Corpus Engine Towards a reproducible .science file.
← All .science files

pmid:35116193

Identification and validation of an epithelial mesenchymal transition-related gene pairs signature for prediction of overall survival in patients with skin cutaneous melanoma.

Yucang Shi · Zhanpeng Li · Zhihong Zhou · Simu Liao · Zhiyuan Wu · Jie Li · Jiasheng Yin · Meng Wang · Meilan Weng

PeerJ · 2022 doi:10.7717/peerj.12646

Paper

complete

Experiment

complete

Data

partial

Analysis

complete

Execution

absent

Execution evidence has not yet been added to this .science file. Explore its methods, data and open questions to plan the next step.
Record details sci_version · id · kind · revision · content_hash · schema · created_at · updated_at · generator
id
pmid:35116193
kind
science-record
content_hash
sha256:7f44c5e8e7b98ed885a2af6ebfdf7c30270156dc4482827e66caa4ac1accc613
schema
https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json
created_at
2026-11-01T17:36:50Z
updated_at
2026-11-01T22:05:44Z
generator object · 2 fields
name
corpus-assay-engine
run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
paper object · 10 fields
state
complete
title
Identification and validation of an epithelial mesenchymal transition-related gene pairs signature for prediction of overall survival in patients with skin cutaneous melanoma.
doi
10.7717/peerj.12646
pmid
35116193
authors array · 9 items
[0]
Yucang Shi
[1]
Zhanpeng Li
[2]
Zhihong Zhou
[3]
Simu Liao
[4]
Zhiyuan Wu
[5]
Jie Li
[6]
Jiasheng Yin
[7]
Meng Wang
[8]
Meilan Weng
journal
PeerJ
year
2022
abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to construct a novel epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene pairs (ERGPs) signature to predict overall survival (OS) in skin cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. METHODS: Expression data of the relevant genes, corresponding clinicopathological parameters, and follow-up data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify ERGPs significantly associated with OS, and LASSO analysis was used to identify the genes used for the construction of the ERGPs signature. The optimal cutoff value determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the two groups were estimated using the log-rank test. The independent external datasets GSE65904 and GSE19234 were used to verify the performance of the ERGPs signature using the area under the curve (AUC) values. In addition, we also integrated clinicopathological parameters and risk scores to develop a nomogram that can individually predict the prognosis of patients with CM. RESULTS: A total of 104 ERGPs related to OS were obtained, of which 21 ERGPs were selected for the construction of the signature. All CM patients were stratified into high-and low-risk groups based on an optimal risk score cutoff value of 0.281. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the mortality rate in the low-risk group was lower than that in the high-risk group in the TCGA cohort (P < 0.001), GSE65904 cohort (P = 0.006), and GSE19234 cohort (P = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that our ERGP signature was an independent risk factor for OS in CM patients in the three cohorts (for TCGA: HR, 2.560; 95% CI [1.907-3.436]; P < 0.001; for GSE65904: HR = 2.235, 95% CI [1.492-3.347], P < 0.001; for GSE19234: HR = 2.458, 95% CI [1.065-5.669], P = 0.035). The AUC value for predicting the 5-year survival rate of patients with CM of our developed model was higher than that of two previously established prognostic signatures. Both the calibration curve and the C-index (0.752, 95% CI [0.678-0.826]) indicated that the developed nomogram was highly accurate. Most importantly, the decision curve analysis results showed that the nomogram had a higher net benefit than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage system. CONCLUSION: Our study established an ERGPs signature that could be potentially used in a clinical setting as a genetic biomarker for risk stratification of CM patients. In addition, the ERGPs signature could also predict which CM patients will benefit from PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.
claims array · 3 items
[0] object · 6 fields
id
claim-method
statement
In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B).
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116193
locator
sections[14] "Establishment and evaluation of the ERGPs signature" paragraph 2
quote
In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B).
state
complete
[1] object · 6 fields
id
claim-data-access
statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
kind
methodological
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116193
locator
sections[31] "Data Availability" paragraph 2
quote
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
state
complete
[2] object · 6 fields
id
claim-target-result
statement
The study developed an EMT-related gene-pair signature that stratified cutaneous melanoma patients by overall-survival risk and was independently prognostic in TCGA and two independent GEO cohorts.
