Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:34372798

Using a machine learning approach to identify key prognostic molecules for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Meng-Xiang Li · Xiao-Meng Sun · Wei-Gang Cheng · Hao-Jie Ruan · Ke Liu · Pan Chen · Hai-Jun Xu · She-Gan Gao · Xiao-Shan Feng · Yi-Jun Qi

BMC cancer · 2021 doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

partial

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:34372798
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:5a5778ef1deb8e35c69616980ef5408e3952e3ca225a168b3836ecc5593fa571
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T15:41:47Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:47:18Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Using a machine learning approach to identify key prognostic molecules for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
doi
10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1
pmid
34372798
authors array · 10 items
[0]
Meng-Xiang Li
[1]
Xiao-Meng Sun
[2]
Wei-Gang Cheng
[3]
Hao-Jie Ruan
[4]
Ke Liu
[5]
Pan Chen
[6]
Hai-Jun Xu
[7]
She-Gan Gao
[8]
Xiao-Shan Feng
[9]
Yi-Jun Qi
journal
BMC cancer
year
2021
abstract
BACKGROUND: A plethora of prognostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that have hitherto been reported are challenged with low reproducibility due to high molecular heterogeneity of ESCC. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal biomarkers for ESCC using machine learning algorithms. METHODS: Biomarkers related to clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic response of patients with ESCC were determined through literature database searching. Forty-eight biomarkers linked to recurrence or prognosis of ESCC were used to construct a molecular interaction network based on NetBox and then to identify the functional modules. Publicably available mRNA transcriptome data of ESCC downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets included GSE53625 and TCGA-ESCC. Five machine learning algorithms, including logical regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF) and XGBoost, were used to develop classifiers for prognostic classification for feature selection. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the prognostic classifiers. The importances of identified molecules were ranked by their occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 48 clinically proven molecules associated with ESCC progression were used to construct a molecular interaction network with 3 functional modules comprising 17 component molecules. The 131,071 prognostic classifiers using these 17 molecules were built for each machine learning algorithm. Using the occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers with AUCs greater than the mean value of all 131,071 AUCs to rank importances of these 17 molecules, stratifin encoded by SFN was identified as the optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC, whose performance was further validated in another 2 independent cohorts. CONCLUSION: The occurrence frequencies across various feature selection approaches reflect the degree of clinical importance and stratifin is an optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC.
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34372798
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34372798
locator
sections[24] "Availability of data and materials" paragraph 2
quote
The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
null
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34372798
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE53625
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE53625
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 4 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:34372798
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1
sha256
sha256:a71008efbf5729c6b73d3520fffad9111ec13b952e86229413e8de407ed892e1
bytes
41500
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8351329
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE53625
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE53625
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE53625
version
null
note
The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 358 items
[0]
GSM1296956
[1]
GSM1296957
[2]
GSM1296958
[3]
GSM1296959
[4]
GSM1296960
[5]
GSM1296961
[6]
GSM1296962
[7]
GSM1296963
[8]
GSM1296964
[9]
GSM1296965
[10]
GSM1296966
[11]
GSM1296967
[12]
GSM1296968
[13]
GSM1296969
[14]
GSM1296970
[15]
GSM1296971
[16]
GSM1296972
[17]
GSM1296973
[18]
GSM1296974
[19]
GSM1296975
[20]
GSM1296976
[21]
GSM1296977
[22]
GSM1296978
[23]
GSM1296979
[24]
GSM1296980
[25]
GSM1296981
[26]
GSM1296982
[27]
GSM1296983
[28]
GSM1296984
[29]
GSM1296985
[30]
GSM1296986
[31]
GSM1296987
[32]
GSM1296988
[33]
GSM1296989
[34]
GSM1296990
[35]
GSM1296991
[36]
GSM1296992
[37]
GSM1296993
[38]
GSM1296994
[39]
GSM1296995
[40]
GSM1296996
[41]
GSM1296997
[42]
GSM1296998
[43]
GSM1296999
[44]
GSM1297000
[45]
GSM1297001
[46]
GSM1297002
[47]
GSM1297003
[48]
GSM1297004
[49]
GSM1297005
[50]
GSM1297006
[51]
GSM1297007
[52]
GSM1297008
[53]
GSM1297009
[54]
GSM1297010
[55]
GSM1297011
[56]
GSM1297012
[57]
GSM1297013
[58]
GSM1297014
[59]
GSM1297015
[60]
GSM1297016
[61]
GSM1297017
[62]
GSM1297018
[63]
GSM1297019
[64]
GSM1297020
[65]
GSM1297021
[66]
GSM1297022
[67]
GSM1297023
[68]
GSM1297024
[69]
GSM1297025
[70]
GSM1297026
[71]
GSM1297027
[72]
GSM1297028
[73]
GSM1297029
[74]
GSM1297030
[75]
GSM1297031
[76]
GSM1297032
[77]
GSM1297033
[78]
GSM1297034
[79]
GSM1297035
[80]
GSM1297036
[81]
GSM1297037
[82]
GSM1297038
[83]
GSM1297039
[84]
GSM1297040
[85]
GSM1297041
[86]
GSM1297042
[87]
GSM1297043
[88]
GSM1297044
[89]
GSM1297045
[90]
GSM1297046
[91]
GSM1297047
[92]
GSM1297048
[93]
GSM1297049
[94]
GSM1297050
[95]
GSM1297051
[96]
GSM1297052
[97]
GSM1297053
[98]
GSM1297054
[99]
GSM1297055
[100]
GSM1297056
[101]
