Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:33520459

Digital Cell Sorter (DCS): a cell type identification, anomaly detection, and Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.

Sergii Domanskyi · Alex Hakansson · Thomas J Bertus · Giovanni Paternostro · Carlo Piermarocchi

PeerJ · 2021 doi:10.7717/peerj.10670

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:33520459
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:2814adc35b4b758e97e35a7ccd1a7ea55407d89681b452fc99245a792a84ca66
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:24Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T21:24:35Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Digital Cell Sorter (DCS): a cell type identification, anomaly detection, and Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.
doi
10.7717/peerj.10670
pmid
33520459
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Sergii Domanskyi
[1]
Alex Hakansson
[2]
Thomas J Bertus
[3]
Giovanni Paternostro
[4]
Carlo Piermarocchi
journal
PeerJ
year
2021
abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different steps including quality control, batch correction, clustering, cell identification and characterization, and visualization. The amount of scRNA-seq data is growing extremely fast, and novel algorithmic approaches improving these steps are key to extract more biological information. Here, we introduce: (i) two methods for automatic cell type identification (i.e., without expert curator) based on a voting algorithm and a Hopfield classifier, (ii) a method for cell anomaly quantification based on isolation forest, and (iii) a tool for the visualization of cell phenotypic landscapes based on Hopfield energy-like functions. These new approaches are integrated in a software platform that includes many other state-of-the-art methodologies and provides a self-contained toolkit for scRNA-seq analysis. RESULTS: We present a suite of software elements for the analysis of scRNA-seq data. This Python-based open source software, Digital Cell Sorter (DCS), consists in an extensive toolkit of methods for scRNA-seq analysis. We illustrate the capability of the software using data from large datasets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), as well as plasma cells of bone marrow samples from healthy donors and multiple myeloma patients. We test the novel algorithms by evaluating their ability to deconvolve cell mixtures and detect small numbers of anomalous cells in PBMC data. AVAILABILITY: The DCS toolkit is available for download and installation through the Python Package Index (PyPI). The software can be deployed using the Python import function following installation. Source code is also available for download on Zenodo: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2533377. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplemental Materials are available at PeerJ online.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33520459
locator
sections[11] "Cell identification in mixtures" paragraph 2
quote
To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: Digital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter. Source Code is available at Zenodo: Sergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550. The documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter: Domanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:33520459
locator
sections[26] "Data Availability Statement" paragraphs 1-7
quote
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: Digital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter. Source Code is available at Zenodo: Sergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550. The documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter: Domanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33520459
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
blocked
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:33520459
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10670
sha256
sha256:ce5bf2818f8dfe4d8ea489177e219d4fdaa6d117905cd6c7901f387ff5b18183
bytes
56436
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.7717/peerj.10670
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC7811293
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:33520459:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:6a8146cb1a01a03d13747950c3899c15410eab93a8a662f0231c8abecf86156b
bytes
555
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[11]/table-wrap[1]#table-1
version
null
note
Performance of annotation methods evaluated using mixtures of pure cell type populations.Median multi-class F1 and percentage of unassigned cells (U) using two lists of markers as knowledge-base.
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC7811293
section_index
11
section_title
Cell identification in mixtures
row_count
4
column_count
7
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Performance of annotation methods evaluated using mixtures of pure cell type populations.Median multi-class F1 and percentage of unassigned cells (U) using two lists of markers as knowledge-base.
rows array · 4 items
[0] array · 4 items
[0]
Method
[1]
pDCS
[2]
Hopfield
[3]
Consensus
[1] array · 7 items
[0]
Metric
[1]
F1
[2]
U (%)
[3]
F1
[4]
U (%)
[5]
F1
[6]
U (%)
[2] array · 7 items
[0]
CD Marker
[1]
0.836
[2]
6.0
[3]
0.867
[4]
16.7
[5]
0.947
[6]
21.6
[3] array · 7 items
[0]
CIBERSORT
[1]
0.740
[2]
6.6
[3]
0.942
[4]
22.3
[5]
0.944
[6]
22.6
locator
section[11]/table-wrap[1]#table-1
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 1 item
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
null
specific
null
label
multi-class weighted F1 score
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 0 items
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures.
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_named_unmapped
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
blocked
tier
R4
blocked_on
data:accession_absent
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R4
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The reader quoted the method the paper names (multi-class weighted F1 score), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R4
reachable
false
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: Digital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter. Source Code is available at Zenodo: Sergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550. The documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter: Domanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io.
basis
The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:33520459
[1]
asset:table:pmid:33520459:1
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:accession_absent
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:26:46Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
41304
completion_tokens
2467
cached_tokens
784
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33520459
type
paper
label
pmid:33520459
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33520459
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33520459 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:33520459
type
paper
label
pmid:33520459
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:33520459
type
manuscript
label
PMID 33520459 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:None
type
dataset
label
GEO None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-33520459
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:33520459
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-None
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:None
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:33520459
parent_hash
sha256:fa4931ec79cc333e15ba2fe4ffa8d2a4a217b9c1524d0be3899614a752680001
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
execution.not_run
[1]
method.reader_named_unmapped
[2]
review.human_critique
[3]
review.independent_reader
[4]
review.machine_critique
[5]
step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
scrna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
unsupported
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
tection, and Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.
[1]
TION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different steps inclu
[2]
terization, and visualization. The amount of scRNA-seq data is growing extremely fast, and novel al
[3]
es and provides a self-contained toolkit for scRNA-seq analysis. RESULTS: We present a suite of sof
order_basis
paper_text_order:65
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.
[1]
MOTIVATION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different
order_basis
