Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:33102231

Hematopoietic Gene Expression Regulation Through m6A Methylation Predicts Prognosis in Stage III Colorectal Cancer.

Zheng Zhou · Shaobo Mo · Ruiqi Gu · Weixing Dai · Xinhui Zou · Lingyu Han · Long Zhang · Renjie Wang · Guoxiang Cai

Frontiers in oncology · 2020 doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.572708

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:33102231
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:fac07b85ed87b3a51379a6a9620611697c1a04f9c03938cf175b7f65c12d8f9b
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:13Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:02:23Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Hematopoietic Gene Expression Regulation Through m6A Methylation Predicts Prognosis in Stage III Colorectal Cancer.
doi
10.3389/fonc.2020.572708
pmid
33102231
authors array · 9 items
[0]
Zheng Zhou
[1]
Shaobo Mo
[2]
Ruiqi Gu
[3]
Weixing Dai
[4]
Xinhui Zou
[5]
Lingyu Han
[6]
Long Zhang
[7]
Renjie Wang
[8]
Guoxiang Cai
journal
Frontiers in oncology
year
2020
abstract
BACKGROUND: Methylation of N6 adenosine (m6A) plays important regulatory roles in diverse biological processes. The purpose of this research was to explore the potential mechanism of m6A modification level on the clinical outcome of stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were adopted to reveal the signal pathway which was most likely affected by m6A methylation. The linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) method and the least absolute shrink-age and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model were used to identify the signature. The signature can sensitively separate the patients into high and low risk indicating the relapse-free survival (RFS) time based on time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Then, the multi-gene signature was validated in GSE14333 and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. The number of the samples in GSE14333 and TCGA cohort are 63 and 150. Finally, two nomograms were set up and validated to predict prognosis of patients with stage III CRC. RESULTS: The hematopoietic cell lineage (HCL) signaling pathway was disclosed through GSEA and GSVA. Seven HCL-related genes were determined in the LASSO model to construct signature, with AUC 0.663, 0.708, and 0.703 at 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS, respectively. Independent datasets analysis and stratification analysis indicated that the HCL-related signature was reliable in distinguishing high- and low-risk stage III CRC patients. Two nomograms incorporating the signature and pathological N stage were set up, which yielded good discrimination and calibration in the predictions of prognosis for stage III CRC patients. CONCLUSIONS: A novel HCL-related signature was developed as a predictive model for survival rate of stage III CRC patients. Nomograms based on the signature were advantageous to facilitate personalized counseling and treatment in stage III CRC.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33102231
locator
sections[6] "Statistics for Classification, Prediction and Validation in the GEO and TCGA Series" paragraph 2
quote
We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33102231
locator
sections[19] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33102231
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:33102231
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.572708
sha256
sha256:4bf01d61106d9f452af67ed7049c5942abc2e8b7858bcfd86c573c4694a7702d
bytes
38138
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fonc.2020.572708
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC7556240
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 5 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
principal_component_analysis
specific
pca
label
Principal component analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
pca_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
wide_numeric_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
PCA
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
LIMMA
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
protein-protein interaction
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
model_calibration
specific
decision_curve
label
Model calibration / clinical utility
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
calibration_bins
[1]
net_benefit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictions_and_outcomes
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
net benefit
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33102231
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T19:13:44Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
27220
completion_tokens
1938
cached_tokens
648
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33102231
type
paper
label
pmid:33102231
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33102231
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33102231 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33102231
type
paper
label
pmid:33102231
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33102231
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33102231 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-33102231
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33102231
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:33102231
parent_hash
sha256:bea0addcd6aa8bbc85de50d4cc36ffb065d3be764039b9a6a19a47bdc39486ff
fork_of
null
gaps array · 5 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
review.human_critique
[2]
review.independent_reader
[3]
review.machine_critique
[4]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
microarray
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
ed by m6A methylation. The linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) method and the least absolute s
order_basis
paper_text_order:538
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:33102231", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 7, "content_hash": "sha256:fac07b85ed87b3a51379a6a9620611697c1a04f9c03938cf175b7f65c12d8f9b", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:13Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:02:23Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Hematopoietic Gene Expression Regulation Through m6A Methylation Predicts Prognosis in Stage III Colorectal Cancer.", "doi": "10.3389/fonc.2020.572708", "pmid": "33102231", "authors": ["Zheng Zhou", "Shaobo Mo", "Ruiqi Gu", "Weixing Dai", "Xinhui Zou", "Lingyu Han", "Long Zhang", "Renjie Wang", "Guoxiang Cai"], "journal": "Frontiers in oncology", "year": 2020, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Methylation of N6 adenosine (m6A) plays important regulatory roles in diverse biological processes. The purpose of this research was to explore the potential mechanism of m6A modification level on the clinical outcome of stage III colorectal cancer (CRC).\nMETHODS: Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were adopted to reveal the signal pathway which was most likely affected by m6A methylation. The linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) method and the least absolute shrink-age and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model were used to identify the signature. The signature can sensitively separate the patients into high and low risk indicating the relapse-free survival (RFS) time based on time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Then, the multi-gene signature was validated in GSE14333 and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. The number of the samples in GSE14333 and TCGA cohort are 63 and 150. Finally, two nomograms were set up and validated to predict prognosis of patients with stage III CRC.\nRESULTS: The hematopoietic cell lineage (HCL) signaling pathway was disclosed through GSEA and GSVA. Seven HCL-related genes were determined in the LASSO model to construct signature, with AUC 0.663, 0.708, and 0.703 at 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS, respectively. Independent datasets analysis and stratification analysis indicated that the HCL-related signature was reliable in distinguishing high- and low-risk stage III CRC patients. Two nomograms incorporating the signature and pathological N stage were set up, which yielded good discrimination and calibration in the predictions of prognosis for stage III CRC patients.\nCONCLUSIONS: A novel HCL-related signature was developed as a predictive model for survival rate of stage III CRC patients. Nomograms based on the signature were advantageous to facilitate personalized counseling and treatment in stage III CRC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33102231", "locator": "sections[6] \"Statistics for Classification, Prediction and Validation in the GEO and TCGA Series\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33102231", "locator": "sections[19] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:33102231"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:33102231", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.572708", "sha256": "sha256:4bf01d61106d9f452af67ed7049c5942abc2e8b7858bcfd86c573c4694a7702d", "bytes": 38138, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fonc.2020.572708", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7556240", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "PCA"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "LIMMA"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "protein-protein interaction"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "model_calibration", "specific": "decision_curve", "label": "Model calibration / clinical utility", "dsl_operations": ["calibration_bins", "net_benefit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictions_and_outcomes"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "net benefit"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:33102231"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T19:13:44Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 27220, "completion_tokens": 1938, "cached_tokens": 648}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:33102231", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33102231"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33102231", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33102231 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:33102231", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33102231"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33102231", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33102231 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-33102231", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:33102231"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:33102231", "parent_hash": "sha256:bea0addcd6aa8bbc85de50d4cc36ffb065d3be764039b9a6a19a47bdc39486ff", "fork_of": null, "generation": 6}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["ed by m6A methylation. The linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) method and the least absolute s"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:538", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["We built a risk score using the formula of CD36, ITGA3, FLT3, CR2, IL7, CD2, and CD55 expression by the method of LASSO Cox regression."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}