Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:34257653

Identification and Validation of Autophagy-Related Gene Nomograms to Predict the Prognostic Value of Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Jinqun Jiang · HongYan Xu · YiHao Wang · Hai Lu

Journal of oncology · 2021 doi:10.1155/2021/5583400

Paper

complete

Experiment

partial

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:34257653
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:08c62813918a128e4aca467f9c0c3fb763d5b052d9d1ed311e6c23b915244331
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:43Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:04:13Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification and Validation of Autophagy-Related Gene Nomograms to Predict the Prognostic Value of Patients with Cervical Cancer.
doi
10.1155/2021/5583400
pmid
34257653
authors array · 4 items
[0]
Jinqun Jiang
[1]
HongYan Xu
[2]
YiHao Wang
[3]
Hai Lu
journal
Journal of oncology
year
2021
abstract
Autophagy is a process of engulfing one's own cytoplasmic proteins or organelles and coating them into vesicles, fusing with lysosomes to form autophagic lysosomes, and degrading the contents it encapsulates. Increasing studies have shown that autophagy disorders are closely related to the occurrence of tumors. However, the prognostic role of autophagy genes in cervical cancer is still unclear. In this study, we constructed risk signatures of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) to predict the prognosis of cervical cancer. The expression profiles and clinical information of autophagy gene sets were downloaded from TCGA and GSE52903 queues as training and validation sets. The normal cervical tissue expression profile data from the UCSC XENA website (obtained from GTEx) were used as a supplement to the TCGA normal cervical tissue. Univariate COX regression analysis of 17 different autophagy genes was performed with the consensus approach. Tumor samples from TCGA were divided into six subtypes, and the clinical traits of the six subtypes had different distributions. Further absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable COX regression yielded an autophagy genetic risk model consisting of eight genes. In the training set, the survival rate of the high-risk group was lower than that of the low-risk group (p < 0.0001). In the validation set, the AUC area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.772 for the training set and 0.889 for the verification set. We found that high and low risk scores were closely related to TNM stage (p < 0.05). The nomogram shows that the risk score combined with other indicators, such as G, T, M, and N, better predicts 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Decline curve analysis (DCA) shows that the risk model combined with other indicators produces better clinical efficacy. Immune cells with an enrichment score of 28 showed statistically significant differences related to high and low risk. GSEA enrichment analysis showed the main enrichment being in KRAS activation, genes defining epithelial and mesenchymal transition (EMT), raised in response to the low oxygen level (hypoxia) gene and NF-kB in response to TNF. These pathways are closely related to the occurrence of tumors. Our constructed autophagy risk signature may be a prognostic tool for cervical cancer.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11].
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34257653
locator
sections[4] "2.2. Identifying Differentially Expressed ARGs" paragraph 2
quote
We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11].
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34257653
locator
sections[25] "Data Availability" paragraph 2
quote
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
partial
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34257653
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE52903
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
blocked
blocked_on
method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE52903
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:34257653
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5583400
sha256
sha256:51396b11c376aaf4ce34158c3af9ffbbd7e44adf47c43eacc2de2603f8e72f52
bytes
26795
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1155/2021/5583400
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8253645
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE52903
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE52903
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE52903
version
null
note
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 72 items
[0]
GSM1277835
[1]
GSM1277836
[2]
GSM1277837
[3]
GSM1277838
[4]
GSM1277839
[5]
GSM1277840
[6]
GSM1277841
[7]
GSM1277842
[8]
GSM1277843
[9]
GSM1277844
[10]
GSM1277845
[11]
GSM1277846
[12]
GSM1277847
[13]
GSM1277848
[14]
GSM1277849
[15]
GSM1277850
[16]
GSM1277851
[17]
GSM1277852
[18]
GSM1277853
[19]
GSM1277854
[20]
GSM1277855
[21]
GSM1277856
[22]
GSM1277857
[23]
GSM1277858
[24]
GSM1277859
[25]
GSM1277860
[26]
GSM1277861
[27]
GSM1277862
[28]
GSM1277863
[29]
GSM1277864
[30]
GSM1277865
[31]
GSM1277866
[32]
GSM1277867
[33]
GSM1277868
[34]
GSM1277869
[35]
GSM1277870
[36]
GSM1277871
[37]
GSM1277872
[38]
GSM1277873
[39]
GSM1277874
[40]
GSM1277875
[41]
GSM1277876
[42]
GSM1277877
[43]
GSM1277878
[44]
GSM1277879
[45]
GSM1277880
[46]
GSM1277881
[47]
GSM1277882
[48]
GSM1277883
[49]
GSM1277884
[50]
GSM1277885
[51]
GSM1277886
[52]
GSM1277887
[53]
GSM1277888
[54]
GSM1277889
[55]
GSM1277890
[56]
GSM1277891
[57]
GSM1277892
[58]
GSM1277893
[59]
GSM1277894
[60]
GSM1277895
[61]
GSM1277896
[62]
GSM1277897
[63]
GSM1277898
[64]
GSM1277899
[65]
GSM1277900
[66]
GSM1277901
[67]
GSM1277902
[68]
GSM1277903
[69]
GSM1277904
[70]
