← All .science files
pmid:34395507
A Comparative Analysis of the Gene Expression Profiles of Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Esophageal Adeno/Squamous Carcinoma.
Di Liu · Junmiao Wen · Jiayan Chen · Boyan Wang · Xinyan Xu · Zhen Zhang · Min Fan
Frontiers in surgery · 2021 doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.655159
Paper
complete
Experiment
partial
Data
partial
Analysis
complete
Execution
absent
Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
paper object · 10 fields
authors array · 7 items
claims array · 2 items
[0] object · 6 fields
[1] object · 6 fields
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 0 items
outputs array · 1 item
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 1 item
data object · 3 fields
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
structure object · 4 fields
[1] object · 16 fields
structure object · 5 fields
table object · 8 fields
rows array · 19 items
[0] array · 7 items
[1] array · 7 items
[2] array · 7 items
[3] array · 7 items
[4] array · 7 items
[5] array · 7 items
[6] array · 7 items
[7] array · 7 items
[8] array · 7 items
[9] array · 7 items
[10] array · 7 items
[11] array · 7 items
[12] array · 7 items
[13] array · 7 items
[14] array · 7 items
[15] array · 7 items
[16] array · 7 items
[17] array · 7 items
[18] array · 7 items
[2] object · 16 fields
structure object · 5 fields
table object · 8 fields
rows array · 26 items
[0] array · 4 items
[1] array · 4 items
[2] array · 4 items
[3] array · 4 items
[4] array · 4 items
[5] array · 4 items
[6] array · 4 items
[7] array · 4 items
[8] array · 4 items
[9] array · 4 items
[10] array · 4 items
[11] array · 4 items
[12] array · 4 items
[13] array · 4 items
[14] array · 4 items
[15] array · 4 items
[16] array · 4 items
[17] array · 4 items
[18] array · 4 items
[19] array · 4 items
[20] array · 4 items
[21] array · 4 items
[22] array · 4 items
[23] array · 4 items
[24] array · 4 items
[25] array · 4 items
gaps array · 0 items
analysis object · 4 fields
methods array · 4 items
[0] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[1] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[2] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[3] object · 10 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
assay_families array · 9 items
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
missing_operations array · 0 items
capability object · 4 fields
data object · 6 fields
accessions array · 0 items
resolved_accessions array · 0 items
statements array · 1 item
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
assets array · 3 items
steps array · 1 item
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
gaps array · 1 item
review object · 5 fields
machine_critique object · 5 fields
reader object · 5 fields
evidence_check object · 2 fields
usage object · 3 fields
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
gaps array · 3 items
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 3 fields
[2] object · 3 fields
[1] object · 4 fields
agents array · 2 items
lineage object · 4 fields
gaps array · 5 items
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 0 items
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
[1] object · 11 fields
required_operations array · 1 item
source_hashes object · 1 field
evidence array · 1 item
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34395507", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:a779f7d6d70e84ea11cc10be1d76ad2309d9441466570b4654218188a46d0be0", "created_at": "2026-11-01T15:41:48Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T21:26:01Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "A Comparative Analysis of the Gene Expression Profiles of Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Esophageal Adeno/Squamous Carcinoma.", "doi": "10.3389/fsurg.2021.655159", "pmid": "34395507", "authors": ["Di Liu", "Junmiao Wen", "Jiayan Chen", "Boyan Wang", "Xinyan Xu", "Zhen Zhang", "Min Fan"], "journal": "Frontiers in surgery", "year": 2021, "abstract": "Purpose/objectives: Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare malignancy without an established treatment strategy. This study investigated the gene expression profile of SCEC and compared it with the expression profiles of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and esophageal adeno/squamous carcinoma (EAC/ESCC). Materials/methods: All patients with SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 1973-2014 were included. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic analysis were conducted. De novo expression array analysis was performed on three pairs of frozen primary SCEC tissues and the corresponding normal samples from the institutional tissue bank using the Affymetrix HG U133 plus 2.0 Array. These data were complemented with public domain expression data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository using the same working platforms, which included primary SCLC, EAC/ESCC, and normal lung/esophagus specimens (series GSE30219 and GSE26886). After individual normalization, the primary tumors were submitted to statistical analysis (GeneSpring GX 13.0) to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) relative to their paired normal tissues. Enrichments of genes categorized by function and gene interactions were analyzed by DAVID 6.8 and STRING 11.0, respectively. Results: The clinical outcomes of the patients with SCEC were significantly more worse than those with EAC/ESCC and SCLC in the SEER database. SCEC