Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:32992503

Identification of Genes Whose Expression Overlaps Age Boundaries and Correlates with Risk Groups in Paediatric and Adult Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Lindsay Davis · Ken I Mills · Kim H Orchard · Barbara-Ann Guinn

Cancers · 2020 doi:10.3390/cancers12102769

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:32992503
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:e3efbfae35c7bf5a471634d21e60e8e88039f544e28176ba2d18d4b1b5846ba7
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:11Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:02:16Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of Genes Whose Expression Overlaps Age Boundaries and Correlates with Risk Groups in Paediatric and Adult Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.
doi
10.3390/cancers12102769
pmid
32992503
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Lindsay Davis
[1]
Ken I Mills
[2]
Kim H Orchard
[3]
Barbara-Ann Guinn
journal
Cancers
year
2020
abstract
Few studies have compared gene expression in paediatric and adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In this study, we have analysed mRNA-sequencing data from two publicly accessible databases: (1) National Cancer Institute's Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (NCI-TARGET), examining paediatric patients, and (2) The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), examining adult patients with AML. With a particular focus on 144 known tumour antigens, we identified STEAP1, SAGE1, MORC4, SLC34A2 and CEACAM3 as significantly different in their expression between standard and low risk paediatric AML patient subgroups, as well as between poor and good, and intermediate and good risk adult AML patient subgroups. We found significant differences in event-free survival (EFS) in paediatric AML patients, when comparing standard and low risk subgroups, and quartile expression levels of BIRC5, MAGEF1, MELTF, STEAP1 and VGLL4. We found significant differences in EFS in adult AML patients when comparing intermediate and good, and poor and good risk adult AML patient subgroups and quartile expression levels of MORC4 and SAGE1, respectively. When examining Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (2016) pathway data, we found that genes altered in AML were involved in key processes such as the evasion of apoptosis (BIRC5, WNT1) or the control of cell proliferation (SSX2IP, AML1-ETO). For the first time we have compared gene expression in paediatric AML patients with that of adult AML patients. This study provides unique insights into the differences and similarities in the gene expression that underlies AML, the genes that are significantly differently expressed between risk subgroups, and provides new insights into the molecular pathways involved in AML pathogenesis.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32992503
locator
sections[6] "2.2. Survival Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:32992503
locator
sections[13] "4.1.1. TARGET Dataset" paragraph 2
quote
The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32992503
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:32992503
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102769
sha256
sha256:8f2bf1af96f525c774920b2c66ce2711c3620b454f0adcf72a7e86f559f069c2
bytes
49633
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3390/cancers12102769
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC7650662
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 2 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
differential_expression
specific
deseq2
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
DESeq2
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: log_rank_test.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32992503
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:22:57Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
null
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
37981
completion_tokens
1651
cached_tokens
12800
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32992503
type
paper
label
pmid:32992503
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32992503
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32992503 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:32992503
type
paper
label
pmid:32992503
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:32992503
type
manuscript
label
PMID 32992503 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-32992503
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:32992503
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:32992503
parent_hash
sha256:7469becfd9eb7ed3aed3ce95517a4e9e9b0e3c2ec169b5da239eaac9143050d7
fork_of
null
gaps array · 5 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
review.human_critique
[2]
review.independent_reader
[3]
review.machine_critique
[4]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
apoptosis_assay
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.69
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
lved in key processes such as the evasion of apoptosis (BIRC5, WNT1) or the control of cell prolife
order_basis
paper_text_order:1427
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:32992503", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 7, "content_hash": "sha256:e3efbfae35c7bf5a471634d21e60e8e88039f544e28176ba2d18d4b1b5846ba7", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:11Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:02:16Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of Genes Whose Expression Overlaps Age Boundaries and Correlates with Risk Groups in Paediatric and Adult Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.", "doi": "10.3390/cancers12102769", "pmid": "32992503", "authors": ["Lindsay Davis", "Ken I Mills", "Kim H Orchard", "Barbara-Ann Guinn"], "journal": "Cancers", "year": 2020, "abstract": "Few studies have compared gene expression in paediatric and adult acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In this study, we have analysed mRNA-sequencing data from two publicly accessible databases: (1) National Cancer Institute's Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (NCI-TARGET), examining paediatric patients, and (2) The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), examining adult patients with AML. With a particular focus on 144 known tumour antigens, we identified STEAP1, SAGE1, MORC4, SLC34A2 and CEACAM3 as significantly different in their expression between standard and low risk paediatric AML patient subgroups, as well as between poor and good, and intermediate and good risk adult AML patient subgroups. We found significant differences in event-free survival (EFS) in paediatric AML patients, when comparing standard and low risk subgroups, and quartile expression levels of BIRC5, MAGEF1, MELTF, STEAP1 and VGLL4. We found significant differences in EFS in adult AML patients when comparing intermediate and good, and poor and good risk adult AML patient subgroups and quartile expression levels of MORC4 and SAGE1, respectively. When examining Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (2016) pathway data, we found that genes altered in AML were involved in key processes such as the evasion of apoptosis (BIRC5, WNT1) or the control of cell proliferation (SSX2IP, AML1-ETO). For the first time we have compared gene expression in paediatric AML patients with that of adult AML patients. This study provides unique insights into the differences and similarities in the gene expression that underlies AML, the genes that are significantly differently expressed between risk subgroups, and provides new insights into the molecular pathways involved in AML pathogenesis.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32992503", "locator": "sections[6] \"2.2. Survival Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:32992503", "locator": "sections[13] \"4.1.1. TARGET Dataset\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:32992503"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:32992503", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102769", "sha256": "sha256:8f2bf1af96f525c774920b2c66ce2711c3620b454f0adcf72a7e86f559f069c2", "bytes": 49633, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3390/cancers12102769", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7650662", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "deseq2", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "DESeq2"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: log_rank_test."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TARGET initiative (https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target) and the AML mRNA-sequencing data we used were specifically derived from phs000465. The full experimental methods used to obtain paired-end mRNA-sequencing data are detailed in [53]. Raw mRNA-sequencing count data and matching clinical data were obtained from the open-access section of the online TARGET Data Matrix for 92 patients from the original TARGET AML cohort."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:32992503"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:22:57Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": null}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 37981, "completion_tokens": 1651, "cached_tokens": 12800}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:32992503", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32992503"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32992503", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32992503 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:32992503", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:32992503"}, {"id": "source:pmid:32992503", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 32992503 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-32992503", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:32992503"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:32992503", "parent_hash": "sha256:7469becfd9eb7ed3aed3ce95517a4e9e9b0e3c2ec169b5da239eaac9143050d7", "fork_of": null, "generation": 6}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "apoptosis_assay", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.69, "evidence": ["lved in key processes such as the evasion of apoptosis (BIRC5, WNT1) or the control of cell prolife"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1427", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Log-rank tests were used to assess whether there were differences in EFS between patients with expression levels in Q1 and patients with expression levels in Q4 for each significantly differentially expressed GOI."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}