Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35116032

Identification of Inflammation-Related Biomarker Pro-ADM for Male Patients With Gout by Comprehensive Analysis.

Kangli Qiu · Tianshu Zeng · Yunfei Liao · Jie Min · Nan Zhang · Miaomiao Peng · Wen Kong · Lu-Lu Chen

Frontiers in immunology · 2021 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35116032
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:880fcab5bd1f8953df74cff2a0f346feab2613e8c887dc9c0a385574d5f47d80
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:50Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:48:21Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification of Inflammation-Related Biomarker Pro-ADM for Male Patients With Gout by Comprehensive Analysis.
doi
10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719
pmid
35116032
authors array · 8 items
[0]
Kangli Qiu
[1]
Tianshu Zeng
[2]
Yunfei Liao
[3]
Jie Min
[4]
Nan Zhang
[5]
Miaomiao Peng
[6]
Wen Kong
[7]
Lu-Lu Chen
journal
Frontiers in immunology
year
2021
abstract
Objective: Gout is a local inflammatory disease caused by the deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints or adjacent tissues. When some gout occurs without hyperuricemia, or its clinical symptoms and signs are not typical, the diagnosis of gout will be delayed, so there is an urgent need to find a new biomarker to predict and diagnose of gout flare. Our research attempts to find the key genes and potential molecular mechanisms of gout through bioinformatics analysis, and collected general data and blood biochemical samples of patients with gout and healthy, then analyzed and compared the expression of factors regulated by key genes. Method: GSE160170 were downloaded from GEO database for analysis. The data were normalized to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), then GO and KEGG enrichment analysis were applied. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and hub genes between DEGs were identified. Then collect general information and blood samples from male patients with acute gout, hyperuricemia and healthy. ELISA method was used to detect pro-ADM levels of different groups, and the data was input into SPSS statistical software for analysis. Result: We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls. GO analysis results show that DEGs are mostly enriched in inflammatory response, growth factor activity, cytokine activity, chemokine activity, S100 protein binding and CXCR chemokine receptor binding. KEGG pathway analysis showed that DEGs are mainly related to Chemokine signaling pathway and Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. ADM, CXCR1, CXCR6, CXCL3, CCL3, CCL18, CCL3L3, CCL4L1, CD69, CD83, AREG, EREG, B7RP1, HBEGF, NAMPT and S100B are the most important hub genes in the PPI network. We found that the expression of pro-ADM in the gout group and hyperuricemia group was higher than that in the healthy group, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: In this study, a series of bioinformatics analyses were performed on DEGs to identify key genes and pathways related to gout. Through clinical verification, we found that pro-ADM can be used as an inflammation-related biomarker for acute attacks of gout, providing new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of gout.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116032
locator
sections[9] "Statistical Analysis" paragraph 2
quote
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups.
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116032
locator
sections[17] "Data Availability Statement" paragraph 2
quote
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116032
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 3
quote
We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35116032
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE160170
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE160170
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 2 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35116032
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719
sha256
sha256:f1ed955039560b588a66ee7ffa1ba29b1c3d9565ff653b4d57b842f48238b010
bytes
25915
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8803656
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body_without_references
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE160170
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160170
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE160170
version
null
note
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 12 items
[0]
GSM4861833
[1]
GSM4861834
[2]
GSM4861835
[3]
GSM4861836
[4]
GSM4861837
[5]
GSM4861838
[6]
GSM4861839
[7]
GSM4861840
[8]
GSM4861841
[9]
GSM4861842
[10]
GSM4861843
[11]
GSM4861844
sample_count
12
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
21827
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
LncRNAs Landscape in the patients of primary gout by Microarray Analysis
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T18:06:43Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 2 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE160170 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE160170 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 3 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
group_comparison
specific
anova
label
Group comparison
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
two_or_more_groups_continuous
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups.
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
differential_expression
specific
limma_voom
label
Differential expression analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
normalise_counts
[1]
differential_expression_fit
[2]
fdr_bh
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
count_matrix_with_condition
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
limma
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
network_analysis
specific
ppi_network
label
Network / pathway analysis
dsl_operations array · 3 items
[0]
build_graph
[1]
centrality_scores
[2]
pathway_enrich
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
edge_list
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Protein-protein interaction
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE160170
resolved_accessions array · 1 item
[0]
GSE160170
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
basis
The paper names GSE160170 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:35116032
[1]
data:geo:GSE160170
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE160170
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:31:40Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
7606
completion_tokens
1072
cached_tokens
256
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35116032
type
paper
label
pmid:35116032
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35116032
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35116032 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE160170
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE160170
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35116032
type
paper
label
pmid:35116032
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35116032
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35116032 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE160170
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE160170
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35116032
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35116032
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE160170
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE160170
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35116032
parent_hash
sha256:7d372d65768c5ed4dabc2aa83d60e489cf5c8c4f23376bfb25cdce7e05324434
fork_of
null
gaps array · 6 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE160170 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE160170 not downloaded
[2]
execution.not_run
[3]
review.human_critique
[4]
review.independent_reader
[5]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 2 items
[0] object · 11 fields
role
data_generation
definition_version
99e1195c7d6f
required_operations array · 0 items
support_state
partial
source_hashes object · 1 field
assay_lexicon
99e1195c7d6f
confidence
0.99
evidence array · 2 items
[0]
with acute gout, hyperuricemia and healthy. ELISA method was used to detect pro-ADM levels of
[1]
clinical application potential of ADM gene, ELISA method was used to detect the protein level
order_basis
paper_text_order:1120
id
assay:1
[1] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
group_comparison
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 4 items
[0]
group_summary
[1]
welch_t
[2]
bootstrap_mean_difference
[3]
group_comparison_anova
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups.
