Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:34631307

A four-gene prognostic signature for predicting the overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Lei Liu · Huayu He · Yue Peng · Zhenlin Yang · Shugeng Gao

PeerJ · 2021 doi:10.7717/peerj.11911

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:34631307
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:a8567d0d6e0010eba59a95df1a3bf8931b044440f60277f2112e918c81ddfaae
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:16Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:47:41Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
A four-gene prognostic signature for predicting the overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
doi
10.7717/peerj.11911
pmid
34631307
authors array · 5 items
[0]
Lei Liu
[1]
Huayu He
[2]
Yue Peng
[3]
Zhenlin Yang
[4]
Shugeng Gao
journal
PeerJ
year
2021
abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is known to vary widely; the 5-year overall survival rate is just 63% even for the pathological IA stage. Thus, in order to identify high-risk patients and facilitate clinical decision making, it is vital that we identify new prognostic markers that can be used alongside TNM staging to facilitate risk stratification. METHODS: We used mRNA expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort to identify a prognostic gene signature and combined this with clinical data to develop a predictive model for the prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves, Lasso regression, and Cox regression, were used to identify specific prognostic genes. The model was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and validated in an independent dataset (GSE50081) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). RESULTS: Our analyses identified a four-gene prognostic signature (CENPH, MYLIP, PITX3, and TRAF3IP3) that was associated with the overall survival of patients with T1-4N0-2M0 in the TCGA dataset. Multivariate regression suggested that the total risk score for the four genes represented an independent prognostic factor for the TCGA and GEO cohorts; the hazard ratio (HR) (high risk group vs low risk group) were 2.34 (p < 0.001) and 2.10 (p = 0.017). Immune infiltration estimations, as determined by an online tool (TIMER2.0) showed that CD4+ T cells were in relative abundance in the high risk group compared to the low risk group in both of the two cohorts (both p < 0.001). We established a composite prognostic model for predicting OS, combined with risk-grouping and clinical factors. The AUCs for 1-, 3-, 5- year OS in the training set were 0.750, 0.737, and 0.719; and were 0.645, 0.766, and 0.725 in the validation set. The calibration curves showed a good match between the predicted probabilities and the actual probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a four-gene predictive signature which represents an independent prognostic factor and can be used to identify high-risk patients from different TNM stages of LUAD. A new prognostic model that combines a prognostic gene signature with clinical features exhibited better discriminatory ability for OS than traditional TNM staging.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[6] "Statistical analysis" paragraph 2
quote
All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: The data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena: https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[28] "Data Availability Statement" paragraphs 1-6
quote
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: The data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena: https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
Using TCGA mRNA-expression and clinical data with survival analysis, Lasso and Cox regression, the study identified and externally validated a four-gene prognostic signature for overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 4 items
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
We used mRNA expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort to identify a prognostic gene signature and combined this with clinical data to develop a predictive model for the prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma.
[1] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 2
quote
Kaplan-Meier curves, Lasso regression, and Cox regression, were used to identify specific prognostic genes.
[2] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Our analyses identified a four-gene prognostic signature (CENPH, MYLIP, PITX3, and TRAF3IP3) that was associated with the overall survival of patients with T1-4N0-2M0 in the TCGA dataset.
[3] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:34631307
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
Multivariate regression suggested that the total risk score for the four genes represented an independent prognostic factor for the TCGA and GEO cohorts; the hazard ratio (HR) (high risk group vs low risk group) were 2.34 (p < 0.001) and 2.10 (p = 0.017).
