Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:32850385

The Better Survival of MSI Subtype Is Associated With the Oxidative Stress Related Pathways in Gastric Cancer.

Lei Cai · Yeqi Sun · Kezhou Wang · Wenbin Guan · Juanqing Yue · Junlei Li · Ruifen Wang · Lifeng Wang

Frontiers in oncology · 2020 doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01269

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:32850385
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:78e7f8a91774fac004620907fbcc3cb2ea8682d970668304886f20b126647039
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:08Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:45:15Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
The Better Survival of MSI Subtype Is Associated With the Oxidative Stress Related Pathways in Gastric Cancer.
doi
10.3389/fonc.2020.01269
pmid
32850385
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Lei Cai
[1]
Yeqi Sun
[2]
Kezhou Wang
[3]
Wenbin Guan
[4]
Juanqing Yue
[5]
Junlei Li
[6]
Ruifen Wang
[7]
Lifeng Wang
journal
Frontiers in oncology
year
2020
abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading fatal cancer in the world and its incidence ranked second among all malignant tumors in China. The molecular classification of GC, proposed by the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), was added to the updated edition (2019) of WHO classification for digestive system tumor. Although MSI and EBV subtypes appeared as ever-increasingly significant roles in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Methods: We systematically summarized the relationship between EBV, d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 GC cases. Furthermore, GSE62254/ACRG and TCGA-STAD datasets, originated from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and TCGA respectively, were analyzed to figure out the prognosis related molecular characteristics by bioinformatics methods. Results: Patients with MSI subtype had better prognosis than the MSS subtype (P = 0.013) and considered as an independent biomarker by the univariate analysis (P = 0.017) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.050). While there was no significant difference between EBV positive and negative tissues (P = 0.533). The positive prognostic value conferred by MSI in different cohorts was revalidated via the clinical analysis of GSE62254/ACRG and TCGA-STAD datasets regardless of race. Then key gene module that tightly associated with better status and longer OS time for MSI cases was obtained from weighted gene co-expression network analysis(WGCNA). NUBP2 and ENDOG were screened from the gene cluster and oxidative phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species(ROS) and glutathione metabolism were analyzed to be the differential pathways in their highly expressed groups. Conclusions: Our results manifested the significant prognostic value of MSI in Chinese GC cohort and comparisons with other populations. More opportunities to induce apoptosis of cancer cells, led by the unbalance between antioxidant system and ROS accumulation, lay foundations for unveiling the better prognosis in MSI phenotype through the bioinformatics analysis.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32850385
locator
sections[11] "Statistical Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32850385
locator
sections[20] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32850385
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE62254
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE62254
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 5 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:32850385
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01269
sha256
sha256:997444b590c2139ee987de99fc458ce4c477658c8ebd4b58e5d42804aef5adc5
bytes
55224
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fonc.2020.01269
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC7399340
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE62254
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62254
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE62254
version
null
note
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 300 items
[0]
GSM1523727
[1]
GSM1523728
[2]
GSM1523729
[3]
GSM1523744
[4]
GSM1523745
[5]
GSM1523746
[6]
GSM1523747
[7]
GSM1523748
[8]
GSM1523765
[9]
GSM1523768
[10]
GSM1523769
[11]
GSM1523770
[12]
GSM1523771
[13]
GSM1523772
[14]
GSM1523773
[15]
GSM1523774
[16]
GSM1523775
[17]
GSM1523776
[18]
GSM1523777
[19]
GSM1523778
[20]
GSM1523779
[21]
GSM1523780
[22]
GSM1523781
[23]
GSM1523782
[24]
GSM1523783
[25]
GSM1523784
[26]
GSM1523785
[27]
GSM1523786
[28]
GSM1523787
[29]
GSM1523788
[30]
GSM1523789
[31]
GSM1523790
[32]
GSM1523791
[33]
GSM1523792
[34]
GSM1523793
[35]
GSM1523794
[36]
GSM1523795
[37]
GSM1523796
[38]
GSM1523797
[39]
GSM1523798
[40]
GSM1523799
[41]
GSM1523800
[42]
GSM1523801
[43]
GSM1523802
[44]
GSM1523803
[45]
GSM1523804
[46]
GSM1523805
[47]