GSM1277905
[71]
GSM1277906
sample_count
72
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
6244
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Gene Dosage, Mainly 3q Amplification, Deregulates a Quarter of Genes in Cervical Cancer: It Induces Glycolysis, Anaphase-dependent Proteasome Proteolysis, and Low Survival
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE52903 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE52903 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
wilcoxon
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11].
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
COX regression
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
limma
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
false
required_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
group_comparison_wilcoxon
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE52903
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE52903
statements array · 1 item
[0]
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
basis
The paper names GSE52903 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:34257653
[1]
data:geo:GSE52903
steps array · 0 items
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
operation
group_comparison_wilcoxon
priority
null
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE52903
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:32:14Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
20758
completion_tokens
1506
cached_tokens
776
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34257653
type
paper
label
pmid:34257653
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34257653
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34257653 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE52903
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE52903
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34257653
type
paper
label
pmid:34257653
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34257653
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34257653 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE52903
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE52903
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-34257653
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34257653
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE52903
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE52903
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:34257653
parent_hash
sha256:641d50c7fbafde6c2107f0ea0962221d8f254efd35a1fde2e41d372ea88d2c23
fork_of
null
gaps array · 8 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE52903 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE52903 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.group_comparison_wilcoxon
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
[7]
step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11].
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34257653", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 7, "content_hash": "sha256:08c62813918a128e4aca467f9c0c3fb763d5b052d9d1ed311e6c23b915244331", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:43Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:04:13Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification and Validation of Autophagy-Related Gene Nomograms to Predict the Prognostic Value of Patients with Cervical Cancer.", "doi": "10.1155/2021/5583400", "pmid": "34257653", "authors": ["Jinqun Jiang", "HongYan Xu", "YiHao Wang", "Hai Lu"], "journal": "Journal of oncology", "year": 2021, "abstract": "Autophagy is a process of engulfing one's own cytoplasmic proteins or organelles and coating them into vesicles, fusing with lysosomes to form autophagic lysosomes, and degrading the contents it encapsulates. Increasing studies have shown that autophagy disorders are closely related to the occurrence of tumors. However, the prognostic role of autophagy genes in cervical cancer is still unclear. In this study, we constructed risk signatures of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) to predict the prognosis of cervical cancer. The expression profiles and clinical information of autophagy gene sets were downloaded from TCGA and GSE52903 queues as training and validation sets. The normal cervical tissue expression profile data from the UCSC XENA website (obtained from GTEx) were used as a supplement to the TCGA normal cervical tissue. Univariate COX regression analysis of 17 different autophagy genes was performed with the consensus approach. Tumor samples from TCGA were divided into six subtypes, and the clinical traits of the six subtypes had different distributions. Further absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable COX regression yielded an autophagy genetic risk model consisting of eight genes. In the training set, the survival rate of the high-risk group was lower than that of the low-risk group (p < 0.0001). In the validation set, the AUC area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.772 for the training set and 0.889 for the verification set. We found that high and low risk scores were closely related to TNM stage (p < 0.05). The nomogram shows that the risk score combined with other indicators, such as G, T, M, and N, better predicts 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Decline curve analysis (DCA) shows that the risk model combined with other indicators produces better clinical efficacy. Immune cells with an enrichment score of 28 showed statistically significant differences related to high and low risk. GSEA enrichment analysis showed the main enrichment being in KRAS activation, genes defining epithelial and mesenchymal transition (EMT), raised in response to the low oxygen level (hypoxia) gene and NF-kB in response to TNF. These pathways are closely related to the occurrence of tumors. Our constructed autophagy risk signature may be a prognostic tool for cervical cancer.