kind
qualitative
target
null
evidence array · 1 item
[0] object · 3 fields
asset
source:pmid:35116193
locator
sections[0] "Abstract" paragraph 4
quote
Our study established an ERGPs signature that could be potentially used in a clinical setting as a genetic biomarker for risk stratification of CM patients.
state
complete
gaps array · 0 items
experiment object · 8 fields
state
complete
objective
The study developed an EMT-related gene-pair signature that stratified cutaneous melanoma patients by overall-survival risk and was independently prognostic in TCGA and two independent GEO cohorts.
steps array · 3 items
[0] object · 13 fields
id
read_published_estimate
order
1
name
Read the published estimate from the source
kind
other
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35116193
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the published estimate and its evidence
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[1] object · 13 fields
id
obtain_source_data
order
2
name
Obtain the source data from the named repository
kind
data-preparation
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE19234
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the source data with its repository provenance
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
[2] object · 13 fields
id
run_analysis
order
3
name
Run the published analysis
kind
analysis
state
complete
blocked_on
null
description
Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.
parameters object · 0 fields
inputs array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE19234
outputs array · 1 item
[0]
the replicated result and its comparison
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
materials array · 0 items
instruments array · 0 items
reagents array · 0 items
conditions object · 0 fields
gaps array · 0 items
data object · 3 fields
state
partial
assets array · 3 items
[0] object · 15 fields
id
source:pmid:35116193
role
manuscript
format
xml
media_type
application/xml
uri
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12646
sha256
sha256:f839cb9a549729488404a55ab2b834cbdd1ba54fe370ab04061b633ec5f5b7c8
bytes
46443
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
10.7717/peerj.12646
version
null
note
Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.
structure object · 4 fields
pmcid
PMC8785661
source
europe_pmc_fulltext
coverage
whole_body
text_hash_scope
rendered_section_body
[1] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE19234
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE19234
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE19234
version
null
note
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 44 items
[0]
GSM476606
[1]
GSM476607
[2]
GSM476608
[3]
GSM476609
[4]
GSM476610
[5]
GSM476611
[6]
GSM476612
[7]
GSM476613
[8]
GSM476614
[9]
GSM476615
[10]
GSM476616
[11]
GSM476617
[12]
GSM476618
[13]
GSM476619
[14]
GSM476620
[15]
GSM476621
[16]
GSM476622
[17]
GSM476623
[18]
GSM476624
[19]
GSM476625
[20]
GSM476626
[21]
GSM476627
[22]
GSM476628
[23]
GSM476629
[24]
GSM476630
[25]
GSM476631
[26]
GSM476632
[27]
GSM476633
[28]
GSM476634
[29]
GSM476635
[30]
GSM476636
[31]
GSM476637
[32]
GSM476638
[33]
GSM476639
[34]
GSM476640
[35]
GSM476641
[36]
GSM476642
[37]
GSM476643
[38]
GSM476644
[39]
GSM476645
[40]
GSM476646
[41]
GSM476647
[42]
GSM476648
[43]
GSM476649
sample_count
44
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
570
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Immune profile and mitotic index of metastatic melanoma lesions enhance clinical staging in predicting patient survival.
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:54Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
[2] object · 15 fields
id
data:geo:GSE65904
role
raw
format
geo-series
media_type
application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json
uri
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE65904
sha256
null
bytes
null
access
open
state
resolved
reader
null
reader_status
reader_required
identifier
GSE65904
version
null
note
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
structure object · 15 fields
repository
GEO
access_route
GEO accession URL
access_statement_verbatim
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
access_statement_kind
data_availability_statement
sample_accessions array · 214 items
[0]
GSM1608593
[1]
GSM1608594
[2]
GSM1608595
[3]
GSM1608596
[4]
GSM1608597
[5]
GSM1608598
[6]
GSM1608599
[7]
GSM1608600
[8]
GSM1608601
[9]
GSM1608602
[10]
GSM1608603
[11]
GSM1608604
[12]
GSM1608605
[13]
GSM1608606
[14]
GSM1608607
[15]
GSM1608608
[16]
GSM1608609
[17]
GSM1608610
[18]
GSM1608611
[19]
GSM1608612
[20]
GSM1608613
[21]
GSM1608614
[22]
GSM1608615
[23]
GSM1608616
[24]
GSM1608617
[25]
GSM1608618
[26]
GSM1608619
[27]
GSM1608620
[28]
GSM1608621
[29]
GSM1608622
[30]
GSM1608623
[31]
GSM1608624
[32]
GSM1608625
[33]
GSM1608626
[34]
GSM1608627
[35]
GSM1608628
[36]
GSM1608629
[37]