GSM1523806
[48]
GSM1523807
[49]
GSM1523808
[50]
GSM1523809
[51]
GSM1523810
[52]
GSM1523811
[53]
GSM1523812
[54]
GSM1523813
[55]
GSM1523814
[56]
GSM1523815
[57]
GSM1523816
[58]
GSM1523817
[59]
GSM1523818
[60]
GSM1523819
[61]
GSM1523820
[62]
GSM1523821
[63]
GSM1523822
[64]
GSM1523823
[65]
GSM1523824
[66]
GSM1523825
[67]
GSM1523826
[68]
GSM1523827
[69]
GSM1523828
[70]
GSM1523829
[71]
GSM1523830
[72]
GSM1523831
[73]
GSM1523832
[74]
GSM1523833
[75]
GSM1523834
[76]
GSM1523835
[77]
GSM1523836
[78]
GSM1523837
[79]
GSM1523838
[80]
GSM1523839
[81]
GSM1523840
[82]
GSM1523841
[83]
GSM1523842
[84]
GSM1523843
[85]
GSM1523844
[86]
GSM1523845
[87]
GSM1523846
[88]
GSM1523847
[89]
GSM1523848
[90]
GSM1523849
[91]
GSM1523850
[92]
GSM1523851
[93]
GSM1523852
[94]
GSM1523853
[95]
GSM1523854
[96]
GSM1523855
[97]
GSM1523856
[98]
GSM1523857
[99]
GSM1523858
[100]
GSM1523859
[101]
GSM1523860
[102]
GSM1523861
[103]
GSM1523862
[104]
GSM1523863
[105]
GSM1523864
[106]
GSM1523865
[107]
GSM1523866
[108]
GSM1523867
[109]
GSM1523868
[110]
GSM1523869
[111]
GSM1523870
[112]
GSM1523871
[113]
GSM1523872
[114]
GSM1523873
[115]
GSM1523874
[116]
GSM1523875
[117]
GSM1523876
[118]
GSM1523877
[119]
GSM1523878
[120]
GSM1523879
[121]
GSM1523880
[122]
GSM1523881
[123]
GSM1523882
[124]
GSM1523883
[125]
GSM1523884
[126]
GSM1523885
[127]
GSM1523886
[128]
GSM1523887
[129]
GSM1523888
[130]
GSM1523889
[131]
GSM1523890
[132]
GSM1523891
[133]
GSM1523892
[134]
GSM1523893
[135]
GSM1523894
[136]
GSM1523895
[137]
GSM1523896
[138]
GSM1523897
[139]
GSM1523898
[140]
GSM1523899
[141]
GSM1523901
[142]
GSM1523903
[143]
GSM1523904
[144]
GSM1523905
[145]
GSM1523906
[146]
GSM1523908
[147]
GSM1523909
[148]
GSM1523910
[149]
GSM1523911
[150]
GSM1523918
[151]
GSM1523919
[152]
GSM1523920
[153]
GSM1523921
[154]
GSM1523922
[155]
GSM1523923
[156]
GSM1523924
[157]
GSM1523925
[158]
GSM1523926
[159]
GSM1523927
[160]
GSM1523928
[161]
GSM1523929
[162]
GSM1523930
[163]
GSM1523931
[164]
GSM1523932
[165]
GSM1523933
[166]
GSM1523934
[167]
GSM1523935
[168]
GSM1523936
[169]
GSM1523937
[170]
GSM1523938
[171]
GSM1523939
[172]
GSM1523940
[173]
GSM1523941
[174]
GSM1523942
[175]
GSM1523943
[176]
GSM1523944
[177]
GSM1523945
[178]
GSM1523946
[179]
GSM1523947
[180]
GSM1523948
[181]
GSM1523949
[182]
GSM1523950
[183]
GSM1523951
[184]
GSM1523952
[185]
GSM1523953
[186]
GSM1523954
[187]
GSM1523955
[188]
GSM1523956
[189]
GSM1523957
[190]
GSM1523958
[191]
GSM1523959
[192]
GSM1523960
[193]
GSM1523961
[194]
GSM1523962
[195]
GSM1523963
[196]
GSM1523964
[197]
GSM1523965
[198]
GSM1523966
[199]
GSM1523967
[200]
GSM1523968
[201]
GSM1523969
[202]
GSM1523970
[203]
GSM1523971
[204]
GSM1523972
[205]
GSM1523973
[206]
GSM1523974
[207]
GSM1523975
[208]
GSM1523976
[209]
GSM1523977
[210]
GSM1523978
[211]
GSM1523979
[212]
GSM1523980
[213]
GSM1523981
[214]
GSM1523982
[215]
GSM1523983
[216]
GSM1523984
[217]
GSM1523985
[218]
GSM1523986
[219]
GSM1523987
[220]
GSM1523988
[221]
GSM1523989
[222]
GSM1523990
[223]
GSM1523991
[224]
GSM1523992
[225]
GSM1523993
[226]
GSM1523994
[227]
GSM1523995
[228]
GSM1523996
[229]
GSM1523997
[230]
GSM1523998
[231]
GSM1523999
[232]
GSM1524000
[233]
GSM1524001
[234]
GSM1524002
[235]
GSM1524003
[236]
GSM1524004
[237]
GSM1524005
[238]
GSM1524006
[239]
GSM1524007
[240]
GSM1524008
[241]
GSM1524009
[242]
GSM1524010
[243]
GSM1524011
[244]
GSM1524012
[245]
GSM1524013
[246]
GSM1524014
[247]
GSM1524015
[248]
GSM1524016
[249]
GSM1524017
[250]
GSM1524018
[251]
GSM1524019
[252]
GSM1524020
[253]
GSM1524021
[254]
GSM1524022
[255]
GSM1524023
[256]
GSM1524024
[257]
GSM1524025
[258]
GSM1524026
[259]
GSM1524027
[260]
GSM1524028
[261]
GSM1524029
[262]
GSM1524030
[263]
GSM1524031
[264]
GSM1524032
[265]
GSM1524033
[266]
GSM1524034
[267]
GSM1524035
[268]
GSM1524036
[269]
GSM1524037
[270]
GSM1524038
[271]
GSM1524039
[272]
GSM1524040
[273]
GSM1524041
[274]
GSM1524042
[275]
GSM1524043
[276]
GSM1524044
[277]
GSM1524045
[278]
GSM1524046
[279]
GSM1524047
[280]
GSM1524048
[281]
GSM1524049
[282]
GSM1524050
[283]
GSM1524051
[284]
GSM1524052
[285]
GSM1524053
[286]
GSM1524054
[287]
GSM1524055
[288]
GSM1524056
[289]
GSM1524057
[290]
GSM1524058
[291]
GSM1524059
[292]
GSM1524060
[293]
GSM1524061
[294]
GSM1524062
[295]
GSM1524068
[296]
GSM1524069
[297]
GSM1524070
[298]
GSM1524071
[299]
GSM1524072
sample_count
300
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:32850385:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:741ec95bd71436e47803335805e95929c781637815c4d57808f120feef567f79
bytes
2410
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[13]/table-wrap[1]#T1
version
null
note
The relationship between EBV and d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 gastric cancers.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC7399340
section_index
13
section_title
Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts
row_count
29
column_count
8
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
The relationship between EBV and d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 gastric cancers.