GSM1297057
[102]
GSM1297058
[103]
GSM1297059
[104]
GSM1297060
[105]
GSM1297061
[106]
GSM1297062
[107]
GSM1297063
[108]
GSM1297064
[109]
GSM1297065
[110]
GSM1297066
[111]
GSM1297067
[112]
GSM1297068
[113]
GSM1297069
[114]
GSM1297070
[115]
GSM1297071
[116]
GSM1297072
[117]
GSM1297073
[118]
GSM1297074
[119]
GSM1297075
[120]
GSM1297076
[121]
GSM1297077
[122]
GSM1297078
[123]
GSM1297079
[124]
GSM1297080
[125]
GSM1297081
[126]
GSM1297082
[127]
GSM1297083
[128]
GSM1297084
[129]
GSM1297085
[130]
GSM1297086
[131]
GSM1297087
[132]
GSM1297088
[133]
GSM1297089
[134]
GSM1297090
[135]
GSM1297091
[136]
GSM1297092
[137]
GSM1297093
[138]
GSM1297094
[139]
GSM1297095
[140]
GSM1297096
[141]
GSM1297097
[142]
GSM1297098
[143]
GSM1297099
[144]
GSM1297100
[145]
GSM1297101
[146]
GSM1297102
[147]
GSM1297103
[148]
GSM1297104
[149]
GSM1297105
[150]
GSM1297106
[151]
GSM1297107
[152]
GSM1297108
[153]
GSM1297109
[154]
GSM1297110
[155]
GSM1297111
[156]
GSM1297112
[157]
GSM1297113
[158]
GSM1297114
[159]
GSM1297115
[160]
GSM1297116
[161]
GSM1297117
[162]
GSM1297118
[163]
GSM1297119
[164]
GSM1297120
[165]
GSM1297121
[166]
GSM1297122
[167]
GSM1297123
[168]
GSM1297124
[169]
GSM1297125
[170]
GSM1297126
[171]
GSM1297127
[172]
GSM1297128
[173]
GSM1297129
[174]
GSM1297130
[175]
GSM1297131
[176]
GSM1297132
[177]
GSM1297133
[178]
GSM1297134
[179]
GSM1297135
[180]
GSM1297136
[181]
GSM1297137
[182]
GSM1297138
[183]
GSM1297139
[184]
GSM1297140
[185]
GSM1297141
[186]
GSM1297142
[187]
GSM1297143
[188]
GSM1297144
[189]
GSM1297145
[190]
GSM1297146
[191]
GSM1297147
[192]
GSM1297148
[193]
GSM1297149
[194]
GSM1297150
[195]
GSM1297151
[196]
GSM1297152
[197]
GSM1297153
[198]
GSM1297154
[199]
GSM1297155
[200]
GSM1297156
[201]
GSM1297157
[202]
GSM1297158
[203]
GSM1297159
[204]
GSM1297160
[205]
GSM1297161
[206]
GSM1297162
[207]
GSM1297163
[208]
GSM1297164
[209]
GSM1297165
[210]
GSM1297166
[211]
GSM1297167
[212]
GSM1297168
[213]
GSM1297169
[214]
GSM1297170
[215]
GSM1297171
[216]
GSM1297172
[217]
GSM1297173
[218]
GSM1297174
[219]
GSM1297175
[220]
GSM1297176
[221]
GSM1297177
[222]
GSM1297178
[223]
GSM1297179
[224]
GSM1297180
[225]
GSM1297181
[226]
GSM1297182
[227]
GSM1297183
[228]
GSM1297184
[229]
GSM1297185
[230]
GSM1297186
[231]
GSM1297187
[232]
GSM1297188
[233]
GSM1297189
[234]
GSM1297190
[235]
GSM1297191
[236]
GSM1297192
[237]
GSM1297193
[238]
GSM1297194
[239]
GSM1297195
[240]
GSM1297196
[241]
GSM1297197
[242]
GSM1297198
[243]
GSM1297199
[244]
GSM1297200
[245]
GSM1297201
[246]
GSM1297202
[247]
GSM1297203
[248]
GSM1297204
[249]
GSM1297205
[250]
GSM1297206
[251]
GSM1297207
[252]
GSM1297208
[253]
GSM1297209
[254]
GSM1297210
[255]
GSM1297211
[256]
GSM1297212
[257]
GSM1297213
[258]
GSM1297214
[259]
GSM1297215
[260]
GSM1297216
[261]
GSM1297217
[262]
GSM1297218
[263]
GSM1297219
[264]
GSM1297220
[265]
GSM1297221
[266]
GSM1297222
[267]
GSM1297223
[268]
GSM1297224
[269]
GSM1297225
[270]
GSM1297226
[271]
GSM1297227
[272]
GSM1297228
[273]
GSM1297229
[274]
GSM1297230
[275]
GSM1297231
[276]
GSM1297232
[277]
GSM1297233
[278]
GSM1297234
[279]
GSM1297235
[280]
GSM1297236
[281]
GSM1297237
[282]
GSM1297238
[283]
GSM1297239
[284]
GSM1297240
[285]
GSM1297241
[286]
GSM1297242
[287]
GSM1297243
[288]
GSM1297244
[289]
GSM1297245
[290]
GSM1297246
[291]
GSM1297247
[292]
GSM1297248
[293]
GSM1297249
[294]
GSM1297250
[295]
GSM1297251
[296]
GSM1297252
[297]
GSM1297253
[298]
GSM1297254
[299]
GSM1297255
[300]
GSM1297256
[301]
GSM1297257
[302]
GSM1297258
[303]
GSM1297259
[304]
GSM1297260
[305]
GSM1297261
[306]
GSM1297262
[307]
GSM1297263
[308]
GSM1297264
[309]
GSM1297265
[310]
GSM1297266
[311]
GSM1297267
[312]
GSM1297268
[313]
GSM1297269
[314]
GSM1297270
[315]
GSM1297271
[316]
GSM1297272
[317]
GSM1297273
[318]
GSM1297274
[319]
GSM1297275
[320]
GSM1297276
[321]
GSM1297277
[322]
GSM1297278
[323]
GSM1297279
[324]
GSM1297280
[325]
GSM1297281
[326]
GSM1297282
[327]
GSM1297283
[328]
GSM1297284
[329]
GSM1297285
[330]
GSM1297286
[331]
GSM1297287
[332]
GSM1297288
[333]
GSM1297289
[334]
GSM1297290
[335]
GSM1297291
[336]
GSM1297292
[337]
GSM1297293
[338]
GSM1297294
[339]
GSM1297295
[340]
GSM1297296
[341]
GSM1297297
[342]
GSM1297298
[343]
GSM1297299
[344]
GSM1297300
[345]
GSM1297301
[346]
GSM1297302
[347]
GSM1297303
[348]
GSM1297304
[349]
GSM1297305
[350]
GSM1297306
[351]
GSM1297307
[352]
GSM1297308
[353]
GSM1297309
[354]
GSM1297310
[355]
GSM1297311
[356]
GSM1297312
[357]
GSM1297313
sample_count
358
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
18109
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
LncRNA profile study reveals a three-lncRNA signature associated with the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:34372798:1
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:a2620f7c578ad22dd99ed5cd6398f39dc51ffab72cc02da86cba6883cab25c84
bytes
8414
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[13]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
version
null
note
Thirty-eight studies reporting 48 molecules that were associated with clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic outcome of ESCC patients
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC8351329
section_index
13
section_title
Prognostic biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
row_count
39
column_count
5
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 1
caption
Thirty-eight studies reporting 48 molecules that were associated with clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic outcome of ESCC patients
rows array · 39 items
[0] array · 5 items
[0]
Biomarkers
[1]
Prognosis/recurrence/therapeutic outcome
[2]
PMID
[3]
Sample sizes
[4]
Conclusions
[1] array · 5 items
[0]
BRCA1
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
23,326,344
[3]
144
[4]
Low BRCA1 expression was an independent prognostic factor in cisplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.71; P = 0.007) or chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.37; P < 0.001) group.