GSM1608630
[38]
GSM1608631
[39]
GSM1608632
[40]
GSM1608633
[41]
GSM1608634
[42]
GSM1608635
[43]
GSM1608636
[44]
GSM1608637
[45]
GSM1608638
[46]
GSM1608639
[47]
GSM1608640
[48]
GSM1608641
[49]
GSM1608642
[50]
GSM1608643
[51]
GSM1608644
[52]
GSM1608645
[53]
GSM1608646
[54]
GSM1608647
[55]
GSM1608648
[56]
GSM1608649
[57]
GSM1608650
[58]
GSM1608651
[59]
GSM1608652
[60]
GSM1608653
[61]
GSM1608654
[62]
GSM1608655
[63]
GSM1608656
[64]
GSM1608657
[65]
GSM1608658
[66]
GSM1608659
[67]
GSM1608660
[68]
GSM1608661
[69]
GSM1608662
[70]
GSM1608663
[71]
GSM1608664
[72]
GSM1608665
[73]
GSM1608666
[74]
GSM1608667
[75]
GSM1608668
[76]
GSM1608669
[77]
GSM1608670
[78]
GSM1608671
[79]
GSM1608672
[80]
GSM1608673
[81]
GSM1608674
[82]
GSM1608675
[83]
GSM1608676
[84]
GSM1608677
[85]
GSM1608678
[86]
GSM1608679
[87]
GSM1608680
[88]
GSM1608681
[89]
GSM1608682
[90]
GSM1608683
[91]
GSM1608684
[92]
GSM1608685
[93]
GSM1608686
[94]
GSM1608687
[95]
GSM1608688
[96]
GSM1608689
[97]
GSM1608690
[98]
GSM1608691
[99]
GSM1608692
[100]
GSM1608693
[101]
GSM1608694
[102]
GSM1608695
[103]
GSM1608696
[104]
GSM1608697
[105]
GSM1608698
[106]
GSM1608699
[107]
GSM1608700
[108]
GSM1608701
[109]
GSM1608702
[110]
GSM1608703
[111]
GSM1608704
[112]
GSM1608705
[113]
GSM1608706
[114]
GSM1608707
[115]
GSM1608708
[116]
GSM1608709
[117]
GSM1608710
[118]
GSM1608711
[119]
GSM1608712
[120]
GSM1608713
[121]
GSM1608714
[122]
GSM1608715
[123]
GSM1608716
[124]
GSM1608717
[125]
GSM1608718
[126]
GSM1608719
[127]
GSM1608720
[128]
GSM1608721
[129]
GSM1608722
[130]
GSM1608723
[131]
GSM1608724
[132]
GSM1608725
[133]
GSM1608726
[134]
GSM1608727
[135]
GSM1608728
[136]
GSM1608729
[137]
GSM1608730
[138]
GSM1608731
[139]
GSM1608732
[140]
GSM1608733
[141]
GSM1608734
[142]
GSM1608735
[143]
GSM1608736
[144]
GSM1608737
[145]
GSM1608738
[146]
GSM1608739
[147]
GSM1608740
[148]
GSM1608741
[149]
GSM1608742
[150]
GSM1608743
[151]
GSM1608744
[152]
GSM1608745
[153]
GSM1608746
[154]
GSM1608747
[155]
GSM1608748
[156]
GSM1608749
[157]
GSM1608750
[158]
GSM1608751
[159]
GSM1608752
[160]
GSM1608753
[161]
GSM1608754
[162]
GSM1608755
[163]
GSM1608756
[164]
GSM1608757
[165]
GSM1608758
[166]
GSM1608759
[167]
GSM1608760
[168]
GSM1608761
[169]
GSM1608762
[170]
GSM1608763
[171]
GSM1608764
[172]
GSM1608765
[173]
GSM1608766
[174]
GSM1608767
[175]
GSM1608768
[176]
GSM1608769
[177]
GSM1608770
[178]
GSM1608771
[179]
GSM1608772
[180]
GSM1608773
[181]
GSM1608774
[182]
GSM1608775
[183]
GSM1608776
[184]
GSM1608777
[185]
GSM1608778
[186]
GSM1608779
[187]
GSM1608780
[188]
GSM1608781
[189]
GSM1608782
[190]
GSM1608783
[191]
GSM1608784
[192]
GSM1608785
[193]
GSM1608786
[194]
GSM1608787
[195]
GSM1608788
[196]
GSM1608789
[197]
GSM1608790
[198]
GSM1608791
[199]
GSM1608792
[200]
GSM1608793
[201]
GSM1608794
[202]
GSM1608795
[203]
GSM1608796
[204]
GSM1608797
[205]
GSM1608798
[206]
GSM1608799
[207]
GSM1608800
[208]
GSM1608801
[209]
GSM1608802
[210]
GSM1608803
[211]
GSM1608804
[212]
GSM1608805
[213]
GSM1608806
sample_count
214
group_sizes
null
group_sizes_basis
null
platform
10558
taxon
Homo sapiens
title
Whole-genome expression analysis of melanoma tumor biopsies from a population-based cohort.
resolution_checked_at
2026-11-01T15:39:55Z
resolution_check
identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read
downloaded
false
licence_read
false
gaps array · 4 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE19234 not downloaded
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE19234 licence not read
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE65904 not downloaded
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE65904 licence not read
analysis object · 4 fields
state
complete
methods array · 6 items
[0] object · 10 fields
id
method-1
family
survival_analysis
specific
cox_proportional_hazards
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
1
band
verbatim
quote
In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B).
[1] object · 10 fields
id
method-2
family
survival_analysis
specific
kaplan_meier
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
survival_km
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
Kaplan-Meier
[2] object · 10 fields
id
method-3
family
survival_analysis
specific
log_rank_test
label
Survival analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
logrank_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
time_to_event_with_censoring
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
log-rank
[3] object · 10 fields
id
method-4
family
correlation_analysis
specific
spearman
label
Correlation analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
spearman_rho
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
paired_numeric_columns
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
Spearman correlation
[4] object · 10 fields
id
method-5
family
model_calibration
specific
decision_curve
label
Model calibration / clinical utility
dsl_operations array · 2 items
[0]
calibration_bins
[1]
net_benefit
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
predictions_and_outcomes