rows array · 29 items
[0] array · 6 items
[0]
[1]
[2]
EBV
[3]
[4]
d-MMR/ MSI-H
[5]
[1] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
[2]
(+)
[3]
(–)
[4]
P
[5]
(+)
[6]
(–)
[7]
P
[2] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Median age
[2]
61
[3]
65
[4]
[5]
70.5
[6]
64
[7]
[3] array · 8 items
[0]
Age (%)
[1]
>65
[2]
4 (44.4)
[3]
122 (46.6)
[4]
1.000
[5]
19 (67.9)
[6]
107 (44)
[7]
0.017
[4] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
≦65
[2]
5 (55.6)
[3]
140 (53.4)
[4]
[5]
9 (32.1)
[6]
136 (56)
[7]
[5] array · 8 items
[0]
Gender (%)
[1]
Male
[2]
6 (66.7)
[3]
176 (46.4)
[4]
1.000
[5]
13 (46.4)
[6]
169 (69.5)
[7]
0.014
[6] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Female
[2]
3 (33.3)
[3]
86 (53.6)
[4]
[5]
15 (53.6)
[6]
74 (30.5)
[7]
[7] array · 8 items
[0]
Location (%)
[1]
GEJ-cardia
[2]
2 (22.2)
[3]
27 (10.3)
[4]
0.248
[5]
1 (3.6)
[6]
28 (11.5)
[7]
0.197
[8] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Non-GEJ-cardia
[2]
7 (77.8)
[3]
235 (89.7)
[4]
[5]
27 (96.4)
[6]
215 (88.5)
[7]
[9] array · 8 items
[0]
Location (%)
[1]
Antrum
[2]
4 (44.4)
[3]
150 (57.3)
[4]
0.674
[5]
20 (71.4)
[6]
134 (55.1)
[7]
0.099
[10] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Non- antrum
[2]
5 (55.6)
[3]
112 (42.7)
[4]
[5]
8 (28.6)
[6]
109 (44.9)
[7]
[11] array · 8 items
[0]
Size (%)
[1]
<5
[2]
3 (33.3)
[3]
110 (28.6)
[4]
0.862
[5]
8 (28.6)
[6]
105 (43.2)
[7]
0.137
[12] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
≧5
[2]
6 (66.7)
[3]
152 (71.4)
[4]
[5]
20 (71.4)
[6]
138 (56.8)
[7]
[13] array · 8 items
[0]
Differentiation (%)
[1]
Well-moderate
[2]
1 (11.1)
[3]
45 (10.7)
[4]
0.980
[5]
3 (10.7)
[6]
43 (17.7)
[7]
0.505
[14] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Poor
[2]
8 (88.9)
[3]
217 (89.3)
[4]
[5]
25 (89.3)
[6]
200 (82.3)
[7]
[15] array · 8 items
[0]
Lauren (%)
[1]
Intestinal
[2]
3 (33.3)
[3]
119 (45.4)
[4]
0.707
[5]
13 (46.4)
[6]
109 (44.9)
[7]
0.874
[16] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Nonintestinal
[2]
6 (66.7)
[3]
143 (54.6)
[4]
[5]
15 (53.6)
[6]
134 (55.1)
[7]
[17] array · 8 items
[0]
T (%)
[1]
T1-T3
[2]
8 (88.9)
[3]
180 (68.7)
[4]
0.355
[5]
26 (92.9)
[6]
162 (47.2)
[7]
0.000
[18] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
T4
[2]
1 (11.1)
[3]
82 (31.3)
[4]
[5]
2 (7.1)
[6]
81 (52.8)
[7]
[19] array · 8 items
[0]
N (%)
[1]
N0
[2]
4 (44.4)
[3]
53 (20.2)
[4]
0.181
[5]
14 (50)
[6]
43 (17.7)
[7]
0.000
[20] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
N+
[2]
5 (55.6)
[3]
209 (79.8)
[4]
[5]
14 (50)
[6]
200 (82.3)
[7]
[21] array · 8 items
[0]
M (%)
[1]
M0
[2]
8 (88.9)
[3]
259 (98.9)
[4]
0.127
[5]
28 (100)
[6]
239 (98.4)
[7]
1.000
[22] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
M1
[2]
1 (11.1)
[3]
3 (1.1)
[4]
[5]
0 (0)
[6]
4 (1.6)
[7]
[23] array · 8 items
[0]
TNM (%)
[1]
I–II
[2]
5 (55.6)
[3]
97 (37)
[4]
0.436
[5]
19 (67.9)
[6]
83 (34.2)
[7]
0.000
[24] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
III–IV
[2]
4 (44.4)
[3]
165 (63)
[4]
[5]
9 (32.1)
[6]
160 (65.8)
[7]
[25] array · 8 items
[0]
WHO (%)
[1]
Medullary
[2]
3 (33.3)
[3]
3 (1.1)
[4]
0.000
[5]
2 (7.1)
[6]
4 (1.6)
[7]
0.119
[26] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Non-medullary
[2]
6 (66.7)
[3]
259 (98.9)
[4]
[5]
26 (92.9)
[6]
239 (98.4)
[7]
[27] array · 8 items
[0]
WHO (%)
[1]
Papillary-tubular
[2]
3 (33.3)
[3]
143 (54.6)
[4]
0.359
[5]
19 (67.9)
[6]
128 (52.7)
[7]
0.127
[28] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
Non-papillary-tubular
[2]
6 (66.7)
[3]
119 (45.4)
[4]
[5]
9 (32.1)
[6]
115 (47.3)
[7]
locator
section[13]/table-wrap[1]#T1
[3] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:32850385:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:e2f1abb41fb76c81ddb25c39a28496de9777ef56108f272f70b2195a5875725f
bytes
1504
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[13]/table-wrap[2]#T2
version
null
note
Univariate and multivariable analysis of overall survival in 271 gastric cancer.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC7399340
section_index
13
section_title
Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts
row_count
15
column_count
8
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
Univariate and multivariable analysis of overall survival in 271 gastric cancer.