[2] array · 5 items
[0]
CCNA2
[1]
Chemotherapy
[2]
23,205,070
[3]
48
[4]
The expression of cyclin A was an independent prognosis factor in patients with ESCC following paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
[3] array · 5 items
[0]
CCND1
[1]
Prognosis and radiochemotherapy
[2]
9,988,238
[3]
172
[4]
Patients with cyclin D1-positive carcinomas showed significantly worse overall survival than patients with cyclin D1-negative carcinomas (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.134–3.42; P = 0.0038)
[4] array · 5 items
[0]
CD163 & CD68
[1]
Prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy
[2]
25,752,960
[3]
210
[4]
High infiltration of CD68+ macrophages and CD163+ macrophages was significantly associated with poor prognosis for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.057, P = 0.003).
[5] array · 5 items
[0]
CD274
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
26,623,522
[3]
45
[4]
The higher PD-L1 H-scores had poorer overall survival (median 16.7 versus 32.9 months, P = 0.02) than those with lower H-scores. (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.12–4.69; P = 0.023)
[6] array · 5 items
[0]
CD44 & PROM1
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
27,748,881
[3]
47
[4]
Patients with strong expression of CD44 or CD133 and those with a high ratio of CD133-positive tumor cells showed significantly poor prognosis regardless of the effect of chemotherapy. PROM1 (HR 5.05, 95% CI 1.12–4.69; P = 0.023)
[7] array · 5 items
[0]
CDKN2A
[1]
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
[2]
26,514,506
[3]
101
[4]
ESCC tumors that were found positive for p16 expression appeared to fall into responders group rather than non responders (P = 0.008) and reported with less mortality (P = 0.048).
[8] array · 5 items
[0]
CEA & KRT19
[1]
Chemoradiotherapy
[2]
19,863,186
[3]
84
[4]
CEA may be helpful in predicting the responsiveness in ESCC of primary lesions to CRT, with the effective rates (CR + PR) in CEA high and low groups of 58.3% (14/24) and 93.3% (56/60), respectively (P = 0.013 and 0.013).
[9] array · 5 items
[0]
EGFR
[1]
Chemoradiotherapy
[2]
17,940,077
[3]
62
[4]
The difference in the CR rate between EGFR positive and -negative groups was significant (CR rate: 62% vs. 34%; P = 0.037).
[10] array · 5 items
[0]
CRP
[1]
Chemoradiotherapy
[2]
21,224,533
[3]
36
[4]
Serum CRP can predict of CRT response with an accuracy of 75%.
[11] array · 5 items
[0]
ERCC1
[1]
Chemotherapy
[2]
23,263,828
[3]
46
[4]
Patients with ERCC1 negative tumors had a higher treatment response than the ERCC1 positive group (radiological response rates; 92.3% vs.50%, P = 0.013).
[12] array · 5 items
[0]
FAM84B
[1]
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation
[2]
25,980,316
[3]
21
[4]
The fold-change of circulating FAM84B mRNA expression can predict the pCR with an AUC of 0.73.
[13] array · 5 items
[0]
FDXR
[1]
Prognosis and Neoadjuvant chemoradiation
[2]
26,637,858
[3]
50
[4]
Fdxr was significantly correlated with postoperative outcomes and an independent prognostic factor (HR 4.950, 95% CI 1.603–15.38; 0.012).
[14] array · 5 items
[0]
HOXC6 & HOXC8
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
24,525,058
[3]
274
[4]
HOXC6 and HOXC8 were independent prognostic factors in patients with ESCC. HOXC6: (HR 1.341, 95% CI 0.895–2.010; P = 0.045); HOXC8: (HR 1.657, 95% CI 1.146–2.395; P = 0.007).
[15] array · 5 items
[0]
IL6R
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
23,648,090
[3]
218
[4]
The sIL6R level was one of several significant independent predictors of an unfavorable outcome. (HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.34–7.53; P = 0.008)
[16] array · 5 items
[0]
MDM2 & MKI67
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
25,880,782
[3]
79
[4]
MDM2 and p16 are predictive markers for chemoradioresistance in cStageIII ESCC and Ki-67 is a prognostic marker following dCRT in cStageIII ESCC.
[17] array · 5 items
[0]
MLH1
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
18,053,639
[3]
51
[4]
The expression of hMLH1 is a potential marker of tumor response and survival.
[18] array · 5 items
[0]
MMS19
[1]
Chemoradiotherapy
[2]
25,892,874
[3]
103
[4]
High cytoplasmic MMS19 expression was associated with a good response to chemoradiotherapy (OR 11.5, 95% CI: 3.0–44.5; P < 0.001).
[19] array · 5 items
[0]
MT3
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
16,351,731
[3]
64
[4]
Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas with negative p53, positive CDC25B, and negative MT expressions respond well to CRT.
[20] array · 5 items
[0]
MUC13 & MUC20
[1]
Prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy
[2]
26,323,930
[3]
186
[4]
The median survival time of patients with low MUC13/high MUC20 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high MUC13/low MUC20 expression (27.7 months vs. 59.5 months, P = 0.021; HR 0.531, 95% CI: 0.299–0.944; P = 0.031).
