Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:33195410

Identifying Common Genes Related to Platelet and Immunity for Lung Adenocarcinoma Prognosis Prediction.

Chengmao Zhou · Ying Wang · Lei Lei · Mu-Huo Ji · Jian-Jun Yang · Hongping Xia

Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020 doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:33195410
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:3275b4b88352672d45d5944264052f737e61466fb725d9f0017b72b2fdca8b88
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:16Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:24:07Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identifying Common Genes Related to Platelet and Immunity for Lung Adenocarcinoma Prognosis Prediction.
doi
10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142
pmid
33195410
authors array · 6 items
[0]
Chengmao Zhou
[1]
Ying Wang
[2]
Lei Lei
[3]
Mu-Huo Ji
[4]
Jian-Jun Yang
[5]
Hongping Xia
journal
Frontiers in molecular biosciences
year
2020
abstract
BACKGROUND: Although 1000s of immune-related and platelet receptor-related genes have been identified in lung adenocarcinoma, their role in prognosis prediction remains unclear. METHODS: We downloaded mRNA data from the Cancer Genome Atlas Dataset (TCGA), and GSE68465 or GSE14814 data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. RESULTS: The high-risk group's overall survival (OS) time was lower than that of the low-risk group's in TCGA (p = 1.15e-03). Additionally, the risk score was an independent prognostic survival factor for lung adenocarcinoma patients in TCGA (HR = 2.136, 95%CI = 1.553-2.937, p < 0.001). The model's prognostic performance was verified with two independent GEO cohorts (GSE68465 and GSE14814). We also developed a nomogram and provided free webpage prediction tools. The mechanism of the high-risk group in this risk score may be have been related to somatic mutations and copy number changes. In addition, this risk score can distinguish the prognosis of the other two cancers (ACC, p < 0.001 and KIRP, p < 0.001). Also, among the other seven cancers, the OS prognosis for high and low risk groups show wide variation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our research demonstrates that CCNA2 and TGFB2 are potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We also determined a novel and reliable prognostic score for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis. The online nomogram prediction tool that contains this risk score may also help clinical medical staff.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33195410
locator
sections[11] "Meta-Analysis on the Difference of Tissue Expression and Survival Analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2" paragraph 2
quote
We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33195410
locator
sections[24] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33195410
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 1 item
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:33195410
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142
sha256
sha256:14b918a97b0a1ba7daf111a5c20959e56e990348c998d4a6a14e1708fef1a3ad
bytes
35716
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC7658298
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 2 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
χ2
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
null
specific
null
label
Meta-analysis
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: chi_square.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
assets array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33195410
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T19:16:02Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
29359
completion_tokens
2014
cached_tokens
9736
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33195410
type
paper
label
pmid:33195410
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33195410
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33195410 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33195410
type
paper
label
pmid:33195410
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33195410
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33195410 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-33195410
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33195410
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:33195410
parent_hash
sha256:fa5d39d8269c6148455dc740be9fbf2bbf667532db25f319e246bfb20b76f90c
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
contingency_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
χ2
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:33195410", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:3275b4b88352672d45d5944264052f737e61466fb725d9f0017b72b2fdca8b88", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:16Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:24:07Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identifying Common Genes Related to Platelet and Immunity for Lung Adenocarcinoma Prognosis Prediction.", "doi": "10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142", "pmid": "33195410", "authors": ["Chengmao Zhou", "Ying Wang", "Lei Lei", "Mu-Huo Ji", "Jian-Jun Yang", "Hongping Xia"], "journal": "Frontiers in molecular biosciences", "year": 2020, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: Although 1000s of immune-related and platelet receptor-related genes have been identified in lung adenocarcinoma, their role in prognosis prediction remains unclear.\nMETHODS: We downloaded mRNA data from the Cancer Genome Atlas Dataset (TCGA), and GSE68465 or GSE14814 data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database.\nRESULTS: The high-risk group's overall survival (OS) time was lower than that of the low-risk group's in TCGA (p = 1.15e-03). Additionally, the risk score was an independent prognostic survival factor for lung adenocarcinoma patients in TCGA (HR = 2.136, 95%CI = 1.553-2.937, p < 0.001). The model's prognostic performance was verified with two independent GEO cohorts (GSE68465 and GSE14814). We also developed a nomogram and provided free webpage prediction tools. The mechanism of the high-risk group in this risk score may be have been related to somatic mutations and copy number changes. In addition, this risk score can distinguish the prognosis of the other two cancers (ACC, p < 0.001 and KIRP, p < 0.001). Also, among the other seven cancers, the OS prognosis for high and low risk groups show wide variation (p < 0.05).\nCONCLUSION: Our research demonstrates that CCNA2 and TGFB2 are potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We also determined a novel and reliable prognostic score for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis. The online nomogram prediction tool that contains this risk score may also help clinical medical staff.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33195410", "locator": "sections[11] \"Meta-Analysis on the Difference of Tissue Expression and Survival Analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33195410", "locator": "sections[24] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:33195410"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:33195410", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142", "sha256": "sha256:14b918a97b0a1ba7daf111a5c20959e56e990348c998d4a6a14e1708fef1a3ad", "bytes": 35716, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fmolb.2020.563142", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7658298", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "χ2"}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "Meta-analysis", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We made a meta-analysis on the difference of tissue expression and survival analysis of TGFB2 and CCNA2 on the website of lung cancer explorer."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: chi_square."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:33195410"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T19:16:02Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 29359, "completion_tokens": 2014, "cached_tokens": 9736}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:33195410", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33195410"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33195410", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33195410 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:33195410", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33195410"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33195410", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33195410 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-33195410", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:33195410"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:33195410", "parent_hash": "sha256:fa5d39d8269c6148455dc740be9fbf2bbf667532db25f319e246bfb20b76f90c", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "contingency_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["χ2"], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}