had more DEGs in common with SCLC than EAC/ESCC [829 vs. 450; false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01; and fold change ≥2], leading to a stronger correlation between SCEC and SCLC (Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.60 for SCEC vs. SCLC, 0.51 or 0.45 for SCEC vs. ESCC or EAC, and the coefficient was 0.73 for ESCC vs. EAC). Similar findings were obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) using all DEGs retrieved from these four groups. Functional annotation showed that a higher proportion of pathways and biological processes were common between SCEC and SCLC and were associated with the cell cycle (mitosis), DNA replication, telomere maintenance, DNA repair, and P53 and RB pathways (Benjamini p < 0.05). Compared with EAC/ESCC, SCEC shared more co-upregulated DEGs coding for the aforementioned common pathways with SCLC (584 vs. 155). In addition, SCEC and SCLC were found to have possessed overlapping gene-interactive networks, with centromere protein F (CENPF), never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 ( NEK2), kinesin family member 11 (KIF11), thymopoietin (TMPO), and forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) as common skeletons centered by gene regulatory network (NUF2). Conclusions: This study is the first attempt to examine the genomic signatures of SCEC at the transcriptomic level and compare the expression profiles between SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC. Our preliminary data indicate that SCEC and SCLC display notably similar patterns of gene expression for mitosis and DNA repair. Further validation studies are warranted.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank testing were conducted to compare the OS among these specific histological types, and the results are shown in Figure 1.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34395507", "locator": "sections[9] \"SEER Data of SCEC as Compared to SCLC and EAC/ESCC\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank testing were conducted to compare the OS among these specific histological types, and the results are shown in Figure 1."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34395507", "locator": "sections[14] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "partial", "objective": null, "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34395507"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "blocked", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": [], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": ["step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"]}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34395507", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.655159", "sha256": "sha256:eb0200e88520b0e5b56070d256883743fa263aae56a8e57c9c2180685094407a", "bytes": 32621, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fsurg.2021.655159", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8362887", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34395507:1", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:2cf399ff87ad9ffbdc58226d9c0920b4b2181cb4d59a293fc8f994347efe7f08", "bytes": 1741, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[9]/table-wrap[1]#T1", "version": null, "note": "Basic characteristics of SCEC, ESCC, EAC, and SCLC in the SEER database.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8362887", "section_index": 9, "section_title": "SEER Data of SCEC as Compared to SCLC and EAC/ESCC", "row_count": 19, "column_count": 7}, "table": {"label": "Table 1", "caption": "Basic characteristics of SCEC, ESCC, EAC, and SCLC in the SEER database.", "rows": [["Stratified by histology type", "level", "SCEC", "ESCC", "EAC", "SCLC", "p-value"], ["n", "", "468", "13,100", "16,573", "33,627", ""], ["Race (%)", "White", "361 (77.1)", "8,160 (62.3)", "15,785 (95.2)", "29,537 (87.8)", "< 0.001"], ["", "Black", "78 (16.7)", "3,642 (27.8)", "386 (2.3)", "2,875 (8.5)", ""], ["", "Others", "29 (6.2)", "1,298 (9.9)", "402 (2.4)", "1,215 (3.6)", ""], ["Sex (%)", "Male", "282 (60.3)", "8,816 (67.3)", "14,515 (87.6)", "18,635 (55.4)", "<0.001"], ["", "Female", "186 (39.7)", "4,284 (32.7)", "2,058 (12.4)", "14,992 (44.6)", ""], ["Year at diagnosis (%)", "1973–1982", "43 (9.2)", "1,622 (12.4)", "271 (1.6)", "5,399 (16.1)", "<0.001"], ["", "1983–1992", "67 (14.3)", "2,204 (16.8)", "997 (6.0)", "8,470 (25.2)", ""], ["", "1993–2002", "115 (24.6)", "4,608 (35.2)", "4,003 (24.2)", "9,160 (27.2)", ""], ["", "2003–2014", "243 (51.9)", "4,666 (35.6)", "11,302 (68.2)", "10,598 (31.5)", ""], ["Stage (%)", "Localized", "81 (17.3)", "4,040 (30.8)", "4,078 (24.6)", "1,916 (5.7)", "<0.001"], ["", "Regional", "78 (16.7)", "5,133 (39.2)", "6,362 (38.4)", "6,830 (20.3)", ""], ["", "Distant", "240 (51.3)", "3,927 (30.0)", "6,133 (37.0)", "14,157 (42.1)", ""], ["", "Unstage", "69 (14.7)", "0 (0.0)", "0 (0.0)", "10,724 (31.9)", ""], ["Age at diagnosis [mean (SD)]", "", "68.35 (11.97)", "65.06 (11.01)", "64.15 (11.60)", "64.66 (9.94)", "<0.001"], ["Marital status (%)", "Married", "250 (53.4)", "6,489 (49.5)", "10,787 (65.1)", "19,657 (58.5)", "<0.001"], ["", "Unmarried", "197 (42.1)", "6,114 (46.7)", "5,232 (31.6)", "12,907 (38.4)", ""], ["", "Unknown", "21 (4.5)", "497 (3.8)", "554 (3.3)", "1,063 (3.2)", ""]], "row_count": 19, "column_count": 7, "numeric_cells": 82, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[9]/table-wrap[1]#T1"}}, {"id": "asset:table:pmid:34395507:2", "role": "table", "format": "jats-table", "media_type": "application/vnd.jats.table+json", "uri": null, "sha256": "sha256:6e952db7cf4fcaae68340fd8dd067419b9d0571cbb8e09a787e053b109bd6cde", "bytes": 1362, "access": "open", "state": "verified", "reader": "read_table", "reader_status": "available", "identifier": "section[10]/table-wrap[1]#T2", "version": null, "note": "DAVID annotation of DEGs in SCEC group.