[21] array · 5 items
[0]
MUC4
[1]
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
[2]
26,673,820
[3]
186
[4]
Low expression of MUC4 and MUC20 in resection samples was significantly correlated with better TRG (tumor regression grade). MUC4 and MUC20 were identified as potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ESCC patients.
[22] array · 5 items
[0]
NOTCH1 & PIK3CA
[1]
Prognosis and Chemotherapy
[2]
26,528,858
[3]
104
[4]
NOTCH1 mutations was correlated with shorter survival times and failed to respond to chemotherapy, whereas PIK3CA mutations pointed to better responses to chemotherapy and longer survival times than patients without PIK3CA mutations.
[23] array · 5 items
[0]
PTGS2
[1]
Prognosis and Chemoradiotherapy
[2]
21,437,756
[3]
58
[4]
Negative or weak expression of PTGS2 was correlated significantly with CRT response (OR 6.296, 95% CI 1.58–25.096; P = 0.010).
[24] array · 5 items
[0]
PTPN6
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
32,536,826
[3]
184
[4]
Elevated PTPN6 expression indicated longer OS (HR 1.123, 95% CI: 0.565–2.230; P = 0.741).
[25] array · 5 items
[0]
RAD51
[1]
Prognosis and recurrence
[2]
24,065,387
[3]
89
[4]
Rad51 expression in ESCC was associated with poor survival (P = 0.0324) and recurrence (P = 0.0171).
[26] array · 5 items
[0]
REG1A
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
23,645,481
[3]
177
[4]
REG1A expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 3.095, 95% CI: 1.569–5.943; P = 0.0015).
[27] array · 5 items
[0]
SFN
[1]
Chemoradiation therapy
[2]
15,999,354
[3]
62
[4]
SFN-positive expressions were closely related to the response to CRT.
[28] array · 4 items
[0]
Prognosis
[1]
24,743,601
[2]
278
[3]
Downregulation of 14–3-3σpredicts poor survival, suggesting that 14–3-3σmay be a biomarker for early detection of high-risk subjects and diagnosis of ESCC. (HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.251–0.866; P = 0.016).
[29] array · 4 items
[0]
Prognosis
[1]
20,108,042
[2]
148
[3]
Reduced stratifin expression, T4 stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were independent risk factors for worse prognosis in ESCC patients.
[30] array · 5 items
[0]
SGTA
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
23,939,810
[3]
120
[4]
SGTA expression indicated poor prognosis (RR 3.513, 95% CI: 2.161–9.791; P = 0.016).
[31] array · 5 items
[0]
TGFB1 & VEGFA
[1]
Prognosis
[2]
24,623,035
[3]
79
[4]
VEGFA and TGFB1 were significantly associated with pathological response and/or DFS, and may be used to predict pathological response and survivals for ESCC patients receiving combined modality therapy.
[32] array · 5 items
[0]
TP53 & RRM2B
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
15,655,547
[3]
62
[4]
p53 or p53R2 (RRM2B) expression was correlated with a favorable response to CRT (P = 0.0001 or 0.041 clinical, P = 0.016 or 0.0018 histological, respectively; TP53, RR 2.688, 95% CI: 1.157–6.250; P = 0.0011. RRM2B, RR 2.469, 95% CI: 1.164–5.235; P = 0.0057).
[33] array · 4 items
[0]
Prognosis
[1]
25,135,238
[2]
36
[3]
The median tumor associated survival was 34.2 months for patients with normal TP53, compared with 8.9 months for those with mutant TP53. The latter had a 3-fold higher risk of death (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.359–6.86; P = 0.005).
[34] array · 4 items
[0]
Prognosis
[1]
10,414,702
[2]
42
[3]
The current study indicated that p53 mutation of tumor tissues might be a prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases and one of the risk factors for its recurrence.
[35] array · 4 items
[0]
Chemotherapy
[1]
19,941,080
[2]
97
[3]
Patients with mutations in p53 therefore showed significantly poorer prognosis than those without mutant p53.
[36] array · 5 items
[0]
RAC3 & TRAM1
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
19,552,757
[3]
98
[4]
Overexpression of AIB1/RAC3/ TRAM1 is a useful predictor of CRT resistance and an independent molecular marker of poor prognosis for ESCC patients.
[37] array · 5 items
[0]
ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH1L1, ALDH1L2
[1]
Prognosis and recurrence
[2]
22,847,125
[3]
152
[4]
ALDH1 was a predictor of postoperative recurrence and prognosis in ESCC, and CD44 might be a predictor of recurrence and prognosis.
[38] array · 5 items
[0]
PITX2
[1]
Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy
[2]
23,132,660
[3]
454
[4]
High expression of PITX2 was associated with poor disease-specific survival (HR 1.732, 95% CI 1.133–2.646; P = 0.011) in ESCC.