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
Using TCGA mRNA-expression and clinical data with survival analysis, Lasso and Cox regression, the study identified and externally validated a four-gene prognostic signature for overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34631307
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:34631307
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11911
sha256
sha256:d79150afed51fc1c128d63377877e5bc2f8952c659d6c4494f492125ce77ff79
bytes
43600
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.7717/peerj.11911
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8465999
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50081
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE50081
version
null
note
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: The data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena: https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: The data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena: https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 181 items
[0]
GSM1213669
[1]
GSM1213670
[2]
GSM1213671
[3]
GSM1213672
[4]
GSM1213673
[5]
GSM1213674
[6]
GSM1213675
[7]
GSM1213676
[8]
GSM1213677
[9]
GSM1213678
[10]
GSM1213679
[11]
GSM1213680
[12]
GSM1213681
[13]
GSM1213682
[14]
GSM1213683
[15]
GSM1213684
[16]
GSM1213685
[17]
GSM1213686
[18]
GSM1213687
[19]
GSM1213688
[20]
GSM1213689
[21]
GSM1213690
[22]
GSM1213691
[23]
GSM1213692
[24]
GSM1213693
[25]
GSM1213694
[26]
GSM1213695
[27]
GSM1213696
[28]
GSM1213697
[29]
GSM1213698
[30]
GSM1213699
[31]
GSM1213700
[32]
GSM1213701
[33]
GSM1213702
[34]
GSM1213703
[35]
GSM1213704
[36]
GSM1213705
[37]
GSM1213706
[38]
GSM1213707
[39]
GSM1213708
[40]
GSM1213709
[41]
GSM1213710
[42]
GSM1213711
[43]
GSM1213712
[44]
GSM1213713
[45]
GSM1213714
[46]
GSM1213715
[47]
GSM1213716
[48]
GSM1213717
[49]
GSM1213718
[50]
GSM1213719
[51]
GSM1213720
[52]
GSM1213721
[53]
GSM1213722
[54]
GSM1213723
[55]
GSM1213724
[56]
GSM1213725
[57]
GSM1213726
[58]
GSM1213727
[59]
GSM1213728
[60]
GSM1213729
[61]
GSM1213730
[62]
GSM1213731
[63]
GSM1213732
[64]
GSM1213733
[65]
GSM1213734
[66]
GSM1213735
[67]
GSM1213736
[68]
GSM1213737
[69]
GSM1213738
[70]
GSM1213739
[71]
GSM1213740
[72]
GSM1213741
[73]
GSM1213742
[74]
GSM1213743
[75]
GSM1213744
[76]
GSM1213745
[77]
GSM1213746
[78]
GSM1213747
[79]
GSM1213748
[80]
GSM1213749
[81]
GSM1213750
[82]
GSM1213751
[83]
GSM1213752
[84]
GSM1213753
[85]
GSM1213754
[86]
GSM1213755
[87]
GSM1213756
[88]
GSM1213757
[89]
GSM1213758
[90]
GSM1213759
[91]
GSM1213760
[92]
GSM1213761
[93]
GSM1213762
[94]
GSM1213763
[95]
GSM1213764
[96]
GSM1213765
[97]
GSM1213766
[98]
GSM1213767
[99]
GSM1213768
[100]
GSM1213769
[101]
GSM1213770
[102]
GSM1213771
[103]
GSM1213772
[104]
GSM1213773
[105]
GSM1213774
[106]
GSM1213775
[107]
GSM1213776
[108]
GSM1213777
[109]
GSM1213778
[110]
GSM1213779
[111]
GSM1213780
[112]
GSM1213781
[113]
GSM1213782
[114]
GSM1213783
[115]
GSM1213784
[116]
GSM1213785
[117]
GSM1213786
[118]
GSM1213787
[119]
GSM1213788
[120]
GSM1213789
[121]
GSM1213790
[122]
GSM1213791
[123]
GSM1213792
[124]
GSM1213793
[125]
GSM1213794
[126]
GSM1213795
[127]
GSM1213796
[128]
GSM1213797
[129]
GSM1213798
[130]
GSM1213799
[131]
GSM1213800
[132]
GSM1213801
[133]
GSM1213802
[134]
GSM1213803
[135]
GSM1213804
[136]
GSM1213805
[137]
GSM1213806
[138]
GSM1213807
[139]
GSM1213808
[140]
GSM1213809
[141]
GSM1213810
[142]
GSM1213811
[143]
GSM1213812
[144]
GSM1213813
[145]
GSM1213814
[146]
GSM1213815
[147]
GSM1213816
[148]
GSM1213817
[149]
GSM1213818
[150]
GSM1213819
[151]
GSM1213820
[152]
GSM1213821
[153]
GSM1213822
[154]
GSM1213823
[155]
GSM1213824
[156]
GSM1213825
[157]
GSM1213826
[158]
GSM1213827
[159]
GSM1213828
[160]
GSM1213829
[161]
GSM1213830
[162]
GSM1213831
[163]
GSM1213832
[164]
GSM1213833
[165]
GSM1213834
[166]
GSM1213835
[167]
GSM1213836
[168]
GSM1213837
[169]
GSM1213838
[170]
GSM1213839
[171]
GSM1213840
[172]
GSM1213841
[173]
GSM1213842
[174]
GSM1213843
[175]
GSM1213844
[176]
GSM1213845
[177]
GSM1213846
[178]
GSM1213847
[179]
GSM1213848
[180]
GSM1213849
sample_count
181
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Validation of a histology-independent prognostic gene signature for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer including stage IA patients
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Cox regression
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
log-rank
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE50081
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE50081
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The following information was supplied regarding data availability: The data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena: https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443 https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.