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.7
band
medium
quote
decision curve analysis
[5] object · 10 fields
id
method-6
family
contingency_analysis
specific
chi_square
label
Categorical (contingency table) analysis
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
chi_square_test
missing_operations array · 0 items
parameters object · 0 fields
data_shapes array · 1 item
[0]
categorical_cross_tabulation
evidence object · 3 fields
score
0.8
band
high
quote
chi-square
targets array · 0 items
gaps array · 0 items
capability object · 3 fields
state
complete
requirements array · 1 item
[0] object · 6 fields
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
label
Computational analysis platform
assay_families array · 9 items
[0]
meta_analysis
[1]
machine_learning
[2]
survival_analysis
[3]
statistical_regression
[4]
pca
[5]
molecular_docking
[6]
network_analysis
[7]
differential_expression
[8]
gwas
candidate
Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters
gaps array · 0 items
readiness object · 8 fields
state
complete
tier
R1
blocked_on
nothing:replicable_now
axes object · 3 fields
method object · 5 fields
tier
R1
expressible
true
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
missing_operations array · 0 items
basis
The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards.
capability object · 4 fields
tier
R1
capability_id
capability:computational_analysis
availability_state
owned
basis
The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here.
data object · 6 fields
tier
R1
reachable
true
accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE65904
[1]
GSE19234
resolved_accessions array · 2 items
[0]
GSE65904
[1]
GSE19234
statements array · 1 item
[0]
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.
basis
The paper names GSE65904, GSE19234 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read.
can_run object · 3 fields
dsl_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
assets array · 2 items
[0]
source:pmid:35116193
[1]
data:geo:GSE19234
steps array · 1 item
[0]
run_analysis
must_build object · 5 fields
dsl_operations array · 0 items
converters array · 0 items
readers array · 0 items
capabilities array · 0 items
data_gaps array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE19234
gaps array · 0 items
review object · 5 fields
state
partial
machine_critique object · 5 fields
kind
extraction_review
reader object · 5 fields
model
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
provider_family
minimax
read_at
2026-11-01T17:31:43Z
independence
single_reader
evidence_check object · 2 fields
method
verbatim
availability
verbatim
calls
5
usage object · 3 fields
prompt_tokens
13934
completion_tokens
1621
cached_tokens
128
stages array · 1 item
[0] object · 4 fields
id
extraction
state
complete
reader
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
provider
minimax
gaps array · 3 items
[0]
review.independent_reader
[1]
review.machine_critique
[2]
review.human_critique
execution object · 5 fields
state
absent
status
not_run
mode
null
runs array · 0 items
gaps array · 1 item
[0]
execution.not_run
provenance object · 7 fields
entities array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35116193
type
paper
label
pmid:35116193
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35116193
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35116193 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE19234
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE19234
activities array · 3 items
[0] object · 4 fields
id
activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01
type
classification
used array · 3 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
pmid:35116193
type
paper
label
pmid:35116193
[1] object · 3 fields
id
source:pmid:35116193
type
manuscript
label
PMID 35116193 full text
[2] object · 3 fields
id
data:geo:GSE19234
type
dataset
label
GEO GSE19234
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
[1] object · 4 fields
id
activity-read-35116193
type
extraction
used array · 1 item
[0]
source:pmid:35116193
agent
agent:minimax-reader
[2] object · 4 fields
id
activity-resolve-GSE19234
type
accession_resolution
used array · 1 item
[0]
data:geo:GSE19234
agent
agent:corpus-assay-engine
agents array · 2 items
[0] object · 3 fields
id
agent:corpus-assay-engine
type
software
label
Corpus assay engine
[1] object · 3 fields
id
agent:minimax-reader
type
software
label
MiniMax literature reader
source_run_id
reading-sci-2026-11-01
dsl_catalogue_fingerprint
343fb30756ba6ec3
capability_table_fingerprint
2cb3e42f047d2ecf
snapshot_id
ba34b49490d9bfaf
lineage object · 4 fields
parent_id
pmid:35116193
parent_hash
sha256:560f7cb1ddca4cf910b521868bfc5cab25d1abf58c8efcd9cd7f3674647d451b
fork_of
null
gaps array · 8 items
[0]
asset:data:geo:GSE19234 licence not read
[1]
asset:data:geo:GSE19234 not downloaded
[2]
asset:data:geo:GSE65904 licence not read
[3]
asset:data:geo:GSE65904 not downloaded
[4]
execution.not_run
[5]
review.human_critique
[6]