locator
section[13]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1
[3] object · 16 fields
id
asset:table:pmid:34372798:2
role
table
format
jats-table
media_type
application/vnd.jats.table+json
uri
null
sha256
sha256:dcbaf7bb4d3876419e4ac99adfd6e21caceb3ca5cf42354a1a2ed2ae3aaddbbc
bytes
528
access
open
state
verified
reader
read_table
reader_status
available
identifier
section[15]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
version
null
note
The top 5 important molecules identified by each machine learning algorithm
structure object · 5 fields
pmcid
PMC8351329
section_index
15
section_title
Prognostic classification using 5 machine learning algorithms
row_count
7
column_count
6
table object · 8 fields
label
Table 2
caption
The top 5 important molecules identified by each machine learning algorithm
rows array · 7 items
[0] array · 3 items
[0]
Moleculerank
[1]
Weak classifiers
[2]
Strong classifiers
[1] array · 5 items
[0]
LR
[1]
SVM
[2]
ANN
[3]
RF
[4]
XGBoost
[2] array · 6 items
[0]
1
[1]
CD44
[2]
CD44
[3]
SFN
[4]
SFN
[5]
SFN
[3] array · 6 items
[0]
2
[1]
RAC3
[2]
TRAM1
[3]
CCND1
[4]
PTGS2
[5]
PIK3CA
[4] array · 6 items
[0]
3
[1]
TP53
[2]
SFN
[3]
CD44
[4]
MDM2
[5]
CD44
[5] array · 6 items
[0]
4
[1]
EGFR
[2]
PTGS2
[3]
PTGS2
[4]
PIK3CA
[5]
VEGFA
[6] array · 6 items
[0]
5
[1]
SFN
[2]
VEGFA
[3]
MDM2
[4]
RAC3
[5]
PTGS2
locator
section[15]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE53625 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE53625 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
partial
methods array · 8 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
group_comparison
specific
student_t_test
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
student_t
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Student t-test
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
machine_learning
specific
random_forest
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 0 items
missing_operations array · 1 item
[0]
machine_learning_random_forest
expressible
false
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
random forest
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
machine_learning
specific
support_vector_machine
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
support vector machine
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
machine_learning
specific
gradient_boosting
label
Machine learning
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
train_classifier
[1]
cross_validate
[2]
roc_auc
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
labelled_feature_matrix
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
XGBoost
[6] object · 10 fields
id
method-7
family
regression_modelling
specific
ols
label
Regression modelling
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
ols_fit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictors_and_outcome
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
linear regression
[7] object · 10 fields
id
method-8
family
diagnostic_evaluation
specific
roc
label
Diagnostic test evaluation
dsl_operations array · 6 items
[0]
confusion_counts
[1]
roc_curve
[2]
sensitivity_specificity
[3]
solve_confusion_matrix
[4]
classification_metrics
[5]
published_precision_envelope
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
reference_standard_and_test
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
ROC curve
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE53625
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE53625
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.
basis
The paper names GSE53625 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
assets array · 4 items
[0]
source:pmid:34372798
[1]
data:geo:GSE53625
[2]
asset:table:pmid:34372798:1
[3]
asset:table:pmid:34372798:2
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE53625
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-10-31T18:33:33Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
3
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
33410
completion_tokens
1456
cached_tokens
776
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34372798
type
paper
label
pmid:34372798
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34372798
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34372798 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE53625
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE53625
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34372798
type
paper
label
pmid:34372798
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34372798
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34372798 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE53625
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE53625
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-34372798
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34372798
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE53625
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE53625
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:34372798
parent_hash
sha256:2a0570ed67a6f9c16bda0b77d9f53380f0b4a06617fb7a5e68ddb181b24cac6c
fork_of
null
gaps array · 7 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE53625 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE53625 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
method.reader_differs_from_extractor
[4]
review.human_critique
[5]
review.independent_reader
[6]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
western_blot
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.93
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
t. The relationship between the abundance of western blot and the expression level of SFN was analyzed
order_basis
paper_text_order:2819
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34372798", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 8, "content_hash": "sha256:5a5778ef1deb8e35c69616980ef5408e3952e3ca225a168b3836ecc5593fa571", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:47Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:47:18Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Using a machine learning approach to identify key prognostic molecules for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.", "doi": "10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1", "pmid": "34372798", "authors": ["Meng-Xiang Li", "Xiao-Meng Sun", "Wei-Gang Cheng", "Hao-Jie Ruan", "Ke Liu", "Pan Chen", "Hai-Jun Xu", "She-Gan Gao", "Xiao-Shan Feng", "Yi-Jun Qi"], "journal": "BMC cancer", "year": 2021, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: A plethora of prognostic biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) that have hitherto been reported are challenged with low reproducibility due to high molecular heterogeneity of ESCC. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal biomarkers for ESCC using machine learning algorithms.\nMETHODS: Biomarkers related to clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic response of patients with ESCC were determined through literature database searching. Forty-eight biomarkers linked to recurrence or prognosis of ESCC were used to construct a molecular interaction network based on NetBox and then to identify the functional modules. Publicably available mRNA transcriptome data of ESCC downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets included GSE53625 and TCGA-ESCC. Five machine learning algorithms, including logical regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF) and XGBoost, were used to develop classifiers for prognostic classification for feature selection. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the prognostic classifiers. The importances of identified molecules were ranked by their occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.\nRESULTS: A total of 48 clinically proven molecules associated with ESCC progression were used to construct a molecular interaction network with 3 functional modules comprising 17 component molecules. The 131,071 prognostic classifiers using these 17 molecules were built for each machine learning algorithm. Using the occurrence frequencies in the prognostic classifiers with AUCs greater than the mean value of all 131,071 AUCs to rank importances of these 17 molecules, stratifin encoded by SFN was identified as the optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC, whose performance was further validated in another 2 independent cohorts.\nCONCLUSION: The occurrence frequencies across various feature selection approaches reflect the degree of clinical importance and stratifin is an optimal prognostic biomarker for ESCC.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34372798", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34372798", "locator": "sections[24] \"Availability of data and materials\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34372798"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE53625"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE53625"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34372798", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1", "sha256": "sha256:a71008efbf5729c6b73d3520fffad9111ec13b952e86229413e8de407ed892e1", "bytes": 41500, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.1186/s12885-021-08647-1", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8351329", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE53625", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE53625", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE53625", "version": null, "note": "The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1296956", "GSM1296957", "GSM1296958", "GSM1296959", "GSM1296960", "GSM1296961", "GSM1296962", "GSM1296963", "GSM1296964", "GSM1296965", "GSM1296966", "GSM1296967", "GSM1296968", "GSM1296969", "GSM1296970", "GSM1296971", "GSM1296972", "GSM1296973", "GSM1296974", "GSM1296975", "GSM1296976", "GSM1296977", "GSM1296978", "GSM1296979", "GSM1296980", "GSM1296981", "GSM1296982", "GSM1296983", "GSM1296984", "GSM1296985", "GSM1296986", "GSM1296987", "GSM1296988", "GSM1296989", "GSM1296990", "GSM1296991", "GSM1296992", "GSM1296993", "GSM1296994", "GSM1296995", "GSM1296996", "GSM1296997", "GSM1296998", "GSM1296999", "GSM1297000", "GSM1297001", "GSM1297002", "GSM1297003", "GSM1297004", "GSM1297005", "GSM1297006", "GSM1297007", "GSM1297008", "GSM1297009", "GSM1297010", "GSM1297011", "GSM1297012", "GSM1297013", "GSM1297014", "GSM1297015", "GSM1297016", "GSM1297017", "GSM1297018", "GSM1297019", "GSM1297020", "GSM1297021", "GSM1297022", "GSM1297023", "GSM1297024", "GSM1297025", "GSM1297026", "GSM1297027", "GSM1297028", "GSM1297029", "GSM1297030", "GSM1297031", "GSM1297032", "GSM1297033", "GSM1297034", "GSM1297035", "GSM1297036", "GSM1297037", "GSM1297038", "GSM1297039", "GSM1297040", "GSM1297041", "GSM1297042", "GSM1297043", "GSM1297044", "GSM1297045", "GSM1297046", "GSM1297047", "GSM1297048", "GSM1297049", "GSM1297050", "GSM1297051", "GSM1297052", "GSM1297053", "GSM1297054", "GSM1297055", "GSM1297056", "GSM1297057", "GSM1297058", "GSM1297059", "GSM1297060", "GSM1297061", "GSM1297062", "GSM1297063", "GSM1297064", "GSM1297065", "GSM1297066", "GSM1297067", "GSM1297068", "GSM1297069", "GSM1297070", "GSM1297071", "GSM1297072", "GSM1297073", "GSM1297074", "GSM1297075", "GSM1297076", "GSM1297077", "GSM1297078", "GSM1297079", "GSM1297080", "GSM1297081", "GSM1297082", "GSM1297083", "GSM1297084", "GSM1297085", "GSM1297086", "GSM1297087", "GSM1297088", "GSM1297089", "GSM1297090", "GSM1297091", "GSM1297092", "GSM1297093", "GSM1297094", "GSM1297095", "GSM1297096", "GSM1297097", "GSM1297098", "GSM1297099", "GSM1297100", "GSM1297101", "GSM1297102", "GSM1297103", "GSM1297104", "GSM1297105", "GSM1297106", "GSM1297107", "GSM1297108", "GSM1297109", "GSM1297110", "GSM1297111", "GSM1297112", "GSM1297113", "GSM1297114", "GSM1297115", "GSM1297116", "GSM1297117", "GSM1297118", "GSM1297119", "GSM1297120", "GSM1297121", "GSM1297122", "GSM1297123", "GSM1297124", "GSM1297125", "GSM1297126", "GSM1297127", "GSM1297128", "GSM1297129", "GSM1297130", "GSM1297131", "GSM1297132", "GSM1297133", "GSM1297134", "GSM1297135", "GSM1297136", "GSM1297137", "GSM1297138", "GSM1297139", "GSM1297140", "GSM1297141", "GSM1297142", "GSM1297143", "GSM1297144", "GSM1297145", "GSM1297146", "GSM1297147", "GSM1297148", "GSM1297149", "GSM1297150", "GSM1297151", "GSM1297152", "GSM1297153", "GSM1297154", "GSM1297155", "GSM1297156", "GSM1297157", "GSM1297158", "GSM1297159", "GSM1297160", "GSM1297161", "GSM1297162", "GSM1297163", "GSM1297164", "GSM1297165", "GSM1297166", "GSM1297167", "GSM1297168", "GSM1297169", "GSM1297170", "GSM1297171", "GSM1297172", "GSM1297173", "GSM1297174", "GSM1297175", "GSM1297176", "GSM1297177", "GSM1297178", "GSM1297179", "GSM1297180", "GSM1297181", "GSM1297182", "GSM1297183", "GSM1297184", "GSM1297185", "GSM1297186", "GSM1297187", "GSM1297188", "GSM1297189", "GSM1297190", "GSM1297191", "GSM1297192", "GSM1297193", "GSM1297194", "GSM1297195", "GSM1297196", "GSM1297197", "GSM1297198", "GSM1297199", "GSM1297200", "GSM1297201", "GSM1297202", "GSM1297203", "GSM1297204", "GSM1297205", "GSM1297206", "GSM1297207", "GSM1297208", "GSM1297209", "GSM1297210", "GSM1297211", "GSM1297212", "GSM1297213", "GSM1297214", "GSM1297215", "GSM1297216", "GSM1297217", "GSM1297218", "GSM1297219", "GSM1297220", "GSM1297221", "GSM1297222", "GSM1297223", "GSM1297224", "GSM1297225", "GSM1297226", "GSM1297227", "GSM1297228", "GSM1297229", "GSM1297230", "GSM1297231", "GSM1297232", "GSM1297233", "GSM1297234", "GSM1297235", "GSM1297236", "GSM1297237", "GSM1297238", "GSM1297239", "GSM1297240", "GSM1297241", "GSM1297242", "GSM1297243", "GSM1297244", "GSM1297245", "GSM1297246", "GSM1297247", "GSM1297248", "GSM1297249", "GSM1297250", "GSM1297251", "GSM1297252", "GSM1297253", "GSM1297254", "GSM1297255", "GSM1297256", "GSM1297257", "GSM1297258", "GSM1297259", "GSM1297260", "GSM1297261", "GSM1297262", "GSM1297263", "GSM1297264", "GSM1297265", "GSM1297266", "GSM1297267", "GSM1297268", "GSM1297269", "GSM1297270", "GSM1297271", "GSM1297272", "GSM1297273", "GSM1297274", "GSM1297275", "GSM1297276", "GSM1297277", "GSM1297278", "GSM1297279", "GSM1297280", "GSM1297281", "GSM1297282", "GSM1297283", "GSM1297284", "GSM1297285", "GSM1297286", "GSM1297287", "GSM1297288", "GSM1297289", "GSM1297290", "GSM1297291", "GSM1297292", "GSM1297293", "GSM1297294", "GSM1297295", "GSM1297296", "GSM1297297", "GSM1297298", "GSM1297299", "GSM1297300", "GSM1297301", "GSM1297302", "GSM1297303", "GSM1297304", "GSM1297305", "GSM1297306", "GSM1297307", "GSM1297308", "GSM1297309", "GSM1297310", "GSM1297311", "GSM1297312", "GSM1297313"], "sample_count": 358, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "18109", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "LncRNA profile study reveals a three-lncRNA signature associated with the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34372798:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:a2620f7c578ad22dd99ed5cd6398f39dc51ffab72cc02da86cba6883cab25c84", "bytes": 