basis
The paper names GSE50081 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:34631307
[1]
data:geo:GSE50081
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:03:40Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
12883
completion_tokens
2447
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34631307
type
paper
label
pmid:34631307
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34631307
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34631307 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE50081
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:34631307
type
paper
label
pmid:34631307
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:34631307
type
manuscript
label
PMID 34631307 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE50081
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE50081
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-34631307
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:34631307
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE50081
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE50081
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:34631307
parent_hash
sha256:c349a79f8310d7313d42bc21cf5ba12c0843f2c31b0ed0d14486ac8e125fb5e4
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_id
rna_seq
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
factorsThe raw data type of gene expression RNAseq downloaded from the public database was FPKM
order_basis
paper_text_order:6899
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:34631307", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 5, "content_hash": "sha256:a8567d0d6e0010eba59a95df1a3bf8931b044440f60277f2112e918c81ddfaae", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:16Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:47:41Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "A four-gene prognostic signature for predicting the overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.11911", "pmid": "34631307", "authors": ["Lei Liu", "Huayu He", "Yue Peng", "Zhenlin Yang", "Shugeng Gao"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2021, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is known to vary widely; the 5-year overall survival rate is just 63% even for the pathological IA stage. Thus, in order to identify high-risk patients and facilitate clinical decision making, it is vital that we identify new prognostic markers that can be used alongside TNM staging to facilitate risk stratification.\nMETHODS: We used mRNA expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort to identify a prognostic gene signature and combined this with clinical data to develop a predictive model for the prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meier curves, Lasso regression, and Cox regression, were used to identify specific prognostic genes. The model was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and validated in an independent dataset (GSE50081) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).\nRESULTS: Our analyses identified a four-gene prognostic signature (CENPH, MYLIP, PITX3, and TRAF3IP3) that was associated with the overall survival of patients with T1-4N0-2M0 in the TCGA dataset. Multivariate regression suggested that the total risk score for the four genes represented an independent prognostic factor for the TCGA and GEO cohorts; the hazard ratio (HR) (high risk group vs low risk group) were 2.34 (p < 0.001) and 2.10 (p = 0.017). Immune infiltration estimations, as determined by an online tool (TIMER2.0) showed that CD4+ T cells were in relative abundance in the high risk group compared to the low risk group in both of the two cohorts (both p < 0.001). We established a composite prognostic model for predicting OS, combined with risk-grouping and clinical factors. The AUCs for 1-, 3-, 5- year OS in the training set were 0.750, 0.737, and 0.719; and were 0.645, 0.766, and 0.725 in the validation set. The calibration curves showed a good match between the predicted probabilities and the actual probabilities.\nCONCLUSIONS: We identified a four-gene predictive signature which represents an independent prognostic factor and can be used to identify high-risk patients from different TNM stages of LUAD. A new prognostic model that combines a prognostic gene signature with clinical features exhibited better discriminatory ability for OS than traditional TNM staging.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[6] \"Statistical analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena:\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[28] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraphs 1-6", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena:\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "Using TCGA mRNA-expression and clinical data with survival analysis, Lasso and Cox regression, the study identified and externally validated a four-gene prognostic signature for overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "We used mRNA expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort to identify a prognostic gene signature and combined this with clinical data to develop a predictive model for the prognosis of patients for lung adenocarcinoma."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 2", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier curves, Lasso regression, and Cox regression, were used to identify specific prognostic genes."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Our analyses identified a four-gene prognostic signature (CENPH, MYLIP, PITX3, and TRAF3IP3) that was associated with the overall survival of patients with T1-4N0-2M0 in the TCGA dataset."}, {"asset": "source:pmid:34631307", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "Multivariate regression suggested that the total risk score for the four genes represented an independent prognostic factor for the TCGA and GEO cohorts; the hazard ratio (HR) (high risk group vs low risk group) were 2.34 (p < 0.001) and 2.10 (p = 0.017)."