review.independent_reader
[7]
review.machine_critique
assays array · 1 item
[0] object · 11 fields
role
analysis
definition_id
survival_analysis
definition_version
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
required_operations array · 1 item
[0]
cox_ph
support_state
supported
source_hashes object · 1 field
dsl_catalogue
f2132e96ae6c7a4e
evidence array · 1 item
[0]
In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B).
order_basis
analysis_only
id
assay:1
Complete file
{"sci_version": "1.2", "schema": "https://corpus.bntrg.co.uk/sci/1.0/sci.schema.json", "id": "pmid:35116193", "kind": "science-record", "revision": 4, "content_hash": "sha256:7f44c5e8e7b98ed885a2af6ebfdf7c30270156dc4482827e66caa4ac1accc613", "created_at": "2026-11-01T17:36:50Z", "updated_at": "2026-11-01T22:05:44Z", "generator": {"name": "corpus-assay-engine", "run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01"}, "paper": {"state": "complete", "title": "Identification and validation of an epithelial mesenchymal transition-related gene pairs signature for prediction of overall survival in patients with skin cutaneous melanoma.", "doi": "10.7717/peerj.12646", "pmid": "35116193", "authors": ["Yucang Shi", "Zhanpeng Li", "Zhihong Zhou", "Simu Liao", "Zhiyuan Wu", "Jie Li", "Jiasheng Yin", "Meng Wang", "Meilan Weng"], "journal": "PeerJ", "year": 2022, "abstract": "BACKGROUND: We aimed to construct a novel epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene pairs (ERGPs) signature to predict overall survival (OS) in skin cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients.\nMETHODS: Expression data of the relevant genes, corresponding clinicopathological parameters, and follow-up data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify ERGPs significantly associated with OS, and LASSO analysis was used to identify the genes used for the construction of the ERGPs signature. The optimal cutoff value determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the two groups were estimated using the log-rank test. The independent external datasets GSE65904 and GSE19234 were used to verify the performance of the ERGPs signature using the area under the curve (AUC) values. In addition, we also integrated clinicopathological parameters and risk scores to develop a nomogram that can individually predict the prognosis of patients with CM.\nRESULTS: A total of 104 ERGPs related to OS were obtained, of which 21 ERGPs were selected for the construction of the signature. All CM patients were stratified into high-and low-risk groups based on an optimal risk score cutoff value of 0.281. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the mortality rate in the low-risk group was lower than that in the high-risk group in the TCGA cohort (P < 0.001), GSE65904 cohort (P = 0.006), and GSE19234 cohort (P = 0.002). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that our ERGP signature was an independent risk factor for OS in CM patients in the three cohorts (for TCGA: HR, 2.560; 95% CI [1.907-3.436]; P < 0.001; for GSE65904: HR = 2.235, 95% CI [1.492-3.347], P < 0.001; for GSE19234: HR = 2.458, 95% CI [1.065-5.669], P = 0.035). The AUC value for predicting the 5-year survival rate of patients with CM of our developed model was higher than that of two previously established prognostic signatures. Both the calibration curve and the C-index (0.752, 95% CI [0.678-0.826]) indicated that the developed nomogram was highly accurate. Most importantly, the decision curve analysis results showed that the nomogram had a higher net benefit than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage system.\nCONCLUSION: Our study established an ERGPs signature that could be potentially used in a clinical setting as a genetic biomarker for risk stratification of CM patients. In addition, the ERGPs signature could also predict which CM patients will benefit from PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.", "claims": [{"id": "claim-method", "statement": "In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B).", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116193", "locator": "sections[14] \"Establishment and evaluation of the ERGPs signature\" paragraph 2", "quote": "In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B)."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-data-access", "statement": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.", "kind": "methodological", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116193", "locator": "sections[31] \"Data Availability\" paragraph 2", "quote": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904."}], "state": "complete"}, {"id": "claim-target-result", "statement": "The study developed an EMT-related gene-pair signature that stratified cutaneous melanoma patients by overall-survival risk and was independently prognostic in TCGA and two independent GEO cohorts.", "kind": "qualitative", "target": null, "evidence": [{"asset": "source:pmid:35116193", "locator": "sections[0] \"Abstract\" paragraph 4", "quote": "Our study established an ERGPs signature that could be potentially used in a clinical setting as a genetic biomarker for risk stratification of CM patients."