paper_text_order:78
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:33520459", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:2814adc35b4b758e97e35a7ccd1a7ea55407d89681b452fc99245a792a84ca66", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:24Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:24:35Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Digital Cell Sorter (DCS): a cell type identification, anomaly detection, and Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.10670", "pmid": "33520459", "authors": ["Sergii Domanskyi", "Alex Hakansson", "Thomas J Bertus", "Giovanni Paternostro", "Carlo Piermarocchi"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2021, "abstract": "MOTIVATION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different steps including quality control, batch correction, clustering, cell identification and characterization, and visualization. The amount of scRNA-seq data is growing extremely fast, and novel algorithmic approaches improving these steps are key to extract more biological information. Here, we introduce: (i) two methods for automatic cell type identification (i.e., without expert curator) based on a voting algorithm and a Hopfield classifier, (ii) a method for cell anomaly quantification based on isolation forest, and (iii) a tool for the visualization of cell phenotypic landscapes based on Hopfield energy-like functions. These new approaches are integrated in a software platform that includes many other state-of-the-art methodologies and provides a self-contained toolkit for scRNA-seq analysis.\nRESULTS: We present a suite of software elements for the analysis of scRNA-seq data. This Python-based open source software, Digital Cell Sorter (DCS), consists in an extensive toolkit of methods for scRNA-seq analysis. We illustrate the capability of the software using data from large datasets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), as well as plasma cells of bone marrow samples from healthy donors and multiple myeloma patients. We test the novel algorithms by evaluating their ability to deconvolve cell mixtures and detect small numbers of anomalous cells in PBMC data.\nAVAILABILITY: The DCS toolkit is available for download and installation through the Python Package Index (PyPI). The software can be deployed using the Python import function following installation. Source code is also available for download on Zenodo: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2533377.\nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplemental Materials are available at PeerJ online.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33520459", "locator": "sections[11] \"Cell identification in mixtures\" paragraph 2", "quote": "To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nDigital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter.\nSource Code is available at Zenodo:\nSergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550.\nThe documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter:\nDomanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:33520459", "locator": "sections[26] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraphs 1-7", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nDigital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter.\nSource Code is available at Zenodo:\nSergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550.\nThe documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter:\nDomanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:33520459"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:33520459", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10670", "sha256": "sha256:ce5bf2818f8dfe4d8ea489177e219d4fdaa6d117905cd6c7901f387ff5b18183", "bytes": 56436, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.10670", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7811293", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:33520459:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:6a8146cb1a01a03d13747950c3899c15410eab93a8a662f0231c8abecf86156b", "bytes": 555, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[11]/table-wrap[1]#table-1", "version": null, "note": "Performance of annotation methods evaluated using mixtures of pure cell type populations.Median multi-class F1 and percentage of unassigned cells (U) using two lists of markers as knowledge-base.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC7811293", "section_index": 11, "section_title": "Cell identification in mixtures", "row_count": 4, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Performance of annotation methods evaluated using mixtures of pure cell type populations.Median multi-class F1 and percentage of unassigned cells (U) using two lists of markers as knowledge-base.", "rows": [["Method", "pDCS", "Hopfield", "Consensus"], ["Metric", "F1", "U (%)", "F1", "U (%)", "F1", "U (%)"], ["CD Marker", "0.836", "6.0", "0.867", "16.7", "0.947", "21.6"], ["CIBERSORT", "0.740", "6.6", "0.942", "22.3", "0.944", "22.6"]], "row_count": 4, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 12, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[11]/table-wrap[1]#table-1"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": null, "specific": null, "label": "multi-class weighted F1 score", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": null, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": [], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "To quantify each method’s performance we calculated a multi-class weighted F1 score, excluding unassigned cells, and took the median value over 100 independent random mixtures."}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_named_unmapped"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R4", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The reader quoted the method the paper names (multi-class weighted F1 score), but the corpus's method extractor could not map it onto a DSL operation, so the method is published but not expressible."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nDigital Cell Sorter is available at GitHub: https://github.com/sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter.\nSource Code is available at Zenodo:\nSergii Domanskyi, & wangjiayin1010. (2020, November 26). sdomanskyi/DigitalCellSorter: DigitalCellSorter (Version 1.3.7). Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4292550.\nThe documentation is available at DigitalCellSorter:\nDomanskyi S., Szedlak A., Hawkins N.T., Wang J., Bertus T., Hakansson A., Paternostro G., Piermarocchi C. (2020). DigitalCellSorter’s documentation. Available at https://digital-cell-sorter.rtfd.io."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:33520459", "asset:table:pmid:33520459:1"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:26:46Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 41304, "completion_tokens": 2467, "cached_tokens": 784}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:33520459", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33520459"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33520459", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33520459 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:33520459", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:33520459"}, {"id": "source:pmid:33520459", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 33520459 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-33520459", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:33520459"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:33520459", "parent_hash": "sha256:fa4931ec79cc333e15ba2fe4ffa8d2a4a217b9c1524d0be3899614a752680001", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "method.reader_named_unmapped", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "scrna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "unsupported", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["tection, and Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.", "TION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different steps inclu", "terization, and visualization. The amount of scRNA-seq data is growing extremely fast, and novel al", "es and provides a self-contained toolkit for scRNA-seq analysis. RESULTS: We present a suite of sof"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:65", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["Hopfield landscapes toolkit for single-cell transcriptomics.", "MOTIVATION: Analysis of singe cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) typically consists of different"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:78", "id": "assay:2"}]}