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "Using TCGA mRNA-expression and clinical data with survival analysis, Lasso and Cox regression, the study identified and externally validated a four-gene prognostic signature for overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:34631307"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:34631307", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11911", "sha256": "sha256:d79150afed51fc1c128d63377877e5bc2f8952c659d6c4494f492125ce77ff79", "bytes": 43600, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.11911", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8465999", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50081", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE50081", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena:\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena:\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1213669", "GSM1213670", "GSM1213671", "GSM1213672", "GSM1213673", "GSM1213674", "GSM1213675", "GSM1213676", "GSM1213677", "GSM1213678", "GSM1213679", "GSM1213680", "GSM1213681", "GSM1213682", "GSM1213683", "GSM1213684", "GSM1213685", "GSM1213686", "GSM1213687", "GSM1213688", "GSM1213689", "GSM1213690", "GSM1213691", "GSM1213692", "GSM1213693", "GSM1213694", "GSM1213695", "GSM1213696", "GSM1213697", "GSM1213698", "GSM1213699", "GSM1213700", "GSM1213701", "GSM1213702", "GSM1213703", "GSM1213704", "GSM1213705", "GSM1213706", "GSM1213707", "GSM1213708", "GSM1213709", "GSM1213710", "GSM1213711", "GSM1213712", "GSM1213713", "GSM1213714", "GSM1213715", "GSM1213716", "GSM1213717", "GSM1213718", "GSM1213719", "GSM1213720", "GSM1213721", "GSM1213722", "GSM1213723", "GSM1213724", "GSM1213725", "GSM1213726", "GSM1213727", "GSM1213728", "GSM1213729", "GSM1213730", "GSM1213731", "GSM1213732", "GSM1213733", "GSM1213734", "GSM1213735", "GSM1213736", "GSM1213737", "GSM1213738", "GSM1213739", "GSM1213740", "GSM1213741", "GSM1213742", "GSM1213743", "GSM1213744", "GSM1213745", "GSM1213746", "GSM1213747", "GSM1213748", "GSM1213749", "GSM1213750", "GSM1213751", "GSM1213752", "GSM1213753", "GSM1213754", "GSM1213755", "GSM1213756", "GSM1213757", "GSM1213758", "GSM1213759", "GSM1213760", "GSM1213761", "GSM1213762", "GSM1213763", "GSM1213764", "GSM1213765", "GSM1213766", "GSM1213767", "GSM1213768", "GSM1213769", "GSM1213770", "GSM1213771", "GSM1213772", "GSM1213773", "GSM1213774", "GSM1213775", "GSM1213776", "GSM1213777", "GSM1213778", "GSM1213779", "GSM1213780", "GSM1213781", "GSM1213782", "GSM1213783", "GSM1213784", "GSM1213785", "GSM1213786", "GSM1213787", "GSM1213788", "GSM1213789", "GSM1213790", "GSM1213791", "GSM1213792", "GSM1213793", "GSM1213794", "GSM1213795", "GSM1213796", "GSM1213797", "GSM1213798", "GSM1213799", "GSM1213800", "GSM1213801", "GSM1213802", "GSM1213803", "GSM1213804", "GSM1213805", "GSM1213806", "GSM1213807", "GSM1213808", "GSM1213809", "GSM1213810", "GSM1213811", "GSM1213812", "GSM1213813", "GSM1213814", "GSM1213815", "GSM1213816", "GSM1213817", "GSM1213818", "GSM1213819", "GSM1213820", "GSM1213821", "GSM1213822", "GSM1213823", "GSM1213824", "GSM1213825", "GSM1213826", "GSM1213827", "GSM1213828", "GSM1213829", "GSM1213830", "GSM1213831", "GSM1213832", "GSM1213833", "GSM1213834", "GSM1213835", "GSM1213836", "GSM1213837", "GSM1213838", "GSM1213839", "GSM1213840", "GSM1213841", "GSM1213842", "GSM1213843", "GSM1213844", "GSM1213845", "GSM1213846", "GSM1213847", "GSM1213848", "GSM1213849"], "sample_count": 181, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Validation of a histology-independent prognostic gene signature for early stage, non-small cell lung cancer including stage IA patients", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Cox regression"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "log-rank"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: kaplan_meier."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE50081"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE50081"], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:\nThe data are available at NCBI GEO: GSE50081 and from UCSC Xena:\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.htseq_fpkm.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.GDC_phenotype.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443\nhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/?dataset=TCGA-LUAD.survival.tsvhost=https%3A%2F%2Fgdc.xenahubs.netremoveHub=https%3A%2F%2Fxena.treehouse.gi.ucsc.edu%3A443."], "basis": "The paper names GSE50081 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "assets": ["source:pmid:34631307", "data:geo:GSE50081"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE50081"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:03:40Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 12883, "completion_tokens": 2447, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:34631307", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34631307"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34631307", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34631307 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE50081"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:34631307", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:34631307"}, {"id": "source:pmid:34631307", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 34631307 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE50081", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE50081"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-34631307", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:34631307"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE50081", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE50081"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:34631307", "parent_hash": "sha256:c349a79f8310d7313d42bc21cf5ba12c0843f2c31b0ed0d14486ac8e125fb5e4", "fork_of": null, "generation": 4}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE50081 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE50081 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "rna_seq", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["factorsThe raw data type of gene expression RNAseq downloaded from the public database was FPKM"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:6899", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["survival_km"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["All statistical analyses were performed with R software version 4.0.3. OS data were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the statistical difference between different groups was determined by the log-rank test. The influence of different parameters on OS was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated using Cox proportional hazards models. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to compare the predictive accuracy of models."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}