}], "state": "complete"}], "gaps": []}, "experiment": {"state": "complete", "objective": "The study developed an EMT-related gene-pair signature that stratified cutaneous melanoma patients by overall-survival risk and was independently prognostic in TCGA and two independent GEO cohorts.", "steps": [{"id": "read_published_estimate", "order": 1, "name": "Read the published estimate from the source", "kind": "other", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The claim, method and evidence span published with the source article.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["source:pmid:35116193"], "outputs": ["the published estimate and its evidence"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "obtain_source_data", "order": 2, "name": "Obtain the source data from the named repository", "kind": "data-preparation", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "The GEO series accession resolves and its sample accessions are listed. This lane did not download the dataset or read its licence.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE19234"], "outputs": ["the source data with its repository provenance"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}, {"id": "run_analysis", "order": 3, "name": "Run the published analysis", "kind": "analysis", "state": "complete", "blocked_on": null, "description": "Apply the paper's statistical method to the resolved series and compare the result with the published target.", "duration_hours": null, "parameters": {}, "inputs": ["data:geo:GSE19234"], "outputs": ["the replicated result and its comparison"], "instruments": [], "reagents": []}], "materials": [], "instruments": [], "reagents": [], "conditions": {}, "gaps": []}, "data": {"state": "partial", "assets": [{"id": "source:pmid:35116193", "role": "manuscript", "format": "xml", "media_type": "application/xml", "uri": "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12646", "sha256": "sha256:f839cb9a549729488404a55ab2b834cbdd1ba54fe370ab04061b633ec5f5b7c8", "bytes": 46443, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "10.7717/peerj.12646", "version": null, "note": "Full article fetched from PMC; the checksum covers the rendered section body, not the original XML bytes.", "structure": {"pmcid": "PMC8785661", "source": "europe_pmc_fulltext", "coverage": "whole_body", "text_hash_scope": "rendered_section_body"}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE19234", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE19234", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE19234", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM476606", "GSM476607", "GSM476608", "GSM476609", "GSM476610", "GSM476611", "GSM476612", "GSM476613", "GSM476614", "GSM476615", "GSM476616", "GSM476617", "GSM476618", "GSM476619", "GSM476620", "GSM476621", "GSM476622", "GSM476623", "GSM476624", "GSM476625", "GSM476626", "GSM476627", "GSM476628", "GSM476629", "GSM476630", "GSM476631", "GSM476632", "GSM476633", "GSM476634", "GSM476635", "GSM476636", "GSM476637", "GSM476638", "GSM476639", "GSM476640", "GSM476641", "GSM476642", "GSM476643", "GSM476644", "GSM476645", "GSM476646", "GSM476647", "GSM476648", "GSM476649"], "sample_count": 44, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "570", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Immune profile and mitotic index of metastatic melanoma lesions enhance clinical staging in predicting patient survival.", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:54Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE65904", "role": "raw", "format": "geo-series", "media_type": "application/vnd.ncbi.geo-series+json", "uri": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE65904", "sha256": null, "bytes": null, "access": "open", "state": "resolved", "reader": null, "reader_status": "reader_required", "identifier": "GSE65904", "version": null, "note": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.", "structure": {"repository": "GEO", "access_route": "GEO accession URL", "access_statement_verbatim": "The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904.", "access_statement_kind": "data_availability_statement", "sample_accessions": ["GSM1608593", "GSM1608594", "GSM1608595", "GSM1608596", "GSM1608597", "GSM1608598", "GSM1608599", "GSM1608600", "GSM1608601", "GSM1608602", "GSM1608603", "GSM1608604", "GSM1608605", "GSM1608606", "GSM1608607", "GSM1608608", "GSM1608609", "GSM1608610", "GSM1608611", "GSM1608612", "GSM1608613", "GSM1608614", "GSM1608615", "GSM1608616", "GSM1608617", "GSM1608618", "GSM1608619", "GSM1608620", "GSM1608621", "GSM1608622", "GSM1608623", "GSM1608624", "GSM1608625", "GSM1608626", "GSM1608627", "GSM1608628", "GSM1608629", "GSM1608630", "GSM1608631", "GSM1608632", "GSM1608633", "GSM1608634", "GSM1608635", "GSM1608636", "GSM1608637", "GSM1608638", "GSM1608639", "GSM1608640", "GSM1608641", "GSM1608642", "GSM1608643", "GSM1608644", "GSM1608645", "GSM1608646", "GSM1608647", "GSM1608648", "GSM1608649", "GSM1608650", "GSM1608651", "GSM1608652", "GSM1608653", "GSM1608654", "GSM1608655", "GSM1608656", "GSM1608657", "GSM1608658", "GSM1608659", "GSM1608660", "GSM1608661", "GSM1608662", "GSM1608663", "GSM1608664", "GSM1608665", "GSM1608666", "GSM1608667", "GSM1608668", "GSM1608669", "GSM1608670", "GSM1608671", "GSM1608672", "GSM1608673", "GSM1608674", "GSM1608675", "GSM1608676", "GSM1608677", "GSM1608678", "GSM1608679", "GSM1608680", "GSM1608681", "GSM1608682", "GSM1608683", "GSM1608684", "GSM1608685", "GSM1608686", "GSM1608687", "GSM1608688", "GSM1608689", "GSM1608690", "GSM1608691", "GSM1608692", "GSM1608693", "GSM1608694", "GSM1608695", "GSM1608696", "GSM1608697", "GSM1608698", "GSM1608699", "GSM1608700", "GSM1608701", "GSM1608702", "GSM1608703", "GSM1608704", "GSM1608705", "GSM1608706", "GSM1608707", "GSM1608708", "GSM1608709", "GSM1608710", "GSM1608711", "GSM1608712", "GSM1608713", "GSM1608714", "GSM1608715", "GSM1608716", "GSM1608717", "GSM1608718", "GSM1608719", "GSM1608720", "GSM1608721", "GSM1608722", "GSM1608723", "GSM1608724", "GSM1608725", "GSM1608726", "GSM1608727", "GSM1608728", "GSM1608729", "GSM1608730", "GSM1608731", "GSM1608732", "GSM1608733", "GSM1608734", "GSM1608735", "GSM1608736", "GSM1608737", "GSM1608738", "GSM1608739", "GSM1608740", "GSM1608741", "GSM1608742", "GSM1608743", "GSM1608744", "GSM1608745", "GSM1608746", "GSM1608747", "GSM1608748", "GSM1608749", "GSM1608750", "GSM1608751", "GSM1608752", "GSM1608753", "GSM1608754", "GSM1608755", "GSM1608756", "GSM1608757", "GSM1608758", "GSM1608759", "GSM1608760", "GSM1608761", "GSM1608762", "GSM1608763", "GSM1608764", "GSM1608765", "GSM1608766", "GSM1608767", "GSM1608768", "GSM1608769", "GSM1608770", "GSM1608771", "GSM1608772", "GSM1608773", "GSM1608774", "GSM1608775", "GSM1608776", "GSM1608777", "GSM1608778", "GSM1608779", "GSM1608780", "GSM1608781", "GSM1608782", "GSM1608783", "GSM1608784", "GSM1608785", "GSM1608786", "GSM1608787", "GSM1608788", "GSM1608789", "GSM1608790", "GSM1608791", "GSM1608792", "GSM1608793", "GSM1608794", "GSM1608795", "GSM1608796", "GSM1608797", "GSM1608798", "GSM1608799", "GSM1608800", "GSM1608801", "GSM1608802", "GSM1608803", "GSM1608804", "GSM1608805", "GSM1608806"], "sample_count": 214, "group_sizes": null, "group_sizes_basis": null, "platform": "10558", "taxon": "Homo sapiens", "title": "Whole-genome expression analysis of melanoma tumor biopsies from a population-based cohort.", "resolution_checked_at": "2026-11-01T15:39:55Z", "resolution_check": "identifier_resolution_only_no_download_no_licence_read", "downloaded": false, "licence_read": false}}], "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE19234 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE19234 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE65904 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE65904 licence not read"]}, "analysis": {"state": "complete", "methods": [{"id": "method-1", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "cox_proportional_hazards", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 1.0, "band": "verbatim", "quote": "In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B)."}}, {"id": "method-2", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "kaplan_meier", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["survival_km"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "Kaplan-Meier"}}, {"id": "method-3", "family": "survival_analysis", "specific": "log_rank_test", "label": "Survival analysis", "dsl_operations": ["logrank_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["time_to_event_with_censoring"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "log-rank"}}, {"id": "method-4", "family": "correlation_analysis", "specific": "spearman", "label": "Correlation analysis", "dsl_operations": ["spearman_rho"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["paired_numeric_columns"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "Spearman correlation"}}, {"id": "method-5", "family": "model_calibration", "specific": "decision_curve", "label": "Model calibration / clinical utility", "dsl_operations": ["calibration_bins", "net_benefit"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["predictions_and_outcomes"], "evidence": {"score": 0.7, "band": "medium", "quote": "decision curve analysis"}}, {"id": "method-6", "family": "contingency_analysis", "specific": "chi_square", "label": "Categorical (contingency table) analysis", "dsl_operations": ["chi_square_test"], "missing_operations": [], "expressible": true, "parameters": {}, "data_shapes": ["categorical_cross_tabulation"], "evidence": {"score": 0.8, "band": "high", "quote": "chi-square"}}], "targets": [], "gaps": []}, "capability": {"state": "complete", "requirements": [{"capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "label": "Computational analysis platform", "assay_families": ["meta_analysis", "machine_learning", "survival_analysis", "statistical_regression", "pca", "molecular_docking", "network_analysis", "differential_expression", "gwas"], "availability_state": "owned", "tier_unlocked": "R1", "candidate": "Automated Assays Laravel application and simulated adapters"}], "gaps": []}, "readiness": {"state": "complete", "tier": "R1", "blocking_axis": "none", "blocked_on": "nothing:replicable_now", "axes": {"method": {"tier": "R1", "expressible": true, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "missing_operations": [], "basis": "The paper names the method it used and the corpus's method extractor maps it onto the DSL catalogue: cox_proportional_hazards."