rows array · 15 items
[0] array · 3 items
[0]
[1]
Univariate analysis
[2]
Multivariable analysis
[1] array · 8 items
[0]
[1]
P (log-rank test)
[2]
P (Cox's test)
[3]
HR
[4]
95% CI
[5]
P (Cox's test)
[6]
HR
[7]
95% CI
[2] array · 8 items
[0]
d-MMR/MSI-H status (Yes vs. No)
[1]
0.013
[2]
0.017
[3]
2.73
[4]
1.20–6.23
[5]
0.050
[6]
2.33
[7]
1.00–5.43
[3] array · 8 items
[0]
EBV (+ vs. –)
[1]
0.533
[2]
0.534
[3]
0.75
[4]
0.31–1.85
[5]
[6]
[7]
[4] array · 8 items
[0]
Age
[1]
0.000
[2]
0.003
[3]
1.03
[4]
1.01–1.05
[5]
0.000
[6]
1.04
[7]
1.02–1.06
[5] array · 8 items
[0]
Sex (male vs. female)
[1]
0.092
[2]
0.093
[3]
1.39
[4]
0.95–2.95
[5]
[6]
[7]
[6] array · 8 items
[0]
Location (antrum vs. nonantrum)
[1]
0.424
[2]
0.422
[3]
0.86
[4]
0.59–1.25
[5]
[6]
[7]
[7] array · 8 items
[0]
Size (<5 vs. ≧5)
[1]
0.078
[2]
0.080
[3]
1.41
[4]
0.96–2.07
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] array · 8 items
[0]
Differentiation (well-moderate vs. poor)
[1]
0.226
[2]
0.228
[3]
1.39
[4]
0.82–2.35
[5]
[6]
[7]
[9] array · 8 items
[0]
Lauren (intestinal vs. nonintestinal)
[1]
0.003
[2]
0.004
[3]
1.78
[4]
1.20–2.64
[5]
0.302
[6]
1.31
[7]
0.78–2.21
[10] array · 8 items
[0]
WHO (poorly cohesive components vs. remant)
[1]
0.000
[2]
0.000
[3]
2.04
[4]
1.40–2.97
[5]
0.130
[6]
1.48
[7]
0.89–2.46
[11] array · 8 items
[0]
pT stage (T1 + T2 vs. T3 + T4)
[1]
0.000
[2]
0.000
[3]
2.61
[4]
1.79–3.81
[5]
0.065
[6]
2.44
[7]
0.95–6.32
[12] array · 8 items
[0]
pN stage (N0 vs. N+)
[1]
0.002
[2]
0.003
[3]
2.35
[4]
1.34–4.12
[5]
0.360
[6]
0.65
[7]
0.26–1.63
[13] array · 8 items
[0]
M stage (M0 vs. M1)
[1]
0.467
[2]
0.476
[3]
0.49
[4]
0.07–3.51
[5]
[6]
[7]
[14] array · 8 items
[0]
TNM (I + II vs. III + IV)
[1]
0.000
[2]
0.000
[3]
3.86
[4]
2.39–6.23
[5]
0.003
[6]
3.47
[7]
1.55–7.77
locator
section[13]/table-wrap[2]#T2
[4] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:32850385:3
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:054e6d4bb461c466c077169f2d387c4d2aa0cd6af29fbb384a4cc4cea7f55b2b
bytes
1514
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[13]/table-wrap[3]#T3
version
null
note
The relationship between MSI subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 309 gastric cancers in TCGA.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC7399340
section_index
13
section_title
Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts
row_count
30
column_count
5
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 3
caption
The relationship between MSI subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 309 gastric cancers in TCGA.
