Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:34623790

Comparative profiling of immune genes improves the prognoses of lower grade gliomas.

Zhiliang Wang · Wen Cheng · Zheng Zhao · Zheng Wang · Chuanbao Zhang · Guanzhang Li · Anhua Wu · Tao Jiang

Cancer biology & medicine · 2021 doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:34623790
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:1b6c2067cb2182ced188546c0183f0d5efa174f423a54a3e32304163e5136fd9
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:16Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:47:40Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Comparative profiling of immune genes improves the prognoses of lower grade gliomas.
doi
10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173
pmid
34623790
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Zhiliang Wang
[1]
Wen Cheng
[2]
Zheng Zhao
[3]
Zheng Wang
[4]
Chuanbao Zhang
[5]
Guanzhang Li
[6]
Anhua Wu
[7]
Tao Jiang
journal
Cancer biology & medicine
year
2021
abstract
OBJECTIVE: Lower grade gliomas (LGGs), classified as World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and grade III gliomas, comprise a heterogeneous group with a median survival time ranging from 4-13 years. Accurate prediction of the survival times of LGGs remains a major challenge in clinical practice. METHODS: We reviewed the expression data of 865 LGG patients from 5 transcriptomics cohorts. The comparative profile of immune genes was analyzed for signature identification and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) dataset were used as training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. The samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE16011 cohorts were used as external validation cohorts, and the real-time PCR of frozen LGG tissue samples (n = 36) were used for clinical validation. RESULTS: A total of 2,214 immune genes were subjected to pairwise comparison to generate 2,449,791 immune-related gene pairs (IGPs). A total of 402 IGPs were identified with prognostic values for LGGs. The HOXA9-related and CRH-related scores facilitated identification of patients with different prognoses. An immune signature based on 10 IGPs was constructed to stratify patients into low and high risk groups, exhibiting different clinical outcomes. A nomogram, combining immune signature, 1p/19q status, and tumor grade, was able to predict the overall survival (OS) with c-indices of 0.85, 0.80, 0.80, 0.79, and 0.75 in the training, internal validation, external validation, and tissue sample cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to report a comparative profiling of immune genes in large LGG cohorts. A promising individualized immune signature was developed to estimate the survival time for LGG patients.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34623790
locator
sections[10] "Statistical analysis" paragraph 2
quote
The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34623790
locator
sections[24] "Availability of data and materials" paragraph 2
quote
The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
An immune-based prognostic signature and clinical nomogram predicted overall survival in lower-grade glioma patients across transcriptomic and tissue-sample validation cohorts.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34623790
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
A nomogram, combining immune signature, 1p/19q status, and tumor grade, was able to predict the overall survival (OS) with c-indices of 0.85, 0.80, 0.80, 0.79, and 0.75 in the training, internal validation, external validation, and tissue sample cohorts, respectively.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
An immune-based prognostic signature and clinical nomogram predicted overall survival in lower-grade glioma patients across transcriptomic and tissue-sample validation cohorts.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34623790
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE16011
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE16011
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:34623790
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173
sha256
sha256:acdba2fc163d80d66694d7dd530a1ed0e6f2c4bd488aa3a2a5b051f826e367ae
bytes
49337
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC9088193
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE16011
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE16011
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE16011
version
null
note
The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 284 items
[0]
GSM405200
[1]
GSM405201
[2]
GSM405202
[3]
GSM405203
[4]
GSM405204
[5]
GSM405205
[6]
GSM405206
[7]
GSM405207
[8]
GSM405208
[9]
GSM405209
[10]
GSM405210
[11]
GSM405211
[12]
GSM405212
[13]
GSM405213
[14]
GSM405214
[15]
GSM405215
[16]
GSM405216
[17]
GSM405217
[18]
GSM405218
[19]
GSM405219
[20]
