GSM1213750", "GSM1213751", "GSM1213752", "GSM1213753", "GSM1213754", "GSM1213755", "GSM1213756", "GSM1213757", "GSM1213758", "GSM1213759", "GSM1213760", "GSM1213761", "GSM1213762", "GSM1213763", "GSM1213764", "GSM1213765", "GSM1213766", "GSM1213767", "GSM1213768", "GSM1213769", "GSM1213770", "GSM1213771", "GSM1213772", "GSM1213773", "GSM1213774", "GSM1213775", "GSM1213776", "GSM1213777", "GSM1213778", "GSM1213779", "GSM1213780", "GSM1213781", "GSM1213782", "GSM1213783", "GSM1213784", "GSM1213785", "GSM1213786", "GSM1213787", "GSM1213788", "GSM1213789", "GSM1213790", "GSM1213791", "GSM1213792", "GSM1213793", "GSM1213794", "GSM1213795", "GSM1213796", "GSM1213797", "GSM1213798", "GSM1213799", "GSM1213800", "GSM1213801", "GSM1213802", "GSM1213803", "GSM1213804", "GSM1213805", "GSM1213806", "GSM1213807", "GSM1213808", "GSM1213809", "GSM1213810", "GSM1213811", "GSM1213812", "GSM1213813", "GSM1213814", "GSM1213815", "GSM1213816", "GSM1213817", "GSM1213818", "GSM1213819", "GSM1213820", "GSM1213821", "GSM1213822", "GSM1213823", "GSM1213824", "GSM1213825", "GSM1213826", "GSM1213827", "GSM1213828", "GSM1213829", "GSM1213830", "GSM1213831", "GSM1213832", "GSM1213833", "GSM1213834", "GSM1213835", "GSM1213836", "GSM1213837", "GSM1213838", "GSM1213839", "GSM1213840", "GSM1213841", "GSM1213842", "GSM1213843", "GSM1213844", "GSM1213845", "GSM1213846", "GSM1213847", "GSM1213848", "GSM1213849"], "sample_count": 181, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Validation of a histology-independent prognostic gene signature for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer including stage IA patients", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE50081"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE50081"], "statements": ["RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and were randomly assigned into the training (n= 213) and validation set (n= 213)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE50081 in GSE50081 and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:32508318", "data:geo:GSE50081"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE50081"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:00:17Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 1993, "completion_tokens": 814, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:32508318", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32508318"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32508318", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32508318 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE50081"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:32508318", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32508318"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32508318", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32508318 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE50081"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-32508318", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:32508318"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE50081", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:32508318", "parent_hash": "sha256:9b510aadb720a3743f719364f18580eeb17ea9d99bdd206827ed0e67ffbc8b43", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["predict risk of recurrence in LUAD. METHODS: RNA-seq data from 426 patients with LUAD were downlo"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:308", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["its performance in the validation set and a microarray dataset. RESULTS: In total, 378 DEGs, includ"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:866", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Recurrence-associated DEGs were selected using multivariate Cox regression analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]}