}, "capability": {"tier": "R1", "capability_id": "capability:computational_analysis", "availability_state": "owned", "basis": "The computational analysis is owned. The physical bench the paper used is not, so a physical validation cannot be run here."}, "data": {"tier": "R1", "reachable": true, "accessions": ["GSE65904", "GSE19234"], "resolved_accessions": ["GSE65904", "GSE19234"], "statements": ["The following information was supplied regarding data availability:Data is available at NCBI GEO: GSE65904."], "basis": "The paper names GSE65904, GSE19234 in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the accession resolves in the repository. No dataset was downloaded and no licence was read."}}, "can_run": {"dsl_operations": ["cox_ph"], "assets": ["source:pmid:35116193", "data:geo:GSE19234"], "steps": ["run_analysis"]}, "must_build": {"dsl_operations": [], "converters": [], "readers": [], "capabilities": [], "data_gaps": ["data:geo:GSE19234"]}, "gaps": []}, "review": {"state": "partial", "machine_critique": {"kind": "extraction_review", "reader": {"model": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax", "provider_family": "minimax", "read_at": "2026-11-01T17:31:43Z", "independence": "single_reader"}, "evidence_check": {"method": "verbatim", "availability": "verbatim"}, "calls": 5, "usage": {"prompt_tokens": 13934, "completion_tokens": 1621, "cached_tokens": 128}}, "human_critique": null, "stages": [{"id": "extraction", "state": "complete", "reader": "MiniMax-M3.1-Flash", "provider": "minimax"}], "gaps": ["review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique", "review.human_critique"]}, "execution": {"state": "absent", "status": "not_run", "mode": null, "runs": [], "gaps": ["execution.not_run"]}, "provenance": {"entities": [{"id": "pmid:35116193", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35116193"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35116193", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35116193 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE19234", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE19234"}], "activities": [{"id": "activity-reading-sci-2026-11-01", "type": "classification", "used": [{"id": "pmid:35116193", "type": "paper", "label": "pmid:35116193"}, {"id": "source:pmid:35116193", "type": "manuscript", "label": "PMID 35116193 full text"}, {"id": "data:geo:GSE19234", "type": "dataset", "label": "GEO GSE19234"}], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}, {"id": "activity-read-35116193", "type": "extraction", "used": ["source:pmid:35116193"], "agent": "agent:minimax-reader"}, {"id": "activity-resolve-GSE19234", "type": "accession_resolution", "used": ["data:geo:GSE19234"], "agent": "agent:corpus-assay-engine"}], "agents": [{"id": "agent:corpus-assay-engine", "type": "software", "label": "Corpus assay engine"}, {"id": "agent:minimax-reader", "type": "software", "label": "MiniMax literature reader"}], "source_run_id": "reading-sci-2026-11-01", "dsl_catalogue_fingerprint": "343fb30756ba6ec3", "capability_table_fingerprint": "2cb3e42f047d2ecf", "snapshot_id": "ba34b49490d9bfaf"}, "lineage": {"parent_id": "pmid:35116193", "parent_hash": "sha256:560f7cb1ddca4cf910b521868bfc5cab25d1abf58c8efcd9cd7f3674647d451b", "fork_of": null, "generation": 3}, "gaps": ["asset:data:geo:GSE19234 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE19234 not downloaded", "asset:data:geo:GSE65904 licence not read", "asset:data:geo:GSE65904 not downloaded", "execution.not_run", "review.human_critique", "review.independent_reader", "review.machine_critique"], "assays": [{"role": "analysis", "definition_id": "survival_analysis", "definition_version": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e", "definition_digest": null, "required_operations": ["cox_ph"], "support_state": "supported", "source_hashes": {"dsl_catalogue": "f2132e96ae6c7a4e"}, "confidence": 1.0, "evidence": ["In the discovery cohort (TCGA dataset), 104 ERGPs were significantly associated with prognosis in CM patients according to univariate Cox regression analysis. Among these, 21 ERGPs were further selected using Lasso-Cox regression analysis to establish a prognostic risk signature (Figs. 1A–1B)."], "order_basis": "analysis_only", "id": "assay:1"}]}