GSM405220
[21]
GSM405221
[22]
GSM405222
[23]
GSM405223
[24]
GSM405224
[25]
GSM405225
[26]
GSM405226
[27]
GSM405227
[28]
GSM405228
[29]
GSM405229
[30]
GSM405230
[31]
GSM405231
[32]
GSM405232
[33]
GSM405233
[34]
GSM405234
[35]
GSM405235
[36]
GSM405236
[37]
GSM405237
[38]
GSM405238
[39]
GSM405239
[40]
GSM405240
[41]
GSM405241
[42]
GSM405242
[43]
GSM405243
[44]
GSM405244
[45]
GSM405245
[46]
GSM405246
[47]
GSM405247
[48]
GSM405248
[49]
GSM405249
[50]
GSM405250
[51]
GSM405251
[52]
GSM405252
[53]
GSM405253
[54]
GSM405254
[55]
GSM405255
[56]
GSM405256
[57]
GSM405257
[58]
GSM405258
[59]
GSM405259
[60]
GSM405260
[61]
GSM405261
[62]
GSM405262
[63]
GSM405263
[64]
GSM405264
[65]
GSM405265
[66]
GSM405266
[67]
GSM405267
[68]
GSM405268
[69]
GSM405269
[70]
GSM405270
[71]
GSM405271
[72]
GSM405272
[73]
GSM405273
[74]
GSM405274
[75]
GSM405275
[76]
GSM405276
[77]
GSM405277
[78]
GSM405278
[79]
GSM405279
[80]
GSM405280
[81]
GSM405281
[82]
GSM405282
[83]
GSM405283
[84]
GSM405284
[85]
GSM405285
[86]
GSM405286
[87]
GSM405287
[88]
GSM405288
[89]
GSM405289
[90]
GSM405290
[91]
GSM405291
[92]
GSM405292
[93]
GSM405293
[94]
GSM405294
[95]
GSM405295
[96]
GSM405296
[97]
GSM405297
[98]
GSM405298
[99]
GSM405299
[100]
GSM405300
[101]
GSM405301
[102]
GSM405302
[103]
GSM405303
[104]
GSM405304
[105]
GSM405305
[106]
GSM405306
[107]
GSM405307
[108]
GSM405308
[109]
GSM405309
[110]
GSM405310
[111]
GSM405311
[112]
GSM405312
[113]
GSM405313
[114]
GSM405314
[115]
GSM405315
[116]
GSM405316
[117]
GSM405317
[118]
GSM405318
[119]
GSM405319
[120]
GSM405320
[121]
GSM405321
[122]
GSM405322
[123]
GSM405323
[124]
GSM405324
[125]
GSM405325
[126]
GSM405326
[127]
GSM405327
[128]
GSM405328
[129]
GSM405329
[130]
GSM405330
[131]
GSM405331
[132]
GSM405332
[133]
GSM405333
[134]
GSM405334
[135]
GSM405335
[136]
GSM405336
[137]
GSM405337
[138]
GSM405338
[139]
GSM405339
[140]
GSM405340
[141]
GSM405341
[142]
GSM405342
[143]
GSM405343
[144]
GSM405344
[145]
GSM405345
[146]
GSM405346
[147]
GSM405347
[148]
GSM405348
[149]
GSM405349
[150]
GSM405350
[151]
GSM405351
[152]
GSM405352
[153]
GSM405353
[154]
GSM405354
[155]
GSM405355
[156]
GSM405356
[157]
GSM405357
[158]
GSM405358
[159]
GSM405359
[160]
GSM405360
[161]
GSM405361
[162]
GSM405362
[163]
GSM405363
[164]
GSM405364
[165]
GSM405365
[166]
GSM405366
[167]
GSM405367
[168]
GSM405368
[169]
GSM405369
[170]
GSM405370
[171]
GSM405371
[172]
GSM405372
[173]
GSM405373
[174]
GSM405374
[175]
GSM405375
[176]
GSM405376
[177]
GSM405377
[178]
GSM405378
[179]
GSM405379
[180]
GSM405380
[181]
GSM405381
[182]
GSM405382
[183]
GSM405383
[184]
GSM405384
[185]
GSM405385
[186]
GSM405386
[187]
GSM405387
[188]
GSM405388
[189]
GSM405389
[190]
GSM405390
[191]
GSM405391
[192]
GSM405392
[193]
GSM405393
[194]
GSM405394
[195]
GSM405395
[196]
GSM405396
[197]
GSM405397
[198]
GSM405398
[199]
GSM405399
[200]
GSM405400
[201]
GSM405401
[202]
GSM405402
[203]
GSM405403
[204]
GSM405404
[205]
GSM405405
[206]
GSM405406
[207]
GSM405407
[208]
GSM405408
[209]
GSM405409
[210]
GSM405410
[211]
GSM405411
[212]
GSM405412
[213]
GSM405413
[214]
GSM405414
[215]
GSM405415
[216]
GSM405416
[217]
GSM405417
[218]
GSM405418
[219]
GSM405419
[220]
GSM405420
[221]
GSM405421
[222]
GSM405422
[223]
GSM405423
[224]
GSM405424
[225]
GSM405425
[226]
GSM405426
[227]
GSM405427
[228]
GSM405428
[229]
GSM405429
[230]
GSM405430
[231]
GSM405431
[232]
GSM405432
[233]
GSM405433
[234]
GSM405434
[235]
GSM405435
[236]
GSM405436
[237]
GSM405437
[238]
GSM405438
[239]
GSM405439
[240]
GSM405440
[241]
GSM405441
[242]
GSM405442
[243]
GSM405443
[244]
GSM405444
[245]
GSM405445
[246]
GSM405446
[247]
GSM405447
[248]
GSM405448
[249]
GSM405449
[250]
GSM405450
[251]
GSM405451
[252]
GSM405452
[253]
GSM405453
[254]
GSM405454
[255]
GSM405455
[256]
GSM405456
[257]
GSM405457
[258]
GSM405458
[259]
GSM405459
[260]
GSM405460
[261]
GSM405461
[262]
GSM405462
[263]
GSM405463
[264]
GSM405464
[265]
GSM405465
[266]
GSM405466
[267]
GSM405467
[268]
GSM405468
[269]
GSM405469
[270]
GSM405470
[271]
GSM405471
[272]
GSM405472
[273]
GSM405473
[274]
GSM405474
[275]
GSM405475
[276]
GSM405476
[277]
GSM405477
[278]
GSM405478
[279]
GSM405479
[280]
GSM405480
[281]
GSM405481
[282]
GSM405482
[283]
GSM405483
sample_count
284
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
8542
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Intrinsic Gene Expression Profiles of Gliomas are a Better Predictor of Survival than Histology
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE16011 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE16011 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 4 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Cox proportional hazards
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
image_quantification
specific
densitometry
label
Image analysis / quantification
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
segment_objects
[1]
quantify_intensity
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
image_stack
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