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8362887", "section_index": 10, "section_title": "Gene Expression Profile of SCEC Compared to SCLC and EAC/ESCC", "row_count": 26, "column_count": 4}, "table": {"label": "Table 2", "caption": "DAVID annotation of DEGs in SCEC group.", "rows": [["Database", "Name", "Counta", "Benjamini p-value"], ["KEGG", "DNA replication b", "19", "8.88E-10"], ["", "Cell cycle", "33", "8.61E-09"], ["", "P53 signaling pathway", "19", "4.80E-05"], ["", "Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation", "18", "0.00457"], ["", "Base excision repair", "11", "0.00419"], ["", "Oocyte meiosis", "20", "0.00790"], ["REACTOME", "Cell cycle, mitotic", "100", "3.47E-36"], ["", "DNA replication", "29", "7.19E-08"], ["", "DNA repair", "22", "0.00173"], ["", "Cell cycle checkpoints", "23", "0.00184"], ["", "Telomere maintenance", "14", "0.00713"], ["PANTHER", "P53 pathway", "22", "0.0456"], ["GO BP (TOP10)", "M phase", "99", "3.91E-28"], ["", "M phase of mitotic cell cycle", "78", "1.97E-26"], ["", "Mitosis", "77", "2.12E-26"], ["", "DNA replication", "61", "2.41E-18"], ["", "DNA metabolic process", "98", "2.54E-13"], ["", "Mitotic sister chromatid segregation", "18", "1.73E-07"], ["", "Spindle organization", "20", "1.55E-07"], ["", "Cell cycle checkpoint", "27", "2.09E-06"], ["", "Regulation of cell cycle process", "28", "6.97E-05"], ["", "DNA repair", "50", "7.34E-05"], ["GO MF", "Pyrophosphatase activity", "91", "0.00138"], ["", "Adenyl ribonucleotide binding", "152", "0.00573"], ["", "Guanyl ribonucleotide binding", "44", "0.0486"]], "row_count": 26, "column_count": 4, "numeric_cells": 53, "header_rows": 1, "locator": "section[10]/table-wrap[1]#T2"}}], "gaps": []}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank testing were conducted to compare the OS among these specific histological types, and the results are shown in Figure 1."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox proportional hazards"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "principal_component_analysis", "specific": "pca", "label": "Principal component analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pca_fit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["wide_numeric_matrix"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "principal component analysis"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "pearson", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["pearson_r"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Pearson's correlation"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "blocked", "tier": "R4", "blocking_axis": "data", "blocked_on": "data:accession_absent", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: log_rank_test."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R4", "reachable": false, "accessions": [], "resolved_accessions": [], "statements": ["The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material."], "basis": "The paper names no accession to its source data, so the data has to come from the authors."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34395507", "asset:table:pmid:34395507:1", "asset:table:pmid:34395507:2"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:None"]}, "gaps": ["data:accession_absent"]}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-10-31T19:45:30Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 3, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 25946, "completion_tokens": 1962, "cached_tokens": 792}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34395507", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34395507"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34395507", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34395507 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34395507", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34395507"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34395507", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34395507 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:None", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO None"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34395507", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34395507"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-None", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:None"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34395507", "parent_hash": "sha256:552fe000c5037729daf9ee2b24c497997c69fb268efb1186c682d6f7bd32e7ad", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "step:obtain_source_data blocked on data:accession_absent"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.77, "evidence": ["from the institutional tissue bank using the Affymetrix HG U133 plus 2.0 Array. These data were comp"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:824", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["logrank_test"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank testing were conducted to compare the OS among these specific histological types, and the results are shown in Figure 1."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}