8414, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1", "version": null, "note": "Thirty-eight studies reporting 48 molecules that were associated with clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic outcome of ESCC patients", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8351329", "section_index": 13, "section_title": "Prognostic biomarkers of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma", "row_count": 39, "column_count": 5}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Thirty-eight studies reporting 48 molecules that were associated with clinical survival, recurrence or therapeutic outcome of ESCC patients", "rows": [["Biomarkers", "Prognosis/recurrence/therapeutic outcome", "PMID", "Sample sizes", "Conclusions"], ["BRCA1", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "23,326,344", "144", "Low BRCA1 expression was an independent prognostic factor in cisplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.71; P = 0.007) or chemoradiotherapy (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.37; P < 0.001) group."], ["CCNA2", "Chemotherapy", "23,205,070", "48", "The expression of cyclin A was an independent prognosis factor in patients with ESCC following paclitaxel-based chemotherapy."], ["CCND1", "Prognosis and radiochemotherapy", "9,988,238", "172", "Patients with cyclin D1-positive carcinomas showed significantly worse overall survival than patients with cyclin D1-negative carcinomas (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.134–3.42; P = 0.0038)"], ["CD163 & CD68", "Prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "25,752,960", "210", "High infiltration of CD68+ macrophages and CD163+ macrophages was significantly associated with poor prognosis for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.057, P = 0.003)."], ["CD274", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "26,623,522", "45", "The higher PD-L1 H-scores had poorer overall survival (median 16.7 versus 32.9 months, P = 0.02) than those with lower H-scores. (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.12–4.69; P = 0.023)"], ["CD44 & PROM1", "Prognosis", "27,748,881", "47", "Patients with strong expression of CD44 or CD133 and those with a high ratio of CD133-positive tumor cells showed significantly poor prognosis regardless of the effect of chemotherapy. PROM1 (HR 5.05, 95% CI 1.12–4.69; P = 0.023)"], ["CDKN2A", "neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "26,514,506", "101", "ESCC tumors that were found positive for p16 expression appeared to fall into responders group rather than non responders (P = 0.008) and reported with less mortality (P = 0.048)."], ["CEA & KRT19", "Chemoradiotherapy", "19,863,186", "84", "CEA may be helpful in predicting the responsiveness in ESCC of primary lesions to CRT, with the effective rates (CR + PR) in CEA high and low groups of 58.3% (14/24) and 93.3% (56/60), respectively (P = 0.013 and 0.013)."], ["EGFR", "Chemoradiotherapy", "17,940,077", "62", "The difference in the CR rate between EGFR positive and -negative groups was significant (CR rate: 62% vs. 34%; P = 0.037)."], ["CRP", "Chemoradiotherapy", "21,224,533", "36", "Serum CRP can predict of CRT response with an accuracy of 75%."], ["ERCC1", "Chemotherapy", "23,263,828", "46", "Patients with ERCC1 negative tumors had a higher treatment response than the ERCC1 positive group (radiological response rates; 92.3% vs.50%, P = 0.013)."], ["FAM84B", "Neoadjuvant chemoradiation", "25,980,316", "21", "The fold-change of circulating FAM84B mRNA expression can predict the pCR with an AUC of 0.73."], ["FDXR", "Prognosis and Neoadjuvant chemoradiation", "26,637,858", "50", "Fdxr was significantly correlated with postoperative outcomes and an independent prognostic factor (HR 4.950, 95% CI 1.603–15.38; 0.012)."], ["HOXC6 & HOXC8", "Prognosis", "24,525,058", "274", "HOXC6 and HOXC8 were independent prognostic factors in patients with ESCC. HOXC6: (HR 1.341, 95% CI 0.895–2.010; P = 0.045); HOXC8: (HR 1.657, 95% CI 1.146–2.395; P = 0.007)."], ["IL6R", "Prognosis", "23,648,090", "218", "The sIL6R level was one of several significant independent predictors of an unfavorable outcome. (HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.34–7.53; P = 0.008)"], ["MDM2 & MKI67", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "25,880,782", "79", "MDM2 and p16 are predictive markers for chemoradioresistance in cStageIII ESCC and Ki-67 is a prognostic marker following dCRT in cStageIII ESCC."], ["MLH1", "Prognosis", "18,053,639", "51", "The expression of hMLH1 is a potential marker of tumor response and survival."], ["MMS19", "Chemoradiotherapy", "25,892,874", "103", "High cytoplasmic MMS19 expression was associated with a good response to chemoradiotherapy (OR 11.5, 95% CI: 3.0–44.5; P < 0.001)."], ["MT3", "Prognosis", "16,351,731", "64", "Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas with negative p53, positive CDC25B, and negative MT expressions respond well to CRT."], ["MUC13 & MUC20", "Prognosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "26,323,930", "186", "The median survival time of patients with low MUC13/high MUC20 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high MUC13/low MUC20 expression (27.7 months vs. 59.5 months, P = 0.021; HR 0.531, 95% CI: 0.299–0.944; P = 0.031)."], ["MUC4", "neoadjuvant chemotherapy", "26,673,820", "186", "Low expression of MUC4 and MUC20 in resection samples was significantly correlated with better TRG (tumor regression grade). MUC4 and MUC20 were identified as potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ESCC patients."], ["NOTCH1 & PIK3CA", "Prognosis and Chemotherapy", "26,528,858", "104", "NOTCH1 mutations was correlated with shorter survival times and failed to respond to chemotherapy, whereas PIK3CA mutations pointed to better responses to chemotherapy and longer survival times than patients without PIK3CA mutations."], ["PTGS2", "Prognosis and Chemoradiotherapy", "21,437,756", "58", "Negative or weak expression of PTGS2 was correlated significantly with CRT response (OR 6.296, 95% CI 1.58–25.096; P = 0.010)."], ["PTPN6", "Prognosis", "32,536,826", "184", "Elevated PTPN6 expression indicated longer OS (HR 1.123, 95% CI: 0.565–2.230; P = 0.741)."], ["RAD51", "Prognosis and recurrence", "24,065,387", "89", "Rad51 expression in ESCC was associated with poor survival (P = 0.0324) and recurrence (P = 0.0171)."], ["REG1A", "Prognosis", "23,645,481", "177", "REG1A expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 3.095, 95% CI: 1.569–5.943; P = 0.0015)."], ["SFN", "Chemoradiation therapy", "15,999,354", "62", "SFN-positive expressions were closely related to the response to CRT."], ["Prognosis", "24,743,601", "278", "Downregulation of 14–3-3σpredicts poor survival, suggesting that 14–3-3σmay be a biomarker for early detection of high-risk subjects and diagnosis of ESCC. (HR 0.466, 95% CI 0.251–0.866; P = 0.016)."], ["Prognosis", "20,108,042", "148", "Reduced stratifin expression, T4 stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were independent risk factors for worse prognosis in ESCC patients."], ["SGTA", "Prognosis", "23,939,810", "120", "SGTA expression indicated poor prognosis (RR 3.513, 95% CI: 2.161–9.791; P = 0.016)."], ["TGFB1 & VEGFA", "Prognosis", "24,623,035", "79", "VEGFA and TGFB1 were significantly associated with pathological response and/or DFS, and may be used to predict pathological response and survivals for ESCC patients receiving combined modality therapy."], ["TP53 & RRM2B", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "15,655,547", "62", "p53 or p53R2 (RRM2B) expression was correlated with a favorable response to CRT (P = 0.0001 or 0.041 clinical, P = 0.016 or 0.0018 histological, respectively; TP53, RR 2.688, 95% CI: 1.157–6.250; P = 0.0011. RRM2B, RR 2.469, 95% CI: 1.164–5.235; P = 0.0057)."], ["Prognosis", "25,135,238", "36", "The median tumor associated survival was 34.2 months for patients with normal TP53, compared with 8.9 months for those with mutant TP53. The latter had a 3-fold higher risk of death (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.359–6.86; P = 0.005)."], ["Prognosis", "10,414,702", "42", "The current study indicated that p53 mutation of tumor tissues might be a prognostic factor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases and one of the risk factors for its recurrence."], ["Chemotherapy", "19,941,080", "97", "Patients with mutations in p53 therefore showed significantly poorer prognosis than those without mutant p53."], ["RAC3 & TRAM1", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "19,552,757", "98", "Overexpression of AIB1/RAC3/ TRAM1 is a useful predictor of CRT resistance and an independent molecular marker of poor prognosis for ESCC patients."], ["ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1B1, ALDH1L1, ALDH1L2", "Prognosis and recurrence", "22,847,125", "152", "ALDH1 was a predictor of postoperative recurrence and prognosis in ESCC, and CD44 might be a predictor of recurrence and prognosis."], ["PITX2", "Prognosis and chemoradiotherapy", "23,132,660", "454", "High expression of PITX2 was associated with poor disease-specific survival (HR 1.732, 95% CI 1.133–2.646; P = 0.011) in ESCC."]], "row_count": 39, "column_count": 5, "numeric_cells": 117, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[13]/table-wrap[1]#Tab1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34372798:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:dcbaf7bb4d3876419e4ac99adfd6e21caceb3ca5cf42354a1a2ed2ae3aaddbbc", "bytes": 528, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2", "version": null, "note": "The top 5 important molecules identified by each machine learning algorithm", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8351329", "section_index": 15, "section_title": "Prognostic classification using 5 machine learning algorithms", "row_count": 7, "column_count": 6}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "The top 5 important molecules identified by each machine learning algorithm", "rows": [["Moleculerank", "Weak classifiers", "Strong classifiers"], ["LR", "SVM", "ANN", "RF", "XGBoost"], ["1", "CD44", "CD44", "SFN", "SFN", "SFN"], ["2", "RAC3", "TRAM1", "CCND1", "PTGS2", "PIK3CA"], ["3", "TP53", "SFN", "CD44", "MDM2", "CD44"], ["4", "EGFR", "PTGS2", "PTGS2", "PIK3CA", "VEGFA"], ["5", "SFN", "VEGFA", "MDM2", "RAC3", "PTGS2"]], "row_count": 7, "column_count": 6, "numeric_cells": 10, "header_rows": 2, "locator": "section[15]/table-wrap[1]#Tab2"}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE53625 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE53625 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "partial", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "student_t_test", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["student_t"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Student t-test"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "random_forest", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": [], "missing_operations": ["machine_learning_random_forest"], "expressible": false, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "random forest"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "support_vector_machine", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "support vector machine"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "machine_learning", "specific": "gradient_boosting", "label": "Machine learning", "dsl_operations": ["train_classifier", "cross_validate", "roc_auc"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["labelled_feature_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "XGBoost"}}, {"id": "method-7", "family": "regression_modelling", "specific": "ols", "label": "Regression modelling", "dsl_operations": ["ols_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictors_and_outcome"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "linear regression"}}, {"id": "method-8", "family": "diagnostic_evaluation", "specific": "roc", "label": "Diagnostic test evaluation", "dsl_operations": ["confusion_counts", "roc_curve", "sensitivity_specificity", "solve_confusion_matrix", "classification_metrics", "published_precision_envelope"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["reference_standard_and_test"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "ROC curve"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": ["method.reader_differs_from_extractor"]}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE53625"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE53625"], "statements": ["The data sets of GSE53625 from GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and 37 ESCC cases with Asian ancestry from TCGA (UCSC Xena, https://xena.ucsc.edu/) are public open and available."], "basis": "The paper names GSE53625 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34372798", "data:geo:GSE53625", "asset:table:pmid:34372798:1", "asset:table:pmid:34372798:2"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE53625"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T18:33:33Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 33410, "completion_tokens": 1456, "cached_tokens": 776}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34372798", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34372798"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34372798", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34372798 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE53625", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE53625"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34372798", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34372798"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34372798", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34372798 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE53625", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE53625"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34372798", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34372798"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE53625", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE53625"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34372798", "parent_hash": "sha256:2a0570ed67a6f9c16bda0b77d9f53380f0b4a06617fb7a5e68ddb181b24cac6c", "fork_of": null, "generation": 7}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE53625 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE53625 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "method.reader_differs_from_extractor", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "western_blot", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.93, "evidence": ["t. The relationship between the abundance of western blot and the expression level of SFN was analyzed"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:2819", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the statistical significance of overall survival."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}