rows array · 30 items
[0] array · 2 items
[0]
[1]
d-MMR/MSI-H
[1] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
[2]
(–)
[3]
(+)
[4]
P
[2] array · 5 items
[0]
Number
[1]
[2]
259
[3]
50
[4]
[3] array · 1 item
[0]
Median age
[4] array · 5 items
[0]
Age (%)
[1]
≤ 65
[2]
124 (47.9)
[3]
14 (28.0)
[4]
0.015
[5] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
>65
[2]
135 (52.1)
[3]
36 (72.0)
[4]
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
Gender (%)
[1]
Male
[2]
177 (68.3)
[3]
26 (52.0)
[4]
0.039
[7] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
Female
[2]
82 (31.7)
[3]
24 (48.0)
[4]
[8] array · 5 items
[0]
Location (%)
[1]
Non-cardia
[2]
188 (72.6)
[3]
45 (90.0)
[4]
0.015
[9] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
Cardia
[2]
71 (27.4)
[3]
5 (10.0)
[4]
[10] array · 5 items
[0]
Location (%)
[1]
Non-antrum
[2]
173 (66.8)
[3]
20 (40.0)
[4]
0.001
[11] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
Antrum
[2]
86 (33.2)
[3]
30 (60.0)
[4]
[12] array · 5 items
[0]
Race (%)
[1]
NA
[2]
32 (12.4)
[3]
13 (26.0)
[4]
0.068
[13] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
White
[2]
165 (63.7)
[3]
25 (50.0)
[4]
[14] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
Asian
[2]
52 (20.1)
[3]
11 (22.0)
[4]
[15] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
Black
[2]
10 (3.9)
[3]
1 (2.0)
[4]
[16] array · 5 items
[0]
T (%)
[1]
T1–T3
[2]
191 (73.7)
[3]
31 (62.0)
[4]
0.129
[17] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
T4
[2]
68 (26.3)
[3]
19 (38.0)
[4]
[18] array · 5 items
[0]
N (%)
[1]
N0
[2]
70 (27.0)
[3]
19 (38.0)
[4]
0.217
[19] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
N+
[2]
185 (71.4)
[3]
31 (62.0)
[4]
[20] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
NX
[2]
4 (1.5)
[3]
0 (0.0)
[4]
[21] array · 5 items
[0]
M (%)
[1]
M0
[2]
227 (87.6)
[3]
46 (92.0)
[4]
0.564
[22] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
M1
[2]
18 (6.9)
[3]
3 (6.0)
[4]
[23] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
MX
[2]
14 (5.4)
[3]
1 (2.0)
[4]
[24] array · 5 items
[0]
Stage (%)
[1]
I–II
[2]
108 (41.7)
[3]
27 (54.0)
[4]
0.147
[25] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
III–IV
[2]
151 (58.3)
[3]
23 (46.0)
[4]
[26] array · 5 items
[0]
NUBP2 (%)
[1]
Low
[2]
184 (71.0)
[3]
25 (50.0)
[4]
0.006
[27] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
High
[2]
75 (29.0)
[3]
25 (50.0)
[4]
[28] array · 5 items
[0]
ENDOG (%)
[1]
Low
[2]
151 (58.3)
[3]
12 (24.0)
[4]
<0.001
[29] array · 5 items
[0]
[1]
High
[2]
108 (41.7)
[3]
38 (76.0)
[4]
locator
section[13]/table-wrap[3]#T3
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 7 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
clustering
specific
hierarchical
label
Clustering
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
hierarchical_cluster
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
dendrogram
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
network_analysis
specific
pathway_enrichment
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
GO enrichment
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
auROC
[6] object · 10 fields
id
method-7
family
contingency_analysis
specific
fisher_exact
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
contingency_table
[1]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Fisher's exact
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE62254
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE62254
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).
basis
The paper names GSE62254 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 5 items
[0]
source:pmid:32850385
[1]
data:geo:GSE62254
[2]
asset:table:pmid:32850385:1
[3]
asset:table:pmid:32850385:2
[4]
asset:table:pmid:32850385:3
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE62254
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:22:09Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
42227
completion_tokens
1642
cached_tokens
656
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32850385
type
paper
label
pmid:32850385
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32850385
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32850385 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE62254
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE62254
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32850385
type
paper
label
pmid:32850385
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32850385
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32850385 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE62254
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE62254
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-32850385
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32850385
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE62254
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE62254
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:32850385
parent_hash
sha256:2585f9ee0141dbb61623af03fcba08565a27a6788080e35a5b40cb6df615001f
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
apoptosis_assay
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.69
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
er populations. More opportunities to induce apoptosis of cancer cells, led by the unbalance betwee
order_basis
paper_text_order:1945