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11].", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34257653", "locator": "sections[4] \"2.2. Identifying Differentially Expressed ARGs\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11]."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34257653", "locator": "sections[25] \"Data Availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Data are available upon request to the corresponding author."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34257653"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE52903"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "method:group_comparison_wilcoxon", "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE52903"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34257653", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5583400", "sha256": "sha256:51396b11c376aaf4ce34158c3af9ffbbd7e44adf47c43eacc2de2603f8e72f52", "bytes": 26795, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1155/2021/5583400", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8253645", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE52903", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE52903", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE52903", "version": null, "note": "Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1277835", "GSM1277836", "GSM1277837", "GSM1277838", "GSM1277839", "GSM1277840", "GSM1277841", "GSM1277842", "GSM1277843", "GSM1277844", "GSM1277845", "GSM1277846", "GSM1277847", "GSM1277848", "GSM1277849", "GSM1277850", "GSM1277851", "GSM1277852", "GSM1277853", "GSM1277854", "GSM1277855", "GSM1277856", "GSM1277857", "GSM1277858", "GSM1277859", "GSM1277860", "GSM1277861", "GSM1277862", "GSM1277863", "GSM1277864", "GSM1277865", "GSM1277866", "GSM1277867", "GSM1277868", "GSM1277869", "GSM1277870", "GSM1277871", "GSM1277872", "GSM1277873", "GSM1277874", "GSM1277875", "GSM1277876", "GSM1277877", "GSM1277878", "GSM1277879", "GSM1277880", "GSM1277881", "GSM1277882", "GSM1277883", "GSM1277884", "GSM1277885", "GSM1277886", "GSM1277887", "GSM1277888", "GSM1277889", "GSM1277890", "GSM1277891", "GSM1277892", "GSM1277893", "GSM1277894", "GSM1277895", "GSM1277896", "GSM1277897", "GSM1277898", "GSM1277899", "GSM1277900", "GSM1277901", "GSM1277902", "GSM1277903", "GSM1277904", "GSM1277905", "GSM1277906"], "sample_count": 72, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "6244", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Gene Dosage, Mainly 3q Amplification, Deregulates a Quarter of Genes in Cervical Cancer: It Induces Glycolysis, Anaphase-dependent Proteasome Proteolysis, and Low Survival", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE52903 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE52903 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "wilcoxon", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11]."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "COX regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.group_comparison_wilcoxon"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": false, "required_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: wilcoxon."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE52903"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE52903"], "statements": ["Data are available upon request to the corresponding author."], "basis": "The paper names GSE52903 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": [], "assets": ["source:pmid:34257653", "data:geo:GSE52903"], "steps": []}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [{"operation": "group_comparison_wilcoxon", "unlocks_papers": null, "priority": null}], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE52903"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:32:14Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 20758, "completion_tokens": 1506, "cached_tokens": 776}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34257653", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34257653"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34257653", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34257653 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE52903", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE52903"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34257653", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34257653"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34257653", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34257653 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE52903", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE52903"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34257653", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34257653"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE52903", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE52903"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34257653", "parent_hash": "sha256:641d50c7fbafde6c2107f0ea0962221d8f254efd35a1fde2e41d372ea88d2c23", "fork_of": null, "generation": 6}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE52903 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE52903 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.group_comparison_wilcoxon", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:run_analysis blocked on method:group_comparison_wilcoxon"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["We used the Wilcoxon test to analyze the difference between 232 autophagy genes based on the limma package [11]."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}