optical density
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE16011
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE16011
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).
basis
The paper names GSE16011 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:34623790
[1]
data:geo:GSE16011
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE16011
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:03:23Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
14661
completion_tokens
1505
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34623790
type
paper
label
pmid:34623790
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34623790
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34623790 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE16011
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE16011
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34623790
type
paper
label
pmid:34623790
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34623790
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34623790 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE16011
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE16011
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-34623790
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34623790
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE16011
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE16011
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:34623790
parent_hash
sha256:0299c252d0c578806b4fe2fe22b8ac49a87e6beaf0214277417410eb10b50fa9
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE16011 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE16011 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 3 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 4 items
[0]
ture identification and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma
[1]
were analyzed (Figure 1B). The in-house CGGA RNAseq and microarray cohorts were used for trainin
[2]
h a Gaussian window smoothing algorithm from RNA sequencing data, and exhibited a good concordance with
[3]
e expression data of 865 LGG patients from 5 transcriptomics cohorts. The comparative profile of immune g
order_basis
paper_text_order:407
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
microarray
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
fication and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (C
[1]
ed (Figure 1B). The in-house CGGA RNAseq and microarray cohorts were used for training and internal
order_basis
paper_text_order:550
id
assay:2
[2] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:3
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34623790", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 5, "content_hash": "sha256:1b6c2067cb2182ced188546c0183f0d5efa174f423a54a3e32304163e5136fd9", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:16Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:47:40Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Comparative profiling of immune genes improves the prognoses of lower grade gliomas.", "doi": "10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173", "pmid": "34623790", "authors": ["Zhiliang Wang", "Wen Cheng", "Zheng Zhao", "Zheng Wang", "Chuanbao Zhang", "Guanzhang Li", "Anhua Wu", "Tao Jiang"], "journal": "Cancer biology & medicine", "year": 2021, "abstract": "OBJECTIVE: Lower grade gliomas (LGGs), classified as World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and grade III gliomas, comprise a heterogeneous group with a median survival time ranging from 4-13 years. Accurate prediction of the survival times of LGGs remains a major challenge in clinical practice.\nMETHODS: We reviewed the expression data of 865 LGG patients from 5 transcriptomics cohorts. The comparative profile of immune genes was analyzed for signature identification and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) dataset were used as training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. The samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE16011 cohorts were used as external validation cohorts, and the real-time PCR of frozen LGG tissue samples (n = 36) were used for clinical validation.\nRESULTS: A total of 2,214 immune genes were subjected to pairwise comparison to generate 2,449,791 immune-related gene pairs (IGPs). A total of 402 IGPs were identified with prognostic values for LGGs. The HOXA9-related and CRH-related scores facilitated identification of patients with different prognoses. An immune signature based on 10 IGPs was constructed to stratify patients into low and high risk groups, exhibiting different clinical outcomes. A nomogram, combining immune signature, 1p/19q status, and tumor grade, was able to predict the overall survival (OS) with c-indices of 0.85, 0.80, 0.80, 0.79, and 0.75 in the training, internal validation, external validation, and tissue sample cohorts, respectively.\nCONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to report a comparative profiling of immune genes in large LGG cohorts. A promising individualized immune signature was developed to estimate the survival time for LGG patients.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34623790", "locator": "sections[10] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34623790", "locator": "sections[24] \"Availability of data and materials\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "An immune-based prognostic signature and clinical nomogram predicted overall survival in lower-grade glioma patients across transcriptomic and tissue-sample validation cohorts.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34623790", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "A nomogram, combining immune signature, 1p/19q status, and tumor grade, was able to predict the overall survival (OS) with c-indices of 0.85, 0.80, 0.80, 0.79, and 0.75 in the training, internal validation, external validation, and tissue sample cohorts, respectively."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "An immune-based prognostic signature and clinical nomogram predicted overall survival in lower-grade glioma patients across transcriptomic and tissue-sample validation cohorts.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34623790"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE16011"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE16011"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34623790", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173", "sha256": "sha256:acdba2fc163d80d66694d7dd530a1ed0e6f2c4bd488aa3a2a5b051f826e367ae", "bytes": 49337, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0173", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC9088193", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE16011", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE16011", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE16011", "version": null, "note": "The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011).", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM405200", "GSM405201", "GSM405202", "GSM405203", "GSM405204", "GSM405205", "GSM405206", "GSM405207", "GSM405208", "GSM405209", "GSM405210", "GSM405211", "GSM405212", "GSM405213", "GSM405214", "GSM405215", "GSM405216", "GSM405217", "GSM405218", "GSM405219", "GSM405220", "GSM405221", "GSM405222", "GSM405223", "GSM405224", "GSM405225", "GSM405226", "GSM405227", "GSM405228", "GSM405229", "GSM405230", "GSM405231", "GSM405232", "GSM405233", "GSM405234", "GSM405235", "GSM405236", "GSM405237", "GSM405238", "GSM405239", "GSM405240", "GSM405241", "GSM405242", "GSM405243", "GSM405244", "GSM405245", "GSM405246", "GSM405247", "GSM405248", "GSM405249", "GSM405250", "GSM405251", "GSM405252", "GSM405253", "GSM405254", "GSM405255", "GSM405256", "GSM405257", "GSM405258", "GSM405259", "GSM405260", "GSM405261", "GSM405262", "GSM405263", "GSM405264", "GSM405265", "GSM405266", "GSM405267", "GSM405268", "GSM405269", "GSM405270", "GSM405271", "GSM405272", "GSM405273", "GSM405274", "GSM405275", "GSM405276", "GSM405277", "GSM405278", "GSM405279", "GSM405280", "GSM405281", "GSM405282", "GSM405283", "GSM405284", "GSM405285", "GSM405286", "GSM405287", "GSM405288", "GSM405289", "GSM405290", "GSM405291", "GSM405292", "GSM405293", "GSM405294", "GSM405295", "GSM405296", "GSM405297", "GSM405298", "GSM405299", "GSM405300", "GSM405301", "GSM405302", "GSM405303", "GSM405304", "GSM405305", "GSM405306", "GSM405307", "GSM405308", "GSM405309", "GSM405310", "GSM405311", "GSM405312", "GSM405313", "GSM405314", "GSM405315", "GSM405316", "GSM405317", "GSM405318", "GSM405319", "GSM405320", "GSM405321", "GSM405322", "GSM405323", "GSM405324", "GSM405325", "GSM405326", "GSM405327", "GSM405328", "GSM405329", "GSM405330", "GSM405331", "GSM405332", "GSM405333", "GSM405334", "GSM405335", "GSM405336", "GSM405337", "GSM405338", "GSM405339", "GSM405340", "GSM405341", "GSM405342", "GSM405343", "GSM405344", "GSM405345", "GSM405346", "GSM405347", "GSM405348", "GSM405349", "GSM405350", "GSM405351", "GSM405352", "GSM405353", "GSM405354", "GSM405355", "GSM405356", "GSM405357", "GSM405358", "GSM405359", "GSM405360", "GSM405361", "GSM405362", "GSM405363", "GSM405364", "GSM405365", "GSM405366", "GSM405367", "GSM405368", "GSM405369", "GSM405370", "GSM405371", "GSM405372", "GSM405373", "GSM405374", "GSM405375", "GSM405376", "GSM405377", "GSM405378", "GSM405379", "GSM405380", "GSM405381", "GSM405382", "GSM405383", "GSM405384", "GSM405385", "GSM405386", "GSM405387", "GSM405388", "GSM405389", "GSM405390", "GSM405391", "GSM405392", "GSM405393", "GSM405394", "GSM405395", "GSM405396", "GSM405397", "GSM405398", "GSM405399", "GSM405400", "GSM405401", "GSM405402", "GSM405403", "GSM405404", "GSM405405", "GSM405406", "GSM405407", "GSM405408", "GSM405409", "GSM405410", "GSM405411", "GSM405412", "GSM405413", "GSM405414", "GSM405415", "GSM405416", "GSM405417", "GSM405418", "GSM405419", "GSM405420", "GSM405421", "GSM405422", "GSM405423", "GSM405424", "GSM405425", "GSM405426", "GSM405427", "GSM405428", "GSM405429", "GSM405430", "GSM405431", "GSM405432", "GSM405433", "GSM405434", "GSM405435", "GSM405436", "GSM405437", "GSM405438", "GSM405439", "GSM405440", "GSM405441", "GSM405442", "GSM405443", "GSM405444", "GSM405445", "GSM405446", "GSM405447", "GSM405448", "GSM405449", "GSM405450", "GSM405451", "GSM405452", "GSM405453", "GSM405454", "GSM405455", "GSM405456", "GSM405457", "GSM405458", "GSM405459", "GSM405460", "GSM405461", "GSM405462", "GSM405463", "GSM405464", "GSM405465", "GSM405466", "GSM405467", "GSM405468", "GSM405469", "GSM405470", "GSM405471", "GSM405472", "GSM405473", "GSM405474", "GSM405475", "GSM405476", "GSM405477", "GSM405478", "GSM405479", "GSM405480", "GSM405481", "GSM405482", "GSM405483"], "sample_count": 284, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "8542", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Intrinsic Gene Expression Profiles of Gliomas are a Better Predictor of Survival than Histology", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE16011 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE16011 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Cox proportional hazards"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "image_quantification", "specific": "densitometry", "label": "Image analysis / quantification", "dsl_operations": ["segment_objects", "quantify_intensity"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["image_stack"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "optical density"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE16011"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE16011"], "statements": ["The expression data were collected from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA, http://www.cgga.org.cn/index.jsp), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, and the Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=gse16011)."], "basis": "The paper names GSE16011 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34623790", "data:geo:GSE16011"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE16011"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:03:23Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 14661, "completion_tokens": 1505, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34623790", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34623790"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34623790", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34623790 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE16011", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE16011"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34623790", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34623790"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34623790", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34623790 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE16011", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE16011"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34623790", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34623790"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE16011", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE16011"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34623790", "parent_hash": "sha256:0299c252d0c578806b4fe2fe22b8ac49a87e6beaf0214277417410eb10b50fa9", "fork_of": null, "generation": 4}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE16011 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE16011 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["ture identification and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma", "were analyzed (Figure 1B). The in-house CGGA RNAseq and microarray cohorts were used for trainin", "h a Gaussian window smoothing algorithm from RNA sequencing data, and exhibited a good concordance with", "e expression data of 865 LGG patients from 5 transcriptomics cohorts. The comparative profile of immune g"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:407", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "microarray", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["fication and validation. In-house RNAseq and microarray data from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (C", "ed (Figure 1B). The in-house CGGA RNAseq and microarray cohorts were used for training and internal"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:550", "id": "assay:2"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["The risk-score formula for predicting survival was developed based on the 10 IGPs and the regression coefficient derived from Lasso regression analysis."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:3"}]}