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:32850385", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:78e7f8a91774fac004620907fbcc3cb2ea8682d970668304886f20b126647039", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:08Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:45:15Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "The Better Survival of MSI Subtype Is Associated With the Oxidative Stress Related Pathways in Gastric Cancer.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2020.01269", "pmid": "32850385", "authors": ["Lei Cai", "Yeqi Sun", "Kezhou Wang", "Wenbin Guan", "Juanqing Yue", "Junlei Li", "Ruifen Wang", "Lifeng Wang"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2020, "abstract": "Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading fatal cancer in the world and its incidence ranked second among all malignant tumors in China. The molecular classification of GC, proposed by the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), was added to the updated edition (2019) of WHO classification for digestive system tumor. Although MSI and EBV subtypes appeared as ever-increasingly significant roles in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Methods: We systematically summarized the relationship between EBV, d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 GC cases. Furthermore, GSE62254/ACRG and TCGA-STAD datasets, originated from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and TCGA respectively, were analyzed to figure out the prognosis related molecular characteristics by bioinformatics methods. Results: Patients with MSI subtype had better prognosis than the MSS subtype (P = 0.013) and considered as an independent biomarker by the univariate analysis (P = 0.017) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.050). While there was no significant difference between EBV positive and negative tissues (P = 0.533). The positive prognostic value conferred by MSI in different cohorts was revalidated via the clinical analysis of GSE62254/ACRG and TCGA-STAD datasets regardless of race. Then key gene module that tightly associated with better status and longer OS time for MSI cases was obtained from weighted gene co-expression network analysis(WGCNA). NUBP2 and ENDOG were screened from the gene cluster and oxidative phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species(ROS) and glutathione metabolism were analyzed to be the differential pathways in their highly expressed groups. Conclusions: Our results manifested the significant prognostic value of MSI in Chinese GC cohort and comparisons with other populations. More opportunities to induce apoptosis of cancer cells, led by the unbalance between antioxidant system and ROS accumulation, lay foundations for unveiling the better prognosis in MSI phenotype through the bioinformatics analysis.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32850385", "locator": "sections[11] \"Statistical Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32850385", "locator": "sections[20] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:32850385"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE62254"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE62254"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:32850385", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01269", "sha256": "sha256:997444b590c2139ee987de99fc458ce4c477658c8ebd4b58e5d42804aef5adc5", "bytes": 55224, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2020.01269", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7399340", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62254", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE62254", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE62254", "version": null, "note": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1523727", "GSM1523728", "GSM1523729", "GSM1523744", "GSM1523745", "GSM1523746", "GSM1523747", "GSM1523748", "GSM1523765", "GSM1523768", "GSM1523769", "GSM1523770", "GSM1523771", "GSM1523772", "GSM1523773", "GSM1523774", "GSM1523775", "GSM1523776", "GSM1523777", "GSM1523778", "GSM1523779", "GSM1523780", "GSM1523781", "GSM1523782", "GSM1523783", "GSM1523784", "GSM1523785", "GSM1523786", "GSM1523787", "GSM1523788", "GSM1523789", "GSM1523790", "GSM1523791", "GSM1523792", "GSM1523793", "GSM1523794", "GSM1523795", "GSM1523796", "GSM1523797", "GSM1523798", "GSM1523799", "GSM1523800", "GSM1523801", "GSM1523802", "GSM1523803", "GSM1523804", "GSM1523805", "GSM1523806", "GSM1523807", "GSM1523808", "GSM1523809", "GSM1523810", "GSM1523811", "GSM1523812", "GSM1523813", "GSM1523814", "GSM1523815", "GSM1523816", "GSM1523817", "GSM1523818", "GSM1523819", "GSM1523820", "GSM1523821", "GSM1523822", "GSM1523823", "GSM1523824", "GSM1523825", "GSM1523826", "GSM1523827", "GSM1523828", "GSM1523829", "GSM1523830", "GSM1523831", "GSM1523832", "GSM1523833", "GSM1523834", "GSM1523835", "GSM1523836", "GSM1523837", "GSM1523838", "GSM1523839", "GSM1523840", "GSM1523841", "GSM1523842", "GSM1523843", "GSM1523844", "GSM1523845", "GSM1523846", "GSM1523847", "GSM1523848", "GSM1523849", "GSM1523850", "GSM1523851", "GSM1523852", "GSM1523853", "GSM1523854", "GSM1523855", "GSM1523856", "GSM1523857", "GSM1523858", "GSM1523859", "GSM1523860", "GSM1523861", "GSM1523862", "GSM1523863", "GSM1523864", "GSM1523865", "GSM1523866", "GSM1523867", "GSM1523868", "GSM1523869", "GSM1523870", "GSM1523871", "GSM1523872", "GSM1523873", "GSM1523874", "GSM1523875", "GSM1523876", "GSM1523877", "GSM1523878", "GSM1523879", "GSM1523880", "GSM1523881", "GSM1523882", "GSM1523883", "GSM1523884", "GSM1523885", "GSM1523886", "GSM1523887", "GSM1523888", "GSM1523889", "GSM1523890", "GSM1523891", "GSM1523892", "GSM1523893", "GSM1523894", "GSM1523895", "GSM1523896", "GSM1523897", "GSM1523898", "GSM1523899", "GSM1523901", "GSM1523903", "GSM1523904", "GSM1523905", "GSM1523906", "GSM1523908", "GSM1523909", "GSM1523910", "GSM1523911", "GSM1523918", "GSM1523919", "GSM1523920", "GSM1523921", "GSM1523922", "GSM1523923", "GSM1523924", "GSM1523925", "GSM1523926", "GSM1523927", "GSM1523928", "GSM1523929", "GSM1523930", "GSM1523931", "GSM1523932", "GSM1523933", "GSM1523934", "GSM1523935", "GSM1523936", "GSM1523937", "GSM1523938", "GSM1523939", "GSM1523940", "GSM1523941", "GSM1523942", "GSM1523943", "GSM1523944", "GSM1523945", "GSM1523946", "GSM1523947", "GSM1523948", "GSM1523949", "GSM1523950", "GSM1523951", "GSM1523952", "GSM1523953", "GSM1523954", "GSM1523955", "GSM1523956", "GSM1523957", "GSM1523958", "GSM1523959", "GSM1523960", "GSM1523961", "GSM1523962", "GSM1523963", "GSM1523964", "GSM1523965", "GSM1523966", "GSM1523967", "GSM1523968", "GSM1523969", "GSM1523970", "GSM1523971", "GSM1523972", "GSM1523973", "GSM1523974", "GSM1523975", "GSM1523976", "GSM1523977", "GSM1523978", "GSM1523979", "GSM1523980", "GSM1523981", "GSM1523982", "GSM1523983", "GSM1523984", "GSM1523985", "GSM1523986", "GSM1523987", "GSM1523988", "GSM1523989", "GSM1523990", "GSM1523991", "GSM1523992", "GSM1523993", "GSM1523994", "GSM1523995", "GSM1523996", "GSM1523997", "GSM1523998", "GSM1523999", "GSM1524000", "GSM1524001", "GSM1524002", "GSM1524003", "GSM1524004", "GSM1524005", "GSM1524006", "GSM1524007", "GSM1524008", "GSM1524009", "GSM1524010", "GSM1524011", "GSM1524012", "GSM1524013", "GSM1524014", "GSM1524015", "GSM1524016", "GSM1524017", "GSM1524018", "GSM1524019", "GSM1524020", "GSM1524021", "GSM1524022", "GSM1524023", "GSM1524024", "GSM1524025", "GSM1524026", "GSM1524027", "GSM1524028", "GSM1524029", "GSM1524030", "GSM1524031", "GSM1524032", "GSM1524033", "GSM1524034", "GSM1524035", "GSM1524036", "GSM1524037", "GSM1524038", "GSM1524039", "GSM1524040", "GSM1524041", "GSM1524042", "GSM1524043", "GSM1524044", "GSM1524045", "GSM1524046", "GSM1524047", "GSM1524048", "GSM1524049", "GSM1524050", "GSM1524051", "GSM1524052", "GSM1524053", "GSM1524054", "GSM1524055", "GSM1524056", "GSM1524057", "GSM1524058", "GSM1524059", "GSM1524060", "GSM1524061", "GSM1524062", "GSM1524068", "GSM1524069", "GSM1524070", "GSM1524071", "GSM1524072"], "sample_count": 300, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:32850385:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:741ec95bd71436e47803335805e95929c781637815c4d57808f120feef567f79", "bytes": 2410, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "The relationship between EBV and d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 gastric cancers.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7399340", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts", "row_count": 29, "column_count": 8}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "The relationship between EBV and d-MMR/MSI-H subtypes and clinicopathological parameters in 271 gastric cancers.", "rows": [["", "", "EBV", "", "d-MMR/ MSI-H", ""], ["", "", "(+)", "(–)", "P", "(+)", "(–)", "P"], ["", "Median age", "61", "65", "", "70.5", "64", ""], ["Age (%)", ">65", "4 (44.4)", "122 (46.6)", "1.000", "19 (67.9)", "107 (44)", "0.017"], ["", "≦65", "5 (55.6)", "140 (53.4)", "", "9 (32.1)", "136 (56)", ""], ["Gender (%)", "Male", "6 (66.7)", "176 (46.4)", "1.000", "13 (46.4)", "169 (69.5)", "0.014"], ["", "Female", "3 (33.3)", "86 (53.6)", "", "15 (53.6)", "74 (30.5)", ""], ["Location (%)", "GEJ-cardia", "2 (22.2)", "27 (10.3)", "0.248", "1 (3.6)", "28 (11.5)", "0.197"], ["", "Non-GEJ-cardia", "7 (77.8)", "235 (89.7)", "", "27 (96.4)", "215 (88.5)", ""], ["Location (%)", "Antrum", "4 (44.4)", "150 (57.3)", "0.674", "20 (71.4)", "134 (55.1)", "0.099"], ["", "Non- antrum", "5 (55.6)", "112 (42.7)", "", "8 (28.6)", "109 (44.9)", ""], ["Size (%)", "<5", "3 (33.3)", "110 (28.6)", "0.862", "8 (28.6)", "105 (43.2)", "0.137"], ["", "≧5", "6 (66.7)", "152 (71.4)", "", "20 (71.4)", "138 (56.8)", ""], ["Differentiation (%)", "Well-moderate", "1 (11.1)", "45 (10.7)", "0.980", "3 (10.7)", "43 (17.7)", "0.505"], ["", "Poor", "8 (88.9)", "217 (89.3)", "", "25 (89.3)", "200 (82.3)", ""], ["Lauren (%)", "Intestinal", "3 (33.3)", "119 (45.4)", "0.707", "13 (46.4)", "109 (44.9)", "0.874"], ["", "Nonintestinal", "6 (66.7)", "143 (54.6)", "", "15 (53.6)", "134 (55.1)", ""], ["T (%)", "T1-T3", "8 (88.9)", "180 (68.7)", "0.355", "26 (92.9)", "162 (47.2)", "0.000"], ["", "T4", "1 (11.1)", "82 (31.3)", "", "2 (7.1)", "81 (52.8)", ""], ["N (%)", "N0", "4 (44.4)", "53 (20.2)", "0.181", "14 (50)", "43 (17.7)", "0.000"], ["", "N+", "5 (55.6)", "209 (79.8)", "", "14 (50)", "200 (82.3)", ""], ["M (%)", "M0", "8 (88.9)", "259 (98.9)", "0.127", "28 (100)", "239 (98.4)", "1.000"], ["", "M1", "1 (11.1)", "3 (1.1)", "", "0 (0)", "4 (1.6)", ""], ["TNM (%)", "I–II", "5 (55.6)", "97 (37)", "0.436", "19 (67.9)", "83 (34.2)", "0.000"], ["", "III–IV", "4 (44.4)", "165 (63)", "", "9 (32.1)", "160 (65.8)", ""], ["WHO (%)", "Medullary", "3 (33.3)", "3 (1.1)", "0.000", "2 (7.1)", "4 (1.6)", "0.119"], ["", "Non-medullary", "6 (66.7)", "259 (98.9)", "", "26 (92.9)", "239 (98.4)", ""], ["WHO (%)", "Papillary-tubular", "3 (33.3)", "143 (54.6)", "0.359", "19 (67.9)", "128 (52.7)", "0.127"], ["", "Non-papillary-tubular", "6 (66.7)", "119 (45.4)", "", "9 (32.1)", "115 (47.3)", ""]], "row_count": 29, "column_count": 8, "numeric_cells": 138, "header_rows": 3, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:32850385:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:e2f1abb41fb76c81ddb25c39a28496de9777ef56108f272f70b2195a5875725f", "bytes": 1504, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[2]#T2", "version": null, "note": "Univariate and multivariable analysis of overall survival in 271 gastric cancer.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7399340", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts", "row_count": 15, "column_count": 8}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "Univariate and multivariable analysis of overall survival in 271 gastric cancer.", "rows": [["", "Univariate analysis", "Multivariable analysis"], ["", "P (log-rank test)", "P (Cox's test)", "HR", "95% CI", "P (Cox's test)", "HR", "95% CI"], ["d-MMR/MSI-H status (Yes vs. No)", "0.013", "0.017", "2.73", "1.20–6.23", "0.050", "2.33", "1.00–5.43"], ["EBV (+ vs. –)", "0.533", "0.534", "0.75", "0.31–1.85", "", "", ""], ["Age", "0.000", "0.003", "1.03", "1.01–1.05", "0.000", "1.04", "1.02–1.06"], ["Sex (male vs. female)", "0.092", "0.093", "1.39", "0.95–2.95", "", "", ""], ["Location (antrum vs. nonantrum)", "0.424", "0.422", "0.86", "0.59–1.25", "", "", ""], ["Size (<5 vs. ≧5)", "0.078", "0.080", "1.41", "0.96–2.07", "", "", ""], ["Differentiation (well-moderate vs. poor)", "0.226", "0.228", "1.39", "0.82–2.35", "", "", ""], ["Lauren (intestinal vs. nonintestinal)", "0.003", "0.004", "1.78", "1.20–2.64", "0.302", "1.31", "0.78–2.21"], ["WHO (poorly cohesive components vs. remant)", "0.000", "0.000", "2.04", "1.40–2.97", "0.130", "1.48", "0.89–2.46"], ["pT stage (T1 + T2 vs. T3 + T4)", "0.000", "0.000", "2.61", "1.79–3.81", "0.065", "2.44", "0.95–6.32"], ["pN stage (N0 vs. N+)", "0.002", "0.003", "2.35", "1.34–4.12", "0.360", "0.65", "0.26–1.63"], ["M stage (M0 vs. M1)", "0.467", "0.476", "0.49", "0.07–3.51", "", "", ""], ["TNM (I + II vs. III + IV)", "0.000", "0.000", "3.86", "2.39–6.23", "0.003", "3.47", "1.55–7.77"]], "row_count": 15, "column_count": 8, "numeric_cells": 76, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[2]#T2"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:32850385:3", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:054e6d4bb461c466c077169f2d387c4d2aa0cd6af29fbb384a4cc4cea7f55b2b", "bytes": 1514, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[3]#T3", "version": null, "note": "The relationship between MSI subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 309 gastric cancers in TCGA.