order_basis
consumes_earlier_output
id
assay:2
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35116032", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 6, "content_hash": "sha256:880fcab5bd1f8953df74cff2a0f346feab2613e8c887dc9c0a385574d5f47d80", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:50Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:48:21Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification of Inflammation-Related Biomarker Pro-ADM for Male Patients With Gout by Comprehensive Analysis.", "doi": "10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719", "pmid": "35116032", "authors": ["Kangli Qiu", "Tianshu Zeng", "Yunfei Liao", "Jie Min", "Nan Zhang", "Miaomiao Peng", "Wen Kong", "Lu-Lu Chen"], "journal": "Frontiers in immunology", "year": 2021, "abstract": "Objective: Gout is a local inflammatory disease caused by the deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints or adjacent tissues. When some gout occurs without hyperuricemia, or its clinical symptoms and signs are not typical, the diagnosis of gout will be delayed, so there is an urgent need to find a new biomarker to predict and diagnose of gout flare. Our research attempts to find the key genes and potential molecular mechanisms of gout through bioinformatics analysis, and collected general data and blood biochemical samples of patients with gout and healthy, then analyzed and compared the expression of factors regulated by key genes.\nMethod: GSE160170 were downloaded from GEO database for analysis. The data were normalized to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), then GO and KEGG enrichment analysis were applied. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and hub genes between DEGs were identified. Then collect general information and blood samples from male patients with acute gout, hyperuricemia and healthy. ELISA method was used to detect pro-ADM levels of different groups, and the data was input into SPSS statistical software for analysis.\nResult: We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls. GO analysis results show that DEGs are mostly enriched in inflammatory response, growth factor activity, cytokine activity, chemokine activity, S100 protein binding and CXCR chemokine receptor binding. KEGG pathway analysis showed that DEGs are mainly related to Chemokine signaling pathway and Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. ADM, CXCR1, CXCR6, CXCL3, CCL3, CCL18, CCL3L3, CCL4L1, CD69, CD83, AREG, EREG, B7RP1, HBEGF, NAMPT and S100B are the most important hub genes in the PPI network. We found that the expression of pro-ADM in the gout group and hyperuricemia group was higher than that in the healthy group, and the difference was statistically significant.\nConclusion: In this study, a series of bioinformatics analyses were performed on DEGs to identify key genes and pathways related to gout. Through clinical verification, we found that pro-ADM can be used as an inflammation-related biomarker for acute attacks of gout, providing new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of gout.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116032", "locator": "sections[9] \"Statistical Analysis\" paragraph 2", "quote": "A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116032", "locator": "sections[17] \"Data Availability Statement\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116032", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 3", "quote": "We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "We identified 266 DEGs (179 up-regulated and 87 down-regulated) between gout patients and healthy controls.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35116032"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE160170"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE160170"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35116032", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719", "sha256": "sha256:f1ed955039560b588a66ee7ffa1ba29b1c3d9565ff653b4d57b842f48238b010", "bytes": 25915, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.3389/fimmu.2021.798719", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8803656", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body_without_references", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE160170", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160170", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE160170", "version": null, "note": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM4861833", "GSM4861834", "GSM4861835", "GSM4861836", "GSM4861837", "GSM4861838", "GSM4861839", "GSM4861840", "GSM4861841", "GSM4861842", "GSM4861843", "GSM4861844"], "sample_count": 12, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "21827", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "LncRNAs Landscape in the patients of primary gout by Microarray Analysis", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T18:06:43Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE160170 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE160170 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "group_comparison", "specific": "anova", "label": "Group comparison", "dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["two_or_more_groups_continuous"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "differential_expression", "specific": "limma_voom", "label": "Differential expression analysis", "dsl_operations": ["normalise_counts", "differential_expression_fit", "fdr_bh"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["count_matrix_with_condition"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "limma"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "network_analysis", "specific": "ppi_network", "label": "Network / pathway analysis", "dsl_operations": ["build_graph", "centrality_scores", "pathway_enrich"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["edge_list"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Protein-protein interaction"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: anova."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE160170"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE160170"], "statements": ["The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors."], "basis": "The paper names GSE160170 in GEO and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35116032", "data:geo:GSE160170"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE160170"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:31:40Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 7606, "completion_tokens": 1072, "cached_tokens": 256}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35116032", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35116032"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35116032", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35116032 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE160170", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE160170"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35116032", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35116032"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35116032", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35116032 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE160170", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE160170"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35116032", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35116032"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE160170", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE160170"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35116032", "parent_hash": "sha256:7d372d65768c5ed4dabc2aa83d60e489cf5c8c4f23376bfb25cdce7e05324434", "fork_of": null, "generation": 5}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE160170 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE160170 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "data_generation", "definition_id": "elisa", "definition_version": "99e1195c7d6f", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": [], "support_state": "partial", "source_hashes": {"assay_lexicon": "99e1195c7d6f"}, "confidence": 0.99, "evidence": ["with acute gout, hyperuricemia and healthy. ELISA method was used to detect pro-ADM levels of", "clinical application potential of ADM gene, ELISA method was used to detect the protein level"], "order_basis": "paper_text_order:1120", "id": "assay:1"}, {"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "group_comparison", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["group_summary", "welch_t", "bootstrap_mean_difference", "group_comparison_anova"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences between the three groups."], "order_basis": "consumes_earlier_output", "id": "assay:2"}]}