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7399340", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "Prognosis and Potential Predictive Value of d-MMR/MSI-H Status in Different Cohorts", "row_count": 30, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 3", "caption": "The relationship between MSI subtype and clinicopathological parameters in 309 gastric cancers in TCGA.", "rows": [["", "d-MMR/MSI-H"], ["", "", "(–)", "(+)", "P"], ["Number", "", "259", "50", ""], ["Median age"], ["Age (%)", "≤ 65", "124 (47.9)", "14 (28.0)", "0.015"], ["", ">65", "135 (52.1)", "36 (72.0)", ""], ["Gender (%)", "Male", "177 (68.3)", "26 (52.0)", "0.039"], ["", "Female", "82 (31.7)", "24 (48.0)", ""], ["Location (%)", "Non-cardia", "188 (72.6)", "45 (90.0)", "0.015"], ["", "Cardia", "71 (27.4)", "5 (10.0)", ""], ["Location (%)", "Non-antrum", "173 (66.8)", "20 (40.0)", "0.001"], ["", "Antrum", "86 (33.2)", "30 (60.0)", ""], ["Race (%)", "NA", "32 (12.4)", "13 (26.0)", "0.068"], ["", "White", "165 (63.7)", "25 (50.0)", ""], ["", "Asian", "52 (20.1)", "11 (22.0)", ""], ["", "Black", "10 (3.9)", "1 (2.0)", ""], ["T (%)", "T1–T3", "191 (73.7)", "31 (62.0)", "0.129"], ["", "T4", "68 (26.3)", "19 (38.0)", ""], ["N (%)", "N0", "70 (27.0)", "19 (38.0)", "0.217"], ["", "N+", "185 (71.4)", "31 (62.0)", ""], ["", "NX", "4 (1.5)", "0 (0.0)", ""], ["M (%)", "M0", "227 (87.6)", "46 (92.0)", "0.564"], ["", "M1", "18 (6.9)", "3 (6.0)", ""], ["", "MX", "14 (5.4)", "1 (2.0)", ""], ["Stage (%)", "I–II", "108 (41.7)", "27 (54.0)", "0.147"], ["", "III–IV", "151 (58.3)", "23 (46.0)", ""], ["NUBP2 (%)", "Low", "184 (71.0)", "25 (50.0)", "0.006"], ["", "High", "75 (29.0)", "25 (50.0)", ""], ["ENDOG (%)", "Low", "151 (58.3)", "12 (24.0)", "<0.001"], ["", "High", "108 (41.7)", "38 (76.0)", ""]], "row_count": 30, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 67, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[3]#T3"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "clustering", "specific": "hierarchical", "label": "Clustering", "dsl_operations": ["hierarchical_cluster"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "dendrogram"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "pathway_enrichment", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "GO enrichment"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "auROC"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "fisher_exact", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["contingency_table", "chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Fisher's exact"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE62254"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE62254"], "statements": ["Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study, these can be found in The Cancer Genome Atlas via the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/); the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE62254)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE62254 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:32850385", "data:geo:GSE62254", "asset:table:pmid:32850385:1", "asset:table:pmid:32850385:2", "asset:table:pmid:32850385:3"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE62254"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:22:09Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 42227, "completion_tokens": 1642, "cached_tokens": 656}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:32850385", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32850385"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32850385", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32850385 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62254", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE62254"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:32850385", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32850385"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32850385", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32850385 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE62254", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE62254"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-32850385", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:32850385"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE62254", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE62254"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:32850385", "parent_hash": "sha256:2585f9ee0141dbb61623af03fcba08565a27a6788080e35a5b40cb6df615001f", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE62254 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE62254 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.69, "evidence": ["er populations. More opportunities to induce apoptosis of cancer cells, led by the unbalance betwee"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1945", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test) as well as Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used for univariate survival analysis. Multivariate survival analysis was performed by Cox's proportional hazards regression model."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}